Anarchist, journalist, drama critic, advocate of birth control and free love, Emma Goldman was the most famous-and notorious-woman in the early twentieth century. This abridged version of her two-volume autobiography takes her from her birthplace in czarist Russia to the socialist enclaves of Manhattan's Lower East Side. Against a dramatic backdrop of political argument, s
Anarchist, journalist, drama critic, advocate of birth control and free love, Emma Goldman was the most famous-and notorious-woman in the early twentieth century. This abridged version of her two-volume autobiography takes her from her birthplace in czarist Russia to the socialist enclaves of Manhattan's Lower East Side. Against a dramatic backdrop of political argument, show trials, imprisonment, and tempestuous romances, Goldman chronicles the epoch that she helped shape: the reform movements of the Progressive Era, the early years of and later disillusionment with Lenin's Bolshevik experiment, and more. Sounding a call still heard today,
Living My Life
is a riveting account of political ferment and ideological turbulence.
...more
Paperback
,
993 pages
Published
July 1st 1983
by G.M. Smith
(first published 1910)
خوندن زندگینامهها همیشه برام لذتبخش بوده همونطور که شنیدن حرفهایی که آدمها از زندگیشون برام میزنن همیشه جالبه برام، خوندن خودزندگینامهی اما گلدمن هم از این قاعده مستثنی نیست.خوندن صفحه میتونه برای بعضی خوانندهها خسته کننده باشه اما باید تحمل کرد و آروم آروم با کتاب پیش رفت.
فقط میخوام بگم ای کاش ای کاش ای کاش بتونم یک صدم اما گلدمن زندگی کنم.
خوندن دیدارهاش با آدمهایی که جاهای مختلف اسمشون رو شنیدیم و آدمهایی که تا حالا اسمشونم به گوشمون نخورده،خوندن دربارهی زندگی شخصیش چه در زمان کودکی چه بزرگسا
خوندن زندگینامهها همیشه برام لذتبخش بوده همونطور که شنیدن حرفهایی که آدمها از زندگیشون برام میزنن همیشه جالبه برام، خوندن خودزندگینامهی اما گلدمن هم از این قاعده مستثنی نیست.خوندن ۱۱۴۶ صفحه میتونه برای بعضی خوانندهها خسته کننده باشه اما باید تحمل کرد و آروم آروم با کتاب پیش رفت.
فقط میخوام بگم ای کاش ای کاش ای کاش بتونم یک صدم اما گلدمن زندگی کنم.
خوندن دیدارهاش با آدمهایی که جاهای مختلف اسمشون رو شنیدیم و آدمهایی که تا حالا اسمشونم به گوشمون نخورده،خوندن دربارهی زندگی شخصیش چه در زمان کودکی چه بزرگسالی و عقایدش همه برام لذت بخش بود.
یکی از جالب توجه ترین فصل های کتاب هم فصل ۵۲ست که گلدمن به روسیه برگشته(در واقع تبعید شده از امریکا) و روایتش از روسیه در سالهای ۱۹۲۰ رو میخونیم.شنیدن تاریخ از زبان کسانی که تجربه و زندگیش کردند گرچه روایت شخصی و در بعضی موارد جانبدارانهست اما حداقل برای من لذت بخش تره نسبت به کتابهای تاریخی،و خب وقتی این روایت رو گلدمن ارائه میده فکر نمیکنم ایرادی بشه بهش وارد دونست.
گلدمن در جملات پایانی کتاب میگه که اونجور که میخواسته زندگی کرده،و واقعا چی از این مهم تره؟
...more
If you want to read the story of a woman who knew everyone worth knowing, originated every radical idea that's ever flitted through your mind eighty years before you did, loved literature, drinking, clothes, flowers, theater, conversation and parties...well, this is the book for you.
«اما گلدمن» (-)زاده ی سرزمین روسیه ، از خانواده ای یهودی مذهب بود که بیشتر عمر خود را در ایالات متحده امریکا صرف مبارزات آنارشیستی و تلاش در رفع بی عدالتی ها کرد.اعدام غم انگیز کارگران شیکاگو و دنبال کردن اخبار مربوط به آن برای اِمای جوان و کم تجربه که تا پیش از این در روسیه زندگی می کرد ، جرقه ای شد تا آتش انقلاب در او شعله ور شود و با اطمینان کامل از هدفش، به سوی سرزمینی جدید و یا به عبارتی به سوی دنیایی نو برای تحقق آرمانهایش روانه شود.
به هنگام خاندن این خودزندگینامه ی بیش از هزار صفحه ای ،خا
«اما گلدمن» (۱۹۴۰-۱۸۶۹)زاده ی سرزمین روسیه ، از خانواده ای یهودی مذهب بود که بیشتر عمر خود را در ایالات متحده امریکا صرف مبارزات آنارشیستی و تلاش در رفع بی عدالتی ها کرد.اعدام غم انگیز کارگران شیکاگو و دنبال کردن اخبار مربوط به آن برای اِمای جوان و کم تجربه که تا پیش از این در روسیه زندگی می کرد ، جرقه ای شد تا آتش انقلاب در او شعله ور شود و با اطمینان کامل از هدفش، به سوی سرزمینی جدید و یا به عبارتی به سوی دنیایی نو برای تحقق آرمانهایش روانه شود.
