Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) served his country in many capacities: President, Vice President to John Adams, Governor of Virginia and Secretary of State to George Washington. He is best revered for his writing of the Declaration of Indepenence. In his autobiograph he comments on the French Revolution and the Articals of Confederation. In the second book "The Jefferson Bibl
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) served his country in many capacities: President, Vice President to John Adams, Governor of Virginia and Secretary of State to George Washington. He is best revered for his writing of the Declaration of Indepenence. In his autobiograph he comments on the French Revolution and the Articals of Confederation. In the second book "The Jefferson Bible" is Jefferson's thoughts to uncover the meaning of true religion. This book was completed in 1819 and is a fantastic view of Jesus thrugh Jefferson's eyes. Like many slave holders - Jefferson had many children with a slave named Sally Hemings. To this day many descendants of Jefferson, both Black and White, take great pride in being connected to Americas great founder and hero. A Collector's Edition.
...more
Hardcover
,
216 pages
Published
June 1st 2007
by Frederick Ellis
(first published 1819)
Though often claimed by anti-religionists as a Deist, Jefferson states flatly, referring to this cut-and-paste version of the New Testament: "It is a document in proof that I am a REAL CHRISTIAN, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus" (his emphasis).
But note the distinction: Jefferson calls himself a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus, not a disciple of Jesus himself. This is a serious difference, as his discomfort with and his disbelief in the supernatural aspects of the story of
Though often claimed by anti-religionists as a Deist, Jefferson states flatly, referring to this cut-and-paste version of the New Testament: "It is a document in proof that I am a REAL CHRISTIAN, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus" (his emphasis).
But note the distinction: Jefferson calls himself a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus, not a disciple of Jesus himself. This is a serious difference, as his discomfort with and his disbelief in the supernatural aspects of the story of Jesus led him to to excise all such events in his edit of the Gospels. Thus there is no walking on water, no calming the storm, no feeding the five thousand, no recalling Lazarus to life, and no resurrection of Jesus himself.
But what remains is the pure doctrine of Jesus, which Jefferson (and I as well) view as the most spectacular recipe for living well and happily ever propounded. "Love thy neighbor as thyself" is the simplest and yet the hardest advice ever given, but no one can dispute its power to transform a life and change the world.
I can't help but believe that even had Jesus performed the miracles and risen from the dead, even if he was the literal Son of God, his understanding of his own doctrine would lead him to discount those very miracles in favor of his desire that we benefit from his teachings and thus obtain eternal life.
I find that the part of me that loves the miracles and fantastic stories about Jesus is a child who is looking for a parent, but the part of me that loves Jesus' pure and difficult teachings is the adult who seeks a guide. Either way, like Jefferson, I strive to be a disciple of Jesus and found in this short book ample food for thought.
...more
Recommends it for:
Anyone who wants a concise view of Jesus's ethical teachings.
This book is Thomas Jefferson's attempt to distill from the gospels the ethical teachings of Jesus. It presents Jesus
purely as a teacher; no chorus of angels marks his birth, he performs no miracles, and the book ends with his burial. The result is a short, 92 page volume that's easy to read in spite of being written in the same archaic style of English as the King James Bible.
The obvious audience for this book is atheists and agnostics who want a view of Jesus's teachings that's free of, as Je
This book is Thomas Jefferson's attempt to distill from the gospels the ethical teachings of Jesus. It presents Jesus
purely as a teacher; no chorus of angels marks his birth, he performs no miracles, and the book ends with his burial. The result is a short, 92 page volume that's easy to read in spite of being written in the same archaic style of English as the King James Bible.
The obvious audience for this book is atheists and agnostics who want a view of Jesus's teachings that's free of, as Jefferson put it, "the corruptions of reason among the ancients." I think even devout Christians might find it useful, though, because it presents a concise, uncluttered view of Jesus's ethical teachings.
...more
Bob
John: read the commentary by Jefferson (in the form of letters, etc) about his version of the Bible; he talks about how there are still things he does
John: read the commentary by Jefferson (in the form of letters, etc) about his version of the Bible; he talks about how there are still things he doesn't agree with, etc.
...more
Dec 04, 2013 08:09AM
John Martindale
Bob wrote: "John: read the commentary by Jefferson (in the form of letters, etc) about his version of the Bible; he talks about how there are still th
Bob wrote: "John: read the commentary by Jefferson (in the form of letters, etc) about his version of the Bible; he talks about how there are still things he doesn't agree with, etc."
Yeah, I agree, after reading many of Jefferson's letters to Adams, I do think he likely disagreed with some of the things that he included in the "Jefferson bible". But that is not the point. What I don't appreciate is reviews like the one above that misrepresent the actual content of the "Jefferson bible", it seems people come to the Jefferson bible with the presupposition that Jefferson removed all things supernatural, they then only look for conformation and are completely blind to all that contradicts their assumption. This seems obvious to me, since so many make the same sweeping black and white statements, when the content of the book clearly contradicts their assessment.
...more
Dec 04, 2013 02:06PM
"We must reduce our volume to the simple evangelists, select, even from them, the very words only of Jesus. There will be remaining the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man."
With this goal, Jefferson set about with razor in hand to extract the true words and actions of Jesus from the enveloping hype and miracle stories of the Gospels. Rejecting the virgin birth, the annunciation, and even the resurrection, Jefferson wanted to dig down to Jesus’ message of
"We must reduce our volume to the simple evangelists, select, even from them, the very words only of Jesus. There will be remaining the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man."
With this goal, Jefferson set about with razor in hand to extract the true words and actions of Jesus from the enveloping hype and miracle stories of the Gospels. Rejecting the virgin birth, the annunciation, and even the resurrection, Jefferson wanted to dig down to Jesus’ message of absolute love and service. The result is a chronological new Gospel formed by merging select portions of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
An excellent, concise introduction by Forrest Church and an afterward by Jaroslav Pelikan ([see Whose Bible Is It]
http://www.dubiousdisciple.com/2011/0...
