This is a pre-1923 historical reproduction that was curated for quality. Quality assurance was conducted on each of these books in an attempt to remove books with imperfections introduced by the digitization process. Though we have made best efforts - the books may have occasional errors that do not impede the reading experience. We believe this work is culturally importan
This is a pre-1923 historical reproduction that was curated for quality. Quality assurance was conducted on each of these books in an attempt to remove books with imperfections introduced by the digitization process. Though we have made best efforts - the books may have occasional errors that do not impede the reading experience. We believe this work is culturally important and have elected to bring the book back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide.
...more
Hardcover
,
158 pages
Published
September 22nd 2009
by BiblioLife
(first published 1908)
Mark Twain takes up the the age old debate: whether Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. With his typical humor and frank nature, Twain presents the evidence forth. But in the treatment of the study, I find myself unable to focus on the important (Shakespeare) since Twain starts to present a lot of things about his own upbringing. When he starts comparing himself to Shakespeare, any trace of scholarly expectations I had were gone, but I kept reading since his arguments are so lovely to hear at times a
Mark Twain takes up the the age old debate: whether Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare. With his typical humor and frank nature, Twain presents the evidence forth. But in the treatment of the study, I find myself unable to focus on the important (Shakespeare) since Twain starts to present a lot of things about his own upbringing. When he starts comparing himself to Shakespeare, any trace of scholarly expectations I had were gone, but I kept reading since his arguments are so lovely to hear at times and these arguments are quite common sense (albeit ineffective). They make you question Shakespeare and inspire a healthy skepticism.
...more
"I only
believed
Bacon wrote Shakespeare, whereas I
knew
Shakespeare didn’t." This is Twain's essential premise. We may not be able to prove conclusively who wrote the works that bear Shakespeare's name (though Francis Bacon gets Twain's vote), but given the facts, any thinking, "reasoning" (a word too often misappropriated by the Stratfordians, according to Twain) person can rule out William Shakespeare completely. If you want to enter the fray on the authorship controversy, this may not be the
"I only
believed
Bacon wrote Shakespeare, whereas I
knew
Shakespeare didn’t." This is Twain's essential premise. We may not be able to prove conclusively who wrote the works that bear Shakespeare's name (though Francis Bacon gets Twain's vote), but given the facts, any thinking, "reasoning" (a word too often misappropriated by the Stratfordians, according to Twain) person can rule out William Shakespeare completely. If you want to enter the fray on the authorship controversy, this may not be the most authoritative place to start, but it'll probably be the most fun.
...more
I loved recording this book, and was flattered to read Kevin McDonnell's review in The Mark Twain Forum; here's an excerpt: "(Henzel) maintains a mild but steady Twain presence, with a soft drawl, appropriate pauses and phrasings, and pleasant modulations. He moves the text along in a convincing first-person voice without resorting to the exaggerated cornpone twang that might distract his listeners from Twain's message."
Very entertaining discussion of the Shakespeare authorship question from an "Baconist" point of view.
He makes some good points.
1. The Plays and the Poetry are too good for someone of the Stratford-upon-Avon origins attributed to William Shakespeare. And too good for the fellow who scratched out "Good Friend for Iesus sake ... moves my bones" for his tomb.
2. There is too much missing biography and too little time in London to acquire the author's many accomplishments while also scraping out a li
Very entertaining discussion of the Shakespeare authorship question from an "Baconist" point of view.
He makes some good points.
1. The Plays and the Poetry are too good for someone of the Stratford-upon-Avon origins attributed to William Shakespeare. And too good for the fellow who scratched out "Good Friend for Iesus sake ... moves my bones" for his tomb.
2. There is too much missing biography and too little time in London to acquire the author's many accomplishments while also scraping out a living in the theater.
3. William Shakespeare of Stratford seems to have a hard time writing his own name.
4. The Stratford Shakespeare seems to have died unnoticed, unmourned, and unremembered in a town in which he spent a quarter of his life and was a relatively wealthy man and active businessman. Twain points out that he himself is better accounted for in Hannibal, Missouri at the time he is writing than Shakespeare was in his home town during his entire lifetime.