به هنگام خاندن این خودزندگینامه ی بیش از هزار صفحه ای ،خاننده هر لحظه باید آماده باشد که همراه با اما گلدمن به ایالتهای مختلف امریکا سفر کرده،در سخنرانیهای پر شور او شرکت کند،شاهد بازداشتهایش باشد،با لحظه های رمانتیک ، شادیها ،دوستیها ، گرمای محبت و انسان دوستی و قدرت بی انتهای او در پایداری طی مبارزه ای چند دَه ساله به هیجان درآید و با سختی های طاقت فرسای مبارزات ،خطر کشته شدن،رنج زندان ، تبعید ، توقیف و از دست دادن دوستان ، دچار اضطراب و پریشانی شود.
بخشی از کتاب:
شبی که غرق در مطالعه بودم،از ورود چند مأمور پلیس و خبرنگار به حیرت افتادم.آنها اعلام کردند:«رئیس جمهور همین الان درگذشت.چه احساسی در این باره دارید؟آیا متأسف نیستید؟«پرسیدم:«آیا امروز در سراسر ایالات متحده فقط رئیس جمهور درگذشته است؟مطمئناً خیلی های دیگر هم در همین زمان و احتمالاً در فقر و تنگدستی،در حالی که وابستگان بیچاره ی خود را تنها گذاشته اند،مرده اند.چرا انتظار دارید که برای مرگ مکینلی بیش از دیگران متأسف باشم؟»ا
افزودم:«دلسوزی من همیشه معطوف به زندگان است.مردگان دیگر به آن نیازی ندارند.مسلماً همه ی شما به همین دلیل احساس دلسوزی شدیدی نسبت به مردگان دارید،چون می دانید هرگز از شما نمیخاهند به ادعاهایتان عمل کنید.»یک خبرنگار جوان فریاد برآورد:«لعنتی،چه مطلب عالی ای!اما فکر می کنم شما دیوانه اید!»ا
در انتها از ترجمه ی دلنشین خانم «سهیلا بسکی» هم نگذریم که در با رضایت به پایان بردن این کتاب بسیار کمک کننده بود.
...more
this is so good. I was always a bit "eh" on Emma Goldman because I read her essays and didn't find them earth-shattering. Plus I don't always agree with her political analysis -- her race-blind attitude was particularly unfortunate. You could say it was par for the times, but she was so far ahead on so much else that I expected more -- and anyway that's rubbish, lots of people critiqued her race politics at the time. That said, it turns out that Goldman's strength was not as a theorist but as an
this is so good. I was always a bit "eh" on Emma Goldman because I read her essays and didn't find them earth-shattering. Plus I don't always agree with her political analysis -- her race-blind attitude was particularly unfortunate. You could say it was par for the times, but she was so far ahead on so much else that I expected more -- and anyway that's rubbish, lots of people critiqued her race politics at the time. That said, it turns out that Goldman's strength was not as a theorist but as an activist and generally fascinating human being. Her autobiography is an incredibly interesting depiction of radical politics in the USA and Europe in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Goldman knew a lot of interesting people, and it's very strange and humanising to read about her trying and failing to make friends with one famous anarchist, or having a bitter breakup with another. Plus she avoids the common tendency of autobiography to obscure the actual process of development. Everything is told in the present tense, with virtually no indication of what's later to come. She'll talk about this great guy she met, or what she thinks about an issue, and you'll be like "Emma! He's kind of a fuckwit!" or "no! that's silly!" and you have to read the next fifty pages to know if she ends up thinking that too. Totally engaging and heartwrenching.
...more
Natalie
Yeah, I think I have to agree with your assessment, though I've only read Vol. 1.
Ben just seems like a trainwreck. Going back to him after his confes
Yeah, I think I have to agree with your assessment, though I've only read Vol. 1.
Ben just seems like a trainwreck. Going back to him after his confession?! GROSS! But, oddly, he is my favorite in terms of how she writes about him - "my strange creature" "my mysterious boy". I wanted to punch Ed in the face on multiple occasions!
...more
Aug 27, 2011 08:51PM
Liz
when I picture ben I can't help but think of a large black-purple butterfly
when I see him as human he is always twirling his moustasche
Aug 28, 2011 01:23AM
This is a very intriguing, exhaustive autobiography that puts the lie to many of the flippant treatments you read/hear of Emma Goldman elsewhere. She was not some unbalanced romantic trying to compensate for a bad childhood or an inhumane psychotic, but instead a reflective, caring, passionate person who stood up for issues and people that/who were extremely unpopular in her day (and some of them still are). Her ideas were radical and her critiques of capitalist society salient.
Still, it is easy
This is a very intriguing, exhaustive autobiography that puts the lie to many of the flippant treatments you read/hear of Emma Goldman elsewhere. She was not some unbalanced romantic trying to compensate for a bad childhood or an inhumane psychotic, but instead a reflective, caring, passionate person who stood up for issues and people that/who were extremely unpopular in her day (and some of them still are). Her ideas were radical and her critiques of capitalist society salient.
