This story is told in the words of a tragic figure in American history - a hook-nosed, hollow-cheeked old Sauk warrior who lived under four flags while the Mississippi Valley was being wrested from his people.
The author is Black Hawk himself - once pursued by an army whose members included Captain Abraham Lincoln and Lieutenant Jefferson Davis. Perhaps no Indian ever saw s
This story is told in the words of a tragic figure in American history - a hook-nosed, hollow-cheeked old Sauk warrior who lived under four flags while the Mississippi Valley was being wrested from his people.
The author is Black Hawk himself - once pursued by an army whose members included Captain Abraham Lincoln and Lieutenant Jefferson Davis. Perhaps no Indian ever saw so much of American expansion or fought harder to prevent that expansion from driving his people to exile and death.
He knew Zebulon Pike, William Clark, Henry Schoolcraft, George Catlin, Winfield Scott, and such figures in American government as President Andrew Jackson and Secretary of State Lewis Cass. He knew Chicago when it was a cluster of log houses around a fort, and he was in St. Louis the day the American flag went up and the French flag came down.
He saw crowds gather to cheer him in Philadelphia, Baltimore, and New York - and to stone the driver of his carriage in Albany - during a fantastic tour sponsored by the government.
And at last he dies in 1838, bitter in the knowledge that he had led men, women, and children of his tribe to slaughter on the banks of the Mississippi.
After his capture at the end of the Black Hawk War, he was imprisoned for a time and then released to live in the territory that is now Iowa. He dictated his autobiography to a government interpreter, Antoine LeClaire, and the story was put into written form by J. B. Patterson, a young Illinois newspaperman. Since its first appearance in 1833, the autobiography has become known as an American classic.
...more
Paperback
,
192 pages
Published
March 1st 1975
by University of Illinois Press
(first published 1833)
I did like this, although parts were confusing. If I had read a book with a map, parts could have been easier to understand. I listened to the audiobook narrated by Brett Barry. In addition, the terms used for different people were confusing. The war strategies were confusing. Some of the language was also confusing. I believe if you read the book it would be easier to figure out the terms and locations.
The different tribes fight each other, the English and the Americans were fighting and the tr
I did like this, although parts were confusing. If I had read a book with a map, parts could have been easier to understand. I listened to the audiobook narrated by Brett Barry. In addition, the terms used for different people were confusing. The war strategies were confusing. Some of the language was also confusing. I believe if you read the book it would be easier to figure out the terms and locations.
The different tribes fight each other, the English and the Americans were fighting and the tribes supported different sides alternately. Black Hawk disputed the agreement that said all Native Americans were to stay west of the Mississippi. His village was on the eastern side and they had never received remunerations. The British had promised one thing, the Americans another and communication was poor. Sometimes I could not agree with how the Native Americans thought, such as their n need for revenge, how bravery should be defined or how human lives should be forfeited for honor, but their beliefs are well portrayed. I could understand why hostilities arose. I also understood how the settlers’ behavior must be seen as dishonest and wrong. Black Hawk was a leader that wanted peace with reasonable conditions for both sides.
What I liked most was the description of the Sauk village life. I also enjoyed Black Hawk’s descriptions of Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York and other new colonial cities, of railroads and steamships. The time period is the end of the 1700s.
...more
This was a free audibook download from audible.com's "Christmas in July" sale for members. I guess I got what I paid for it. The reading (by Brett Bailey, I believe) was lovely, but the content itself was--although at times beautifully poetic and spiritual--mostly just frustrating. Time and time again, Black Hawk and his people show themselves to be gullible and complacent when it comes to the "promises" and treaties made by the Americans. I just want to shake him and tell him that twice is a co
This was a free audibook download from audible.com's "Christmas in July" sale for members. I guess I got what I paid for it. The reading (by Brett Bailey, I believe) was lovely, but the content itself was--although at times beautifully poetic and spiritual--mostly just frustrating. Time and time again, Black Hawk and his people show themselves to be gullible and complacent when it comes to the "promises" and treaties made by the Americans. I just want to shake him and tell him that twice is a coincidence, but three times is a pattern! Enough with the forgiveness bullshit! For the love of god, don't sign anything with the damn goose quill! Episode after episode, instance after instance, the Native Americans kowtow to the white men's (false) promises. Black Hawk is always apologizing and demurring ("I said that which I did not intend") rather than doing what is best for himself and his people. Alas and alack, it's too late now.
