A rigorously unfictionalized narrative that protrays Roth unadorned -- as young artist, as student , as son, as lover, as husband, as American, as Jew -- and candidly examines how close the novels have been to, and how far from, autobiography.
Hardcover
,
195 pages
Published
September 1st 1988
by Farrar, Straus and Giroux
(first published 1988)
Attraverso una lettera indirizzata a Nathan Zuckerman, il suo alter ego, ma anche il protagonista di alcuni suoi romanzi, Roth scrive la sua autobiografia. Una autobiografia diversa, atipica che si snoda su cinque punti, che sono la tematica portante della sua vita da romanziere, ma soprattutto la sua vita di uomo.
In un percorso che va dal rapporto con i genitori, un rapporto molto dolce, ma anche troppo protettivo che l'hanno tenuto in una campana di vetro, ai primi successi, all'università si
Attraverso una lettera indirizzata a Nathan Zuckerman, il suo alter ego, ma anche il protagonista di alcuni suoi romanzi, Roth scrive la sua autobiografia. Una autobiografia diversa, atipica che si snoda su cinque punti, che sono la tematica portante della sua vita da romanziere, ma soprattutto la sua vita di uomo.
In un percorso che va dal rapporto con i genitori, un rapporto molto dolce, ma anche troppo protettivo che l'hanno tenuto in una campana di vetro, ai primi successi, all'università sino all'establishment ebraica sino ai rapporti sentimentali, compreso quello con Josie, la cui morte è per lui fonte di sollievo, impariamo a conoscere il pensiero di Roth.
Se vi aspettate la solita autobiografia, mi spiace deludervi, questo non il romanzo che fa per voi.
Questa è l'autobiografia non convenzionale di uno scrittore, ma soprattutto di un uomo che ho imparato ad apprezzare e amare.
...more
Comprei este livro para levar para as férias que hoje acabaram. Li-o em 2 dias. É uma auto-biografia do Philip Roth, engenhosamente construída: começa com uma carta aberta do Autor dirigida a um dos seus principais personagens (o seu alter-ego Nathan Zuckerman), anunciando a remessa do manuscrito da sua auto-biografia e pedindo opinião quanto à bondade da sua publicação. Termina com a resposta de Zuckerman. Entre estes dois momentos, há uma biografia a cinco tempos. E funciona, porque Roth conse
Comprei este livro para levar para as férias que hoje acabaram. Li-o em 2 dias. É uma auto-biografia do Philip Roth, engenhosamente construída: começa com uma carta aberta do Autor dirigida a um dos seus principais personagens (o seu alter-ego Nathan Zuckerman), anunciando a remessa do manuscrito da sua auto-biografia e pedindo opinião quanto à bondade da sua publicação. Termina com a resposta de Zuckerman. Entre estes dois momentos, há uma biografia a cinco tempos. E funciona, porque Roth consegue dar uma versão dos factos que o seu personagem depois desconstrói: faz de deus e diabo, juiz e réu, polícia e ladrão. Admirou-me o tom terno e geralmente conciliador do texto, o que não é de todo identificável com o Autor, pouco dado a caminhar em terrenos de consenso. É um livro com partes comoventes, de um homem que parece querer fazer as pazes com as suas raízes, depois do ajuste de contas com o passado que é, em grande parte, a sua obra. Este livro não ajuda a esclarecer se Portnoy é Roth: mas ajuda a perceber melhor o Autor, não necessariamente pelo que conta, mas pelo que deixa por contar e, nesse sentido, Zuckerman (Roth) tem muita razão no que afirma no final: se tudo foi assim como conta, aonde foi o homem buscar a bílis e o humor que escorre dos seus livros? Não sei dizer e o Roth, pelos vistos, também não. Mas recomendo vivamente a leitura deste livro de um Autor que é cada vez mais um dos meus favoritos.
