I love how his optimism in life really comes through in his writings. He never says anything bad about anyone and always has a positive outlook on things. I think he would have been an enjoyable person to be around. Before reading this book, I assumed he was a stuck-up rich guy (being incredibly wealthy in his lifetime) however, it amazed me how gracious he was and how much he really gave back to the world.
This book was written in his spare time over several vacations and follows his life from
I love how his optimism in life really comes through in his writings. He never says anything bad about anyone and always has a positive outlook on things. I think he would have been an enjoyable person to be around. Before reading this book, I assumed he was a stuck-up rich guy (being incredibly wealthy in his lifetime) however, it amazed me how gracious he was and how much he really gave back to the world.
This book was written in his spare time over several vacations and follows his life from starting in a poor Scottish town to the end of his life. I always keep this book around when it is rainy or dreary out, and I feel a bit down because Carnegie's cheery temperament always gets rid of my blues.
Whilst reflecting on his life, Andrew Carnegie (in his autobiography) inspires his readers with an abundance of life-lessons. He describes how his family moved to the United States. He plainly describes how he took on responsibility early on in life. He isn't boastful of the steel corporations he helps build. And in the end he shows gratitude and ends up giving away almost his whole fortune. In his autobiography Andrew Carnegie never gets too personal, but we can still learn a lot from his life.
Whilst reflecting on his life, Andrew Carnegie (in his autobiography) inspires his readers with an abundance of life-lessons. He describes how his family moved to the United States. He plainly describes how he took on responsibility early on in life. He isn't boastful of the steel corporations he helps build. And in the end he shows gratitude and ends up giving away almost his whole fortune. In his autobiography Andrew Carnegie never gets too personal, but we can still learn a lot from his life.
Youth: Always learning, always working
As a kid Carnegie already understood two big life lessons (lessons that many people never seem to grasp). The first was that you should work hard to start earning. As a deliverer of messages he made it his job to learn everybodies name. When moving up the (corporate) ladder he learned on the job, wasn't afraid to ask for advice and grew to become one of the richest men in history. The second lesson is that he knew to learn when he was not working, reading books in the evening and keeping in good company. In his own words "There was scarcely a minute in which I couldn't learn something or find out how much there was to learn and how little I knew."
When speaking about his upbringing I believe we get the best insight into the person who Carnegie was. Always a sunny disposition to life, he describes how he has benefited from having poor parents. His parents fulfilled all the roles a kid looks up to (nurse, cook, teacher, saint, exemplar, guide, friend). He shows great gratitude for their support and start contributing to the family at a very young age. In later chapters they are rarely mentioned, but it's hard to imagine that they weren't taken good care of.
Business: Keep your focus and listen to people
When Carnegie proved himself very resourceful and capable in his first few jobs he soon rose to high positions. First he moved up the ladder in the railroad business, and then switched to become a business owner in production (most famously steel). For me he portraits that even in those early days a honest and kind person can always win from the cheating and deceiving kinds. When he speaks of his workers he is apt to name names and attribute positive traits to them. Even when in conflict with others he knows that first listening is more important than being heard.
One thing Carnegie is quoted for a lot is the following "Put all your eggs in one basket, and then watch that basket!" In the following sentences he argues that this doesn't mean you can't pursue multiple goals, nor to miss opportunities because you weren't looking beyond your own reach. He states that you should be fully committed and have single minded focus on your core business to make it a success. Looking at what he did you can see that this is true, he became big by focussing on steel. In his free time however he was very busy distributing his wealth, shortly engaged in politics and more generally used his power for the good.
Charity: Give it all away
His autobiography almost never mentions how much Carnegie has given away. In his lifetime Carnegie gave away more than 350 million dollars (giving away the remaining 30 million in his will). He used this money to build over 2,000 libraries, fund universities and promote world peace. One thing that is genius in the way he distributed his money is that he made sure the institutions he erected would stand for centuries to come. Municipalities were asked to maintain the libraries and each fund had very qualified boards.
In the essay The Gospel of Wealth Carnegie writes more about his giving philosophy. He states that it's a disgrace for rich people to die rich. He argues that the capitalist system can work because smart rich people can best distribute that wealth back to the people. He uses the example of a library as something that can better a society, but if that money would be evenly distributed would be lost to trifling matters (i.e. booze or other excesses). Carnegie states "In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves."
"People who are unable to motivate themselves must be content with mediocrity, no matter how impressive their other talents." - Andrew Carnegie
The Autobiography of Andrew Carnegie is one of the best biographies that I have read to date. It reflects on a great career, has a human touch and is packed with timeless lessons. It may forget to go into depth about his personal feelings or fail to expose flaws in his character. These miscomings are however forgiven when you consider the amazing legacy Carnegie has left behind. Please take your time to read this book when convenient.