) round out the book. Jefferson espoused a Unitarian philosophy, subjugating the topic of religion in his library to the category of “moral philosophy.” Pelikan, in his afterward about Jefferson’s contemporaries, classifies Jefferson among the “Enlightenment rationalists.” After reading Jefferson’s Bible, I’d say that’s a fair assessment.
...more
To thoroughly grasp the hubris, imagine it in modern day: a US president whose religious beliefs are widely regarded as insufficient and blasphemous towards Christian doctrine, deciding that he doesn't really care for the Bible as it's written--too many miracles, and that Paul character, he's gotta go--so he'll just take some scissors, snip out the good parts, and rearrange them into a better order. Clearly, Thomas Jefferson predated cable news networks. Apparently, the
Jefferson Bible
is now di
To thoroughly grasp the hubris, imagine it in modern day: a US president whose religious beliefs are widely regarded as insufficient and blasphemous towards Christian doctrine, deciding that he doesn't really care for the Bible as it's written--too many miracles, and that Paul character, he's gotta go--so he'll just take some scissors, snip out the good parts, and rearrange them into a better order. Clearly, Thomas Jefferson predated cable news networks. Apparently, the
Jefferson Bible
is now distributed to members of the US Congress; I can't help but wonder how many of them have actually read it before lauding the Protestant religiosity of founding fathers. (The introductory matter in this edition claims that Jefferson's beliefs tended towards Unitarian, although it is published by the Unitarian church, and I'm having difficulty confirming anything more concrete than a "close alignment" with Unitarianism.)
Jefferson doesn't set out as many religious scholars do in an attempt to quarantine a historical Jesus from the embellishments of later generations' evangelizing competitiveness. If this were his goal I would expect a heavier reliance on the earlier gospels, especially Mark, but this isn't the case; basically, Jefferson snips out the miraculous and supernatural, leaving barebones biographical detail and the words attributed to Jesus himself, and rearranges things into an approximation of Chronological order (though several of the stories that appear in more than one gospel are separated by several pages). The translation is King James with almost no deviations, despite Jefferson using a side-by-side English/French/Greek/Latin edition. (Again, here a modern dedicated biblical historian would, I imagine, try to go back to the most original texts possible, though one can imagine the limitations of this in 19th century Virginia.)
One of the things that is both problematic and intensely lucky about Christianity, as opposed to more recent religions such as Islam, is that the details of Jesus's life and sayings were not recorded as they happened. We have, for example, a huge body of information via Hadiths and the Qu'ran about Muhammed that borders on TMI (a recent reading of Fatima Mernissi's
The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women's Rights in Islam
underscored this to me). Without too much information on the trivial details of Jesus's life, Christians are free to deviate from them rather than have every small dietary or sartorial choice be regarded as a religious pronouncement. This, at least, is consistent with the message of Jesus in the gospels. The downside, of course, is the resultant disagreement over resolving conflicts among spiritual texts written long after the fact.
The Jesus that is left after Jefferson's clippings is not unfamiliar, and perhaps more interesting for attracting followers through his Temple-reforming rabble rousing and philosophical questioning rather than miracle-performance. It worked well enough for Martin Luther, after all, I suppose. In the end, though, it probably gives more insight into Jefferson and his religious beliefs than it does into Christianity.
...more
As a deist, Thomas Jefferson believed in God as the ultimate creator and believed Jesus to be the greatest moral teacher. This collection of writings confirms his staunch belief in reason over faith. Jefferson believed that the Bible was imperfect insofar as it contained the works of corrupt individuals who sought to use Christianity as a means to control people.
What amazes me the most is how little a role religion played in the election of Thomas Jefferson in both 1800 and 1804. People furious
As a deist, Thomas Jefferson believed in God as the ultimate creator and believed Jesus to be the greatest moral teacher. This collection of writings confirms his staunch belief in reason over faith. Jefferson believed that the Bible was imperfect insofar as it contained the works of corrupt individuals who sought to use Christianity as a means to control people.
What amazes me the most is how little a role religion played in the election of Thomas Jefferson in both 1800 and 1804. People furiously attacked Jefferson, labeling him as an atheist, but somehow he was still elected. It is very interesting to note that this would not occur in today's environment. He wrote this book because he knew he was not an atheist or without a sense of morality like his enemies claimed. He believed religion to be very personal, between a man and his god. This is why he did not bother with answering questions of his religion since he believed his moral system was clearly intact, and he was consistent in that he did not require to know the religion of others. As history notes, he was a proponent of religious freedom. After reading his extracts, it is very easy to see why.
Perhaps the best experience of reading this collection is my personal recognition of Thomas Jefferson not only as a President, but also as a great philosopher.
...more
Brilliant editing...when considered with his design for the University of Virginia grounds sheds light on TJ's careful consideration, no, critical inquiry into the spectrum of 18th c norms. Everything is in play with reason the blade that carves the irrelevant and nonsense from core truths. UVA is an architectural analog. Though it can be debated that it is less successful as a unified work because it is new, untested function from an old form (a core campus from a Roman temple and forum), it is
Brilliant editing...when considered with his design for the University of Virginia grounds sheds light on TJ's careful consideration, no, critical inquiry into the spectrum of 18th c norms. Everything is in play with reason the blade that carves the irrelevant and nonsense from core truths. UVA is an architectural analog. Though it can be debated that it is less successful as a unified work because it is new, untested function from an old form (a core campus from a Roman temple and forum), it is a gathering of edited architectural pieces (pavilions) around a new social space ruled by a Temple of reason open to the physical and intellectual frontier (west). I find both the JB and UVA profoundly inspiring as an imagining and creation of a more perfect present from a critically examined past. We need more of this now!