Still, it is easy to get lost in this book. There's an endless array of characters, developments, and locations, all of which keep doubling back and changing as time passes. Further, I found myself wishing to hear more of her voice on the various issues, not just a recounting of events and personalities. For that, I've turned to a book of her essays.
In short, this book is a long road to a better understanding of an absolutely vital person in the history of social justice and change.
...more
I read this when I was transitioning from far left activism to Torah Judaism, and this was the perfect book for it. Emma Goldman was as far left as they come – an anarchist at the dawn of the 20th century – but she was Jewish, and I agree with her grandmother, who said to the warden while bringing her Passover food to eat in prison, “My Chavaleh does more for the poor than the traditional girls.”
You can’t help admiring Emma Goldman after reading her autobiography, even if you don’t agree with h
I read this when I was transitioning from far left activism to Torah Judaism, and this was the perfect book for it. Emma Goldman was as far left as they come – an anarchist at the dawn of the 20th century – but she was Jewish, and I agree with her grandmother, who said to the warden while bringing her Passover food to eat in prison, “My Chavaleh does more for the poor than the traditional girls.”
You can’t help admiring Emma Goldman after reading her autobiography, even if you don’t agree with her. She’s the quintessential example of an idealistic Jew lured into the Utopian “messianism” of the left.
For me, the main lesson was in the title, “Living My Life.” This two-volume autobiography gives a complete picture of Emma Goldman’s inner feelings and outward actions from her youth till her old age. She never wavered from the cause, and she asserted early on that part of it meant enjoying life, too. When I was a leftist, I hung with a bunch of drifters who talked about “creating a reality” for themselves. Nobody “lived life” with any kind of direction. And so I learned to think about my life from a new perspective. Though I am living a life drastically different than Emma Goldman’s, I’m very glad she gave over the teachings of her life in this intimate autobiography.
...more
this is such an epic masterpiece! i can think of at least 5 reasons why you should read this:
1. for the sordid details of Emma's many love affairs and open relationships.
2. for a view into the political and economic realities of the United States at the turn of the last century, which i don't know have ever been better explained than through Emma's immigrant, anarchist eyes.
3. for Emma's comments on virtually every radical and left-wing figure the 1890s - 1920s, including her relationships with
this is such an epic masterpiece! i can think of at least 5 reasons why you should read this:
1. for the sordid details of Emma's many love affairs and open relationships.
2. for a view into the political and economic realities of the United States at the turn of the last century, which i don't know have ever been better explained than through Emma's immigrant, anarchist eyes.
3. for Emma's comments on virtually every radical and left-wing figure the 1890s - 1920s, including her relationships with such notables as Eugene Debs, Peter Kropotkin, Lenin, Trotsky, Makhno, Big Bill Haywood, Margaret Sanger, John Reed, Ernest Hemingway, and her views on Nietschze, Freud, William Jennings Bryan, Henry George, Walt Whitman, and the list goes on and on and on!
4. for details of the absolutely amazing escape plan to free Alexander Berkman from prison in Pittsburgh, after he attempted to assassinate Henry Clay Frick, a vicious steel tycoon. the most astonishing thing about this story is how close the escape came to succeeding.
5. last but certainly not least, the very long chapter about Emma's experiences in "Soviet" Russia, 1920-21. i had already read "My Disillusionment in Russia", but reading this taught me a whole lot more. i think this chapter is written in a more personal style, for one, and in it Emma is also able to do more reflecting and summarizing, connecting the events she witnessed with the larger political degeneration of Russia after the Bolsheviks assumed command and steered the Revolution into the gutter. actually, if you dont have time to read this entire 1000-page book, which is understandable, just do yourself a favor and reach chapter 52, in volume 2. this is really the heart of the whole book, and the great tragedy of Emma's life.
one tidbit i will reveal is that Lenin instructed Emma and Berkman to take the Tsar's dinner plates from the basement of the Winter Palace for their trip collecting artifacts for the Museum of the Revolution. what??!!
...more
Ms. Goldman's role in the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 is the best reason I can find to recommend this book, and I wish she would have spent more time talking about it and why she supported the rebellion, rather than presuming her readership understood the story in advance.
Other than providing a rare firsthand account of said rebellion, much less from a source unsympathetic to both the Soviet state and the west, I am hesitant to recommend the book.
Goldman was a part of the conspiracy to murder He
Ms. Goldman's role in the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 is the best reason I can find to recommend this book, and I wish she would have spent more time talking about it and why she supported the rebellion, rather than presuming her readership understood the story in advance.
Other than providing a rare firsthand account of said rebellion, much less from a source unsympathetic to both the Soviet state and the west, I am hesitant to recommend the book.
Goldman was a part of the conspiracy to murder Henry Clay Frick, and played a part in virtually every American leftist movement during her life.
Female suffrage (only arguably "leftist") is the only exception I can think of, and this abstention was willful.
In spite of this, I walked away feeling as though she hadn't presented what she felt was right or wrong (maybe this is an anarchist thing?) in any sort of systematic way. It's a fascinating life story, but I read her life story hoping to develop a greater understanding of 20th century history, or at least how she understood human relationships in a systematic sense. What I got sounded like the gossipy version of the "Food, Not Bombs" meeting minutes. Probably interesting for a lot of people, not my bag.
