Jimmy Connors took the tennis world by storm like no player in the history of the game. A shaggy-haired working-class kid from the wrong side of the tracks, he was prepared to battle for every point, to shout and scream until he was heard, and he didn't care whom he upset in doing so. He was brash, he was a brat. He was a crowd-pleaser, a revolutionary. And he won more tou
Jimmy Connors took the tennis world by storm like no player in the history of the game. A shaggy-haired working-class kid from the wrong side of the tracks, he was prepared to battle for every point, to shout and scream until he was heard, and he didn't care whom he upset in doing so. He was brash, he was a brat. He was a crowd-pleaser, a revolutionary. And he won more tournaments - an astonishing 109 - than any other man in history, including eight Grand Slam singles titles.
Only now is Connors ready to set the record straight on what really happened on and off the court. The rivalry with John McEnroe, that frequently threatened to turn violent. His romance with Chris Evert, which made them the sweethearts of the sport. The escapades with his partner in crime, Ilie Nastase. The deep roots of the fierce determination that made him the best player on the planet.
This is no genteel memoir of a pillar of the tennis establishment. Unflinching, hard-hitting, humorous and passionate, this is the story of the one and only Jimmy Connors.
...more
Hardcover
,
416 pages
Published
May 23rd 2013
by Bantam Press
(first published August 1st 2012)
My opinion of Jimmy Connors did not change after reading this. I wanted to like him and at times actually felt sorry for him. I came away with the thought that because someone is blunt and in your face, it does not necessarily mean they are honest. (He, in fact, boasts all through the book of his absolute honesty)
Tennis needed Connors like The Indy needs a wreck. I give him kudos for making the game interesting but grabbing his junk, demeaning the officials and foul language in a punk street lik
My opinion of Jimmy Connors did not change after reading this. I wanted to like him and at times actually felt sorry for him. I came away with the thought that because someone is blunt and in your face, it does not necessarily mean they are honest. (He, in fact, boasts all through the book of his absolute honesty)
Tennis needed Connors like The Indy needs a wreck. I give him kudos for making the game interesting but grabbing his junk, demeaning the officials and foul language in a punk street like fashion, was a turn off. He just came across like a bully.
He admits to the one affair that everyone knows about, but I find it hard to believe that was his only stray. His innuendo about Chris Evert is shameful. I would hope that he gave her the heads up, that he needed to put "that" in his book. And what he had to write about Agassi sounded more like sour grapes in justifying his loss.
Have no respect for him on so many levels, but did enjoy the book, and glad that I read it. It was a good trip down memory lane. Loved the play by play descriptions.
...more
For Andre Agassi, tennis was famously about "the journey," about figuring out who he was and what he wanted -- and maybe, just maybe, growing up a little along the way.
No wonder Jimmy Connors, in his new memoir "The Outsider," calls Agassi "nothing but an act."
Because Connors doesn't believe anyone can change. You are who you are. There's no personal growth to be had, there's only pushing forward, trying harder.
I love tennis, but I've never been a fan of Jimmy Connors. I thought I would enjoy this book because of my love for the game. Nope! This book just reiterated why I never cared for him as a player. He is just as much a pompous jerk in this book as he was on the court. It's amazing to think he actually faults himself for nothing. The only reason I stuck with this narcissistic tale was to see his take on tennis. If you really like tennis, don't waste your time. Read Andre Agassi's book or John McEn
I love tennis, but I've never been a fan of Jimmy Connors. I thought I would enjoy this book because of my love for the game. Nope! This book just reiterated why I never cared for him as a player. He is just as much a pompous jerk in this book as he was on the court. It's amazing to think he actually faults himself for nothing. The only reason I stuck with this narcissistic tale was to see his take on tennis. If you really like tennis, don't waste your time. Read Andre Agassi's book or John McEnroe's book. They're more honest and better written.
...more
With Connors you get what you see. This book is no different. If you disliked Connors totally then you will not like this book. He disparages opponents, talks big and skips around a lot.