...more
On the one hand, a fantastic document; Black Hawk's autobiography (in reality, more an extended interview) from the stories of his grandfather who met the first French colonists in Canada, to his decision to make a stand against the United States after having one too many deals disregarded and his people gunned down under parliamentary flag, to his defeat. As a first-hand account, it's invaluable, and paints a much-needed counternarrative to the traditional view - which, yeah, has become much mo
On the one hand, a fantastic document; Black Hawk's autobiography (in reality, more an extended interview) from the stories of his grandfather who met the first French colonists in Canada, to his decision to make a stand against the United States after having one too many deals disregarded and his people gunned down under parliamentary flag, to his defeat. As a first-hand account, it's invaluable, and paints a much-needed counternarrative to the traditional view - which, yeah, has become much more commonplace over the last 50 years or so, but this was written and published THEN, making it even clearer that the contemporary view of Native Americans as "savages" was little more than wishful thinking; all the evidence to the contrary was easily available if they wanted it. Black Hawk's analysis of the colonial attitude is, occasionally, still frighteningly applicable.
Bad and cruel as our people were treated by the whites, not one of them was hurt or molested by our band. (...) The whites [who were settling on his land] were complaining at the same time that we were intruding upon their rights. They made it appear that they were the injured party, and we the intruders. They called loudly to the great war chief to protect their property.
How smooth must be the language of the whites, when they can make right look like wrong, and wrong like right.
On the other hand, Black Hawk lost more than just land, people, and a war. While his translator and biographer no doubt were sympathetic to him and did their job as fairly as was possible, there's still the feeling that not only do they still play up stereotypes (positive ones rather than negative, but still) and as one commenter has said, use the noble defeated warrior to make white people feel good about themselves. But above all they rob him of his language. After he's filtered through two well-meaning 19th century gentlemen writing for their audience, he comes out speaking like a Dickens character. Couple this with the decision to present his story as one long monologue, unedited and without contextualisation, and this rare authentic story looks curiously inauthentic and inaccessible to a modern reader. I find myself wanting to go back in time and hand the translator a tape recorder, so it'll be possible for someone in a future where people actually want to read Black Hawk's own words to retranslate the book.
The Gutenberg edition helps this somewhat by not only containing Black Hawk's own story but also a number of appendices about the Black Hawk War. It also adds some unfortunate proofreading errors, though, such as the US ordering Black Hawk to "buy the hatchet", which,
um...
...more
Audible recently made a free audiobook version of this work available to its members. I love "free" and was interested in the character of Black Hawk, so I was pleased to listen to this brief 3-1/2 hour work. Black Hawk lived from the late 1790s to the mid 1830s. He wrote his autobiography about 1833 and included the relocation of his Sac and Fox tribes from an area near Montreal to an area near Rock Island on the Mississippi. The story narrates the tribe's encounters with the French, the Englis
Audible recently made a free audiobook version of this work available to its members. I love "free" and was interested in the character of Black Hawk, so I was pleased to listen to this brief 3-1/2 hour work. Black Hawk lived from the late 1790s to the mid 1830s. He wrote his autobiography about 1833 and included the relocation of his Sac and Fox tribes from an area near Montreal to an area near Rock Island on the Mississippi. The story narrates the tribe's encounters with the French, the English, the Spanish, and, finally, the Americans. In 1804, the Americans swindled the tribe out of its lands east of the Mississippi. The treaty of 1804 was later used to forcibly relocate the tribe west of the river. Many of the tribe were killed when Black Hawk defended his lands. Ironically, Black Hawk was then treated to a grand tour that included visits to Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Albany. On this tour he was treated like a great celebrity, although he and his tribe had been treated with extreme cruelty and indifference in his home territory by the agents of the U.S. government and the settlers.
Much of the abuse of the Indians by the U.S. is not news to us, but to hear the details of the abuse in the words of an Indian of that time period is quite moving. Also interesting is Black Hawk's description of the Mississippi and the Wisconsin Rivers in the early 1800s, the various tribes who inhabited the area, and the nobility of the lifestyle of the American Indian.
