This is by far the most enjoyable book ever written by the normal dour and humourless Maxim Gorky. Gorsky was a friend off Fyodor Chaliapin who was the possibly the greatest basso profundo of all time and most certainly the most tamous.
Gorky was unquestionably under the impression that this book conformed to the rules of official socialist realism as specified by a law enacted by the Communist Party Congress of 1934 in which it was specified that socialist books must:
-1- have a proletarian as a
This is by far the most enjoyable book ever written by the normal dour and humourless Maxim Gorky. Gorsky was a friend off Fyodor Chaliapin who was the possibly the greatest basso profundo of all time and most certainly the most tamous.
Gorky was unquestionably under the impression that this book conformed to the rules of official socialist realism as specified by a law enacted by the Communist Party Congress of 1934 in which it was specified that socialist books must:
-1- have a proletarian as a protagonist. Chaliapin qualifed.
-2- present typical: scenes of every day life of the people. The book presented the everyday life of Chaliapin who was a man of the people
-3- Realistic: in the representational sense. Clearly it was.
-4- Show how a proletarian hero becomes aware of his status as a proletarian and engages actively in the class struggle. On this point the book is somewhat problematic. Chaliapin the proletarian caught on to the fact that he was an itnernational operatic superstar which allowed him to the play the role of the bon vivant, roue, or philandering swine to the fullest with absolute impunity.
Strangely enough, Gorky who was normally insufferably moralizing was quite enchanted by Chaliapin's highly immoral personal life. The result is a fan's book of a great artist, wild party animal and irrepressible satyr.
...more