On the other hand, if you want to know what being a kid learning tennis, a pro playing all over the world and a retired sports figure is like then this is a good book.
Having been a big fan of tennis in the Connor's era and also living in St. Louis I was really interested in the story. It did not disappoint me at
With Connors you get what you see. This book is no different. If you disliked Connors totally then you will not like this book. He disparages opponents, talks big and skips around a lot.
On the other hand, if you want to know what being a kid learning tennis, a pro playing all over the world and a retired sports figure is like then this is a good book.
Having been a big fan of tennis in the Connor's era and also living in St. Louis I was really interested in the story. It did not disappoint me at all. The writing isn't great but it feels authentic. Connors does dish on some people (like Chrissy) and holds back on others (the girlfriend he had while married) he is pretty honest for someone with a big ego. In a profession like tennis where you are on your own I think big egos are common.
I liked the parts about Jimmy's family in East St. Louis and how often he came home. Not only was his mom huge in his tennis career (and much maligned) his grandparents were too.
A memoir, not an autobiography, this is Jimmy's story.
...more
Having really been into tennis during the Jimmy Connors era and being from St. Louis where we heard more about his family than most I really enjoyed his book. Don't get me wrong, I am not a huge fan but I think this book really opens up the world of tennis of all levels to the outsiders. It really took me back hearing all those names from tennis in the past.
Jimmy's family life was also interesting. His relationship with his mother was well known but also this book explains more about his father
Having really been into tennis during the Jimmy Connors era and being from St. Louis where we heard more about his family than most I really enjoyed his book. Don't get me wrong, I am not a huge fan but I think this book really opens up the world of tennis of all levels to the outsiders. It really took me back hearing all those names from tennis in the past.
Jimmy's family life was also interesting. His relationship with his mother was well known but also this book explains more about his father and grandparents I wondered why the book was called a memoir but now that I know a memoir means sections taken from a person's life as opposed to an autobiography which is chronological I like the book more. It does skip around!
For those who never liked Jimmy Connors, you will like him less if you read this book. He admits faults but does not apologize for them and frequently disparages former competitors. This book, like Jimmy Connors is open and brash.
...more
Jimmy Connors was a childhood hero of mine. When I picked up tennis in the 7th grade I became addicted to watching him, McEnroe, Edberg, Becker, and Agassi bring tennis to the front page of the sports section.
This book is written just as though Jimmy were speaking. It's not always grammatically correct, but it sure does get the point across. He's vulnerable, humorous, and opinionated. I loved getting a front row seat to both his tennis and personal world.
I didn't want this book to end. I wish t
Jimmy Connors was a childhood hero of mine. When I picked up tennis in the 7th grade I became addicted to watching him, McEnroe, Edberg, Becker, and Agassi bring tennis to the front page of the sports section.
This book is written just as though Jimmy were speaking. It's not always grammatically correct, but it sure does get the point across. He's vulnerable, humorous, and opinionated. I loved getting a front row seat to both his tennis and personal world.
I didn't want this book to end. I wish there was another 400 pages to read. If you read this book be ready to feel the pain as he watches his mom get beat up by thugs when he was a young child, feel the passion as he discovers the beauty of tennis as his mom grooms him, experience the highs and lows of professional tennis, and hurt when he goes through personal darkness including the dissolving of his marriage (followed by the redemption).
It was a fantastic book to read for several reasons. First it gave me an understanding of his life and all that went into his budding tennis career. The book allowed me to see the back story not just what we saw on TV. Second, reading about his career and professional relationships fascinated me mainly because every opponent was part of my tennis-following life. In today's game there is no personality - no desire to root for any single player. It is not and will not ever be the same. Third, his
It was a fantastic book to read for several reasons. First it gave me an understanding of his life and all that went into his budding tennis career. The book allowed me to see the back story not just what we saw on TV. Second, reading about his career and professional relationships fascinated me mainly because every opponent was part of my tennis-following life. In today's game there is no personality - no desire to root for any single player. It is not and will not ever be the same. Third, his family life added to the read as is was the webbing of his life and it allowed me to see the whole story. I still miss watching Connors play but this book helped me to relive many great moments of his career. If you are an 80's tennis fan you will love the book and his stories.
