In the annals of espionage, one name towers above all others: that of H.A.R. “Kim” Philby, the ringleader of the legendary Cambridge spies. A member of the British establishment, Philby joined the Secret Intelligence Service in 1940, rose to the head of Soviet counterintelligence, and, as MI6’s liaison with the CIA and the FBI, betrayed every secret of Allied operations to
In the annals of espionage, one name towers above all others: that of H.A.R. “Kim” Philby, the ringleader of the legendary Cambridge spies. A member of the British establishment, Philby joined the Secret Intelligence Service in 1940, rose to the head of Soviet counterintelligence, and, as MI6’s liaison with the CIA and the FBI, betrayed every secret of Allied operations to the Russians, fatally compromising covert actions to roll back the Iron Curtain in the early years of the Cold War.
Written from Moscow in 1967,
My Silent War
shook the world and introduced a new archetype in fiction: the unrepentant spy. It inspired John le Carré’s Smiley novels and the later espionage novels of Graham Greene. Kim Philby was history’s most successful spy. He was also an exceptional writer who gave us the great iconic story of the Cold War and revolutionized, in the process, the art of espionage writing.
...more
Paperback
,
256 pages
Published
September 24th 2002
by Modern Library
(first published 1968)
Philby. The name alone is enough to provoke a whole raft of visceral feelings about treachery, deceit, double dealing and betrayal. Together with Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross, Harold 'Kim' Philby was one of the Cambridge Five, the most devastating group of Soviet-controlled double agents in British history. But, of the five, it was Philby who did the most damage. Prior to his flight to Moscow in 1963, Philby had risen to head the Soviet desk at MI6, the UK's Sec
Philby. The name alone is enough to provoke a whole raft of visceral feelings about treachery, deceit, double dealing and betrayal. Together with Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross, Harold 'Kim' Philby was one of the Cambridge Five, the most devastating group of Soviet-controlled double agents in British history. But, of the five, it was Philby who did the most damage. Prior to his flight to Moscow in 1963, Philby had risen to head the Soviet desk at MI6, the UK's Secret Intelligence Service, and was on course to become its director, before doubts about his activities led him to be exiled as a journalist in Beirut. These often sneering memoirs, written in 1967 and published the following year in the aftermath of the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, are highly readable, if chilling. No apologies are made for his treachery, which is described in the mildest of terms. And, despite detailing his belief that anti-fascism led him to spy for the Soviets, Philby never discusses why he served Stalin, even when the latter was in a pact with Hitler. Graham Greene said that Philby's actions left him without a cause, a country or friends, while John le Carre wrote that he acted, not out of ideological committment, but because he wanted to gain the superiority of knowing things which others could not. Both men are right and any serious student of espionage has a duty to read this fascinating and chilling account of a life wasted in the service of a now dead, but once mighty and baleful, creed.
...more
I wasn't sure what I thought of Philby before I read this book. Its nothing to do with his politics; I've some fairly strong communist sympathies myself. But whilst I couldn't help but admire the chutzpah of anyone who manages to pull off the double agent trick as effectively as he did, I also couldn't forget that this is a man who had to betray people who were apparently close to him, which is something that sits very badly with me.
After reading about a third of the book my dilemma was resolved
I wasn't sure what I thought of Philby before I read this book. Its nothing to do with his politics; I've some fairly strong communist sympathies myself. But whilst I couldn't help but admire the chutzpah of anyone who manages to pull off the double agent trick as effectively as he did, I also couldn't forget that this is a man who had to betray people who were apparently close to him, which is something that sits very badly with me.
After reading about a third of the book my dilemma was resolved, he appears to have been a right berk. I always assumed that it must have taken an uncommonly sharp mind to do what Philby did, but you start to think that just maybe, rather than being incredibly clever, he was actually just another over educated member of the establishment, who only got away with it for so long because the people around him were exactly the same.