...more
An autobiographical writer's only straight autobiography, written when he was 55. And there is very little here: about five scenes, as it were, each of different periods in his life ("Safe at Home" (boyhood obsession with baseball in Weequahic), college at Bucknell, "Girl of My Dreams" (Chicago years, the woman who became his first wife), "All in the Family" (Defending himself against Jewish community attacks on his writing at Yeshiva University),
and "Now Vee May Perhaps to Begin" (His divorce
An autobiographical writer's only straight autobiography, written when he was 55. And there is very little here: about five scenes, as it were, each of different periods in his life ("Safe at Home" (boyhood obsession with baseball in Weequahic), college at Bucknell, "Girl of My Dreams" (Chicago years, the woman who became his first wife), "All in the Family" (Defending himself against Jewish community attacks on his writing at Yeshiva University),
and "Now Vee May Perhaps to Begin" (His divorce and death of his first wife). About thirty pages of commentary by Nathan Zuckerman--whose voice, incidentally, is distinguishable from Roth's only in that he commits more solecisms--comes at the end of this brief book.
Most of Zuckerman's criticisms are pretty accurate, which allows Roth to have this both ways, to commit evasions in one place, to admit to some pretty dark and horrible things in later sections, and to leave massive gaps between the chapters, while, by acknowledging them, wash his hands of these flaws. Roth shows us little, but that little is generally interesting, if occasionally utterly disgraceful. Some of the events that he casually alludes to, such as traveling through Europe, winning prizes, etc. would be nice to actually hear about, but he remains silent on them for some reason. His sympathies are narrow, and it is often hard to sympathize with them as a reader.
...more
Some might claim that 'Dear Roth' is the most interesting chapter in this "autobiography"; for me, it's that surprising chapter (letter), 'Girl of My Dreams', a glitch in his life, his first marriage, after otherwise steady achievement. Josephine (Josie) Jensen, the fake name of the scheming, low-class gentile who turned his life to emotional hell and even threatened it, reminded me of a movie star's exposé of her/his awful childhood. Poor, Roth; with all these sordid 'facts', no wonder he presu
Some might claim that 'Dear Roth' is the most interesting chapter in this "autobiography"; for me, it's that surprising chapter (letter), 'Girl of My Dreams', a glitch in his life, his first marriage, after otherwise steady achievement. Josephine (Josie) Jensen, the fake name of the scheming, low-class gentile who turned his life to emotional hell and even threatened it, reminded me of a movie star's exposé of her/his awful childhood. Poor, Roth; with all these sordid 'facts', no wonder he presumably whistled in the taxi to her funeral or to the hospital morgue. Despite the marriage, he amazingly continued to produce stories and novels through the couple's emotional and legal problems. Roth reasons that Josie's
imagination's claim on my own [imagination] may well have been what accounted for her inexplicable power over a supremely independent, self-assured, and enterprising young man, a stalwart competitor with a stubborn sense of determination and a strong desire to have his own way.
He doesn't sound easy to live with either. Besides the marriage, another glitch in his life is retold in 'All In the Family', accusations from pro-Jewish groups about anti-Semitism in his writing, unflattering portraits of fellow Jews, these angry comments from "The New Yorker" readers and from The Anti-Defamation League. Everything, however, rights itself, i.e., Josie accidentally dies, coincidentally after he and a new girlfriend mention to a former high-level politician the obstacles in getting a New York divorce from Josie. Then, there's the last chapter, 'Dear Roth', the epistolary afterword written to Roth from his fictional character Nathan Zuckerman. In it, he repeats what the reader thought all along: why his autobiography is sort of all about himself and blasé about others, identified by false names as well; and why its truth is one-sided about Josie. Did someone already mention that the only facts here are his place of birth, his parents' names, his alma maters, and his fiction?
...more
William Burroughs referred to Paul Bowles autobiography, "Without Stopping", as "Without Telling". I was reminded of that while reading "The Facts". It isn't that Roth doesn't tell us the truth, whatever that might be, it's simply that he doesn't tell us anything that those of us who have read everything else didn't already know.
Having said that, his family is removed a few steps from the representations in the Zuckerman novels--meaningfully so--and the entire narrative resonates profoundly in i
William Burroughs referred to Paul Bowles autobiography, "Without Stopping", as "Without Telling". I was reminded of that while reading "The Facts". It isn't that Roth doesn't tell us the truth, whatever that might be, it's simply that he doesn't tell us anything that those of us who have read everything else didn't already know.
Having said that, his family is removed a few steps from the representations in the Zuckerman novels--meaningfully so--and the entire narrative resonates profoundly in it's quotidian reality. In many ways, it was really gratifying to encounter the rough cloth out of which he has woven his fiction. It was not, however, what I wanted. I have no doubt that the failure is my own--a failure of expectations, i.e., having them.