...more
As a fairly regular viewer of tennis in the 70s and 80s I remember wondering whether all of the on-court Connors belligerence was real. From this account, I get a curiously mixed answer. It was, apparently, real enough in the moment, and the hostility towards many of his opponents - on and off the court - was also apparently quite real. On the other hand, Connors and his best mate Nastase were also perfectly capable of playing the whole thing up for yuks. Obsessed as he was with that marker of p
As a fairly regular viewer of tennis in the 70s and 80s I remember wondering whether all of the on-court Connors belligerence was real. From this account, I get a curiously mixed answer. It was, apparently, real enough in the moment, and the hostility towards many of his opponents - on and off the court - was also apparently quite real. On the other hand, Connors and his best mate Nastase were also perfectly capable of playing the whole thing up for yuks. Obsessed as he was with that marker of professionalism, money - not an unnatural obsession, by the way, in an age when the sport was in structural flux - Connors by his own account was bizarrely unprofessional in other ways. It's little wonder that the tone of this autobiography is frequently highly defensive. He concedes with generous frankness his double failings of alcohol abuse and an addiction to gambling which, at time of writing, doesn't sound fully under control. It argues a measure of self-awareness that's to his credit.
That said, you have to concede that the man's tennis was marvellous, and that he appealed (by the very fact that he was mired in macho culture and not the more refined set of manners expected of tennis) to a different audience, and he and MacEnroe between them are probably responsible, still, for the enormous and very enthusiastic audiences at the U.S. Open.
There are some good stories in here, and Connors addresses most of the famous (and infamous) scenes we associate with him through video flashbacks. It's worth the read, even if you are like me, merely a fan of the game and not of Connors in particular. If you are like me, however, it will probably not persuade you that you would be likely to invite him to dinner!
I had always imagined that Jimmy Connors was a fascinating person behind the public face. He was my favorite player growing up, although I was a bit too young to have been aware of him until around 1980 when he was third in the conversation behind Borg and McEnroe. His upbringing in East St. Louis wasn't exactly the club atmosphere that creates champion tennis players, but he was blessed with mother and grandmother that could really play the game and they had him playing it from an early age.
It'
I had always imagined that Jimmy Connors was a fascinating person behind the public face. He was my favorite player growing up, although I was a bit too young to have been aware of him until around 1980 when he was third in the conversation behind Borg and McEnroe. His upbringing in East St. Louis wasn't exactly the club atmosphere that creates champion tennis players, but he was blessed with mother and grandmother that could really play the game and they had him playing it from an early age.
It's hard to review Jimmy Connors's reflections without making comparisons to John McEnroe's earlier autobiography. In McEnroe's book he and Borg were everything and Connors somewhat inconsequential. McEnroe blames Borg's retirement on his own disillusionment with the game. McEnroe may have ended Borg's streak at Wimbledon, but Connors prevented Borg from that elusive U.S. Open title on more than one occasion.
Having not picked up Connors until 1980, I saw little of the bad boy reputation he built in the mid 1970s. Even when Connors was pugnacious, he was always overshadowed by McEnroe. The memoir fills us in the many controversies of his early career and the ire he drew from so many of the other players. I hadn't realized that he all but ignored the early ATP so that he could play the events he wanted. I didn't know that he played so many event matches in Las Vegas for big money. I didn't know that he boycotted the French Open during the peak years of his career.
Connors freely admits that he played tennis for money and tried to make as much money as possible. His different outlook on the game didn't win many friends in tennis. Though the friends he did make seemed to last his whole career. His exploits with llie Nastase and friendship Vita Gerulaitis show a different side of his persona. Connors doesn't praise or knock the personalities of other players like McEnroe does. Where John will spell out his dislike of Ivan Lendl or Brad Gilbert, Connors will tell similar stories more amused than perturbed. The only person he really calls out is Andre Agassi, a player that he has never forgiven for his early antics. Maybe most important, Connors reminds the reader that he had the longevity of an NFL kicker in a game built for players under 25.