He's certainly no writer, the book is amazingly dull. He appears to have decided (or been told) to say nothing whatsoever about what information he passed on, or what activities he undertook on behalf of his Soviet bosses. In fact if you deleted three or four sentences you wouldn't know he was working for anyone but the UK government. The book becomes a procession of run-ins with staff at various levels of the UK secret services. It feels like being trapped talking to a particularly dull civil servant on the night of his retirement, who is determined to relate to you every detail of the times he bested some rival in a petty bureaucratic dispute.
The story is called "My Silent War" but Philby is entirely missing from the book. As previously noted, he (perhaps understandably) says nothing of one side of his work at all. But he also says practically nothing of his motivations. He mentions how committed he was to the communist ideals, but no passion for this comes across. There is no mention of the workers whose interests he was willing to go to such extreme lengths for. It feels like he picked his side in the political struggle as a purely academic exercise and his unwavering devotion to this cause appears more as an unwillingness to admit he could have been wrong. There absolutely no attempt to question his position. Soviet defectors to the west "commit suicide" with amazing regularity, and Philby without apparent raising of an eyebrow, comments only on how they must have been dissatisfied with the realities of capitalist life.
I could of course be doing Philby a terrible injustice here (he says swiftly, looking around for anyone with a sharp looking umbrella). He may really have done all this for the good of his fellow man, its just not how it comes across in this book.
Alba73
" he was actually just another over educated member of the establishment, who only got away with it for so long because the people around him were exa
" he was actually just another over educated member of the establishment, who only got away with it for so long because the people around him were exactly the same." He was clever but you're spot on here. I think that much history has proved now. They had occasions to catch him but MI6 was all a bunch of "One of Us", at least back then. They didn't want to see or believe. All a bunch of Cambridge and Oxford educated, coming from "good" and wealthy families etc.etc. Even their final interview with Philby in Beirut, when they knew for certain that he was a KGB spy is incredible and so grotesque. Sending a friend of Philby, Nichola Elliott, to do the job. I mean it's LOL.
...more
updated
Oct 03, 2015 12:19AM
This book is worth reading if only to provide a personal perspective on the shadow war during WWII and the early Cold War.
An abundance of official relationships to individuals who are no longer prominent and laying out the organization of early British espionage via acronyms can make reading a little confusing but a guide at the front for the latter does help. Philby begins his espionage career in Spain prior to WWII and the confusion of the war makes it easy for anyone with some connections to
This book is worth reading if only to provide a personal perspective on the shadow war during WWII and the early Cold War.
An abundance of official relationships to individuals who are no longer prominent and laying out the organization of early British espionage via acronyms can make reading a little confusing but a guide at the front for the latter does help. Philby begins his espionage career in Spain prior to WWII and the confusion of the war makes it easy for anyone with some connections to get in. The organization is rife with petty rivalries and incompetents.
His characterizations of Hoover ( FBI), Angleton (CIA), and Allen Dulles (CIA) along with a host of other players and officials provides interesting sketches of individuals and how their personal quirks can affect the functioning of bureaucratic organizations. Philby notes an extreme dislike for Hoover and his organization's use of blackmail of American citizens to maintain his grip on power.
Not until his posting to Washington and Burgess' defection does Philby allude to his covert association with the USSR as well as possible knowledge of the activities of Burgess and Maclean. He spends a fair amount of time discussing his interrogations and his bouts with the media once he came under suspicion but does not provide underlying reasons for his treason other than his motivation was not money.
...more
I was expecting so much more of this book since Kim Philby was the most notoriously successful spy of the entire Cold War era, and quite possibly the most important secret agent who ever lived. And, it's not that Philby can't write, because he really can, yet his choice of material and his impartial approach seems to render his extraordinary life almost dry and dull. Kim Philby was a secret lifelong Soviet Communist who became the head of the British secret service, MI6, and betrayed or serious
I was expecting so much more of this book since Kim Philby was the most notoriously successful spy of the entire Cold War era, and quite possibly the most important secret agent who ever lived. And, it's not that Philby can't write, because he really can, yet his choice of material and his impartial approach seems to render his extraordinary life almost dry and dull. Kim Philby was a secret lifelong Soviet Communist who became the head of the British secret service, MI6, and betrayed or seriously compromised nearly all covert activity by every agent operating for the Americans and British, yet managed to remain in place and undetected for almost three decades. However, Philby's book never rises above, 'just the facts', and completely lacks emotional depth. This book should have been a thrill a minute, but comes across almost as flat and passionless as a Wikipedia entry.