...more
Very interesting sidebar of American History. Jefferson, who was a questioner and often skeptic, believed the teachings of Jesus profound. As a founding father, he was not so obsessed with his own salvation later, but in acting rightly in practice in the present. The forward and introduction, do a lot to enlighten the reader on Jefferson's own viewpoints on religion and freedoms surrounding practice and purpose. As far as the Bible that Jefferson presents goes: it is abridged version of the New
Very interesting sidebar of American History. Jefferson, who was a questioner and often skeptic, believed the teachings of Jesus profound. As a founding father, he was not so obsessed with his own salvation later, but in acting rightly in practice in the present. The forward and introduction, do a lot to enlighten the reader on Jefferson's own viewpoints on religion and freedoms surrounding practice and purpose. As far as the Bible that Jefferson presents goes: it is abridged version of the New Testament. This may offend some- but I found it to be a quick reminder of the breadth of story and teaching. The repetition between the apostle tellers is more evident in this abridgment. If one has read the more complete texts, you will see what Jefferson found important, by seeing what was kept and what was scrapped. In different books I have read that told the story of this Bible, it has been suggested that Jefferson was attempting to make an American Bible that everyone was to use. Those who fathom these falsehoods of our most zealous defender of liberty and freedom from tyranny, should check themselves, the Declaration of Independence he presented and Bill of Rights he defended as Commander-in Chief. To me this was an exercise of a genius, as he toyed with his own personal notions of religion and God. I am happy that this edition is available- it s truly eye-opening to see Jefferson's editorial bone put to use.
...more
Jefferson's Bible is an important work both for what it shows of a pivotal Founding Father and lynch-pin president, and what it doesn't show. Jefferson was neither the passionate Christian that some try to paint him as, nor was he the foaming at the mouth Deist that others attempt to paint him as. Jefferson was earlier in his life leaning more toward Deism and toward the end of his life best described as a Unitarian in the sense that the word was used in that day. In a
Says a Lot about Jefferson!
Jefferson's Bible is an important work both for what it shows of a pivotal Founding Father and lynch-pin president, and what it doesn't show. Jefferson was neither the passionate Christian that some try to paint him as, nor was he the foaming at the mouth Deist that others attempt to paint him as. Jefferson was earlier in his life leaning more toward Deism and toward the end of his life best described as a Unitarian in the sense that the word was used in that day. In an effort to paint their positions, camps from both sides fail to account for the fact that Jefferson was human and his journey through life developed his thinking in these areas and he showed progression and modification of his positions as learning and experience tempered them.
Jefferson clearly rejected Trinitarian theology and believed the gospel narratives to be tarnished with later redaction by the early Church. His "Bible" as such was an attempt to cull out those redactions and isolate those words and teachings of Christ that reflect the moral code of Jesus Christ that Jefferson held to be the highest such teaching known to man. He was in effect trying to identify that theoretical "Q document" that Biblical Scholars from Jefferson's day until now believe existed which had only the words of Christ as he spoke them recorded.
Jefferson's Bible demonstrates both Jefferson's judgement as to what true Christianity (by his definition) entailed, and also what was baggage and needed to be removed. Jefferson revered Christ's moral code and teachings, even as he rejected his deity. This is eminently clear in Jefferson's writings, especially in his lengthy, latter year correspondence with John Adams.
Those who try and demonstrate Jefferson as to one side or the other demonstrate their own bias and need for Jefferson to be cast into their own camp.
Don't make the same mistake. Read the text at face value and determine what it says to you about Jefferson. Then, if you want, wade into the swamp of what others want to tell you it says about Jefferson and his view of our nation. You'll be equipped to reject either extreme and let Jefferson speak for himself.
Those who feel the need to cast stones at it for some felt need to protect the Bible miss the point. This is not about the Bible. The Bible has stood for centuries before Jefferson and will stand long after Jefferson is forgotten. It's about what Jefferson thought, and what he believed and should be read first and foremost from that position.
...more
Well, first off, this is the "Life and morals of Jesus of Nazareth" its not the "Jefferson bible," Jefferson would have been horrified if he learned someone took a book where he compiled the moral philosophy of Jesus and called it his bible. I have heard that according to the original preface, it was suppose to be for the native Indians, though there is no evidence of it reaching them, we have no right to create a new motive for Jefferson.
Next, Jefferson cutting from a bible and pasting in anoth
Well, first off, this is the "Life and morals of Jesus of Nazareth" its not the "Jefferson bible," Jefferson would have been horrified if he learned someone took a book where he compiled the moral philosophy of Jesus and called it his bible. I have heard that according to the original preface, it was suppose to be for the native Indians, though there is no evidence of it reaching them, we have no right to create a new motive for Jefferson.
Next, Jefferson cutting from a bible and pasting in another book, is no reason for the delight and glee from secularist and horror from Christians. Think about it, Jefferson didn't have a computer where he could copy and paste the moral philosophy of Christ from the bible into a book, so he did exactly what I would do if I had several bibles. I personally once cut verses from a bible to paste in a painting, I suppose 200 years from now, someone will find the painting and think I was some anti-Christian, irreligious, bible hating deist, because I applied my scissors to the Holy Bible!
Now as far as the content, so many of reviews just focus and delight on what is LEFT out and yet don't feel any discomfort about what is there. Though it is obvious that Jefferson didn't allow any of Jesus' miracles to be recorded and he didn't include the resurrection of Christ at the end, it is still rather interesting what he did leave in the so called "Jefferson bible." There is much more then moral teachings here.
So yeah, for a so called "Secular humanist" among many atheist and a Deist among "Christians," how do they make sense of all Jefferson left in? For I suppose they must assume that Jefferson cut out all the supernatural crap he disagreed with, and what is left in the Jefferson bible is the "Diamonds from the dung hill". The way some reviewers are acting, I suppose we can say what Jefferson left in the Jefferson Bible, he approved of? So what are these diamonds salvaged from the dung hill?