Jimmy Connors has given honest reflections and a great chronicle of his unique career. It's essential reading for anyone interested in pro tennis during his era.
...more
Overall, the book moved quickly and was easy to read. Despite its length I read it in about a week. He definitely lays bare his vices and indiscretions, along with those of some of his friends. I was on the fence about giving it three or four stars, and if I were more of a tennis fan I probably would have rated it higher. He gives a lot of good detail about his preparation and strategy.
he writes the way he played - straight at you. He was the seismic shift that brought the game to the boomer generation.
I wish he and Ashe hadn't had such a rocky relationship. They were both my tennis heroes. Ashe taught me how to act, court courtesy, sportsmanship
Connors showed me how to play your heart out. - Never quite, grind in out!
This is a truncated review, as Goodreads ate my first one.
I was never a huge Connors fan, as I always favored Ashe, and they seemed destined for opposite axes. However, to say that tennis did not benefit from Connors participation is ludicrous. Connors plays his guts out every time he steps on the court. Not only an elite player, JC is a showman, and gives the fan their money's worth not out of disrespect to the game, but for the love of it.
To this day, Connors continues to promote the game at e
This is a truncated review, as Goodreads ate my first one.
I was never a huge Connors fan, as I always favored Ashe, and they seemed destined for opposite axes. However, to say that tennis did not benefit from Connors participation is ludicrous. Connors plays his guts out every time he steps on the court. Not only an elite player, JC is a showman, and gives the fan their money's worth not out of disrespect to the game, but for the love of it.
To this day, Connors continues to promote the game at every opportunity. A few weeks ago, Connors played McEnroe in a PowerShares quarterfinal. What tennis fan would not want to see that?
Connors will never be my favorite player, but you have to respect his effort and place in tennis history. He is definitely one of the architects of the paydays and amenities the pros receive today.
I always enjoyed watching Jimmy Connors play tennis, so it was a no brainer that I would read his memoir called The Outsider. I especially liked reading about his young teen years and found his comments on his fellow players interesting. The part with his on-again, off-again relationship with Chris Evert was very good also.
(Gerard's review)
I got to follow Jimmy Connors in the second half of his tennis career, so it was interesting to read about his family life and tennis "history." The book had a lot of name dropping and did not go into as much depth as I would have liked about some of his career highs.
I gave this book 3 stars because it was like a train wreck and I just couldn't stop watching the carnage. This is definitely a no holds barred memoir and if you ever pissed off Jimmy Connors, you are probably mentioned in this book.
I gave this two stars instead of one because he did something I didn't think was possible...he proved he's more of an a$$hat than I could have imagined.
A surprisingly personal autobiography from one of the game's biggest stars and one that finds Connors unrepentant, at times arrogant and, frankly, often crankier that a solitary old man with unwanted kids on his lawn (especially towards later generations of pros), but also open about his flaws (including gambling—he claims to have once bet $1,000,000 on himself—and philandering). If you found Connors abrasive and unlikeable in his playing days, this book won't change your mind about him, but it
A surprisingly personal autobiography from one of the game's biggest stars and one that finds Connors unrepentant, at times arrogant and, frankly, often crankier that a solitary old man with unwanted kids on his lawn (especially towards later generations of pros), but also open about his flaws (including gambling—he claims to have once bet $1,000,000 on himself—and philandering). If you found Connors abrasive and unlikeable in his playing days, this book won't change your mind about him, but it will undoubtedly appeal to his countless fans.
...more
I think Connors' The Outsider is a good read for a tennis fan, and for those who remember his epic run to the US Open semi-finals at 39!
The book is an interesting {if sometimes eyeroll-inducing} look at tennis in the time of Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe & some of the other greats of tennis. It contextualises the sport today and how it has grown and shifted over the years; how {despite people criticising the professionalism of players today as 'too professional'} it is a sport buil
I think Connors' The Outsider is a good read for a tennis fan, and for those who remember his epic run to the US Open semi-finals at 39!