John le Carre based his Smiley character on Kim Philby, and I think that the fictionalized account provides more realism than Philby's own autobiography. And this is most unfortunate since Kim Philby was a writer of exceptional quality, and I'm mystified that he chose to tell the story of his most exceptional life with such a dearth of excitement.
...more
Alba73
"John le Carre based his Smiley character on Kim Philby" You're totally wrong on this one. The character inspired by Philby in Le Carré's book "Tinker
"John le Carre based his Smiley character on Kim Philby" You're totally wrong on this one. The character inspired by Philby in Le Carré's book "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" is not Smiley but Bill Haydon.The traitor, the mole, that Smiley was after. Le Carré himselfs explains in an interview with Channel 4 how Philby betrayed his (Le Carré) identity to the Russians, which was a factor in the 1964 termination of his intelligence career. Smiley and Philby are complete opposites as characters.
...more
Oct 02, 2015 11:58PM
Somewhat disappointing, most of the book is about his daily activities,
he tells almost nothing about what intel he gave the Russians,
or what effect it had for the US & allies
page 53
he gives credit for breaking the german cypher to Dilly Knox
I've read that
1 polish mathematicians broke the cypher
2 alan turning " "
3 d knox " "
but the story I'm most inclined to believe
is that a polish machinist worked at the cypher factory
assembling the machines and before war broke out in sep 1939,
he fled to
Somewhat disappointing, most of the book is about his daily activities,
he tells almost nothing about what intel he gave the Russians,
or what effect it had for the US & allies
page 53
he gives credit for breaking the german cypher to Dilly Knox
I've read that
1 polish mathematicians broke the cypher
2 alan turning " "
3 d knox " "
but the story I'm most inclined to believe
is that a polish machinist worked at the cypher factory
assembling the machines and before war broke out in sep 1939,
he fled to Britain,
there he gave plans of how the machine was made to the British
not brilliant, but probably true.
so much of the history that has been written the last 100 years
is a lot of lies.
what to believe?
...more
I hated the first three-quarters if this book and nearly abandoned it. Nothing worse than boring and confusing, with very little to take away. I had heard of Philby before and was expecting a much more interesting story with a lot of intrigue and adventure. I would have probably been better off reading a book about Philby rather than his autobiography
The last 50 pages were more interesting and also the only thing that prevented me from giving this true spy story only one star. I would have like
I hated the first three-quarters if this book and nearly abandoned it. Nothing worse than boring and confusing, with very little to take away. I had heard of Philby before and was expecting a much more interesting story with a lot of intrigue and adventure. I would have probably been better off reading a book about Philby rather than his autobiography
The last 50 pages were more interesting and also the only thing that prevented me from giving this true spy story only one star. I would have liked to have learned more about the global and historical implications of Philby's espionage. He is, after all, considered one of the greatest spies of all time. But, by the end of this book, I barely can tell why.
...more
This book would have perhaps been slightly better if I remembered more about Kim than what I got from compendiums of the world's greatest spies that I read as a child, but only marginally so. The book, written 5-10 years after his defection to the USSR, goes heavy on the interoffice politics of the SIS in WW2 as well as brief and uninteresting paragraph long character sketches of his coworkers. Occasionally, he will make a brief nudge-nudge, wink-wink reference to being responsible for the failu
This book would have perhaps been slightly better if I remembered more about Kim than what I got from compendiums of the world's greatest spies that I read as a child, but only marginally so. The book, written 5-10 years after his defection to the USSR, goes heavy on the interoffice politics of the SIS in WW2 as well as brief and uninteresting paragraph long character sketches of his coworkers. Occasionally, he will make a brief nudge-nudge, wink-wink reference to being responsible for the failure of some anti-Soviet spy effort but other than his discussion of the Volkov affair and how he got Burgess and Maclean out there is nothing there.