5. It is odd that there are no specimens of writing in his own hand apart from four signatures. For such a literate and culturally active man to have not left behind some letters or manuscripts seems very remarkable.
6. In particular, he goes into Shakespeare's apparently deep knowledge of the law and its proceedings. Some "Statfordolaters" assert he must have worked in a law firm or spent a great deal of time watching at court in London in the early days. But as a law clerk he would have been called upon to sign as a witness on many occasions and there is no such evidence in London or Stratford. (He does suggest that there is something to the idea Stratford Will apprenticed as a butcher, namely the play
Titus Andronicus
).
I wonder if there has been any conclusive proof that all the works, plays, poems, sonnets, the works are all written by the same person. My favorite alternative is the Oxfordian theory. It is noted that the dating of the plays shows signs of being arranged to suit the Stratfordolaters (as is the case with most of Will's "biography"), and a curious drop off shortly after Vere dies. (And he may have had a few in the works or even complete, able to be polished up and used afterward as well.)
Great fun, and Occam's razor cuts both ways. Seems to be the biggest mystery of this kind in civilization second only to the question of what Jesus was up to before he was thirty.
...more
This book is not at all what I expected from famed satirist Mark Twain.
I was expecting something fairly witty and light, and the book did start out like that but then it quickly descended into this long rant about how there wasn't any evidence William of Stratford was the Shakespeare who wrote the famed Plays and Poems. Mr. Twain seems to think that we just blindly accept the Stratford chap out of blind tradition and superstition. But I say to him that Will Shakespeare penned Shakespeare, I know
This book is not at all what I expected from famed satirist Mark Twain.
I was expecting something fairly witty and light, and the book did start out like that but then it quickly descended into this long rant about how there wasn't any evidence William of Stratford was the Shakespeare who wrote the famed Plays and Poems. Mr. Twain seems to think that we just blindly accept the Stratford chap out of blind tradition and superstition. But I say to him that Will Shakespeare penned Shakespeare, I know because his name is on them. I also know that Mark Twain didn't write all his books. Sam Clemens did.
...more
Shakespeare didn't write Shakespeare. I think he's right, and he doesn't fail to entertain. A more scholarly treatment on the subject is Shakespeare's Unorthodox Biography by Diana Price.
I chose this book after seeing a great stage impersonation of Mark Twain expounding on his question of who really wrote the Shakespeare plays and poems. His comparison of this question to the question and validity of the Bible was hilarious, and much of it was word for word taken from this book. It was probably written before the Duke of Oxford became the prime possibility as the actual author, but Twain included him as one of several candidates for that honor. I would recommend "Is Shakespeare
I chose this book after seeing a great stage impersonation of Mark Twain expounding on his question of who really wrote the Shakespeare plays and poems. His comparison of this question to the question and validity of the Bible was hilarious, and much of it was word for word taken from this book. It was probably written before the Duke of Oxford became the prime possibility as the actual author, but Twain included him as one of several candidates for that honor. I would recommend "Is Shakespeare Dead" by Mark Twain to anyone who is interested in the Shakespeare question.
...more
I was intrigued by this book originally when reading some criticism and praise of it. As a satire, the book sounded like an interesting attack on just about all of the Shakespeare arguments as well as our tendency as a culture to try to overanalyze things. Sounds good, right? Unfortunately, the book didn't quite come off like that to me.
Is Shakespeare Dead
didn't just come off as a misinformed argument in favor of Baconian authorship, but it also came off as just... a rushed and jumbled essay th
I was intrigued by this book originally when reading some criticism and praise of it. As a satire, the book sounded like an interesting attack on just about all of the Shakespeare arguments as well as our tendency as a culture to try to overanalyze things. Sounds good, right? Unfortunately, the book didn't quite come off like that to me.
Is Shakespeare Dead
didn't just come off as a misinformed argument in favor of Baconian authorship, but it also came off as just... a rushed and jumbled essay that never found its footing. By the time
Mark Twain
began to employ his comedic touch the exhaustive arguments and analyses had already soured me to the piece itself. It was just confusing and strange from beginning to end. I feel like I missed something somewhere along the line, but if I did, then a great many readers did over the years as well.