I just read the it and inside the "Jefferson bible" we find many examples of heaven, the fires of hell and both devils and angels. Also, most of Jesus' mentions of the second coming, the final Judgment, the Kingdom of God, salvation, Jesus' mighty works and that Jesus is the Son of God are all here! Jesus affirms the resurrection, Noah and the flood and Sodom and Gomorrah. Most importantly almost every reference to prayer from Jesus is in the "Jefferson bible", even God giving the Holy Spirit to all who ask. We also find fulfilled prophesy; Jesus prophesies Peter will deny him 3 times before the cock crows and later we read of this happening. So yeah, there is a lot more, I could make this into an extremely long review and just post example after example directly from the eBook, of all that shouldn't have survived Jefferson's scissors and bible blotter!
so yeah for a so called Deist, it sure seems odd he didn't clip out all mentions of prayer, God's activity on the earth, as well as prophesy, the second coming, angels and demons and the Holy Spirit and Jesus being the actual Son of God, the Christ and the King whose Kingdom is not of this earth. It would be nice to find some explanation for all Jefferson left in there, if he really was creating for himself his own bible without the supernatural. Is not the resurrection, the Holy Spirit, prophesy and salvation supernatural? Oh Hitchen's and Dawkin's, how did all this nonsense make it into this book from your secular saint?
O.K with all of that aside, i must say i really enjoyed "The Life and morals of Jesus." As far as Jesus' life, its extremely brief, the book is primarily the read letters of the bible, Jesus' teachings all put together seamlessly. I am glad Jefferson did this, it was a pleasure to read Jesus' teachings without the constant interruptions of miracles.
...more
Finally, Smithsonian Offers Jefferson Bible for General Readers
If you’re choosing an edition of the so-called Jefferson Bible, my strong recommendation is: Snap up a copy of this gorgeous Smithsonian facsimile of Jefferson’s original work, which he created by hand with his razor and pot of glue.
Nationwide studies show that most American households own a Bible, most Americans claim they read the Bible regularly, and regular Bible readers own multiple editions. Many Americans preach, teach and sh
Finally, Smithsonian Offers Jefferson Bible for General Readers
If you’re choosing an edition of the so-called Jefferson Bible, my strong recommendation is: Snap up a copy of this gorgeous Smithsonian facsimile of Jefferson’s original work, which he created by hand with his razor and pot of glue.
Nationwide studies show that most American households own a Bible, most Americans claim they read the Bible regularly, and regular Bible readers own multiple editions. Many Americans preach, teach and share in small groups that include Bible study. This is the first time in two centuries that a reasonably priced facsimile of Jefferson’s Bible is available for general readers. This gorgeous Smithsonian edition is likely to go out of print and, perhaps, become a collector’s item. From a practical standpoint, imagine the spirited discussions you can spark in your class or small group by passing around a copy. Buy it now, while this edition is still available.
What is in Jefferson’s Bible? First of all, Jefferson never called it “The Jefferson Bible,” although that is now such a widely used title that even the Smithsonian edition uses that phrase as the main title for the new color facsimile. Jefferson’s own original title appears as the sub-title of the Smithsonian edition. However, his original intention is captured in that first title: Jefferson only included the life and teachings of Jesus using verses from the Gospels.
How did Jefferson produce his Bible? Equipped with a razor and glue, the Smithsonian says: “At seventy-seven years of age, Thomas Jefferson constructed his book by cutting excerpts from six printed volumes published in English, French, Latin, and Greek of the Gospels of the New Testament. He arranged them to tell a chronological and edited story of Jesus’s life, parables, and moral teaching. Left behind in the source material were those elements that he could not support through reason or that he believed were later embellishments, such as the miracles and the Resurrection.
“The act of cutting and rearranging passages from the New Testament to create something fresh was an ambitious, even audacious initiative, but not an act of disrespect. Through this distillation Jefferson sought to clarify Jesus’s teachings, which he believed provided ‘the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man.’”
A second recommendation, if you’re a Bible collector or Bible-study teacher: You also should snap up Tarcher’s new release of the now-classic 1940 edition of The Jefferson Bible.
...more
This is the way the Bible is supposed to be. Thomas Jefferson, founding father and President of the USA has cut away all the supernatural BS behind Jesus Christ and his life time. Dug hard into various Bibles of the times and manages to find the wisdom of a progressive Jewish rebel. This Jesus was killed for believing in treating people equally and finding the best of human nature.
The supernatural birth and other mystical events of Jesus' life have been removed and instead readers will discover
This is the way the Bible is supposed to be. Thomas Jefferson, founding father and President of the USA has cut away all the supernatural BS behind Jesus Christ and his life time. Dug hard into various Bibles of the times and manages to find the wisdom of a progressive Jewish rebel. This Jesus was killed for believing in treating people equally and finding the best of human nature.
The supernatural birth and other mystical events of Jesus' life have been removed and instead readers will discover a new vision in the man called Jesus, with all the mystical mumbo-jumbo that the church has added to him to make him seem like a divine being.
Instead we see a person who even during his childhood questioned his family and leaders with critical reasoning skills that were probably self-taught. Jesus learned that they were manipulating the public for their own personal gain over the betterment of all. He hung out with criminals, whores and the lowest end of the public, treated them with compassion and became an accidental leader to them.
His martyrdom was then justified by the church to make him divine much like the ancient demi-gods like Hercules, Peresus, and other Greek/Roman heroes that inspired the people. His "divinity" has been cut by Jefferson's own hand and instead we see through the church's deception and lies to keep the public in control and instead see that Jesus was a rebel with a cause to help to better not only his fellow Jews but all people everywhere. The pseudo-mystical nature of his birth to the documentation of his supposed resurrection have been cut away and we still see a good leader who inspired people to help people.
Unlike the many Christians today who turn their backs on their own fellow human being in the name of Christ and don't bother to lend a helping hand as Jesus did. Jefferson took the true teachings of Jesus the man and rebel leader to heart. Those teaching helped America throw off the shackles of English rule and domination to allow America the right to be free.