If you are intimately familiar with his record and the history of the British secret service then I expect this book would shade in some details for you. Otherwise the man was wise to leave the post-spy literary career to Graham Greene.
...more
"'He betrayed his country' – yes, perhaps he did, but who among us has not committed treason to something or someone more important than a country?" asks Graham Greene in the foreword.
Yes, but not many of us have worked with a government to deprive individuals of their life or liberty. Eighteen young men were parachuted into Eastern Europe and, thanks to Philby, were never heard from again.
It's a cold book and I couldn't help thinking that Philby's greatest crime was taking it all too seriously
"'He betrayed his country' – yes, perhaps he did, but who among us has not committed treason to something or someone more important than a country?" asks Graham Greene in the foreword.
Yes, but not many of us have worked with a government to deprive individuals of their life or liberty. Eighteen young men were parachuted into Eastern Europe and, thanks to Philby, were never heard from again.
It's a cold book and I couldn't help thinking that Philby's greatest crime was taking it all too seriously. It sounds like he was the only person in MI6, MI5, the FBI or the CIA doing anything other than arguing with colleagues in the governments or other agencies. He takes great joy in pointing out how ineffectual the services were and how most agents spent huge amounts of time receiving generous salaries for doing nothing. Philby demonstrates that he worked hard, driving around Turkey and taking countless photos of the border with the USSR. But perhaps it would have been better if he'd been more like the others?
"the men of the FBI, with hardly an exception, were proud of their insularity, of having sprung from the grass roots. One of the senior G-men I met in Washington claimed to have had a grandpappy who kept a general store at Horse Creek, Missouri. They were therefore whisky-drinkers, with beer for light refreshment. By contrast, CIA men flaunted cosmopolitan postures. They would discuss absinthe and serve Burgundy above room temperature. This is not just flippancy. It points to a deep social cleavage between the two organisations,"
...more
This is a short, rather bare bones account of Kim Philby's pre-Moscow life, mainly centering on his time spent in the British secret service and abroad. Written by Philby whilst in exile in the Soviet Union, it's not so much an autobiography (Philby avoids talking too much about himself) more an insider's look at a life many of us can never hope, or really want, to lead.
Starting with his Cambridge years and brief stint as a journalist in Franco Spain, it moves on to Philby's early career in the
This is a short, rather bare bones account of Kim Philby's pre-Moscow life, mainly centering on his time spent in the British secret service and abroad. Written by Philby whilst in exile in the Soviet Union, it's not so much an autobiography (Philby avoids talking too much about himself) more an insider's look at a life many of us can never hope, or really want, to lead.
Starting with his Cambridge years and brief stint as a journalist in Franco Spain, it moves on to Philby's early career in the SIS, through his rapid rise through the ranks, finally culminating in his fall from grace following the Burgess and Maclean scandal. Throughout, Philby comments pungently on the various figures who made up his secret world, many of whom are now mere footnotes. Of his own actions that led to the death and capture of countless agents he remains chillingly detached.
A couple of the chapters focus on specific cases, several of which seem to have formed the background for a number of well known spy thrillers. One of these, involving an operation to infiltrate spies into Soviet occupied Georgia, is probably the most interesting part of the book, though also the most disturbing, knowing as we do Philby's probable role in the doomed operation. The fact that it's described in such matter-of-fact tones makes it all the more so.
It's hard to say what to make of the book as a whole. As a portrait of the intelligence world it's tainted by the fact that we can never be sure just how truthful Philby's words are, or how much he was forced to leave out by his Moscow masters. As an exploration of Philby as a person, his motivations and deepest convictions, it's rather too shallow and glossy. An interesting read, all told, though much like Philby himself impossible to pin down.