I was put off by her breathy style, and felt this already-condensed book could have been about 100 pages shorter. Most of that would be removing her periodic 3 lines of expressing outrage or orgiastic joy.
If you are less cynical than I you may appreciate this book more.
I don't like memoirs, so take all this with a grain of salt.
...more
Yep, five stars like I thought. I may not have enjoyed this memoir for lyrical qualities and literary conventions. But, feck lyrics and conventions. Through her memoir, Goldman subtly reminds her reader to keep things in a perspective of sorts (a couple conceptual steps back, if you will). What's more important? Literary conventions or humanitarian ideals? Money and power or love and dignity? I've been moved by many a memoir, but Goldman's holds a special place (right next to Jensen's A Language
Yep, five stars like I thought. I may not have enjoyed this memoir for lyrical qualities and literary conventions. But, feck lyrics and conventions. Through her memoir, Goldman subtly reminds her reader to keep things in a perspective of sorts (a couple conceptual steps back, if you will). What's more important? Literary conventions or humanitarian ideals? Money and power or love and dignity? I've been moved by many a memoir, but Goldman's holds a special place (right next to Jensen's A Language Older than Words) in my heart for a handful of reasons (among others that I'm sure will continue to come to me as I grow older):
1. I learned more about myself by reading this book than I could have done in months of silent retreats and isolated soul searching.
2. Goldman gave me the confidence to believe in and live my ideals, even when facing what might seem like an insurmountable challenge.
3. She gives anarchism a good name--the kind it deserves.
...more
Just bought this novel and so excited to read it! I know the general gist of Emma Goldman's life through some Wikepdia articles, but that is not enough. I want to hear the own words of this revolutionary myself! what a spectacular woman. Will definitely pick this up next after I finish Anna Karenina
From modest accounts of her own unbelievably brave stance against the various forms of violence of the (United) State(s) to loving descriptions of hundreds of incredible people which Emma met during her activities, and to testimonies almost too terrible to read of the abominable farce of the Russian revolution, this book swept me of my feet and immensely encouraged me to stand on my own feet at the same time. A personal drama and a rare historic perspective, even if repetitive in style at times,
From modest accounts of her own unbelievably brave stance against the various forms of violence of the (United) State(s) to loving descriptions of hundreds of incredible people which Emma met during her activities, and to testimonies almost too terrible to read of the abominable farce of the Russian revolution, this book swept me of my feet and immensely encouraged me to stand on my own feet at the same time. A personal drama and a rare historic perspective, even if repetitive in style at times, I guess it (re)presents an anarchist life better than any textbook - and that with barely a paragraph on anarchism itself.
...more
It is amazing how this compassionate, vibrant, obstinate woman is able to transport the reader from the transformation of her life from early adulthood to mature adulthood as though we are right there with her through it all. Although I do not necessarily agree with her political views, she gives a unique and valuable perspective both on the bourgeoisie of American Capitalism and on the disappointing realities of Russia's Communist Revolution. A must-read for anyone who wants a better understand
It is amazing how this compassionate, vibrant, obstinate woman is able to transport the reader from the transformation of her life from early adulthood to mature adulthood as though we are right there with her through it all. Although I do not necessarily agree with her political views, she gives a unique and valuable perspective both on the bourgeoisie of American Capitalism and on the disappointing realities of Russia's Communist Revolution. A must-read for anyone who wants a better understanding of political change and revolutionary thought.
...more
This is the story of a woman who lived the fullest possible life. It's just a tragedy that what she dreamed of, what many people of her time dreamed of, was destroyed by the Bolsheviks. She saw the Communist reality in Russia and very quickly understood its demonic statism which she knew, and which it did, lead to disaster. A little long-winded at times, perhaps, but always enthralling for people intrigued y the question of how to change society for the better..
زندگی ام آنگونه که من زیسته ام مدیون کسانی است که بدان راه یافته اند و دیرگاهی یا اندک زمانی در آن ماندند و گذشتند و عشق و نفرتشان به یک اندازه زندگیم را ارزشمند ساخته است
اما گلدمن
This is a great book. Emma Goldman wasn't an author, but the prose flows easily enough (if at times a bit flowery). I couldn't put it down and finished the nearly 1000 pages in record time. This is highly recommended for all readers, but especially those interested in late 19th century/early 20th century America, radicalism, and the early years of the Soviet Union. It is almost overwhelming in scope; Goldman must have mentioned several thousand names of people she met along the way. But it doesn
This is a great book. Emma Goldman wasn't an author, but the prose flows easily enough (if at times a bit flowery). I couldn't put it down and finished the nearly 1000 pages in record time. This is highly recommended for all readers, but especially those interested in late 19th century/early 20th century America, radicalism, and the early years of the Soviet Union. It is almost overwhelming in scope; Goldman must have mentioned several thousand names of people she met along the way. But it doesn't make the book any less effective. I won't give it a 5-star rating because of the literary quality, but the content is fascinating and definitely worth your time.