...more
This is an illuminating and important book historically. Not only does it represent Thomas Jefferson's fearless edit of the Gospels of Matthew,Mark, Luke and John from the New Testament the Bible extracting what he thought was of value from "a groundwork of vulgar ignorance, of things impossible, of superstitions, fanaticisms and fabrications"but sheds a light on the inquiring minds of the intellectual elite of his day. He basically cut and pasted and shared his work with John Adams and others w
This is an illuminating and important book historically. Not only does it represent Thomas Jefferson's fearless edit of the Gospels of Matthew,Mark, Luke and John from the New Testament the Bible extracting what he thought was of value from "a groundwork of vulgar ignorance, of things impossible, of superstitions, fanaticisms and fabrications"but sheds a light on the inquiring minds of the intellectual elite of his day. He basically cut and pasted and shared his work with John Adams and others who shared his views.
A copy of this slim volume was given to every member of the US Senate upon their being sworn in since 1904 as a tradition. As a Deist, Thomas Jefferson rejected the story of the virgin birth and the dogma of the Trinity. Anticlerical and a strong advocate of separation of church and state, he embodies the spirit of freedom of thought and the individual which is the foundation of America...and in stark contrast to the fantasy of the founding fathers creation of a "Christian nation" drawing its institutions and laws from the Bible as evangelicals claim.
...more
I liked this book. I went into the book with an open mind. I am an Atheist who has read the bible and wondered what Thomas Jefferson had to say about it. If you have heard of the famous Jefferson - Adams letters where they lightly debate religion then you may know that Thomas wasn't really a fan of the church. That does not mean he is not religious. On the contrary, this book is a basic asemblance of how Thomas Jefferson interpreted the bible. It gives good incite into his views on religion and
I liked this book. I went into the book with an open mind. I am an Atheist who has read the bible and wondered what Thomas Jefferson had to say about it. If you have heard of the famous Jefferson - Adams letters where they lightly debate religion then you may know that Thomas wasn't really a fan of the church. That does not mean he is not religious. On the contrary, this book is a basic asemblance of how Thomas Jefferson interpreted the bible. It gives good incite into his views on religion and pretty much describes his personality and how he would govern his young country. It is obvious from the very begining that Thomas did not like organized religion but felt there was some truth in the scripture. The book was very repetative as I believe he had revisions of earlier interpretations and would try to revisit some of his earlier writtings of certain scriptures. Not to say there were contradiction in the scriptures themselves, but I think he was contradicting his previous interpretation. Very good book if you are into the founding fathers and their religious views.
...more
Jefferson's attempt to present Jesus's story, as collected from the four Gospels, in chronological order, omitting all of its supernatural aspects, gives the story a shape that one doesn't necessarily perceive in selecting verses for study out of context. The reader can see an inevitable trajectory towards crucifixion as Jesus gains a following while challenging the authority of some important people.
Jefferson did not believe in the virgin birth, the miracles, the resurrection, etc., but he wish
Jefferson's attempt to present Jesus's story, as collected from the four Gospels, in chronological order, omitting all of its supernatural aspects, gives the story a shape that one doesn't necessarily perceive in selecting verses for study out of context. The reader can see an inevitable trajectory towards crucifixion as Jesus gains a following while challenging the authority of some important people.
Jefferson did not believe in the virgin birth, the miracles, the resurrection, etc., but he wished show that Jesus had presented a sound system of ethics. But, reading many of Jesus's words for the first time, in spite of spending the first 17-or-so years of my life as a practicing Christian, I detected some troubling notes that were not emphasized in my own liberal congregation. The fire and brimstone Jesus is every bit as present here as the gentle, loving one. And once or twice, his words contained a touch of paranoia and mistrust of outsiders that characterizes the messianic cults we see today.
...more
Thomas Jefferson is among the greatest minds from the Founding Generation of Americans. Despite his contributions to the American framework, Jefferson believed that religious beliefs were and should remain an immensely personal topic, and as such he spends very little time discussing this issue even among his most trusted contemporaries, including Benjamin Rush, who may have inspired Jefferson to complete this work following Rush's death.
The Jeffersonian Bible is an intimate look into the mind o
Thomas Jefferson is among the greatest minds from the Founding Generation of Americans. Despite his contributions to the American framework, Jefferson believed that religious beliefs were and should remain an immensely personal topic, and as such he spends very little time discussing this issue even among his most trusted contemporaries, including Benjamin Rush, who may have inspired Jefferson to complete this work following Rush's death.
The Jeffersonian Bible is an intimate look into the mind of Thomas Jefferson on perhaps his most intimately guarded beliefs; spirituality. Jefferson attempts to recreate the life of Jesus from the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, while focusing on Jesus as a man and teacher. In doing so Jefferson, I believe succeeds in creating a vivid and clear image of the key teachings of Jesus and how to live a more harmonious and fulfilling life.
...more
Thomas Jefferson was the father of the phrase: "Wall of separation between church and state." And I can think of no greater enduring philosophy left by the Founding Fathers than imagining Jefferson cutting apart the New Testament of his King James Bible with razor and glue to form his own Gospels in an effort to, in his own words, separate the "diamonds" from the "dunghill" and "nonsense".
The former were the words and wisdom of the teachings of Jesus and the latter were all things supernatural,
Thomas Jefferson was the father of the phrase: "Wall of separation between church and state." And I can think of no greater enduring philosophy left by the Founding Fathers than imagining Jefferson cutting apart the New Testament of his King James Bible with razor and glue to form his own Gospels in an effort to, in his own words, separate the "diamonds" from the "dunghill" and "nonsense".
The former were the words and wisdom of the teachings of Jesus and the latter were all things supernatural, the divinity of Jesus (which Jefferson says Jesus never intended) or outside of reason. It was the age of Enlightenment, fueled by the Deism of Thomas Paine's marvelous "The Age of Reason" and the writings of John Toland, Matthew Tindal, John Locke, David Hume, Voltaire and Spinoza.