...more
Well,...A mixed bag. Definitely worth reading if for only understanding the twisted and convoluted pathways the mind of a traitor can take. Philby was a loathsome,narcissistic, arrogant and self centered neurotic, who harboured precious little love for anyone or anything other than himself. Throughout his book, he delivers tirades of scathing and disparaging remarks against the likes of J.Edgar Hoover, and Alan Dulles(former directors FBI/CIA respectively) "...the bumbling Dulles" (Philby 2002,
Well,...A mixed bag. Definitely worth reading if for only understanding the twisted and convoluted pathways the mind of a traitor can take. Philby was a loathsome,narcissistic, arrogant and self centered neurotic, who harboured precious little love for anyone or anything other than himself. Throughout his book, he delivers tirades of scathing and disparaging remarks against the likes of J.Edgar Hoover, and Alan Dulles(former directors FBI/CIA respectively) "...the bumbling Dulles" (Philby 2002, p.180). Still "Harold" (his true name) was never on par with their stature. A surprising and most disappointing touch was the fawning introduction be Graham Greene, and wonders about his sanity and loyalty after reading his contribution. Nevertheless the book makes for good reading and the story is captivating. It is essential to fight of the little jabs of distaste that Philby inspires as one traverses the pages. He considers himself the ultimate spy, the maleversion of Mata Hari personified. Constantly boasting of his prowess against the rival powers (whom he has betrayed). His father was not much better and the fruit, as it can be seen, never fell far from the tree. He whines and moans over the apparent injustice he suffers at the hands of his (courteous and controlled) interrogators, and the reader wonders how he would have faired in present day conditions. Toward the end of the story, once he has been unmasked, for all intents and purposes, the adjectives, "nasty," "ugly," pop up frequently, indicating the manifestation of sociopathic tendencies and a failure to see his own failures, preferring rather to place blame upon the rest of society. Very few people, other than Philby himself, escape his bile and wrath. Unfortunately Kim Philby did not live to see his communist dream crumble to ashes, rather he wasted away in his humble Moscow abode, unloved, unwanted and rejected. Disrespected and rejected by his friends, colleagues and nation Kim Philby passed in the night without great ado just another wasted life filled with treason and bitterness, and perhaps that was his greatest punishment of all.
...more
The book is interesting and very well written (if you like extremely dry British humor) but it leaves out quite a lot. If you are interested, for example, in how and why Philby first became a Soviet agent, don't bother because he doesn't really explain the beginnings of the whole thing - he assumes his audience already knows, I guess. Mostly this is a history of Philby's career in British intelligence from the perspective of someone infiltrating it and the bulk of it is essentially a summing up
The book is interesting and very well written (if you like extremely dry British humor) but it leaves out quite a lot. If you are interested, for example, in how and why Philby first became a Soviet agent, don't bother because he doesn't really explain the beginnings of the whole thing - he assumes his audience already knows, I guess. Mostly this is a history of Philby's career in British intelligence from the perspective of someone infiltrating it and the bulk of it is essentially a summing up of who Philby felt was competent and who he could easily exploit, with various hints dropped about why various operations were foiled by the Soviets or why they knew things they shouldn't have. Then towards the end there is an account of the period of initial suspicion around him and how he managed to dodge being caught, though his subsequent service in the Middle East is very much glossed over. I suppose given that he wrote the book in Moscow he was rather limited in what he could say directly, in any case the book is interesting and often funny in a sort of snarky way but if you want to know the full story you'll have to do a lot more other reading.
...more
A detailed but short account of Philby's career in British intelligence (albeit as a Soviet agent) My Silent War is not 'tell-all' but it is a fascinating read nonetheless. Philby and the other Cambridge spies became Communist agents in the service of the Soviet Union because they believed it was the only way to defeat fascism in Europe. However, Philby was the only one to stick wholeheartedly by the Soviet Union, through the show trials, pogroms, and disappointments, believing that he had betra
A detailed but short account of Philby's career in British intelligence (albeit as a Soviet agent) My Silent War is not 'tell-all' but it is a fascinating read nonetheless. Philby and the other Cambridge spies became Communist agents in the service of the Soviet Union because they believed it was the only way to defeat fascism in Europe. However, Philby was the only one to stick wholeheartedly by the Soviet Union, through the show trials, pogroms, and disappointments, believing that he had betrayed his country in service of a greater good. Sadly, one gets the sense that Philby batted for the wrong side of history. He may have been buried a 'Hero of the Soviet Union' but ultimately his silent war was lost, with the two pariah states of Cuba and North Korea the last remnants of his beloved Communism. If only he had stuck with the good guys, he would have defeated fascism and been able to watch the cricket.