The book is an interesting {if sometimes eyeroll-inducing} look at tennis in the time of Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe & some of the other greats of tennis. It contextualises the sport today and how it has grown and shifted over the years; how {despite people criticising the professionalism of players today as 'too professional'} it is a sport built and sustained by personalities; and how difficult it can be to win and to stay at the top of the game.
There are huge flaws in the book and it could've done with a really strict editor, but it also reflects so much of Connors' brashness; his constant clutching of his 'Outsider' status {really, Jimmy? You're as much of the tennis 'establishment' now as John McEnroe; no matter how much you deny it}; and his fraught relationship with tennis and the press. Jimmy's idea of himself is often at war with the idea of Jimmy the tennis player; the portrayal of Jimmy by the media; and his overwhelming tendency to unthinkingly shove his foot down his own throat {the whole section where he talks about Chris Evert is really, really, really out of order though he attempts to make it sound as though he was wronged.. twat!}.
His superficial exploration of the impact of his grandmother and mother on his tennis career, how Gloria Connors broke so many of the 'rules' of the upper echelons of tennis' male-dominated management spaces, and his fraught relationship with tennis itself was really a bit of a letdown. It has such potential for storytelling- that women crafted his winning game that has, to a large extent, affected how players play tennis today; the racquets they use; their baseline games- this is not a history (or 'herstory') of tennis that is often explored, especially with regard to men's tennis. Connors' relationship to tennis is different to that of most of the other players- Agassi writes (in 'Open') about his fraught relationship with the sport, how much he hated it even though he was just so very good at it. Connors saw tennis as a way to make money, as a way to support his family and as access to the lifestyle he had always been on the 'wrong side of the tracks' for; and this is significant because it not just shifts tennis from an 'upper class' sport, but because it adds dynamics of money and sponsorship and public perception and tennis personalities as devoured by the public- all of which has an impact on how tennis is run as business now, as a professional space.
Obviously, tennis in Connors' time is a different setup to tennis today. It's often been called the 'Wild West' of the time, and was no doubt affected by its political setting too. It was at the heart of the Cold War and Jimmy, an All-American Blue Collar boy, was best friends with some of the greatest tennis players produced by the 'other' side of the Iron Curtain. He doesn't explore this very much, except to reflect on his trips to Romania with Ilie Nastase with a bland, sort of 'observer' {outsider?} outlook rather than reflect on this, and how it may have affected his relationship within the US tennis ranks and extended to his friction with the Davis Cup too.
The book has so much potential to move beyond the superficial and it's best reflected in Connors' stilted attempts to talk about his OCD and his gambling addiction; and the affection with which he speaks of his family, the prickly pride he has in where he comes from. My favourite bits of the book are where he {I think, inadvertently} talks about the true friendships he's made and sustained through tennis. His gratitude and support for Billie Jean King and her partner {unexpected support for a lesbian, trail-blazing feminist in women's tennis from a self-described- and evident- chauvinist; I'll admit} and his genuine and heartbreaking guilt over the untimely death of Vitas Gerulaitis are very real and come through with sincerity.
The book, unfortunately, is not the greatest of tennis memoirs {Agassi really did herald a shift in that with 'Open'} but I think it's as accurate a look as we're going to get into Connors' head and his understanding of the world.
p.s. Apt tennis-related post as the French Open starts today... a tournament Jimmy's never won!
I am of the age where I remember Jimmy Connors playing Tennis and he was one of the reasons I used to play the game until my late teens. (illness forced me into not playing and I stopped watching it too). This book was a gift from my Nan after seeing him on QVC, and he signed every copy which was an added bonus.
This book was one of those I had trouble putting down from the very first page. I loved the style of writing, the honesty and the humour, to say Jimmy Connor was keeping me awake at bed t
I am of the age where I remember Jimmy Connors playing Tennis and he was one of the reasons I used to play the game until my late teens. (illness forced me into not playing and I stopped watching it too). This book was a gift from my Nan after seeing him on QVC, and he signed every copy which was an added bonus.