Unlike the lies modern American politicians like to tell about the Founders (clearly they don't really read any of the Founders' works) during the election cycle, the Founders definitively wanted government apart from religion. No officially sanctioned religion, period. One of the best things about this Smithsonian copy in particular is the "history" chapter than proceeds Jefferson's work. It is a succinct breakdown of his beliefs and his desire for social religious tolerance. In fact, Jefferson, much like the current U.S. President Obama, was accused of being Muslim by the riff-raff simply for imagining a harmonious nation where they too could find a place for their beliefs.
Jefferson's personal beliefs were that the New Testament writers were "ignorant, unlettered men" who produced "superstitions, fanaticisms, and fabrications." He called the Apostle Paul the “first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.” He dismissed the concept of the Trinity as "abracadabra" and a tool for priests and clergy to become powerful and rich. One can only imagine what he'd think of its political uses in the Republican party (and sometimes the Democratic Party) of today.
In the end, what we're left with is a Jesus who is the ultimate rabbi, but not a shaman. We're left with religion as a personal belief, not a political one. And as Jefferson so aptly points out, "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."
...more
As Thomas Jefferson is arguably the most important figure in American History. I had to pick this one up. While nothing but a re-telling of the New Testement, and even though it is written with a strange mixture of Old Enlish and Contemperary American. It allows for a fresh look at the New Testement with out all of the religious stuff thrown in.
You have to admire the audacity of the man who wrote "The Declaration of Independence." Who else would take
a knife and pot of glue to the very Gospels
, and, with an intuitive hermeneutic rooted in his own Enlightenment-era deistic presumptions, attempt to strip away what he considered the "dung" and reveal the "diamonds" of Christ's teachings? Jefferson's attempts to find the universal, essential teachings of Jesus foreshadowed the
higher critical approaches
of the 19th century, and the 20th ce
You have to admire the audacity of the man who wrote "The Declaration of Independence." Who else would take
a knife and pot of glue to the very Gospels
, and, with an intuitive hermeneutic rooted in his own Enlightenment-era deistic presumptions, attempt to strip away what he considered the "dung" and reveal the "diamonds" of Christ's teachings? Jefferson's attempts to find the universal, essential teachings of Jesus foreshadowed the
higher critical approaches
of the 19th century, and the 20th century's searches for the hypothetical
Q sayings gospel
and the
"authentic" words of the "historical Jesus"
. Those facts, plus the insightful preface (by the late UU minister Forrest Church) and afterword (by the late scholar Jaroslav Pelikan), would, by themselves make this a four- or -five star book.
Unfortunately, since the only English translation of the Gospels that Jefferson had on hand was the King James Version, the resulting "Jefferson Bible" retains the usually impenetrable and too often stultifying language of that translation. He also didn't have access to
gospel parallels
, and evidently didn't think to look at the Gospels synoptically, because his redaction includes many duplicate stories and parables that make reading it more tedious than necessary. Finally, in reading through what remains of the Gospels, I began to see, for the first time, what many of my atheist friends have argued for some time: that there are fewer clear and flawless "diamonds" in Christ's teachings than Sunday school would leave one to believe. The import of many parables, even with interpretations provided, is lost on a modern reader (heck, it might have been lost on a 1st century reader), and the various discourses and teachings don't sum up to a comprehensive ethical or cosmological vision. This book left me wondering whether Jesus' ethics really were that profound (or even coherent!) after all, or if we just continue to assume so as inheritors of a tradition that insists on this as a fact, even after the obviously mythical elements get stripped away.
...more
I suppose I expected a more condensed version of the Gospels in Jefferson's work. And, while it is more condensed (by leaving out all the miracles and resurrection story), it is not more concise. He's merely stripped away those parts and left everything else in. So, as with other parts of the Bible, we're left reading similar passages, with similar wording, over and over again.
However, in this edition, if you continue on past Jefferson's manipulation of the Gospels, you'll read an afterword by
I suppose I expected a more condensed version of the Gospels in Jefferson's work. And, while it is more condensed (by leaving out all the miracles and resurrection story), it is not more concise. He's merely stripped away those parts and left everything else in. So, as with other parts of the Bible, we're left reading similar passages, with similar wording, over and over again.
However, in this edition, if you continue on past Jefferson's manipulation of the Gospels, you'll read an afterword by Jaroslav Pelikan which takes Jefferson to task (lightly) for this very thing. AND, recommends some readings that portend to do exactly what I expected this to do: distill the teachings of Jesus to their very essence and clearing out the "dung" from the "diamonds." Of particular interest are writings by Hermann Samuel Reimarus, Tatian's
Diatessaron
,Edward Gibbon, Hume, Goethe, and John Henry Newman. That said, I'm not sure that any of these accomplish the task...so we are left with Jefferson's Bible. And, for its Deist background, it's not a bad attempt.
...more
These days there are all kinds of Bibles in various styles of translations, some with highlights targeting different types of people. Chronological Bibles aid better understanding. None of this was available in Thomas Jefferson's day. He had to resort to cutting and pasting onto blank pages. In his original book, he placed Greek and Latin translations in double columns on one page and on the facing page he placed Hebrew and English translations.
In this Kindle version of three books, we get his
These days there are all kinds of Bibles in various styles of translations, some with highlights targeting different types of people. Chronological Bibles aid better understanding. None of this was available in Thomas Jefferson's day. He had to resort to cutting and pasting onto blank pages. In his original book, he placed Greek and Latin translations in double columns on one page and on the facing page he placed Hebrew and English translations.
In this Kindle version of three books, we get his English version; the New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE); and a short biography with some of his more well-known quotes. (The version shown may not be the version I read. Mine was edited by William V. Grebenik, published in 2013.) I thoroughly enjoyed reading this Bible and was inspired by Jesus's teachings all over again. Jefferson's biography is short, concise, and well worth reading. I highly recommend this book to everyone.