...more
Really wanted to read this after reading A Spy Among Friends
A Spy Among Friends: Kim Philby and the Great Betrayal
, and found it at Powell's. Philby was a really intelligent and idealistic secret agent, and also a total dick.
An interesting take that merits more of a review than I can provide over a mobile phone keyboard...it isn't really his autobiography as much as it is his recounting of his time in intelligence. Shines an interesting light on the times and activities of the British and the Soviets. Probably required reading for anyone looking to read the other books on Philby that are popular right now.
Kim Philby was a fascinating character whose brilliance and addiction to treachery are equally staggering, but boy is he ever unable to bring his own story to life in this nose-thumbing account of capital-offense-level malfeasance. Rogues are usually fun, but not this guy. Particularly after reading this autobiography, it's hard to believe he was ever really a dedicated communist. He was just a dedicated liar with the greatest contempt for everyone he came into contact with.
Anyone who wants to g
Kim Philby was a fascinating character whose brilliance and addiction to treachery are equally staggering, but boy is he ever unable to bring his own story to life in this nose-thumbing account of capital-offense-level malfeasance. Rogues are usually fun, but not this guy. Particularly after reading this autobiography, it's hard to believe he was ever really a dedicated communist. He was just a dedicated liar with the greatest contempt for everyone he came into contact with.
Anyone who wants to get a glimpse of the real Philby should check out the YouTube video of the 1955 press conference in which he disavows his relationship with Guy Burgess. His disdain could not be more palpable: he actually seems to be teetering on the verge of laughter throughout.
Philby is a fascinating character in World War II and Post WWII history. A master of espionage, he very nearly become director of MI6 before it was discovered that two British agents (Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess) had been double agents for the Soviets. Philby supposedly tipped Maclean and Burgess off, thereby bringing suspicion upon himself.
He was a member of the Cambridge Five, whose intelligence activities for the NKVD and KGB inflicted a great deal of damage on British and American intelli
Philby is a fascinating character in World War II and Post WWII history. A master of espionage, he very nearly become director of MI6 before it was discovered that two British agents (Donald Maclean and Guy Burgess) had been double agents for the Soviets. Philby supposedly tipped Maclean and Burgess off, thereby bringing suspicion upon himself.
He was a member of the Cambridge Five, whose intelligence activities for the NKVD and KGB inflicted a great deal of damage on British and American intelligence efforts.
He was a friend of Graham Greene, who, incidentally, never spoke an ill word of Philby.
It has been suggested that Philby may have actually been a triple agent while in exile in Russia.
That said, Philby comes across as arrogant and condescending in his writings, and the book suffers because of it.
...more
This is Philby's own account of his life working in the British secret service (whilst spying for the Soviets). An absolutely fascinating perspective on events, the tale that launched a thousand spy novels. Although he pulls a veil over some areas, particularly his Soviet contacts, he is happy at other times to put the boot in on some individuals. I was reading this at the same time as Robert Harris's fictional account of the Dreyfus affair in France, and was struck by how accurately Harris mana
This is Philby's own account of his life working in the British secret service (whilst spying for the Soviets). An absolutely fascinating perspective on events, the tale that launched a thousand spy novels. Although he pulls a veil over some areas, particularly his Soviet contacts, he is happy at other times to put the boot in on some individuals. I was reading this at the same time as Robert Harris's fictional account of the Dreyfus affair in France, and was struck by how accurately Harris managed to convey the petty office politics that life serving the secret service of your country seems to boil down to.
...more
You would expect a book by one of the most famous double agents in the history of spying to be more interesting. It's not bad, but what Philby chose to write about wasn't interesting. More than half the book focuses on his work during WWII, and while he was passing information to the Russians at that time they were on our side, and it's not as interesting. His actions and motivations in the Cold War are the things that were of interest to me, and those don't get nearly as much space in his book.