I'm open to arguments, though I am a Stratford supporter overall. This just wasn't even an argument as much as it was a flailing
Mark Twain
who couldn't make up his mind as to what narrative voice would best support the piece going forward.
...more
An exploration of the authorship of Shakespeare's works: the Shakespeare- Bacon controversy. Twain knows how to make such an exploration interesting with his sarcastic humor. He comes with facts and surmises, and however it is clear to which side Twain is tending to, his own remarks held controversies within themselves as well:
"...when principle and personal interest found themselves in opposition to each other and a choice had to be made: I let principle go, and went to the oth
Are facts facts?
An exploration of the authorship of Shakespeare's works: the Shakespeare- Bacon controversy. Twain knows how to make such an exploration interesting with his sarcastic humor. He comes with facts and surmises, and however it is clear to which side Twain is tending to, his own remarks held controversies within themselves as well:
"...when principle and personal interest found themselves in opposition to each other and a choice had to be made: I let principle go, and went to the other side. (...) Study, practice, experience in handling my end of the matter presently enabled me to take my new position almost seriously; a little bit later, utterly seriously; a little later still, lovingly, gratefully, devotedly; finally: fiercely, rabidly, uncompromisingly. After that, I was welded to my faith, I was theoretically ready to die for it, and I looked down with compassion not unmixed with scorn, upon everybody else's faith that didn't tally with mine."
"...And whenever we have been furnished a fetish, and have been taught to believe in it, and love it and worship it, and refrain from examining it, there is no evidence, howsoever clear and strong, that can persuade us to withdraw from it our loyalty and our devotion."
A friend recommended I read this book. I'm not a big fan of Mark Twain and I guess I would also say that I am not a fan of the various theories that Shakespeare wasn't written by Shakespeare because X Y Z reasons. Therefore, I was not really a fan of this book. The best criticism of Shakespeare =/= Shakespeare theories is that they seem to find it impossible that someone from a lower class background could ever write something so lasting and important to culture (isn't it crazy?!?!), which is ju
A friend recommended I read this book. I'm not a big fan of Mark Twain and I guess I would also say that I am not a fan of the various theories that Shakespeare wasn't written by Shakespeare because X Y Z reasons. Therefore, I was not really a fan of this book. The best criticism of Shakespeare =/= Shakespeare theories is that they seem to find it impossible that someone from a lower class background could ever write something so lasting and important to culture (isn't it crazy?!?!), which is just ridiculous. I also have issues with the argument that just because someone was not the subject of heavy biography (and also, at that time period, who would write a bio of a rather unimportant personage, despite his being a renowned playwright/etc) negates existence. We might as well claim half the figures in ancient history don't exist, in this case. I actually found myself eye rolling by the end, which may just be a sign of me taking a satirical (?) book too seriously, but yeah, I was most definitely not a fan.
...more
Mark Twain offers his thoughts on whether Shakespeare was really the author of his plays. This starts out really good. I particularly liked the part where he talks about the necessity of experience in order to write about a topic well. Also, the part where he talks about his time on the Mississippi River with a captain who loved Shakespeare is interesting. At about the halfway point, this piece starts to ramble, though.
This is a very short book, but a hilariously funny account of the Shakespeare authorship question through the filter of the inimitable Mark Twain. He doesn't know who DID write the plays, but he's pretty certain who didn't.
This is not really "Is Shakespeare Dead" because he certainly is but who wrote Shakespeare's works? Twain makes a very interesting and plausible argument that Francis Bacon could have been the author, because there is no evidence that Shakespeare had any legal training and whoever wrote the works would virtually had to have been working as a lawyer (at some point in his life) to have such an indepth knowledge of English law and use legal jargon so extensively throughout his works.
It certainly ma
This is not really "Is Shakespeare Dead" because he certainly is but who wrote Shakespeare's works? Twain makes a very interesting and plausible argument that Francis Bacon could have been the author, because there is no evidence that Shakespeare had any legal training and whoever wrote the works would virtually had to have been working as a lawyer (at some point in his life) to have such an indepth knowledge of English law and use legal jargon so extensively throughout his works.