...more
Last time I started this, I could not get into it. This time -- maybe because I am taking a brief series of classes in Yiddishkeit at Green Apple Books sponsored by the Workman's Circle -- I am really enjoying it. I also read Vivian Gornick's biography of Emma, so I have a better overview. But I'm finding Emma's own retelling of her life very engaging.
J.Edgar Hoover called Emma Goldman "the most dangerous woman in America," and this book tells you why. Goldman is a terrific writer -- she can com
Last time I started this, I could not get into it. This time -- maybe because I am taking a brief series of classes in Yiddishkeit at Green Apple Books sponsored by the Workman's Circle -- I am really enjoying it. I also read Vivian Gornick's biography of Emma, so I have a better overview. But I'm finding Emma's own retelling of her life very engaging.
J.Edgar Hoover called Emma Goldman "the most dangerous woman in America," and this book tells you why. Goldman is a terrific writer -- she can combine explosive emotions of her varied loves in the same chapter where she describes Trostky's betrayal of the Kronstadt revolutionary soldiers and strikers and the deep divisions between different groups of anarchists, Communists, Socialists and syndicalists. Goldman gives the reader a front row seat to history -- from IWW strikes to Lenin's launching of the NEP. I think the autobiography was way better than Gornick's biography -- in fact, why would a writer need to retell an incredibly well-written, self-reflective, dramatic personal account? Only to add another analytical dimension, or some perspective that comes with the passage of time...but in this case "Living My Life" holds up to time and distance -- and is a much for fun read!
...more
This edition is abridged (I don't know, for the life of me, where you can find the full thing --it seems to be out of print), and sometimes the transitions did come off as somewhat jarring. Still, it was over 500 pages long, and worth every single one of them. Emma Goldman lived in one of the most interesting periods of American history, or rather, during a period in American history where things were exactly the same as they are now, but instead of targeting Muslims, the (then) "war on terror"
This edition is abridged (I don't know, for the life of me, where you can find the full thing --it seems to be out of print), and sometimes the transitions did come off as somewhat jarring. Still, it was over 500 pages long, and worth every single one of them. Emma Goldman lived in one of the most interesting periods of American history, or rather, during a period in American history where things were exactly the same as they are now, but instead of targeting Muslims, the (then) "war on terror" was being fought against European (mostly Russian and German) anarchists (in the US). What makes the period and her role in it so interesting is that her entire life and career took place
before
that rather unfortunate moment of social maturity in which violent repression and persecution were replaced by indifference, the death warrant of political dissension or mobilization of any kind. She is also interesting because she was one of the first
international
advocates of the Russian Revolution who had the courage, as early as the 1920s, to publicly withdraw her support of the Bolsheviks and openly criticise the first dictatorship of the proletariat. She provides an interesting and harrowing and inspiring account of that change of conscience, in which she finally realises what that "revolution" really was. It is interesting to follow the intellectual process that gradually brings her to the unsavoury realisation that there is little if no difference between sheer capitalism and the dictatorship of the proletariat. She is also, incidentally, one of the first political activists to advocate the rights of gay people in the US, as early as the turn of the century. This gained her the enmity of many anarchists in her own ranks, of course. Not being gay herself, she is surprisingly matter of fact about this business. She doesn't even feel the need to defend or explain herself. She thus makes it into the obvious thing to do, that it, exactly, is.
...more
I discovered Emma Goldman a decade ago through the
E.L. Doctorow
masterpiece
Ragtime
. The professor asked for historical research on one of the characters, and that's how a conservative, orthodox undergrad wound up at the little shelf of anarchist theory in the basement of the Brigham Young University library. Reading E.G.'s biographies and letters I was introduced to this gracious, charming, sane, and brave woman, and ergo had my world flipped upside down.
And for all that I never read her autob
I discovered Emma Goldman a decade ago through the
E.L. Doctorow
masterpiece
Ragtime
. The professor asked for historical research on one of the characters, and that's how a conservative, orthodox undergrad wound up at the little shelf of anarchist theory in the basement of the Brigham Young University library. Reading E.G.'s biographies and letters I was introduced to this gracious, charming, sane, and brave woman, and ergo had my world flipped upside down.
And for all that I never read her autobiography until now. Maybe I assumed that a person who could live such a full and meaningful life could never have the additional gift of being able to write about it well. But E.G. is as vivacious and sprightly in her writing as she was on the dance floor.
And she also has flaws. She's full of herself, she holds court, she revels in her fame and recognition. She's a little too eager to speak her truth without thought for the consequences for others involved (similarly to how Berkman set out to kill Frick without first talking to the striking workers he was "defending"). But she's also capable of some real reflection and self-criticism, whether it's struggling with the Bolsheviks or thinking through her young beliefs in ends always justifying means. The most compelling tension in the book for me is how a principled person lives in a world of 'two evils.' Do you dedicate yourself to the 'lesser,' or remain critical to both at the risk of being perpetually misunderstood?
Without knowing what was removed, I think this abridged version worked well. But I found the introduction by Miriam Brody unfortunate -- why would you open this work with a long-winded, centrist-liberal academic rather than one of the many radical activist-organizers who have been motivated by E.G.? But as she herself points out: publishers have always been getting Emma Goldman all wrong.
