At the age of eight, Karl Popper was puzzling over the idea of infinity and by fifteen was beginning to take a keen interest in his father's well-stocked library of books. Unended Quest recounts these moments and many others in the life of one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century, providing an indispensable account of the ideas that influenced him most
At the age of eight, Karl Popper was puzzling over the idea of infinity and by fifteen was beginning to take a keen interest in his father's well-stocked library of books. Unended Quest recounts these moments and many others in the life of one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century, providing an indispensable account of the ideas that influenced him most. As an introduction to Popper's philosophy, Unended Quest also shines. Popper lucidly explains the central ideas in his work, making this book ideal for anyone coming to Popper's life and work for the first time.
...more
Hardcover
,
328 pages
Published
June 20th 2002
by Routledge
(first published 1976)
Required reading for school (again). Author is a philosopher of science who has an unfortunate tendency to assume that the average reader has the same knowledge base of philosophy as he has. The ideas themselves are fairly interesting, but the presentation nearly obscures them at times. A very frustrating read and a book that I would not recommend unless you have severe insomnia.
Reading this 40-chapter “Unended Quest” by Karl Popper was enriching and stimulating since the book “recounts these moments and many others in the life of one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century. … Yet it is as an introduction to Popper’s philosophy that "Unended Quest" shines. …” (back cover) However, the contents from Chapter 31 (Objectivity and Criticism) towards Chapter 40 (The Place of Values in a World of Facts) seemed to focus on his philosophy gradually and theoreti
Reading this 40-chapter “Unended Quest” by Karl Popper was enriching and stimulating since the book “recounts these moments and many others in the life of one of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth century. … Yet it is as an introduction to Popper’s philosophy that "Unended Quest" shines. …” (back cover) However, the contents from Chapter 31 (Objectivity and Criticism) towards Chapter 40 (The Place of Values in a World of Facts) seemed to focus on his philosophy gradually and theoretically in which, I think, his readers would have better understood if they had ideally, possibly cooperated in a reading project with a scholar on Popper philosophy.
...more
I feel guilty for saying this, but I find this book to be really boring and am having trouble making myself slog through it.
Certainly like the whole "reality exists" idea though.
(Later on).
Relieved to have finished the book. It sort of picks up after the bit where he talks about his ideas about music. Again a feeling of embarrassment, as though I were a kid who would only read books if they had pictures in them, I often found myself being much more interested in Popper's life story than his idea
I feel guilty for saying this, but I find this book to be really boring and am having trouble making myself slog through it.
Certainly like the whole "reality exists" idea though.
(Later on).
Relieved to have finished the book. It sort of picks up after the bit where he talks about his ideas about music. Again a feeling of embarrassment, as though I were a kid who would only read books if they had pictures in them, I often found myself being much more interested in Popper's life story than his ideas. I feel horrible saying this, because I'm sure the ideas are quite remarkable (science as a sort of process of natural selection by falsification, darwinism not as a proper scientific theory but a metaphysical research programme, a straw at which we must gratefully grasp)
And feeling foolish for criticising somebody far smarter than me, and worse without criticising the ideas themselves, I'm not so comfortable when he ventures out into politics and into stuff like the Body-Mind problem, or starts making claims about the link between consciousness and language. Again, this isn't a proper critique of ideas, just a sort of fuzzy feeling, kind of like what happens sometimes when Really Brilliant computer scientists can get interested in some field they know nothing about (say Natural Language)... or maybe just a personal sense of dissatisfaction with trying to tackle all problems with Reason alone.
Now if anybody notices, I'm probably going to get flak (or worse, praise from the wrong sort of people) for muttering about something like the inadequacy of Reason... but that's where I'm going to have to stand until I get a bigger brain.
...more
My first time reading this ~2003 it was a frustrating experience. I did, at the time, really enjoy the chapter about his musical interests. Rereading over a decade later and found it to have subtle charms throughout
A very challenging biography of one of the greatest philosophers of science in the twentieth century. Popper is best known for overthrowing positivism and for his falsification criterion.