For me, ultimately, the most gratifying part of "The Facts" was the sense that Roth was speaking to me--and threw him his father, his mother, his brother, his friends, Newark--directly. The U of C came alive. And "My Life as a Man" came alive. Zuckerman, I should add, the bookending, was a brilliant touch.
Possibly only fit for completeists and graduate students, but then if you're not a completeist (or a graduate student) why are you reading Roth? I don't believe he was ever published in Redbook.
...more
Nella sua parte prettamente autobiografica, è un libro ricco di spunti interessanti.
Un vero e proprio manuale di istruzione al Roth-pensiero.
Il mestiere del romanziere presuppone un grande lavoro di fantasia; lo sforzo principale consiste soprattutto nel corredare di fronzoli immaginari un fatto realmente accaduto.
Roth decide di fare il lavoro inverso, ossia di condurre la sua autobiografia disimmaginandosi.
Depurando il suo passato, spogliando la realtà dall’immaginazione, provando a raggiungere
Nella sua parte prettamente autobiografica, è un libro ricco di spunti interessanti.
Un vero e proprio manuale di istruzione al Roth-pensiero.
Il mestiere del romanziere presuppone un grande lavoro di fantasia; lo sforzo principale consiste soprattutto nel corredare di fronzoli immaginari un fatto realmente accaduto.
Roth decide di fare il lavoro inverso, ossia di condurre la sua autobiografia disimmaginandosi.
Depurando il suo passato, spogliando la realtà dall’immaginazione, provando a raggiungere la veridicità di ogni episodio vissuto. L’idea è quella di arrivare ai fatti.
Ma... è davvero possibile tutto questo?
Può, un romanziere, rivelarsi completamente?
Raccontarsi, attenendosi semplicemente ai fatti?
La mia ipotesi è che tu abbia scritto così tante metamorfosi di te stesso da non sapere più né chi sei né chi sei stato.
—BUS RIDING BOOKS—
"The Facts, a novelist autobiography", by Philip Roth
Here is my review of the book…
In his autobiography, Philip Roth is looking at the wounds that plagued him for decades, yet were kept at a distance. The same troubles that led him to a grave depression after he decided to open himself up by writing these pages. For him, like for so many other writers before him, this self-investigation is like a second chance. That's the beauty of being a writer I suppose: Roth can fictionali
—BUS RIDING BOOKS—
"The Facts, a novelist autobiography", by Philip Roth
Here is my review of the book…
In his autobiography, Philip Roth is looking at the wounds that plagued him for decades, yet were kept at a distance. The same troubles that led him to a grave depression after he decided to open himself up by writing these pages. For him, like for so many other writers before him, this self-investigation is like a second chance. That's the beauty of being a writer I suppose: Roth can fictionalise a "kind" of himself... and rewrite his eventful past one way or another, as and when he chooses to.
And what a journey he had! From his Jewish upbringing in 1950s America to being a professor at the University of Chicago and getting his PhD there, who would have imagined he would one day become one of the most famous American writers of our times?
For a little while, the classroom was his stage and he thought this was going to be his life. But Philipp Roth really wanted to be a writer, right from the start, unlike some other authors I'm familiar with, like former lawyer Marc Levy who wrote his first book at the age of 37 - a story for his daughter - and found huge success straight away, to his biggest surprise. Only then did he decide to stop law and focus on his writing. No, Roth was already involved with the "Et cetera" magazine in high school and writing on the side. For Roth, life had always been about writing, nothing else was on his mind and I find this both courageous and admirable. A trajectory I would have liked to pursue had there been no other, more pressing imperatives such as getting a job, repaying my student loan, buying a flat, getting married, becoming a dad and so on and so on. Instead, and despite having a few books out there, I am still at the fringe of literary life but I continue to write, always.
Of course, having the vocation is not enough. It took Roth a lot of hard work and isolation from real life and people to be able to write those books that became instant blockbusters. And tons of talent.
All in all, this book is fascinating but also very sad in more ways than one. Roth' journey is not one for the faint hearted, dotted with marriages, break ups, divorces, abortions, years of legal battles, property disputes, and disputes over whose books is who's...
It does take hubris or narcissism or whatever to write an autobiography of the "Facts" behind the written fiction. The author must believe that somebody has taken the time to read *those* works and then regards those works well enough to want to read the behind the scenes details.