...more
Carnegie was a steel tycoon. No one can argue about that. He did have an extraordinary life emerging from a poor family and fighting his way through. My impression is that Carnegie portrays perfection in his autobiography. The mistakes he made does not exceed fingers of one hand. In reality, no one's perfect. I wished to see his struggles, major problems he had encountered and how he fought them and succeeded. The impression you get from reading this autobiography was that his life was a strike
Carnegie was a steel tycoon. No one can argue about that. He did have an extraordinary life emerging from a poor family and fighting his way through. My impression is that Carnegie portrays perfection in his autobiography. The mistakes he made does not exceed fingers of one hand. In reality, no one's perfect. I wished to see his struggles, major problems he had encountered and how he fought them and succeeded. The impression you get from reading this autobiography was that his life was a strike of luck: He was intelligent and disciplined; He was destined to succeed without struggles. That's science fiction for me. Additionally, he spends a portion of the book rationalizing some actions he was criticized for, which made me doubt his intentions behind writing such an autobiography. The book overall was a fair read and Carnegie was a good writer.
...more
I could only make it 1/3 of the way through this book before giving up. I really like reading about business and biographies, but this is an example of how an autobiography should not be written.
People are quite bad at analysing themselves and their own life and that came off in the part of the book I read. Carnegie doesn't do a good job of identifying key points in his life and writing in an entertaining manner. In parts of the book he goes off on tangents that really don't have anything to do
I could only make it 1/3 of the way through this book before giving up. I really like reading about business and biographies, but this is an example of how an autobiography should not be written.
People are quite bad at analysing themselves and their own life and that came off in the part of the book I read. Carnegie doesn't do a good job of identifying key points in his life and writing in an entertaining manner. In parts of the book he goes off on tangents that really don't have anything to do with his life leaving the reader confused and wondering what the point is.
He seems to advance in his career without giving much thought as to why that happened. What made him different than others? One day he is working as a courier and the next day he is in charge of managing the railroad. He does try to identify some points (like loyalty and taking risks) but, in my view, there is probably a lot he left out. It would have been better to write his autobiography with a biographer, similar to Malcolm X, who could have probed more into these situations and discovered the real reasons behind his rise to fortune.
Recently I read the autobiography of Henry Ford which I really enjoyed. It wasn't so much an autobiography as a collection of his business values and principles. While I didn't agree with them and found him hypocritical in places, it was valuable to see Ford's thinking process and where he was coming from. I would have preferred more like that for Carnegie's book. There were some lessons and thought process but they were spaced too few between the long, drawn out stories to make it worthwhile continuing to read the book.
Despite not liking this book, I would still be interested in reading a good biography about the man if anyone has suggestions.
...more
Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth is really galling. He assumes that great men accumulate great wealth and that it is thereafter incumbent on them to give it away to benefit the public, or at least the segment of the public that can "help themselves." In appointing himself a public benefactor, Carnegie explicitly insists he can better shepherd enormous wealth than can common people if the money were distributed to them in small sums as wages. But his goal in doing so (helping advance the race) is incr
Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth is really galling. He assumes that great men accumulate great wealth and that it is thereafter incumbent on them to give it away to benefit the public, or at least the segment of the public that can "help themselves." In appointing himself a public benefactor, Carnegie explicitly insists he can better shepherd enormous wealth than can common people if the money were distributed to them in small sums as wages. But his goal in doing so (helping advance the race) is incredibly esoteric and subjective. In my view, that goal is essentially a red herring (whether he believes it to be so or not I'm not sure) distracting attention from the fact that his wealth would not have been so immense had collective bargaining or especially antitrust law been effective in his time. His arguments for protective tariffs are similarly weak and evasive. Neither does he, an avowed "individualist" nominally in favor of stiff economic competition, justify his preference for thinking of the good of "the race" or general society rather than the good of individual people. I have other complaints with his views (particularly strange is his story explaining how Ulysses S. Grant quit drinking), but I don't have the time to address them here. Suffice it to say, I find Carnegie's thinking clever yet self-serving and at times contradictory.
...more
I was rather unimpressed with Mr. Carnegie's need to name drop for the last third of the book. It had a slow start, but the first portion of the book, through his rise to success as a steel magnate, was pretty good. If he had refrained from adding the last third of the book, it would have been much better. Overall, he was a little hard to take. This was a class assignment, and we unanimously decided it was not one of the better selections, nor was Carnegie very likeable (in spite of his protesta
I was rather unimpressed with Mr. Carnegie's need to name drop for the last third of the book. It had a slow start, but the first portion of the book, through his rise to success as a steel magnate, was pretty good. If he had refrained from adding the last third of the book, it would have been much better. Overall, he was a little hard to take. This was a class assignment, and we unanimously decided it was not one of the better selections, nor was Carnegie very likeable (in spite of his protestations of popularity with his "men" and the elite). While respect should go to him as a truly self-made man and a generous philanthropist, he was rather smug and condescending and not very likeable as portrayed through his own words.