...more
This is an odd one to review. It could be titled The best of Jesus Christ as told by the disciples chosen by Thomas Jefferson. It is somewhat refreshing because there is little story in there, just some morals and parables. Regardless of how you view Christianity, I don't really want to associate with people who don't find the morals in this book to be virtuous at the least.
It isn't the easiest thing to read, but it is the Bible what did I expect? Lots of old english confusing the sentences, bu
This is an odd one to review. It could be titled The best of Jesus Christ as told by the disciples chosen by Thomas Jefferson. It is somewhat refreshing because there is little story in there, just some morals and parables. Regardless of how you view Christianity, I don't really want to associate with people who don't find the morals in this book to be virtuous at the least.
It isn't the easiest thing to read, but it is the Bible what did I expect? Lots of old english confusing the sentences, but it isn't that big of a deal.
Overall it is a decent read for someone who wants to get a taste of the teachings of Jesus. But you have to realize all the supernatural has been cut out, random stories Jefferson thought were misinterpreted have been cut out, and of course anything not from a book of one of the disciples has been cut out.
...more
My sister suggested I might get something out of this, after I'd been going on about how bogus everything in the bible is. That Thomas Jefferson took out all the supernatural elements from the Jesus mythology and humanized him and his moral lessons. It's cool that Jefferson was bold enough to attempt that, but it still didn't work for me because Jesus still waxes on about a supernatural god and heaven and hell and spirits, and a lot of his moral lessons are still based around those things, so ho
My sister suggested I might get something out of this, after I'd been going on about how bogus everything in the bible is. That Thomas Jefferson took out all the supernatural elements from the Jesus mythology and humanized him and his moral lessons. It's cool that Jefferson was bold enough to attempt that, but it still didn't work for me because Jesus still waxes on about a supernatural god and heaven and hell and spirits, and a lot of his moral lessons are still based around those things, so how could a practical person make sense of it? It was an interesting exercise, but it didn't mend the overall flaws with the religion for me. I sort of mark this book as one of the last steps before I wrote off Christianity as anything useful in my life.
...more
It's an interesting idea. Take the four gospels of the new testament. Put all the accounts into one linear volume and cut out the miracles. What you have is the account of a philosopher/story-teller with a very unhappy ending.
I liked it. It only takes a couple of hours to read, I got to refamiliarise myself with all the parables and imagine a more relatable Jesus figure.
Other only real problem is it gets a bit repetitive. The same lessons get taught at different times over the four gospels so n
It's an interesting idea. Take the four gospels of the new testament. Put all the accounts into one linear volume and cut out the miracles. What you have is the account of a philosopher/story-teller with a very unhappy ending.
I liked it. It only takes a couple of hours to read, I got to refamiliarise myself with all the parables and imagine a more relatable Jesus figure.
Other only real problem is it gets a bit repetitive. The same lessons get taught at different times over the four gospels so now all the stories are compiled into one Jesus repeats himself a lot.
Not quite sure what the point was. As an atheist, I appreciate a more reality-based telling and can get behind a "be excellent to each other" type message but it's still very heavy on "the coming of the kingdom of Christ." Not sure the purpose of taking out miracle healing and virgin births but keeping references to angels, heaven, hell, and all that stuff. It kind of leaves the book in an odd place, it's enough to upset the people that like full-blown magical Jesus but not enough to win over people that want to follow the golden rule without needing heavenly rewards pushed on them. I guess the Jefferson bible is headed to book limbo.
After this they should make a monument in Washington DC to Thomas Jefferson's sense of self-importance. The level of self-grandizement it takes to edit the words of scripture is a new level of pride reserved for the best the world has to offer. I wonder if he made his moral judgements on the words of Christ before or after he had children with his slaves.
Definitely a puzzling project for Jefferson to undertake. I really didn't like how he jumps from chapter to chapter. It's not like the Bible is exactly easy to read in the first place, but Jefferson's approach to the translation of the New Testament is even more beguiling.
This is the strongest case I've read for Jefferson being a deist, and I don't see how he could be seen as anything else. To end his version of the gospel message with, "There laid they Jesus, and rolled a great stone to the door of the supulchre, and departed," is terribly depressing. No resurrection? And before that, no incarnation? Reducing Jesus to a mere teacher does the opposite of Jefferson's stated purpose, to show the "true" teachings of Jesus, and instead turns him into a kindly fool wh
This is the strongest case I've read for Jefferson being a deist, and I don't see how he could be seen as anything else. To end his version of the gospel message with, "There laid they Jesus, and rolled a great stone to the door of the supulchre, and departed," is terribly depressing. No resurrection? And before that, no incarnation? Reducing Jesus to a mere teacher does the opposite of Jefferson's stated purpose, to show the "true" teachings of Jesus, and instead turns him into a kindly fool who died for no greater purpose (other than as an example).
Read this to know about Jefferson's religious convictions, but then go read Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John again so you don't lose sight of the real Jesus.
...more
Succinct, well written, and a powerful insight into the truth, the contradiction, and the absolutely insanity of the Bible. Thomas Jefferson was absolutely a brilliant man.
I mostly enjoyed the introductory material, learning more about the history, study, and restoration of the document. I recognize the obsessive-compulsive traits in Jefferson from my own experience getting a "project" into my head. The fact that he did this, and how he did it, says so much more about who this person was as an individual than the official and very public documents he left behind. My one criticism of the publication is that I would have liked a section that includes all the element
I mostly enjoyed the introductory material, learning more about the history, study, and restoration of the document. I recognize the obsessive-compulsive traits in Jefferson from my own experience getting a "project" into my head. The fact that he did this, and how he did it, says so much more about who this person was as an individual than the official and very public documents he left behind. My one criticism of the publication is that I would have liked a section that includes all the elements he left out. It has been awhile since I've read the Gospels so having that be a little more blatant, and perhaps some discussion and commentary on what was left out would have been interesting.