You would expect a book by one of the most famous double agents in the history of spying to be more interesting. It's not bad, but what Philby chose to write about wasn't interesting. More than half the book focuses on his work during WWII, and while he was passing information to the Russians at that time they were on our side, and it's not as interesting. His actions and motivations in the Cold War are the things that were of interest to me, and those don't get nearly as much space in his book. He also spends a lot of time talking about the personalities in MI5 and SIS. It's not bad, it's just not what I expected.
...more
If you enjoyed John Le Carre's books about George Smiley, this is a book that makes them an even richer experience. Also, for those who like untrustworthy narrators of fiction, Philby is the real deal, a truly untrustworthy narrator of non-fiction.
It is hard to describe just how appalling Philby is. He writes an effective, and charming narrative of his life, but the almost complete lack of real feeling for other human beings enables him to essentially gloss over many of the terrible things he d
If you enjoyed John Le Carre's books about George Smiley, this is a book that makes them an even richer experience. Also, for those who like untrustworthy narrators of fiction, Philby is the real deal, a truly untrustworthy narrator of non-fiction.
It is hard to describe just how appalling Philby is. He writes an effective, and charming narrative of his life, but the almost complete lack of real feeling for other human beings enables him to essentially gloss over many of the terrible things he did. Read closely it is the bare bones record of a man who did truly despicable things.
...more
Read this I guess in Germany around 1968. Having been steeped in TV's 'I Led Three Lives' I suppose I was primed for something like this, especially after probably having read Joe Heller's 'Catch 22'. I was particularly taken with Captain Yossarian's solution to the problem. Perhaps I was influenced by the gaming aspect to the action which may be closer to the bone than the 'logic' behind one's actions. The point being, like Gen Arnold . . . he got away, which in itself is not always the moral h
Read this I guess in Germany around 1968. Having been steeped in TV's 'I Led Three Lives' I suppose I was primed for something like this, especially after probably having read Joe Heller's 'Catch 22'. I was particularly taken with Captain Yossarian's solution to the problem. Perhaps I was influenced by the gaming aspect to the action which may be closer to the bone than the 'logic' behind one's actions. The point being, like Gen Arnold . . . he got away, which in itself is not always the moral high ground, but I was rather taken with this story.
...more
So this was really,
really
interesting, but I personally found it difficult to follow because I can never seem to wrap my mind around politics. Nevertheless, it was informative and enthralling.
Bonus points because a couple of little things in Foyle's War now make sense to me.
Foreword by Graham Greene, who says it reads better than any spy novel. Philby was a pariah over here after making a run for it to Moscow in 1963. Burgess and Maclean followed later, and Blunt - the fourth man - later still. Philby said he put up with the Stalin years as a Catholic would put up with the Inquisition, remaining true to his beliefs despite the bad times.
Certainly one of the better parts of my class on the Cold War. This book is short, and rather interesting because Kim Philby had no remorse for his actions. As you read his autobiography, you cannot help but be pulled into his world and at once develop a respect and disgust for him and his actions. Philby is one of the most interesting individuals from the Cold War era.
The autobiography of the most infamous "spy" in modern history, it isn't difficult to tell why Philby evaded detection for so long: He doesn't say much of anything about his experience as a Soviet agent.
This is a difficult book to rate because it is so distasteful, in many ways, to read. I've read a half-dozen or so books on Philby/the Cambridge spies. Philby's version discloses a contemptuous and arrogant individual with a crabbed and constipated soul. He does not display even a misguided idealism. Still, it is is fascinating as a case study.
I made myself read this as research for my own writing. It's a bad book, with some interesting factoids for spy-geeks like me. Philby is so full of himself I'm guessing he has to have someone else eat for him. Still, it's a real-life spy story written by the spy in the story. Two stars, but not recommended as a pleasurable read.
Starts off slow and is fairly tedious going for a decent chunk of the book but sparks into life towards the end. The real interest and best discussion regarding this memoir though lies to a great extent outside the book itself. Reactions to Philby can expose a great deal about a persons politics and worldview.
updated Oct 03, 2015 12:19AM