Well, since I'm reading all of Roth, the author might be correct in his assumption. It mainly works since Roth approaches the same level of writing that he does in his novels. Which isn't hard since the main character
It does take hubris or narcissism or whatever to write an autobiography of the "Facts" behind the written fiction. The author must believe that somebody has taken the time to read *those* works and then regards those works well enough to want to read the behind the scenes details.
Well, since I'm reading all of Roth, the author might be correct in his assumption. It mainly works since Roth approaches the same level of writing that he does in his novels. Which isn't hard since the main character of almost all his novels is a representation of Philip Roth.
The stories behind the stories are interesting for the most part - the one that sticks out of course is the "crazy wife who tricks him into thinking she's pregnant by buying a pregnant lady's urine" story. His frank appraisal that having the crazy wife in his life basically shot him on the way to his new style is probably accurate. But then why degrade her so much? She helped make Roth into Roth (if in a negative way) and my bet is that he is angry about that - it certainly shows in the writing!
The bit about Zuckerman (one of Roth's fictional mainstays) reviewing the autobiography at the end is a little postmoderny precious - it doesn't add up to enough for the space though.
...more
Only Roth would write an autobiography in which his fictional alter-ego chastises him for not being fully introspective and honest, a meta-trick fully acknowledged and in turn criticized: " . . . the book is fundamentally defensive. Just as having this letter at the end is a self-defensive trick to have it both ways." Either brilliant or exasperating or both.
Confieso que esta es la primera vez que leo la autobiografía de un autor completamente desconocido para mi… bueno en realidad el nombre de Phillip Roth ya lo había oído antes pues estaba al tanto de su fama de perpetuo candidato al premio Nóbel y en alguna ocasión leí muy buenas criticas sobre su Trilogía Americana pero solamente hasta ahí llegaba lo que conocía sobre este autor.
Tal vez leer su autobiografía no sea la manera más indicada de abordar la obra de Phillip Roth, pienso esto por dos
Confieso que esta es la primera vez que leo la autobiografía de un autor completamente desconocido para mi… bueno en realidad el nombre de Phillip Roth ya lo había oído antes pues estaba al tanto de su fama de perpetuo candidato al premio Nóbel y en alguna ocasión leí muy buenas criticas sobre su Trilogía Americana pero solamente hasta ahí llegaba lo que conocía sobre este autor.
Tal vez leer su autobiografía no sea la manera más indicada de abordar la obra de Phillip Roth, pienso esto por dos razones la primera de ellas es que Los Hechos parece una obra demasiado personal, pasan más de 100 páginas sin un solo guiño hacia el lector lo cuál como lectores nos hace sentir participando de una fiesta a la cuál no fuimos invitados, parece un libro escrito para el mismo autor y no para su público. La segunda razón por la que hubiese preferido acercarme a Roth con otra de sus obras es la manera en que Los Hechos hace referencia a la relación que tiene la vida del autor con la construcción de personajes e historias plasmadas en sus libros. La obra empieza con una carta con el manuscrito de Los Hechos que Phillip Roth envía a un tal Nathan Zuckerman para que éste le de su opinión . Resulta ser que Zuckerman es uno de los personajes de sus libros y el recurso narrativo de usar a uno de sus protagonistas como corrector de su autobiografía se pierde en gran parte para todos aquellos lectores que ignoramos las particularidades de la personalidad de Zuckerman. Lo interesante es la opinión que Zuckerman tiene respecto a Los Hechos, creo que dicha opinión es lo más rescatable de este libro.
Llegué a Los Hechos buscando el relato sobre las circunstancias que llevan a un hombre a convertirse en escritor pero solo encontré en la única parte interesante del libro las quejas de alguien que odia a su esposa. El titulo de la obra parece abarcar algo interesante pero lastimosamente aquí sólo encontré la idealización de los padres y la satanización de la pareja del autor. No recomiendo acercarse a este autor con esta obra.
...more
It is a given these days to treat the "facts" contained within autobiographies with a grain of salt. In the past, authors quietly manipulated events to tell a specific story with the hope that reviewers did not notice. Today, blending fiction and fact is all the rage. Whereas some autobiographers (James Frey, for example) get into trouble by falsifying information, most others get away with their constructed versions of reality.
Given Philip Roth's long career as a novelist drawing on his persona
It is a given these days to treat the "facts" contained within autobiographies with a grain of salt. In the past, authors quietly manipulated events to tell a specific story with the hope that reviewers did not notice. Today, blending fiction and fact is all the rage. Whereas some autobiographers (James Frey, for example) get into trouble by falsifying information, most others get away with their constructed versions of reality.