A good, though perhaps not excellent, introduction to Popper's thinking on issues like the problem of demarcation (and the role of falsificationism in solving it), the nature of theories, political philosophy, evolutionary theory, and the role of metaphysics in science. There is also a good amount of biographical info in here, especially on Popper's early years in Vienna (among other things, Popper almost became a professional musician).
My reservations about the book are primarily due to Popper
A good, though perhaps not excellent, introduction to Popper's thinking on issues like the problem of demarcation (and the role of falsificationism in solving it), the nature of theories, political philosophy, evolutionary theory, and the role of metaphysics in science. There is also a good amount of biographical info in here, especially on Popper's early years in Vienna (among other things, Popper almost became a professional musician).
My reservations about the book are primarily due to Popper's somewhat biased presentation of the issues; Popper tends to present debates as if his is the only possible solution, and that everyone else is obviously wrong. In some cases (especially in philosophy of physics), this seems somewhat justified (for example, I think Popper's early attacks on the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics seem justified, and I think that there is at least *something* to his attack on using entropy to define the arrow of time). Even in these cases, though, I'm not convinced that Popper's positive accounts are successful. It might have helped here that Popper's opponents were (primarily) practicing physicists, and they had failed to think carefully through some of the more traditionally "philosophical" issues (i.e., in figuring out the relationship between observation and reality).
In other cases, though, I think Popper's account is misleading. In particular, Popper spent most of his professional life attacking the "inductivist" program of Carnap and the linguistic philosophy of Wittgenstein. From Popper's description, you might think that everyone had agreed that Popper "won" these debates; the real situation seems to be almost the reverse--while Popper's criticisms of certain aspects of these programs were valuable, Carnap's and Wittgenstein's positive programs have remained hugely influential among contemporary researchers (especially in areas like inductive and modal logic, formal epistemology, and linguistics/philosophy of language), Popper's influence seems to been constrained to somewhat peripheral issues (for example, in educating laypeople about the difference between "science" and "non-science").
...more
"Unended Quest" provides a lucid summary of the broad themes of Popper's work along with some background he has provided of his life. I don't think one can overstate the contribution Popper has made to the theory of knowledge, even if many philosophers seem to ignore him after making, perhaps, offhand comments against his criticism of induction. I suppose they would be prickly as, as W.W.Bartley says, if Popper is even remotely on the right track many professional philosophers have simply wasted
"Unended Quest" provides a lucid summary of the broad themes of Popper's work along with some background he has provided of his life. I don't think one can overstate the contribution Popper has made to the theory of knowledge, even if many philosophers seem to ignore him after making, perhaps, offhand comments against his criticism of induction. I suppose they would be prickly as, as W.W.Bartley says, if Popper is even remotely on the right track many professional philosophers have simply wasted their lives. Upton Sinclair said it is difficult to get a man to understand something if his salary depends upon his not understanding it.
I personally find this book exciting and I often revisit it. I would recommend his "All Life is Problem Solving" as a follow up for those who have limited familiarity with Popper. In particular the essay "Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge" was written late in his life and is brilliant in its overarching synthesis.
It is a pity that Richard Dawkins has not absorbed more of Popper's way of talking about science as it might temper his positivist tendencies and make his rebuttal of intelligent design and creationism more rigorous and less dogmatic.
Joe Barnhart wrote an excellent column "Karl Popper: philosopher of critical realism". A paragraph is quoted here:
"Furthermore, Popper's epistemology makes no fetish of either skepticism or faith. I know of no one who practices either wholesale skepticism or wholesale faith. All believers in certain claims are skeptics about rival claims. And all skeptics regarding some claims are believers regarding other claims. All of us, however, have pockets in our lives in which we would be better off if we showed more faith or trust. At the same time, there are pockets in which we would be better off if we trusted less-or at least shifted our faith to something or somebody more trustworthy. Trust and faith, like skepticism, are essential ingredients to human living. Skepticism per se is neither the enemy nor ally of faith per se, for the simple reason that neither exists."
La autobiografía intelectual de Popper es una gran obra introductoria para aquellos que no son familiares a su obra, pero también es una gran fuente de material para entender algunos de los procesos que generaron sus contribuciones mas importantes en las áreas de episcopologio, filosofía política y de la ciencia, probabilidad y su visión en general realista.