At first the points Twain makes are feasible but on reading further, his arguments are disproved by other authors (Andrew Lang, Sidney Lee). His main argument seems to be that a young man who spent his time holding horses outside a theatre would have no time to write plays. This seems to me to be the main argument against Bacon being the author, surely he was one of the busiest men of the age, being a scientist, serious author, lawyer and politician! A very interesting read though.
A thoughtful and interesting essay (does this qualify as an essay?) which is just as much about questioning traditions as it is about whether or not Francis Bacon was really the author of Shakepeare's plays -- and quite frankly, I could care less about the latter, but Twain delivered well. Strangely enough, begins with a great section about Satan.
Nicely written. What I expect from Mark Twain. Hated the subject material. They said semi-autobiographical. But I was hoping for more than semi, I think.
I don't care much about who wrote the Shakespeare plays.
Certainly helped wake up my brain with it's syntax and arguments against the authorship question. While Twain says that Bacon MIGHT not be the author of the works credited to Shakespeare, he's definitely a more credible suspect than William Shakespeare of Stratford. Still, regardless of how strong his arguments, it's hard to throw centuries of claims that Shakespeare WAS the Bard.
While I was already somewhat familiar with the "Shakespeare Controversy" over who actually wrote the works attributed to the Bard, Twain's handling of the topic (and he's clearly in the anti-Stratford camp) is as entertainingly biting as one would expect from the man who quipped: If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way.
While I was already somewhat familiar with the "Shakespeare Controversy" over who actually wrote the works attributed to the Bard, Twain's handling of the topic (and he's clearly in the anti-Stratford camp) is as entertainingly biting as one would expect from the man who quipped: ���If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way.���
...more
A captivating little book that outlines Mark Twain's response to the Shakespeare-Bacon debate. Sarcasm is rife, but at no point is he disparaging of either side of the argument. He makes his views on the 'who wrote it' saga pretty clear early on and then presents his reasons for them. The book is finished off with an overview of Twain's life and works.
I enjoyed this narration by Richard Henzel. He has a great voice which seems appropriate to Mark Twain's writing. He is a one man Mark Twain audio powerhouse. He also posts on the Goodreads Audiobook group and offers free samples from time to time, which is how I got this book.
Samuel Langhorne Clemens
, better known by his pen name
Mark Twain
, was an American author and humorist. He is noted for his novels
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
(1885), called "the Great American Novel", and
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
(1876).
Twain grew up in Hannibal, Missouri, which would later provide the setting for
Huckleberry Finn
and
Tom Sawyer
. He apprenticed with a printer. He also work
Samuel Langhorne Clemens
, better known by his pen name
Mark Twain
, was an American author and humorist. He is noted for his novels
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
(1885), called "the Great American Novel", and
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
(1876).
Twain grew up in Hannibal, Missouri, which would later provide the setting for
Huckleberry Finn
and
Tom Sawyer
. He apprenticed with a printer. He also worked as a typesetter and contributed articles to his older brother Orion's newspaper. After toiling as a printer in various cities, he became a master riverboat pilot on the Mississippi River, before heading west to join Orion. He was a failure at gold mining, so he next turned to journalism. While a reporter, he wrote a humorous story, "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County," which proved to be very popular and brought him nationwide attention. His travelogues were also well-received. Twain had found his calling.
He achieved great success as a writer and public speaker. His wit and satire earned praise from critics and peers, and he was a friend to presidents, artists, industrialists, and European royalty.
However, he lacked financial acumen. Though he made a great deal of money from his writings and lectures, he squandered it on various ventures, in particular the Paige Compositor, and was forced to declare bankruptcy. With the help of Henry Huttleston Rogers, however, he eventually overcame his financial troubles. Twain worked hard to ensure that all of his creditors were paid in full, even though his bankruptcy had relieved him of the legal responsibility.
Born during a visit by Halley's Comet, he died on its return. He was lauded as the "greatest American humorist of his age", and
William Faulkner
called Twain "the father of American literature".