Given Philip Roth's long career as a novelist drawing on his personal experiences, it is not surprising that he has waded into the arena of autobiography. And, by entitling his effort "The Facts," he has done so with an explicit focus on the complicated nature of the genre.
I was very interested to see how Roth would handle his own history and was not disappointed. Much of the book is a fairly conventional autobiography, recounting several romantic and literary episodes in his early life. Although Roth changes names (I did a lot of googling to check if he had) of some of his partners, the stories he tells are quite straightforward. But the book begins and concludes with contributions from Roth's literary alter ego, Nathan Zuckerman, which challenge Roth's memory and motivations. Roth, says Zuckerman, is "telling in order not to tell." It is if Roth did the job of potential reviewers, skewering his own autobiography before they could do it. Roth does this expertly. I highly recommend "The Facts" not only to fans of Roth but also to professors trying to get their students to understand what autobiography does and does not tell us.
FIRST READ: I am a fan of Roth, and find myself engrossed in his books despite by aversion at times to his style, but while this one was wholly sound philosophically for me (insight into his translations of actual events into fictive ones, and a wonderful counterpoint from his own character Nathan Zuckerman to contest this autobiographical turn), I just wasn't charged during my read of this one and kept checking what page number I was on and how far I had to go. Sorry, Phil--I REALLY wanted to l
FIRST READ: I am a fan of Roth, and find myself engrossed in his books despite by aversion at times to his style, but while this one was wholly sound philosophically for me (insight into his translations of actual events into fictive ones, and a wonderful counterpoint from his own character Nathan Zuckerman to contest this autobiographical turn), I just wasn't charged during my read of this one and kept checking what page number I was on and how far I had to go. Sorry, Phil--I REALLY wanted to like this one...
SECOND READ: I found myself too much in agreement with his Zuckerman critique of the book not to publish it, and I came to the end in a kind of aesthetic quandary--while the Zuckerman section is certainly astute in some of its observations, by the end I think Roth posed great questions about what might or might not make an autobiography interesting, but ultimately posed them rather than exemplified them. Interesting to read the last chapter of the 'Roth' autobiography, though, to see the view of the artist who determines his own voice.
...more
I can't remember now why I changed my original plan--to read only Roth's fiction--and decided to read this, the second book collected in the
fifth volume
of the Library of America's edition, but I'm glad I did, and glad I read it so soon after
The Lifespan of a Fact
, whose protagonist makes a much less palatable arugument for blurring fact and fiction.
Roth's fiction is unabashedly autobiographical, of course--or maybe "abashedly autobiographical" is apter, since he spends a great deal of energy
I can't remember now why I changed my original plan--to read only Roth's fiction--and decided to read this, the second book collected in the
fifth volume
of the Library of America's edition, but I'm glad I did, and glad I read it so soon after
The Lifespan of a Fact
, whose protagonist makes a much less palatable arugument for blurring fact and fiction.
Roth's fiction is unabashedly autobiographical, of course--or maybe "abashedly autobiographical" is apter, since he spends a great deal of energy (including the whole of
Zuckerman Unbound
) reminding readers and the world at large that "autobiographical fiction" ≠ "autobiography." So here he gives us his first book presented as unvarnished memoir--and bookends it with a long letter to his fictional creation Nathan Zuckerman and Zuckerman's even longer response, complete with contributions from the English lover/wife from
The Counterlife
.
In between, it's fascinating to compare the facts of his life to the parallel events in his fiction--and to wonder to what extent these "facts" are any closer to reality that someone close to him might have observed than the fiction we've been reading for a while now. It corkscrews the brain--and I mean that as a compliment.
...more
Should you care about the life story of novelist Phillip Roth? I've read a few of his books (Goodbye Columbus and Portnoy's Complaint were my long ago introductions, and Everyman is my all time favorite) and I've enjoyed listening to him in interviews. I found this book worth reading because it is so redolent of, and parallel to, my father's Bronx immigrant Jewish world, and my father's experience of coming out of that world into the larger American world.