...more
There’s a horrible tendency to believe American rebellion started in the late 40’s/early 50’s with the Beats, psychic reaction to the horrors of the A bomb, the flowering of a socio-economic class called “teenager” and it’s beloved rock and roll. People wrote poems at Walden pond, hobos hopped freight trains and there has always been a party in Chinatown, but somehow it doesn’t get credit for being as sexy as Elvis to modern minds. Obviously American rebellion goes back much further than this, a
There’s a horrible tendency to believe American rebellion started in the late 40’s/early 50’s with the Beats, psychic reaction to the horrors of the A bomb, the flowering of a socio-economic class called “teenager” and it’s beloved rock and roll. People wrote poems at Walden pond, hobos hopped freight trains and there has always been a party in Chinatown, but somehow it doesn’t get credit for being as sexy as Elvis to modern minds. Obviously American rebellion goes back much further than this, and if we are less in touch with those angry times that came before, our horrid attention spans and lack of historical presence must be blamed. Emma Goldman lived over a span that could be described as the golden age of American (and European) anarchism, and had to have been, as she was very much at the center of that times creation. A young immigrant woman, sickened and inspired by the hangings that followed the Haymarket Riots of 1886, Goldman devoted her life to philisophical Anarchism: a challenge to the institutions which mankind allows to limit it’s very humianity, be they “church”, “law”, “work”, or “love”. Her autobiography is a document to what the immigrant experience was like, what working conditions were at the turn of the century, the role of women in our culture then; and is filled with examples of what “control” will fear and how it will react. Though she never fired a bullet or threw a bomb, she was harassed throughout her carear by authorities and the press. After president McKinley was assasinated by an “Anarchist”, ludicrous laws swept the nation forbiding legal assembly and attempted to suppress their rights of suspect non-WASP indiviuals to express their views. Sound familiar? Emma was considered extemely dangerous, and she was, in the sense that she would not stray from her principles, though there were times when pragmatism overrode dogma. And the horrific questions she wanted answered: can’t we be more “free” than this? can’t we be more human? This first volume follows her through struggles as a seamstress and a nurse, orator and independant publisher, convict, lover of the unloved. It traces her relationships with other Anarchist of the era, both well known and otherwise. It follows her on speaking tours through a younger America and Europe. If it is at times a little tedious in it’s self-examination and passion, this can only be attributed to a quest for absolute honesty. It is long but thorough, with great titles at the top of every page like “I remarry Kershner and leave him again” or “I shock the pilgrim fathers”. It is an inspiring and fascinating read that requires a commitment that will be rewarded. People fought long and hard for an eight hour work day in this country, the idea of which somehow began to vanish in the eighties. There was a time when technology granted a certain aninimity to individuals, even though every effort was being made to suppress and find them. There was a time when “freedom” meant more than a series of economic choices, and humanity was not so tied to income. This is a new century, and a new struggle. We can take clues from the vision of those who came before.
...more
Emma Goldman was inspiring and almost superhuman. Her life contained an immeasurable amount of struggle for the liberation of humanity from capitalism and the state.
The metastory of Emma Goldman is quite sad. Having lived a large portion of her life in the United States, she adopted it as a homeland, and was promptly deported. Because Russia was in the midst of revolution, she therefore considered that her homeland. But conditions became so malformed there that she was forced to sneak out. And s
Emma Goldman was inspiring and almost superhuman. Her life contained an immeasurable amount of struggle for the liberation of humanity from capitalism and the state.
The metastory of Emma Goldman is quite sad. Having lived a large portion of her life in the United States, she adopted it as a homeland, and was promptly deported. Because Russia was in the midst of revolution, she therefore considered that her homeland. But conditions became so malformed there that she was forced to sneak out. And she went from country to country, where no one would take her. Emma Goldman couldn't ever just go home.
But she never stopped struggling. When she was arrested, she organized inside US prisons for better working conditions for the prisoners. When Russia was in revolution, she tirelessly advocated for it. When she was deported, she radicalized the boat's crew, convincing them to go AWOL and join Russia in its revolution. When the revolution turned sour and Lenin began to put former capitalists in charge again, she was there, too, struggling to defend the Kronstadt sailors, and then going across the world to condemn the Bolshevik betrayal.
Something that I had never known about Emma Goldman was her infatuation with art, specifically theater. As an orator, she spent the majority of her time speaking about modern drama and social thought in theater. She was a public intellectual as well as a radical, and a self-taught cultural critic.
The unabridged version of this book is a thousand pages long, in two volumes: one roughly covering her experiences organizing in the United States, as she moves in the anarchist movement from margin to center, and then, in the second volume, her deportation to Russia, her disillusionment there, and her wandering around the globe. If I had known better I would have read the abridged version. At first, I thought it was an outrage to abridge such an incredibly important person's life. But there were plenty of pages that slowed the narrative arc, and therefore made the book more difficult to read, and explains why it took me almost six months to finish it.