...more
This short book—the full title of which is
Autobiography of Ma-Ka-Tai-Me-She-Kia-Kiak, or Black Hawk, Embracing the Traditions of his Nation, Various Wars In Which He Has Been Engaged, and His Account of the Cause and General History of the Black Hawk War of 1832, His Surrender, and Travels Through the United States. Also Life, Death and Burial of the Old Chief, Together with a History of the Black Hawk War
—was the first autobiography of an American Indian leader published in the United States a
This short book—the full title of which is
Autobiography of Ma-Ka-Tai-Me-She-Kia-Kiak, or Black Hawk, Embracing the Traditions of his Nation, Various Wars In Which He Has Been Engaged, and His Account of the Cause and General History of the Black Hawk War of 1832, His Surrender, and Travels Through the United States. Also Life, Death and Burial of the Old Chief, Together with a History of the Black Hawk War
—was the first autobiography of an American Indian leader published in the United States and therefore something of a phenomenon when it appeared in 1833.
Black Hawk was born in 1767 on the Rock River in Illinois, as a member of the Sauk (Sac) tribe, which at that time populated lands east of the Mississippi River, in Illinois and Wisconsin. His reminiscences were edited by a local newspaper reporter, J. B. Patterson, and recount Black Hawk’s experiences with the French, the British, the American settlers, and other tribes.
What turned him against the Americans was an 1804 treaty, which an unauthorized group of Sauks signed, that unilaterally gave away their lands, providing American settlers the legal right (as if such niceties mattered) to appropriate them, and forcing the Indians to resettle to the west.
I found by that treaty, that all of the country east of the Mississippi, and south of Jeffreon [the Salt River in northern Missouri, a tributary of the Mississippi] was ceded to the United States for one thousand dollars a year. I will leave it to the people of the United States to say whether our nation was properly represented in this treaty? Or whether we received a fair compensation for the extent of country ceded by these four individuals?
Because of this opposition, Black Hawk fought with the British during the War of 1812. Twenty years later, when he was 65 years old and after a trail of broken promises, he led a band of Sauk warriors against settlers in Illinois and Wisconsin in the 1832 Black Hawk War.
Eventually, he was captured and gave up the warrior life. He traveled extensively in the United States on a government-sponsored tour, marveling at the size of the major cities, the railroads, the roads. In his attempts to negotiate with military leaders, provincial governors, and even the Great Father in Washington, he interacted personally with many of the leading politicians and military men of the day. President Andrew Jackson (a major character in Steve Inskeep’s recent book about another betrayal of the Indians,
Jacksonland
) desired that Black Hawk and other chiefs see these sights, in order to convince them of the might of the United States.
Black Hawk provides his point of view quite clearly and compellingly. To no avail, of course. According to the University of Illinois Press, “Perhaps no Indian ever saw so much of American expansion or fought harder to prevent that expansion from driving his people to exile and death.” His prowess as a warrior chief is now honored by the U.S. military, which has named several ships after him, as well as the Black Hawk helicopter.
...more
The modern reader has much to learn from The Life of Black Hawk. Historically, it represents an invaluable time capsule; the psychology of the Native American, an authentic chief no less, is, if not a more all-encompassing portrait of devastating war than The Diary of Anne Frank at least its equal--in its inherent sincerity and pathos. Never forgetting that the autobiography is actually a life story thrice filtered (from the Sac chief’s remembering tongue directly to the interpreter, then edited
The modern reader has much to learn from The Life of Black Hawk. Historically, it represents an invaluable time capsule; the psychology of the Native American, an authentic chief no less, is, if not a more all-encompassing portrait of devastating war than The Diary of Anne Frank at least its equal--in its inherent sincerity and pathos. Never forgetting that the autobiography is actually a life story thrice filtered (from the Sac chief’s remembering tongue directly to the interpreter, then edited by yet a third man) it does contain a straightforward voice which vacillates easily between regret and grief, with a tone that is undeniably oppressed. The Sac chief’s main intention is “to vindicate [his] character from misinterpretation” (xxiii) but he does more than this: he gives us a grave full of atrocities committed by self-righteous, indolent whites. That, on top of musings, and questions open to discussion, and confessions all accomplish what only the best of autobiographies can: to teach, usually to warn against bad decisions that ruin lives, by transporting the reader directly to the writer’s specific place and time--and access to the pervading emotion of that pin-point.
By posing questions such as
“All our country… was ceded to the united States for one thousand dollars a year! I will leave it to the people of the United States to say, whether our nation was properly represented in this treaty? Or whether we received a fair compensation for the extent of country ceded by those four individuals?” (10)
to the general audience, Black Hawk immediately makes us question too our very claim to land. The entire continent was eradicated of its people--and many injustices have been committed then and since. Giving us the particular decisions for his specific actions, explaining over and over why he desisted from moving his tribe out of danger or from going to war much earlier (“There was no reconverted plan to attack the whites at that time--but I am of the opinion now, had our party got into the fort, all the whites would have been killed” [11]). The messiness that characterizes books like “The Prairie” is felt here too, as alliances change at random, as enemies are made all too frequently between the people at the frontier.