Like my father, Roth married a troubled
Should you care about the life story of novelist Phillip Roth? I've read a few of his books (Goodbye Columbus and Portnoy's Complaint were my long ago introductions, and Everyman is my all time favorite) and I've enjoyed listening to him in interviews. I found this book worth reading because it is so redolent of, and parallel to, my father's Bronx immigrant Jewish world, and my father's experience of coming out of that world into the larger American world.
Like my father, Roth married a troubled woman from outside the tribe, and found his way to professional success. Roth is about 6 years younger than my father was, and there are many other differences between the life stories of a Newark born novelist and a Bronx born scientist, but the informative parallels to my father's early experiences kept me interested.
Roth frames this 1988 telling of his life (at age 55) with a critique by one of his characters, Zuckerman, whose stories I have not yet read. Zuckerman accuses Roth of duplicity and dishonesty, questions his motives, his accuracy, and the value of his entire autobiographical project. All of that comes off as a bit defensive on Roth's part, a grand effort to show that he considers a form which claims a petty allegiance to facts to be the inferior of a form like the novel rooted in a fully imaginary world, and therefore able to speak more honestly of real human truths. OK Roth, if you need to do that, I won't object, and it's moderately interesting to hear you yell at yourself in the voice of Zuckerman.
But the straight autobiography of the central chapters really is valuable in its own right, and I'm not sure we need QUITE this many words from Zuckerman to remind us of the way in which non-fiction is a bigger lie than fiction. We get it, and most of us are able to move on from that realization to an enjoyment of an autobiographical tale and an evocation of time, place and human experience such as this, fully aware that it is a subjective telling, by definition. Your childhood in Newark, and college experiences at Bucknell and that crazy, crazy woman you chose to marry, "The Girl of Your Dreams," are, even in the filtered, other-protective and self-protective form that you present them, informative about where and how your consciousness emerged and was shaped. They are history, not fiction, however warped by the mind of a man who believes mostly in fiction. They deepen and do not distract from my understanding of your fiction. Zuckerman's commentary is fun, but the fellow does go on a bit in an unnecessary demonstration of how well you've thought through the essential problematicity of autobiography. For my part I enjoyed your auto-telling well enough on its own half honest historical terms. Sometimes a life story is just a life story, and valuable on its face.
I really enjoyed the illumination you provide on who Phillip Roth, the man, was and is.
...more
An interesting, if at times slightly tedious, autobiographical account of Philip Roth's life up to the publication of
Portnoy's Complaint
, the novel that made him a literary star. The book begins with a letter Roth writes to his literary alter-ego, Nathan Zuckerman, and ends with Zuckerman's reply; in these letters, Roth (and Zuckerman) can really flesh out the purpose of the book itself, and also expose some of the truth behind "the facts" (Roth, as Zuckerman, does not let himself off easily on
An interesting, if at times slightly tedious, autobiographical account of Philip Roth's life up to the publication of
Portnoy's Complaint
, the novel that made him a literary star. The book begins with a letter Roth writes to his literary alter-ego, Nathan Zuckerman, and ends with Zuckerman's reply; in these letters, Roth (and Zuckerman) can really flesh out the purpose of the book itself, and also expose some of the truth behind "the facts" (Roth, as Zuckerman, does not let himself off easily on any of the more complicated issues in his autobiography). I recommend this book to anybody who is already well acquainted with Roth's work, particularly the Zuckerman books (this is, in essence, a companion piece to the magnificent
The Counterlife
).
...more
Well this is not the Roth you read because you love reading good writing.
It's not up to the standard set by Bukowski's
Ham on Rye
, but that's not purely biography, if you believe the bookjacket assignation of genre.
Anyway, the writing here is sloppy as hell, and the truest part of the whole thing is the letter from Roth's alter-ego, Zuckerman. It's true, Roth dances around motivation and culpability for the entirety, and the only hints about what hurt the most are the reappearances of "Josie" in
Well this is not the Roth you read because you love reading good writing.
It's not up to the standard set by Bukowski's
Ham on Rye
, but that's not purely biography, if you believe the bookjacket assignation of genre.
Anyway, the writing here is sloppy as hell, and the truest part of the whole thing is the letter from Roth's alter-ego, Zuckerman. It's true, Roth dances around motivation and culpability for the entirety, and the only hints about what hurt the most are the reappearances of "Josie" in places where you're thinking, "Got it, she was a bad woman. Can we be done with her yet, or maybe you want to say something about your part in that temporary hell?"