Goldman defended Leon Czolgocz, and her lifelong love Sasha Berkman's attempts on the lives of both president McKinley and the capitalist Henry Clay Frick in an intriguing way. The way she described these acts of violence (terror, even) was not that the perpetraitors were callous to human suffering and that enabled them to commit the acts. In fact, quite the contrary. They were so sensitive to the suffering of people that they couldn't stand by and let these individuals perpetuate that suffering. They took such drastic action on behalf of those that suffered because they were so hypersensitive that they couldn't bring themselves to live with the suffering of others. She refused to condemn the men whose propaganda by the deed was condemned by nearly the entire anarchist movement of the day, because of the state repression that followed the actions. She, like Malcom X, though the focus should be on the social conditions that led to these reactions.
I was disappointed that the book had no ending. Until the very last page, Goldman rattled off the themes and locations of lectures, so there was no closure. Part of the problem was that there wasn't closure in Emma Goldman's life at that point, given that she would still live to see the Spanish Revolution/Civil War and much of World War II before dying. An afterward from a friend or admirer would have closed the book nicely, though perhaps that now I think of Emma as still alive and working for anarchist revolution, and perhaps thats the way I should be thinking about her.
A passionate lover, a revolutionary, a woman without a country. Emma Goldman was an amazing woman.
The edition I have of this book is beautiful, and I would be willing to let anyone who wants to borrow it. The books is cloth-bound with embossed gold foil titles. Printed on heavy weighted paper, the type looks hand placed. There are pictures of characters about every 100 pages, an illustration table of contents, and an index in the back. Every page has a sentence summary of the page's contents, something I've never seen before.
...more
A very inspiring work by the anarchist-communist. Goldman tirelessly committed herself to the Cause and her beautiful ideal. She lived to motivate the masses and teach workers of the more sustainable and just alternative of anarchism. Her autobiography begins by giving insight into the injustices of being an immigrant, and throughout the book, the reader learns a first-person account of all of the movement's major demonstrations and events of the late 19th and early 20th century in the United St
A very inspiring work by the anarchist-communist. Goldman tirelessly committed herself to the Cause and her beautiful ideal. She lived to motivate the masses and teach workers of the more sustainable and just alternative of anarchism. Her autobiography begins by giving insight into the injustices of being an immigrant, and throughout the book, the reader learns a first-person account of all of the movement's major demonstrations and events of the late 19th and early 20th century in the United States. Her deportation brings her to the home of the October Revolution, where she learns the truth behind the Bolshevik's deemed workers republic. Not just a work of her political activity, Goldman includes the reader in her most intimate moments, from her relationships with the men she loved to her bonds with her closest family members, this autobiography illustrates that one devoted to activism still has many similarities to one who isn't.
...more
In a time when even the farthest flung reaches of the American left are actually sorta psyched about a presidential candidate, the words of Emma Goldman come as a refreshing kick in the pants. Her writing explodes with life, bursting with an unabashedly anarchist ideology. The book reads like a who's-who of late 19th/early 20th century anarchism, rich with colorful details chronicling the events and differences within the movement. All the while, Emma Goldman keeps it personal, relating all thes
In a time when even the farthest flung reaches of the American left are actually sorta psyched about a presidential candidate, the words of Emma Goldman come as a refreshing kick in the pants. Her writing explodes with life, bursting with an unabashedly anarchist ideology. The book reads like a who's-who of late 19th/early 20th century anarchism, rich with colorful details chronicling the events and differences within the movement. All the while, Emma Goldman keeps it personal, relating all these political philosophies and goings on to her own lived experience. The layout of the book is superb—each page bears a synopsis of its contents in the upper margin. Headings such as, "Erotic experiences of my childhood," or, "The president dies. Am I sorry?" make Goldman's memoir an accessible read. Read this book and be swept off your feet.
...more
This book was amazing. I never thought a nearly 2,000 page autobiography of a woman who lived 100 years ago could be so inspiring, funny, poignant, thought-provoking, educational, honest, and sad. Goldman was an incredible writer — the book mixes momentous historical events which she lived through and participated in, and small-scale vignettes about her personal life and relationships to other people. Both are fascinating.
As a social justice activist, it's was also riveting to read a firsthand a
This book was amazing. I never thought a nearly 2,000 page autobiography of a woman who lived 100 years ago could be so inspiring, funny, poignant, thought-provoking, educational, honest, and sad. Goldman was an incredible writer — the book mixes momentous historical events which she lived through and participated in, and small-scale vignettes about her personal life and relationships to other people. Both are fascinating.
As a social justice activist, it's was also riveting to read a firsthand account of how much, and how little, has changed since Goldman was fighting for a more just and humane society a century ago. The book is STRONGLY recommended for serious readers and modern-day radicals.
Living My Life, Emma Goldman
عنوان: آنگونه که من زیستم (خود زندگینامه)؛ نویسنده: اما گلدمن؛ مترجم: سهیلا بسکی؛ تهران، نیلوفر، 1385، در 1146 ص، شابک: 9644483200؛ موضوع: سرگذشتنامه انا گلد من، آنارشیستها، ایالات متحده قرن
At times overwrought, exasperating, and definitely a lot to read even in the abridged version, but how could one come out of this anything but charmed by Emma? So vibrant, so full of questioning and passionate intelligence. So full of life. Dedicated not just to her ideals and justice, but to living and realizing them in the world. She had an amazing life of her own making, with seemingly endless stories and a strong ability for telling them.