Finally, a disclosure on his tribe’s customs and deviations from Old World conventions are the nuggets of knowledge which contribute to its intrinsic patina of sadness. Allegiances to the Kickapoos, Ottawas, Pottowatomies and Winnebagoes gives proof of camaraderie, which the Americans and British often lacked. (Of the races, which is most human? the reader is inspired to wonder.) “The whites may do bad all their lives,” Black Hawk writes, “and then, if they were sorry for it when about to die, all is well!” (32) The knocking of religion, and of other institutions such as marriage (as the memorable crane dance [34-5] goes on to describe unions formed out of love, and not of duty) contrasts considerably with the absurd endorsement to General Scott for the presidency (77) and then his suggestion of clearing the country of “black skins.” (78) Black Hawk is prejudiced, himself. There is, alas, no hero in a man whose hand “had ever been raised against any but warriors”, though still remains intolerant of others. But one feels certain that this was more the doing of the two (white) men who adapted the true tale, than that of Black Hawk himself.
It’s not many people that get a war – even a small one – named after them. The Black Hawk War of 1832 was small, but it made a mark. Already in his declining years, Black Hawk, a war chief of the Sacs, led a band of 500 braves and a similar number of women and children up the Rock River of Illinois and Wisconsin to reclaim territory that had been taken from them by a disputed treaty. Over six thousand American militiamen (including Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis), as well as native allies,
It’s not many people that get a war – even a small one – named after them. The Black Hawk War of 1832 was small, but it made a mark. Already in his declining years, Black Hawk, a war chief of the Sacs, led a band of 500 braves and a similar number of women and children up the Rock River of Illinois and Wisconsin to reclaim territory that had been taken from them by a disputed treaty. Over six thousand American militiamen (including Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis), as well as native allies, pursued them.
When it was over, half of Black Hawk’s followers were dead. Black Hawk himself surrendered and was taken eastward to meet President Jackson. He was paraded through Washington D.C., Philadelphia and New York City and was everywhere greeted by spellbound throngs. Some of these were sympathetic to his cause, offering him gifts and encouragement, others just wanted to see a real live Indian warrior, while such a thing still existed.
The next year, back among his tribe where they had relocated on the west side of the Mississippi, Black Hawk dictated his life story, and the story of a war he felt he had been cornered into fighting. Laying out his case, Black Hawk is careful most of the time to report only things he witnessed with his own eyes. It’s heart-breaking stuff, some of it really shameful. The insights that Black Hawk provides into Native American ethics and philosophy, and his take on Anglo-American culture, are fascinating.
...more
I'd say it's tough to rate this book. How do you rate it? It's the story of the life of Black Hawk, the Sauk warrior who led an insurrection in the American Midwest in the early 19th century.
Now then. Let's see. Essentially, Black Hawk was the driving force behind the Black Hawk War of 1832, during which he led a band of warriors and, I suppose it's safe to say, tribespeople in a series of skirmishes with the United States government that got pretty nasty on both sides. Eventually he was capture
I'd say it's tough to rate this book. How do you rate it? It's the story of the life of Black Hawk, the Sauk warrior who led an insurrection in the American Midwest in the early 19th century.
Now then. Let's see. Essentially, Black Hawk was the driving force behind the Black Hawk War of 1832, during which he led a band of warriors and, I suppose it's safe to say, tribespeople in a series of skirmishes with the United States government that got pretty nasty on both sides. Eventually he was captured and imprisoned, but became a minor celebrity after a tour of the eastern USA shortly thereafter.
The book is his account of his life as dictated to a government translator of the day. So there's always a sense in which we're beholden unto the the translator for accuracy, both in terms of Black Hawk's words and his sentiment, or intention.
Generally, the book does feel accurate, mind you, with our narrator not pulling any punches when he discusses being swindled out of land by the Federal Government's underhandedness. And the handy thing is the plentiful annotation throughout, cross-referencing the text with historical document and archive accounts of events mentioned in Black Hawk's narration.
Fascinating? Well, not particularly. As a cover-to-cover read, it's not particularly riveting. Not a lot of tension or literary device used, bar exclamation marks at Black Hawk's frequent outrage!
Where it works well, though is as a supporting text to a course about American history, which is actually how I've come to have the book. It's 'good', but not as a read you simply 'must have'.