But that's all right because you
have
to see through that if you're thinking at all while you read. It's just too bad he doesn't let us have more insight into how he got where he was (by 1987, already long past).
...more
(3.5 stars) The Facts: A Novelist's Autobiography is interesting and unconventional. It is an exploration of life, love and craft that I found a bit slow in the beginning, but eventually it pulled me in and left me wanting more. Initially, I was afraid that The Facts wouldn't be very revealing. Roth strikes me as someone who keeps his cards close to the chest; however, as the episodes of the book unfolded his life became more and more tantalizing. Just when I thought, "okay, so these are the fac
(3.5 stars) The Facts: A Novelist's Autobiography is interesting and unconventional. It is an exploration of life, love and craft that I found a bit slow in the beginning, but eventually it pulled me in and left me wanting more. Initially, I was afraid that The Facts wouldn't be very revealing. Roth strikes me as someone who keeps his cards close to the chest; however, as the episodes of the book unfolded his life became more and more tantalizing. Just when I thought, "okay, so these are the facts according to Philip Roth," his alter ego, Nathan Zuckerman (and Zuckerman's wife), chimed in and provided another point of view- Hmmm...very clever.
...more
"You try to pass off here as frankness what looks to me like the dance of the seven veils-what's on the page is like a code for something missing," writes Roth's fictional creation Zuckerman in the cheeky but pointed response to the bulk of this book, which is a relatively straightforward and orderly autobiography until the deviously playful final thirty-five pages.
Bought this book in a book store in le Marais in Paris - a book store that is also a wine bar - how perfect! I think Chicago needs one. Roth is self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-inflating, self-centered, self-promoting - but also self-aware. Which is a very underrated quality. I have always been fascinated with Roth (and his topics), but am less so after reading this, as it humanized him so much. (So much more than Zuckerman.) This is not a good read for a reader who hasn't read his work - and
Bought this book in a book store in le Marais in Paris - a book store that is also a wine bar - how perfect! I think Chicago needs one. Roth is self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-inflating, self-centered, self-promoting - but also self-aware. Which is a very underrated quality. I have always been fascinated with Roth (and his topics), but am less so after reading this, as it humanized him so much. (So much more than Zuckerman.) This is not a good read for a reader who hasn't read his work - and only a pretty good read for those who have. I will read his future works with the story of his personal life in the front of my mind.
...more
The "facts" part of this book, purportedly the autobiography of Philip Roth is not that interesting. Roth focuses on five events in his life, but leaves out so much that you wonder why he bothers. But then Roth has his alter ego, Zuckerman, comment on and criticize what he has written. That is very interesting, as he considers the difference between fact and fiction and explains how fiction can be more truthful than fact. What the book comes down to is not about the facts of the life of Philip R
The "facts" part of this book, purportedly the autobiography of Philip Roth is not that interesting. Roth focuses on five events in his life, but leaves out so much that you wonder why he bothers. But then Roth has his alter ego, Zuckerman, comment on and criticize what he has written. That is very interesting, as he considers the difference between fact and fiction and explains how fiction can be more truthful than fact. What the book comes down to is not about the facts of the life of Philip Roth, but an interesting exploration or truth and fiction. The last Zuckerman chapter brought my rating of the book up from three to four stars.
...more
“The Facts” is billed as a memoir but I cannot help but wonder if it is actually the first “Roth” novel. As fiction writer-memoirists go, Roth is no Gabriel Garcia Marquez, or even a Bob Dylan, but as a long prolog to the Roth novels that followed, it is a weird, passable part of a series. It might be telling that the Zuckerman letters are the book’s best features, serving as Zuckerman’s rebuke to the “Duck Amuck” antics of “The Counterlife,” but it was a stylistic dead end. “Zuckerman Bound” wa
“The Facts” is billed as a memoir but I cannot help but wonder if it is actually the first “Roth” novel. As fiction writer-memoirists go, Roth is no Gabriel Garcia Marquez, or even a Bob Dylan, but as a long prolog to the Roth novels that followed, it is a weird, passable part of a series. It might be telling that the Zuckerman letters are the book’s best features, serving as Zuckerman’s rebuke to the “Duck Amuck” antics of “The Counterlife,” but it was a stylistic dead end. “Zuckerman Bound” was about the angry dialog with the outside world, but “The Facts” was content to yell at itself.