As with Marxism, there is plenty of insightful critiq
At times overwrought, exasperating, and definitely a lot to read even in the abridged version, but how could one come out of this anything but charmed by Emma? So vibrant, so full of questioning and passionate intelligence. So full of life. Dedicated not just to her ideals and justice, but to living and realizing them in the world. She had an amazing life of her own making, with seemingly endless stories and a strong ability for telling them.
As with Marxism, there is plenty of insightful critique in Emma's anarchism and outlook. (Especially when in early Soviet Russia). It's the prescriptive part where they both lose me.
Overall it was thought provoking and inspiring. And a bit long. 3.5 stars, rounding up.
...more
I finally finished. It was a wonderful book, if only to open my eyes to a part of history that I was not even aware happened. Sometimes, I forgot how important it is to read biographies, autobiographies, and histories to truly know the past. They barely scrap the surface in school (unless you were a history major but even then, do you get it all?). I would write more but I feel it would be inadequate to describe. Her life was interesting and the movement she dedicated herself to was one I could
I finally finished. It was a wonderful book, if only to open my eyes to a part of history that I was not even aware happened. Sometimes, I forgot how important it is to read biographies, autobiographies, and histories to truly know the past. They barely scrap the surface in school (unless you were a history major but even then, do you get it all?). I would write more but I feel it would be inadequate to describe. Her life was interesting and the movement she dedicated herself to was one I could almost join. But I fall more on the socialist side not the anarchist (communist) side. I know this does not do justice to how I felt about the book but I am not ready to fully share.
Emma Goldman was a feminist anarchist known for her political activism, writing and speeches. She played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe in the first half of the twentieth century.
Born in Kovno in the Russian Empire (present-day Kaunas, Lithuania), Goldman emigrated to the US in 1885 and lived in New York City, where she joined the bu
Emma Goldman was a feminist anarchist known for her political activism, writing and speeches. She played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe in the first half of the twentieth century.
Born in Kovno in the Russian Empire (present-day Kaunas, Lithuania), Goldman emigrated to the US in 1885 and lived in New York City, where she joined the burgeoning anarchist movement.Attracted to anarchism after the Haymarket affair, Goldman became a writer and a renowned lecturer on anarchist philosophy, women's rights, and social issues, attracting crowds of thousands.
She and anarchist writer Alexander Berkman, her lover and lifelong friend, planned to assassinate Henry Clay Frick as an act of propaganda of the deed. Although Frick survived the attempt on his life, Berkman was sentenced to twenty-two years in prison. Goldman was imprisoned several times in the years that followed, for "inciting to riot" and illegally distributing information about birth control. In 1906, Goldman founded the anarchist journal Mother Earth.
In 1917, Goldman and Berkman were sentenced to two years in jail for conspiring to "induce persons not to register" for the newly instated draft. After their release from prison, they were arrested—along with hundreds of others—and deported to Russia.
Initially supportive of that country's Bolshevik revolution, Goldman quickly voiced her opposition to the Soviet use of violence and the repression of independent voices. In 1923, she wrote a book about her experiences, My Disillusionment in Russia. While living in England, Canada, and France, she wrote an autobiography called Living My Life. After the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, she traveled to Spain to support the anarchist revolution there. She died in Toronto on May 14, 1940, aged 70.
During her life, Goldman was lionized as a free-thinking "rebel woman" by admirers, and derided by critics as an advocate of politically motivated murder and violent revolution.Her writing and lectures spanned a wide variety of issues, including prisons, atheism, freedom of speech, militarism, capitalism, marriage, free love, and homosexuality. Although she distanced herself from first-wave feminism and its efforts toward women's suffrage, she developed new ways of incorporating gender politics into anarchism. After decades of obscurity, Goldman's iconic status was revived in the 1970s, when feminist and anarchist scholars rekindled popular interest in her life.
...more
“I want freedom, the right to self-expression, everybody's right to beautiful, radiant things.' Anarchism meant that to me, and I would live it in spite of the whole world — prisons, persecution, everything. Yes, even in spite of the condemnation of my own closest comrades I would live my beautiful ideal.”
—
26 likes
“I became alive once more. At the dances I was one of the most untiring and gayest. One evening a cousin of Sasha, a young boy, took me aside. With a grave face, as if he were about to announce the death of a dear comrade, he whispered to me that it did not behoove an agitator to dance. Certainly not with such reckless abandon, anyway. It was undignified for one who was on the way to become a force in the anarchist movement. My frivolity would only hurt the Cause.
I grew furious at the impudent interference of the boy. I told him to mind his own business. I was tired of having the Cause constantly thrown into my face. I did not believe that a Cause which stood for a beautiful ideal, for anarchism, for release and freedom from convention and prejudice, should demand the denial of life and joy. I insisted that our Cause could not expect me to become a nun and that the movement would not be turned into a cloister. If it meant that, I did not want it. "I want freedom, the right to self-expression, everybody's right to beautiful, radiant things." Anarchism meant that to me, and I would live it in spite of the whole world — prisons, persecution, everything. Yes, even in spite of the condemnation of my own closest comrades I would live my beautiful ideal”
—
10 likes