...more
amazon review:
One of the most respected personages in Native American history, BLACK HAWK (1767-1838), Sauk war chief of the Native American tribe in Illinois, was already a renowned name in the early 1800s, having fought for the British during the War of 1812. By 1832, when Black Hawk led warriors against encroaching European settlers on Sauk lands, he was so well-known that the engagement became known as the Black Hawk War. In his 1833 autobiography, Black Hawk-dictating to American newspaper
amazon review:
One of the most respected personages in Native American history, BLACK HAWK (1767-1838), Sauk war chief of the Native American tribe in Illinois, was already a renowned name in the early 1800s, having fought for the British during the War of 1812. By 1832, when Black Hawk led warriors against encroaching European settlers on Sauk lands, he was so well-known that the engagement became known as the Black Hawk War. In his 1833 autobiography, Black Hawk-dictating to American newspaper editor JOHN BARTON PATTERSON (1805-1890)-tells his tale, from the "Indian wars" as he saw them to his capture, in 1832, by American forces and his subsequent meeting with President Andrew Jackson and grand tour of the United States. A provocative look at Black Hawk's wisdom and, ironically, his misunderstanding of the politics of the United States, this is a fascinating firsthand account of one of the foundational philosophical battles of American history.
...more
This book was originally published in 1833 (dictated by Chief Black Hawk to his translator, Antoine Leclair) and was an immediate best seller. A no holds barred and unflinching narrative of the great Sauk leader, 'The Autobiography of Black Hawk' stands as one of the very first accounts of the conflict between American indians and white settlers. Historically, this is an important work because it stands as one of the first native narratives of the war of attrition fought against American indians
This book was originally published in 1833 (dictated by Chief Black Hawk to his translator, Antoine Leclair) and was an immediate best seller. A no holds barred and unflinching narrative of the great Sauk leader, 'The Autobiography of Black Hawk' stands as one of the very first accounts of the conflict between American indians and white settlers. Historically, this is an important work because it stands as one of the first native narratives of the war of attrition fought against American indians. It is a moving, but also a very important piece of our National story.
Black Hawk, in this autobiography, emerges as a multifaceted, strong, and even sometimes inconsistent leader, whose introspective honesty gives us a depth to both his own life story the story of of the Sauks, during the Black Hawk War.
Oh Oh Oh....this book made my heart weep. The Indians received such a raw deal. This was truly tragic. Black Hawk fell for every promise that was given. Each one echoed just as hollow as the previous one. And for every honorable white man that they found, there were 10 more that weren't. One of my favorite quotes goes something like, "When someone shows you who they really are, believe them the first time." I mean for crying out loud, I was inwardly screaming, "Learn and adapt." That quote would
Oh Oh Oh....this book made my heart weep. The Indians received such a raw deal. This was truly tragic. Black Hawk fell for every promise that was given. Each one echoed just as hollow as the previous one. And for every honorable white man that they found, there were 10 more that weren't. One of my favorite quotes goes something like, "When someone shows you who they really are, believe them the first time." I mean for crying out loud, I was inwardly screaming, "Learn and adapt." That quote would have been a good one for the Indians to have had tacked on their fridge.
Black Hawk dictated his autobiography through amanuensis Antoine LeClair which was originally published in 1833. He was a Sauk leader and in his own words describes the conflict in 1832 as Americans came into the land east of the Mississippi and took the land away from his people. Black Hawk gives a good description of the Native American Culture as well as the trouble trying to do business with the US government. Of course the citizens weren't admirable in their behavior either.. It was interes
Black Hawk dictated his autobiography through amanuensis Antoine LeClair which was originally published in 1833. He was a Sauk leader and in his own words describes the conflict in 1832 as Americans came into the land east of the Mississippi and took the land away from his people. Black Hawk gives a good description of the Native American Culture as well as the trouble trying to do business with the US government. Of course the citizens weren't admirable in their behavior either.. It was interesting to learn about this area of Illinois and Wisconsin. Also to see the American culture as viewed through Black Hawk. Especially interesting was his solutions for the black problem.
...more
Interesting historical perspective, and I did enjoy that aspect of it. But it's pretty dry reading. Also, this was clearly translated as it was written 100+ years ago, since the writing style and language bears no similarity to anything other than English spoken in those days. I suspect this was standard fare for that time and place, so I don't want to be too critical. It's just that the use of a language imparts the real story, and translating the words into "high English" means the heart and s
Interesting historical perspective, and I did enjoy that aspect of it. But it's pretty dry reading. Also, this was clearly translated as it was written 100+ years ago, since the writing style and language bears no similarity to anything other than English spoken in those days. I suspect this was standard fare for that time and place, so I don't want to be too critical. It's just that the use of a language imparts the real story, and translating the words into "high English" means the heart and soul of what might have been the story of Black Hawk is lost. Still, history weanies like me still enjoy it a bit.