This book was one of those I had trouble putting down from the very first page. I loved the style of writing, the honesty and the humour, to say Jimmy Connor was keeping me awake at bed time was no lie!! I enjoyed the details of his tennis life and I learnt a few things too, I also agreed with his comments on the modern game which I no longer watch as I do not find it as exciting and entertaining as games of old. His honesty in his life showed in this book and it is an honesty I loved and appreciated. There were hiccups along the way but he appreciates what tennis gave him and how he worked to get there. I have much admiration and respect for him and this is a great read if you remember his tennis days.
...more
OK, this is by no means "literature," but that doesn't mean it wasn't entertaining. And, for tennis players (and fans) of a former era (particularly the 1970's and the 1980's), there are plenty of entertaining anecdotes, memories, and insights. I'm guessing that the editor/publisher strove mightily to let Connors maintain his voice throughout - it really does read/sound like you'd expect (for better or for worse). Unfortunately, it is what it is - a jock autobiography, with all of the pathologie
OK, this is by no means "literature," but that doesn't mean it wasn't entertaining. And, for tennis players (and fans) of a former era (particularly the 1970's and the 1980's), there are plenty of entertaining anecdotes, memories, and insights. I'm guessing that the editor/publisher strove mightily to let Connors maintain his voice throughout - it really does read/sound like you'd expect (for better or for worse). Unfortunately, it is what it is - a jock autobiography, with all of the pathologies one would expect (including more than a healthy dose of hubris). Connors was always entertaining - and he knew it - and he ran in an incredible circle (including his marriage to a Playmate of the Year and rubbing shoulders and cruising in the fast lane with celebrity and wealth). Connors makes no bones about who he liked, loved, disliked, and hated - and is brutally honest about how certain individuals fluctuated along that spectrum over the course of his life. True to his word, he appears to have pulled no punches, laying bare his mis-steps, infidelities, fears, and failures (including his gambling "problem," which, at times, is jaw-dropping). [Baseball fans will guffaw when they read about Connors' gambling exploits in light of Baseball's black-balling of Pete Rose for gambling - what a different world!?!?!?!?] As a huge Connors fan, I am really glad I read it, but this book isn't for everyone.
...more
Jimmy is just a couple of years older than me and as I teenager I loved watching tennis (not playing--I tried one time while I was visiting my cousin at a small college in southern Utah and my serve went into the next court and hit some guy on his behind--embarrassing to say the least). I was an Arthur Ashe fan...and then Bjorn Borg hit the courts! But I digress...
As a teen, I was not a Connors fan. His game was good, but I thought his shenanigans on the court were generally disgusting and total
Jimmy is just a couple of years older than me and as I teenager I loved watching tennis (not playing--I tried one time while I was visiting my cousin at a small college in southern Utah and my serve went into the next court and hit some guy on his behind--embarrassing to say the least). I was an Arthur Ashe fan...and then Bjorn Borg hit the courts! But I digress...
As a teen, I was not a Connors fan. His game was good, but I thought his shenanigans on the court were generally disgusting and totally uncalled for. If he was playing, I was rooting for his opponent. So I got this book in hopes of reading something about him that might change my feelings/attitude about him. He says throughout the book that he is being completely honest about his life and I think he was--which was too bad because my feelings about him, as a person and a tennis player, didn't change. He's a jerk and proud of it. Throughout the book it is obviously that he cares for no one but himself and that keeping his name in lights is first and foremost in his life goals.
That said, I thought he was a decent author (if he really wrote the book himself) and he laid out his life well. There wasn't a lot of jumping around or repeating himself in order to keep the story line going. There were slow parts with way too much detail and that made it hard to keep my interest. It took my 3 weeks to read the book.