...more
Más allá de las peripecias vividas por Roth en su etapa de formación, las páginas más interesantes de este libro se concentran en su último apartado, en el que Zuckermann, protagonista de algunas de las novelas del autor, lanza una réplica cargada de lúcidas reflexiones que ponen en tela de juicio las pretensiones de veracidad de su creador, desmontando muchas ideas preconcebidas sobre el estatuto de realidad al que pueden aspirar los géneros de la biografía y la autobiografía, y destacando, en
Más allá de las peripecias vividas por Roth en su etapa de formación, las páginas más interesantes de este libro se concentran en su último apartado, en el que Zuckermann, protagonista de algunas de las novelas del autor, lanza una réplica cargada de lúcidas reflexiones que ponen en tela de juicio las pretensiones de veracidad de su creador, desmontando muchas ideas preconcebidas sobre el estatuto de realidad al que pueden aspirar los géneros de la biografía y la autobiografía, y destacando, en última instancia, esa borrosa frontera entre vida y literatura.
...more
Roth's autobiographical writings here are interesting but seemed to me a bit bland... but suddenly the book is made wondrous when Roth has his fictional alter-ego Zuckerman comment on Roth's autobiography!
The book then swings into high gear, becoming an energetic, hilarious and extremely insightful commentary on Roth's own life, his view of himself, how fiction can lead to greater truths than autobiography, etc.
It's the Zuckerman commentary that moves this book from good Roth -- which is very
Roth's autobiographical writings here are interesting but seemed to me a bit bland... but suddenly the book is made wondrous when Roth has his fictional alter-ego Zuckerman comment on Roth's autobiography!
The book then swings into high gear, becoming an energetic, hilarious and extremely insightful commentary on Roth's own life, his view of himself, how fiction can lead to greater truths than autobiography, etc.
It's the Zuckerman commentary that moves this book from good Roth -- which is very good -- to great Roth.
Interesting mainly for Roth's description of his first wife and his insane relationship with her. The joy and relief he takes in her accidental death is amazing. I don't know why he bothered to change her name when anyone could find out her name.
I wonder if Roth made this memoir intentionally flawed just so he could publish the last chapter which is essentially a query letter about the book written to Roth by his fictional alter-ego Nathan Zuckerman.
Si no supiera que hay un mejor Roth, le daría las cinco estrellas. Esta no es una autobiografía común y corriente. Es un corte de caja, un ajuste de cuentas entre el autor y uno de sus alter egos. A fin de cuentas, ¿quién habla y narra? Grande, pero sobre todo original, como siempre.
I thought Roth was a man after my own heart for a little while, and then I despised him, but at the end the letters between Zuckerman and himself really tie together all of the random thoughts I, and the others that other readers have, about this autobiography.
I'm also a research assistant right now for The Life Story Lab, which focuses studies around how people remember their lives.
I read this autobiography of Philip Roth to find out what 'the facts' of his life were as opposed to the version he presents via Zuckerman et al. It is fascinating for what it tells us of Roth's life, as well as for what it doesn't tell (a lot). He starts it off with a letter to Zuckerman and ends it with a letter from Zuckerman, his alter ego, who doesn't, in this case, let Roth get off the hook lightly.
Philip Milton Roth is an American novelist. He gained early literary fame with the 1959 collection
Goodbye, Columbus
(winner of 1960's
National Book Award
), cemented it with his 1969 bestseller
Portnoy's Complaint
, and has continued to write critically-acclaimed works, many of which feature his fictional alter ego, Nathan Zuckerman. The Zuckerman novels began with
The Ghost Writer
in 1979, and inc
Philip Milton Roth is an American novelist. He gained early literary fame with the 1959 collection
Goodbye, Columbus
(winner of 1960's
National Book Award
), cemented it with his 1969 bestseller
Portnoy's Complaint
, and has continued to write critically-acclaimed works, many of which feature his fictional alter ego, Nathan Zuckerman. The Zuckerman novels began with
The Ghost Writer
in 1979, and include
American Pastoral
(1997) (winner of the
Pulitzer Prize
). In May 2011, he won the
Man Booker International Prize
for lifetime achievement in fiction.
...more
“Llega un momento, como me llegó a mí hace unos meses, en que se halla uno en tal estado de desamparo y confusión, que no logra comprender lo que otrora resultaba obvio: por qué hago lo que hago, por qué vivo donde vivo, por qué comparto mi vida con quien la comparto.”
—
1 likes