...more
I've never read a book like this. It's fascinating for its first-hand historical content. It's really interesting to hear Chief Black Hawk describe his tribe's culture and that of the Portuguese, British, and Americans. It's a quick smooth read because of how concise his word choice is, and yet there's a minimalist poetry to it, kind of like haiku.
“I explained to them the manner the British and Americans fought. Instead of stealing upon each other, and taking every advantage to kill the enemy and save their own people, as we do, (which, with us, is considered good policy in a war chief,) they marched out, in open daylight, and fight, regardless of the number of warriors they may lose! After the battle is over, they retire to feast, and drink wine, as if nothing had happened; after which, they make a statement in writing, of what they have
“I explained to them the manner the British and Americans fought. Instead of stealing upon each other, and taking every advantage to kill the enemy and save their own people, as we do, (which, with us, is considered good policy in a war chief,) they marched out, in open daylight, and fight, regardless of the number of warriors they may lose! After the battle is over, they retire to feast, and drink wine, as if nothing had happened; after which, they make a statement in writing, of what they have done – each party claiming the victory! and neither giving an account of half the number that have been killed on their own side. They all fought like braves, but would not do to lead a war party with us. Our maxim is, “to kill the enemy and save our own men.” Those chiefs would do to paddle a canoe, but not to steer it.” (page 20)
Firsthand account from Black Hawk. Originally published in 1834.
Shines a light on many weaknesses of that time that still exist today:
Inability to see how actions affect others.
Projecting problems unto others in an unbalanced way.
Making oneself out to be the victim.
Unworthy entitlement to land ownership.
...more
Black Hawk was a leader of the Sauk tribe (around Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin) and lead his people with the British against the American's in the War of 1812, and fought the Americans again in 1832 when white settlers took his tribe's lands (Called the Black Hawk Wars).
It was fascinating to read about these confrontations from the Native American point of view. The descriptions of war (scalping), honor against enemies, ceremonies and family life during peace were all very interesting.
His biog
Black Hawk was a leader of the Sauk tribe (around Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin) and lead his people with the British against the American's in the War of 1812, and fought the Americans again in 1832 when white settlers took his tribe's lands (Called the Black Hawk Wars).
It was fascinating to read about these confrontations from the Native American point of view. The descriptions of war (scalping), honor against enemies, ceremonies and family life during peace were all very interesting.
His biography was told to and translated by Antoine LeClair (who was half French/half Pottawatomie and married to a woman who was half French Canadian/half Sauk). In the back of my mind, I wondered how much was Black Hawk and how much was LeClair?
Black Hawk has been honored for his bravery and wisdom by having many things named after him - helicopters, hockey team, mining town in Colorado. In an interesting note, I read
The Art of War
right after this, and when
Sun Tzu
describes the perfect general, he describes Black Hawk.
...more
Having grown up in an area with a high population of Native Americans (Sioux) - mere hours from where much of this story took place, It was refreshing to hear a deeper perspective from one of the chiefs. I wish more of them had had their story written down. I think much has been lost in the ensuing years.
In this book, Black Hawk tells the story of the promises made by the great war chiefs of the whites (Generals, president, etc.), and the wrongs done to them by others. Sadly, promises were not k
Having grown up in an area with a high population of Native Americans (Sioux) - mere hours from where much of this story took place, It was refreshing to hear a deeper perspective from one of the chiefs. I wish more of them had had their story written down. I think much has been lost in the ensuing years.
In this book, Black Hawk tells the story of the promises made by the great war chiefs of the whites (Generals, president, etc.), and the wrongs done to them by others. Sadly, promises were not kept. The Sauk were push off of their land when their crops were almost ready for harvest. They were told they had to leave lands they had occupied, farmed, hunted, and lived on for many generations.
The tribes had, at this time, no reason to believe the white man would not keep his word. They not only lived and died by 'their word', but generation after generation after kept that word.
To this day, many of the tribes still cry foul at the way they were treated. Are they right? Hell yes! However - they are a 'conquered nation'. The rest of the world has all gone through this in their past, but for us in the US, this is still 'recent history'. They were wronged 100+ years ago, but it is time to move on.