...more
This excellently reproduced facsimile of Jefferson's famous reworking of the four gospels includes fine introductory matter on the history of the Jefferson Bible and its conservation. Jefferson considered Jesus "this first of human Sages," but felt that scripture had been corrupted by the addition of miracles and claims to the divinity of Christ. His version, which omits all such intrusions, consists of one narrative interweaving sections from the four gospels. He literally cut and pasted passag
This excellently reproduced facsimile of Jefferson's famous reworking of the four gospels includes fine introductory matter on the history of the Jefferson Bible and its conservation. Jefferson considered Jesus "this first of human Sages," but felt that scripture had been corrupted by the addition of miracles and claims to the divinity of Christ. His version, which omits all such intrusions, consists of one narrative interweaving sections from the four gospels. He literally cut and pasted passages from bibles in four languages--Greek, Latin, French, and English--and arranged them in columns to permit comparisons. No walking on water, no healing of lepers, no water changed into wine. In the Garden of Gethsemane, for example, Peter cuts off the ear of the servant of the high priest but, alas for him, the verse where Jesus restores it has been omitted. As you'd imagine, Jefferson's story ends of Jesus being laid in the tomb, sans hope of resurrection. It is fascinating to read the Jefferson Bible alongside the uncut original to see what has been rearranged and what deleted, all the while trying to imagine what was in Jefferson's mind during his reshaping. Seeing the gospels reconstituted in this way enables the reader to focus on the life and teachings of Jesus. Considered thus, there is much to admire in his morals, but also much that has been rendered irrelevant or even wrong headed by the advances in knowledge during the past 2,000 years. Take away the supernatural and you see Jesus as a remarkable but time-bound teacher. As Jefferson himself said (as recorded in a panel in the Jefferson Memorial): "I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
...more
It is always been my understanding that Jefferson was devoted to the teachings of Jesus Christ. But it was known that he didn’t always agree with how they were interpreted by biblical sources, including the writers of the four Gospels, whom he considered to be untrustworthy correspondents. So Jefferson cut out all the narrative and miracles, then edited by pasting up his own account of Christ’s philosophy. This approach is practical and common sense based. I found this perspective enlightening a
It is always been my understanding that Jefferson was devoted to the teachings of Jesus Christ. But it was known that he didn’t always agree with how they were interpreted by biblical sources, including the writers of the four Gospels, whom he considered to be untrustworthy correspondents. So Jefferson cut out all the narrative and miracles, then edited by pasting up his own account of Christ’s philosophy. This approach is practical and common sense based. I found this perspective enlightening and plan on re-reading this a few more times.
...more
More than a mere renaissance man, Jefferson may actually have been a new kind of man. He was fluent in five languages and able to read two others. He wrote, over the course of his life, over sixteen thousand letters. He was acquainted with nearly every influential person in America, and a great many in Europe as well. He was a lawyer, agronomist, musician, scientist, philosopher, author, architect
More than a mere renaissance man, Jefferson may actually have been a new kind of man. He was fluent in five languages and able to read two others. He wrote, over the course of his life, over sixteen thousand letters. He was acquainted with nearly every influential person in America, and a great many in Europe as well. He was a lawyer, agronomist, musician, scientist, philosopher, author, architect, inventor, and statesman. Though he never set foot outside of the American continent before adulthood, he acquired an education that rivaled the finest to be attained in Europe. He was clearly the foremost American son of the Enlightenment.
Jefferson was born at Shadwell in Albemarle county, Virginia on April 13, 1743. He was tutored by the Reverend James Maury, a learned man, in the finest classical tradition. He began the study of Latin, Greek, and French at the age of 9. He attended William and Mary College in Williamsburg at sixteen years old, then continued his education in the Law under George Wythe, the first professor of law in America (who later would sign Jefferson's Declaration in 1776). Thomas Jefferson attended the House of Burgesses as a student in 1765 when he witnessed Patrick Henry's defiant stand against the Stamp Act. He gained the Virginia bar and began practice in 1769, and was elected to the House of Burgesses in 1769. It was there that his involvement in revolutionary politics began. He was never a very vocal member, but his writing, his quiet work in committee, and his ability to distill large volumes of information to essence, made him an invaluable member in any deliberative body.
In 1775 when a Virginia convention selected delegates to the Continental Congress, Jefferson was selected as an alternate. It was expected that Payton Randolph, (then Speaker of the Virginia House and president of the Continental Congress too,) would be recalled by the Royal Governor. This did happen and Jefferson went in his place. Thomas Jefferson had a theory about self governance and the rights of people who established habitat in new lands. Before attending the Congress in Philadelphia he codified these thoughts in an article called A Summary View of the Rights of British America. This paper he sent on ahead of him. He fell ill on the road and was delayed for several days. By the time he arrived, his paper had been published as a pamphlet and sent throughout the colonies and on to England where Edmund Burke, sympathetic to the colonial condition, had it reprinted and circulated widely. In 1776 Jefferson, then a member of the committee to draft a declaration of independence, was chosen by the committee to write the draft. This he did, with some minor corrections from James Madison and an embellishment from Franklin, the document was offered to the Congress on the first day of July. The congress modified it somewhat, abbreviating certain wording and removing points that were outside of general agreement. The Declaration was adopted on the Fourth of July.
Jefferson returned to his home not long afterward. His wife and two of his children were very ill, he was tired of being remote from his home, and he was anxious about the development of a new government for his native state.
In June of 1779 he succeeded Patrick Henry as Governor of Virginia. The nation was still at war, and the southern colonies were under heavy attack. Jefferson's Governorship was clouded with hesitation. He himself concluded that the state would be better served by a military man. He declined re-election after his first term and was succeeded by General Nelson of Yorktown.
In 1781 he retired to Monticello, the estate he inherited, to write, work on improved agriculture, and attend his wife. It was during this time that he wrote Notes on the State of Virginia, a work that he never completed. Martha Jefferson died in September of 1782. This event threw Jefferson into a depression that, according to his eldest daughter he might never have recovere
...more