El libro narra los diversos encuentros intelectuales de Popper con otros pensadores y cientificos de la época como Niels Bohr, Albert Einste
La autobiografía intelectual de Popper es una gran obra introductoria para aquellos que no son familiares a su obra, pero también es una gran fuente de material para entender algunos de los procesos que generaron sus contribuciones mas importantes en las áreas de episcopologio, filosofía política y de la ciencia, probabilidad y su visión en general realista.
El libro narra los diversos encuentros intelectuales de Popper con otros pensadores y cientificos de la época como Niels Bohr, Albert Einstein, F. A. Hayek y muchos otros, incorporando la influencia de otros tantos desde Schopenahuer o la música del periodo romántico alemán Brahms, Mahler, Wagner etc hasta la de Mach, Figl, Boltzman etc.
This book is a bit of a ramble of Poppers ideas, which isn't necassarily a bad thing since he has so many good one. It's probably one of Popper's funnest books, in that it's a lighter read but still full of interesting thoughts, and if you like the idea of reading an intellectual autobigraphy it'll scratch that itch. But it's main merit is unfortunately very much the biographical element--it's fun to see where the ideas come from. As far as Popper books goes there are many deeper and more insigh
This book is a bit of a ramble of Poppers ideas, which isn't necassarily a bad thing since he has so many good one. It's probably one of Popper's funnest books, in that it's a lighter read but still full of interesting thoughts, and if you like the idea of reading an intellectual autobigraphy it'll scratch that itch. But it's main merit is unfortunately very much the biographical element--it's fun to see where the ideas come from. As far as Popper books goes there are many deeper and more insightful pieces. Still a good read and it does cover a lot of scope.
...more
Considero o livro muito interessante embora com algumas passagens quase inacessíveis para um leitor não muito versado em filosofia e na ciência.
Por outro lado, gostei muito de conhecer o percurso de vida do Karl Popper e acho que fiquei ainda melhor elucidado sobre como esse percurso moldou o seu extraordinário pensamento.
Claro que aprecio muito o seu optimismo e o seu gosto imenso pela VIDA e pelo regime democrático, coisas que partilho com Popper.
I really like the philosophy of Karl Popper, and The Logic of Scientific Discovery has made a big impact on my life as a young scientist in training. However, asking famous philosophers to wax-reminiscent about their life experiences may be somewhat ill-advised. He comes of as somewhat of a self-effacing, yet pompous know-it-all. Kind of a disappointing read.
Fantastic intro to popper's philosophy. Not a biography in the conventional sense. His life is his work; the book is a collection of problems he has solved and wants to solve.
Sir Karl Raimund Popper CH, FRS, FBA (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian and British philosopher and a professor at the London School of Economics. He is counted among the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century, and also wrote extensively on social and political philosophy. Popper is known for repudiating the classical observationalist/inductivist account of sc
Sir Karl Raimund Popper CH, FRS, FBA (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian and British philosopher and a professor at the London School of Economics. He is counted among the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century, and also wrote extensively on social and political philosophy. Popper is known for repudiating the classical observationalist/inductivist account of scientific method by advancing empirical falsification instead; for his opposition to the classical justificationist account of knowledge which he replaced with critical rationalism, "the first non justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy" and for his vigorous defense of liberal democracy and the principles of social criticism which he took to make the flourishing of the "open society" possible.
“I remained a socialist for several years, even after my rejection of Marxism; and if there could be such a thing as socialism combined with individual liberty, I would be a socialist still. For nothing could be better than living a modest, simple, and free life in an egalitarian society. It took some time before I recognized this as no more than a beautiful dream; that freedom is more important than equality; that the attempt to realize equality endangers freedom; and that, if freedom is lost, there will not even be equality among the unfree.”
—
26 likes
“Learning to read, and to a lesser degree, to write, are of course the major events in one’s intellectual development. There is nothing to compare with it, since very few people (Helen Keller is the great exception) can remember what it meant for them to learn to speak.”
—
1 likes