There is much EVERYONE can learn from this story.
...more
The autobiography, the authenticity of which is called into question, is an accounting of important battles that happen in and around the Illinois and Iowa border. The novel presents the case both for and against validity of the source of the story. The footnotes are long, at times, but should be required reading; they add a depth and breadth to the story.
Almost every town and county around the Quad Cities are named for the people in the story: Whiteside, LeClaire, Colonel Davenport. A list tha
The autobiography, the authenticity of which is called into question, is an accounting of important battles that happen in and around the Illinois and Iowa border. The novel presents the case both for and against validity of the source of the story. The footnotes are long, at times, but should be required reading; they add a depth and breadth to the story.
Almost every town and county around the Quad Cities are named for the people in the story: Whiteside, LeClaire, Colonel Davenport. A list that is long and distinguished. The historical sidelights provide some of the most interesting information. Personalities are ascribed to famous local historical figures. I was surprised to learn that future President Zachary Taylor was a big part of the war. Also, Abraham Lincoln was a foot soldier, in a minor way.
The story begins with Black Hawk's trip, as a prisoner, to visit Andrew Jackson in Washington. Battles and skirmishes detailed in the text, there are a surprisingly high number, are covered in slight detail. Images create a good overall collage of the engagements that make the Black Hawk War.
"What I think" is a somewhat ridiculous question when faced with a text like this, since the historical implications are far more important than style or opinion. Americans are too little educated about the brutality of the ongoing Indian wars during colonization.
...it is important, here, to read the introduction provided in the Penguin edition, which does an excellent job of situating some of the difficulties of the text itself (questions of authorship/translation, and the purpose of the text,
"What I think" is a somewhat ridiculous question when faced with a text like this, since the historical implications are far more important than style or opinion. Americans are too little educated about the brutality of the ongoing Indian wars during colonization.
...it is important, here, to read the introduction provided in the Penguin edition, which does an excellent job of situating some of the difficulties of the text itself (questions of authorship/translation, and the purpose of the text, or of Black Hawk himself). I think the complicated subjectivity of Black Hawk——his seemingly open humility about his limitations, his seeming ignorance of his own need to establish authority, and his at times appalling lack of awareness of his own contradictory views and projections——make this as interesting a text for insight into human "psychology" (across cultures and as affected/determined by culture), as it is an important entry into the historical record.
...more
If in fact the story is true it is an excellent account of his tribe s life and his life. The encroachment of the white (pale faced) people and the treatment given to the Indians by the newcomers. I truly believe that the newcomers to America were the antagonizers. Who would push people off their land with no compensation? Us. I believe him when he says that they always treated people the way they expected to be treated. If the American Indians did attack the settlers it was because the deserved
If in fact the story is true it is an excellent account of his tribe s life and his life. The encroachment of the white (pale faced) people and the treatment given to the Indians by the newcomers. I truly believe that the newcomers to America were the antagonizers. Who would push people off their land with no compensation? Us. I believe him when he says that they always treated people the way they expected to be treated. If the American Indians did attack the settlers it was because the deserved it for one reason or another. Stealing crops, invading their lands etc.
...more
Good book, a bit flat at first, especially in the dry narrative it presents, but the subject matter is fascinating, and the more we learn about his life, the more you get involved in the story. I was very touched by the events narrated in the book and how the character saw and dealt with the ever-changing circumstances in his life.
There are some interesting historical events portrayed. The authenticity of the story may be impaired due to normal language barriers and other bias given the circumstances of the time.
Interesting autobiography of Black Hawk, a Sauk Indian warrior born on Rock Island, Illinois, in 1767. He became a great warchief among his people. Allied to the British (who he said usually kept their word - the Americans usually didn't), he faught the American settlers during the war of 1812 and later faught them again in the late 1820s/early 1830s as the westward moving Americans began to strip the Sauks of their traditional tribal lands (along the Mississippi and Wisconsin rivers). The book
Interesting autobiography of Black Hawk, a Sauk Indian warrior born on Rock Island, Illinois, in 1767. He became a great warchief among his people. Allied to the British (who he said usually kept their word - the Americans usually didn't), he faught the American settlers during the war of 1812 and later faught them again in the late 1820s/early 1830s as the westward moving Americans began to strip the Sauks of their traditional tribal lands (along the Mississippi and Wisconsin rivers). The book was an interesting look at early western American white/Indian relations in the first half of the 19th Century, told from the standpoint of a well-respected Indian who faced and had to deal with the western American migration.