...more
Foremost recognize that it is a narrative written over a long period of time, which allowed for plenty of revision. The Autobiography reads well with many entertaining stories, but it also seems to push several agendas. I would almost say it is didactic. There are several great aphorisms in throughout the work (it seems that Carnegie meant to be quoted). It is an idealist description of the method of a successful working man, and treads lightly over the large problems adjoint to this process (it
Foremost recognize that it is a narrative written over a long period of time, which allowed for plenty of revision. The Autobiography reads well with many entertaining stories, but it also seems to push several agendas. I would almost say it is didactic. There are several great aphorisms in throughout the work (it seems that Carnegie meant to be quoted). It is an idealist description of the method of a successful working man, and treads lightly over the large problems adjoint to this process (it is regularly one sided). Worth reading? I would say yes. It has plenty of things that stop and make you think, but, to use a colloquial expression, take it with a grain of salt.
...more
It was good. Not sure if this was the edition I really read since I didn't find the essay on Wealth in it.
Not sure it is fair to really criticize or review this one, since it was never Carnegie's intent for anyone but his friends and family to read his autobiography. So I won't. Other than to say it is good, and he may have surrounded himself with those that were smarter than he, but Carnegie was no slouch. He was as educated as any man (and much better than most) and in the elite when it came t
It was good. Not sure if this was the edition I really read since I didn't find the essay on Wealth in it.
Not sure it is fair to really criticize or review this one, since it was never Carnegie's intent for anyone but his friends and family to read his autobiography. So I won't. Other than to say it is good, and he may have surrounded himself with those that were smarter than he, but Carnegie was no slouch. He was as educated as any man (and much better than most) and in the elite when it came to intelligence, as well as wisdom.
One of the great men of our country; one of the men who built America.
...more
Inspiring man, inspiring book. His life is a shining example of the pursuit of excellence and the desire to uplift his fellow man by providing them with the tools to help themselves. Every one of us can learn something from this book
Andrew Carnegie's inflation-adjusted fortune was worth around US$298 billion. Carnegie's most famous quote is "Put all your eggs in one basket and then watch that basket". In my 13 habits series of books, "Focus stay on track, concentrate;put all your eggs in one basket, and then watch that basket." Carnegie inspired my thinking for my "13 Habits that made me Billions". According to Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers, Andrew Carnegie, was the second most prolific wealth creator and recent rec
Andrew Carnegie's inflation-adjusted fortune was worth around US$298 billion. Carnegie's most famous quote is "Put all your eggs in one basket and then watch that basket". In my 13 habits series of books, "Focus stay on track, concentrate;put all your eggs in one basket, and then watch that basket." Carnegie inspired my thinking for my "13 Habits that made me Billions". According to Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers, Andrew Carnegie, was the second most prolific wealth creator and recent recorded history.
...more
a most amazing rendition of the "self Made man', the American Dream come true. As the introduction indicates, he was in no wise perfect but he discovered his talents and improved upon them to the benefit of his fellow man, subject to his philosophy of wealth accumulation and distribution.
His life will probably be viewed as out of fashion with today's ideals, but no one should be able to discount his innate ability to succeed where most of us have had limited success.
I tip my hat to him.
The first autobiography I've read in my life. I appreciated the introduction, which explained very well the difference between biographies and autobiographies.
The book itself is a beautiful recount of his life. The rise from his first job to the steel magnate is astounding. The change from industrialist to philanthropist is beautiful. I enjoyed the reading.
He may come off as a money-hungry bastard in history, but he had a fascinating life & capacity for building massive companies from nothing. He was quite a person.
Lots of interesting perspectives on historical figures from a first-hand experience.
This is a man I greatly admire and respect being poor from Scotland and making it big in the U.S. with a humble heart. Unfortunately the book was a bit dry and hard to get through. I would like to read one of his biographies instead.
This book was interesting because Carnegie had an interesting life. However, it ws hard to get through because it was not the most well-written book. One of his biographies may be easier to read.
I enjoyed this book. Having more insight into his early life, his loyalty to those closest to him and his family and his general views on business was refreshing. I say a must read.
Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish American industrialist who led the enormous expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century. He built a leadership role as a philanthropist for America and the British Empire. During the last 18 years of his life, he gave away to charities, foundations, and universities about $350 million (in 2011, $225 billion) – almost 90 percent of his fortune. H
Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish American industrialist who led the enormous expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century. He built a leadership role as a philanthropist for America and the British Empire. During the last 18 years of his life, he gave away to charities, foundations, and universities about $350 million (in 2011, $225 billion) – almost 90 percent of his fortune. His 1889 article proclaiming "The Gospel of Wealth" called on the rich to use their wealth to improve society, and it stimulated a wave of philanthropy.
...more
“Humanity is an organism, inherently rejecting all that is deleterious, that is, wrong, and absorbing after trial what is beneficial, that is, right. If so disposed, the Architect of the Universe, we must assume, might have made the world and man perfect, free from evil and from pain, as angels in heaven are thought to be; but although this was not done, man has been given the power of advancement rather than of retrogression. The Old and New Testaments remain, like other sacred writings of other lands, of value as records of the past and for such good lessons as they inculcate. Like the ancient writers of the Bible our thoughts should rest upon this life and our duties here. "To perform the duties of this world well, troubling not about another, is the prime wisdom," says Confucius, great sage and teacher. The next world and its duties we shall consider when we are placed in it.”
—
2 likes