This was a gift....although I'm a Connors fan, I'm not sure I would have sought it out. That said, I enjoyed the book. It starts off with a bang, but then slows down significantly; it took me awhile to really get into it. It appears to be written from an extremely honest perspective. You could definitely classify this as a "tell-all", and there are some people, primarily other tennis players, who will not like what Jimmy says. The editing falls off a bit in the final quarter of the book. The sto
This was a gift....although I'm a Connors fan, I'm not sure I would have sought it out. That said, I enjoyed the book. It starts off with a bang, but then slows down significantly; it took me awhile to really get into it. It appears to be written from an extremely honest perspective. You could definitely classify this as a "tell-all", and there are some people, primarily other tennis players, who will not like what Jimmy says. The editing falls off a bit in the final quarter of the book. The stories of the "bad boys of tennis" and their antics are interesting, humorous, and at times a bit shocking (coming from someone who knew nothing about it). He could possibly have benefitted from a ghost writer, but definitely no moreso than Tina Fey and/or Sheryl Soderberg. Final point: if you are not a tennis fan, do NOT read this, as there is a voluminous amount of time devoted to recounting specific matches, specific points in specific matches, the evolution of the different organizations and governing bodies of tennis, the Champions Tour...you get my drift.
...more
Jimmy Connors is a jackass and an asshole and he knows it. He even revels in it to a certain extent. And most importantly, to him anyway, he is not sorry for being am asshole, for competing hard. That's the theme of this book, perhaps even the theme of Connors' life. It's not, however, enough theme to sustain the entirety of the volume.
I found this unsatisfying as a book and as a sports bio. As a book, Connors' ghost writer should have been better. Adverbs abound abundantly and with redundantne
Jimmy Connors is a jackass and an asshole and he knows it. He even revels in it to a certain extent. And most importantly, to him anyway, he is not sorry for being am asshole, for competing hard. That's the theme of this book, perhaps even the theme of Connors' life. It's not, however, enough theme to sustain the entirety of the volume.
I found this unsatisfying as a book and as a sports bio. As a book, Connors' ghost writer should have been better. Adverbs abound abundantly and with redundantness. The book has the loose structure of historical biography, but will gleefully jump across time if it (dubiously) serves the story. Sometimes, the book contradicts itself: one chapter ends with "I never played in a Grand Slam final again", yet two pages later, he mentions an additional (ultimately ultimate?) Grand Slam final.
As a sports biography, I expect insight into the game. I certainly expect more insight than "play hard". The early chapters, where his mother and grandmother teach him the game are interesting enough. And while the lessons he learns are important ("Play hard" "Come to win" "On the court, play tennis [no distractions]") are deeply important to Connors, they are, at heart, not much more than cliches.
The infamous Connors bad attitude boils down to his desire to compete hard. He didn't see any point in being nice to someone who had what he wanted (coming up) or wanted what he had (on the way back down). There's some discussion of this coming from his mother and grandmother, and maybe having a bit of a chip on his shoulder growing up lower middle class in East St. Louis. But what comes across most clearly is that Jimmy Connors is an asshole because he's always been an asshole. If you're his friend, fine (Ilie Nastase) but if you're not, don't expect favors, or courtesy for that matter.
The last two things I want to mention are the issues of revelations and score settling. The two biggest reveals of the book are handled oddly. The one, about his relationship with Chris Evert, is unnecessary. And handled with an odd sense of kid gloves, a certain linguistic obliqueness. I wondered why it was included at all. The other revelation, about an extramarital affair, is related with an odd combination of Victorian prudery (he never mentions her name) and disconnectedness (he claims to not understand why he engaged in the affair). The former revelation shouldn't be there and the latter revelation should have been more, well, revealing.
As to settling scores: we know that Connors didn't get along with Arthur Ashe or John MacEnroe. He has some choice words for Andre Agassi and he even disputes his good friend Ilie Nastase's account of an argument they once had. Thankfully, settling accounts is not a major part of the book. I'm left, though, wondering more about what Connors thought of these, his competitors and his colleagues. There's a surprising lack of depth here, which actually resounds throughout the book. Jimmy Connors isn't particularly regretful and doesn't spend a lot of time thinking about... much of anything, really.
...more