...more
Although more readable than most first-person early 19th century accounts of the frontier, I was glad it was rather short, with Black Hawk's autobiography taking up less than half of the text.
I read the gutenberg project version. print versions may vary.
Without knowing much at all about the life of Black Hawk, this narrative pulled me straight in and made me see history through his eyes. Such is the point of autobiography, but it's rare to find one this powerful. Black Hawk's account is small by comparison, but he makes his words count.
Alternate perspectives, especially accounts written by those who were there, offer so much more to a student of history than what you can find in the average textbook. It reminds us that history is so much more t
Without knowing much at all about the life of Black Hawk, this narrative pulled me straight in and made me see history through his eyes. Such is the point of autobiography, but it's rare to find one this powerful. Black Hawk's account is small by comparison, but he makes his words count.
Alternate perspectives, especially accounts written by those who were there, offer so much more to a student of history than what you can find in the average textbook. It reminds us that history is so much more than names and dates. It's about human experiences, conflicts, and motivations. Black Hawk's experiences gave him wisdom, and he imparts that to us as a gift to the ages.
...more
History from a different and refreshing angle -- that of an old Sauk warrior who lived in the upper Mississippi Valley from 1767 - 1838. Black Hawk saw an incredible amount of American expansion (and the accompanying lies that went with it), and was involved in several wars. Interestingly, he was “once pursued by an army whose members included Captain Abraham Lincoln and Lieutenant Jefferson Davis.”
Black Hawk told his story to a government interpreter, and there’s not a strong storyline. I reall
History from a different and refreshing angle -- that of an old Sauk warrior who lived in the upper Mississippi Valley from 1767 - 1838. Black Hawk saw an incredible amount of American expansion (and the accompanying lies that went with it), and was involved in several wars. Interestingly, he was “once pursued by an army whose members included Captain Abraham Lincoln and Lieutenant Jefferson Davis.”
Black Hawk told his story to a government interpreter, and there’s not a strong storyline. I really liked hearing what the various tribes considered fair or honorable, as well as some of their battle tactics. Definitely interesting for history buffs.
...more
Book about Black Hawk, a Chief of the Sox Indians, and personal story of his life as a chief of the Sox and Fox Indians. It was in the early 1800’s and he explains about his part of the French and Indian and the British vs. the American in the war of 1812, He lives on the east side of the Mississippi River. And he was very trusting of white men, something that did not bode well for him or his people. In another book I just finished it stated that his body was taken around and showed off like a t
Book about Black Hawk, a Chief of the Sox Indians, and personal story of his life as a chief of the Sox and Fox Indians. It was in the early 1800’s and he explains about his part of the French and Indian and the British vs. the American in the war of 1812, He lives on the east side of the Mississippi River. And he was very trusting of white men, something that did not bode well for him or his people. In another book I just finished it stated that his body was taken around and showed off like a traveling freak show. If he had any idea how hateful the early Americans were I'm sure his words would not have been so kind and forgiving.
...more
Definitely not a book I would normally read but it was free on Audible and I thought it would be a good book to try listening to at 3x speed so I gave it a go.
There's some interesting bits here but I definitely felt like I needed prior historical context to truly understand the story.
The most interesting part for me was his brief comments on ethics, particularly in terms of religion and linguistics. I would love to have heard more about that and his thoughts on both his people and the European
Definitely not a book I would normally read but it was free on Audible and I thought it would be a good book to try listening to at 3x speed so I gave it a go.
There's some interesting bits here but I definitely felt like I needed prior historical context to truly understand the story.
The most interesting part for me was his brief comments on ethics, particularly in terms of religion and linguistics. I would love to have heard more about that and his thoughts on both his people and the European Americans rather than the factual timeline but that wasn't this kind of book.
...more
As the introduction suggests it is not easy to know where the real man's voice comes in and where the translator has taken poetic licence. A very short account but a worthwhile read. It is true that we are not lead to believe this a complete fabricated story. Ma-ka-tai-me-she-kia-kiak was a real man and the times he lived in where very real. There are many aspects of this book that do have truth ringing out. Give it a read.
“Bad and cruel as our people were treated by the whites, not one of them
was hurt or molested by our band. (...)
The whites were complaining at the same time that we were intruding upon
their rights. They made it appear that they were the injured party, and
we the intruders. They called loudly to the great war chief to protect
their property.
How smooth must be the language of the whites, when they can make right
look like wrong, and wrong like right.”
—
1 likes