At the outbreak of WWII, Diana Mosley, the Mitford sister who grew up with the Churchills, was imprisoned after her husband, the British Fascist Leader, Sir Oswald Mosley, was arrested under the orders of Winston Churchill. In this work, she tells in her own words what motivated her life & under what exceptional circumstances it took place, having known the two most po
At the outbreak of WWII, Diana Mosley, the Mitford sister who grew up with the Churchills, was imprisoned after her husband, the British Fascist Leader, Sir Oswald Mosley, was arrested under the orders of Winston Churchill. In this work, she tells in her own words what motivated her life & under what exceptional circumstances it took place, having known the two most powerful politicians of 20th-century Europe & living with one of the most controversial British politicians in recent history.
1 Grandfathers & Grandmother (1)
2 "...She Can't Live Long" (6)
3 Batsford (12)
4 Asthall (22)
5 Paris (44)
6 Swinbrook (55)
7 Bailiffscourt (61)
8 Buckingham Street (70)
9 Cheyne Walk (86)
10 Mosley (94)
11 Munich & Rome (106)
12 Hitler (116)
13 Accident (129)
14 Wooton (136)
15 Berlin (147)
16 War (157)
17 Prison (169)
18 Crux Easton (199)
19 Crowood (210)
20 ALIANORA (218)
21 Le Temple de la Gloire (230)
22 Clonfert (235)
23 Venice & Paris (244)
24 Inch Kenneth & London (254)
25 The Windsors (264)
26 The Antagonists (268)
27 A Vale of Tears (273)
28 Laughter & the Love of Friends (282)
Index (289)
...more
Hardcover
,
1st
,
304 pages
Published
March 1st 1977
by Times Books (NYC)
(first published 1977)
Like many people I'm totally intrigued by the Mitfords, a wonderfully eccentric family. I have read and loved Hons and Rebels, other biographies of the family and a few of Nancy Mitford's novels. This however, was a disappointment. Knowing Diana's background I wanted to read this with a very open mind but I couldn't help disliking her. Even if you ignore her political leanings she comes across as spoilt, snobbish, deluded and obnoxious. That doesn't make the book bad though, what makes it bad is
Like many people I'm totally intrigued by the Mitfords, a wonderfully eccentric family. I have read and loved Hons and Rebels, other biographies of the family and a few of Nancy Mitford's novels. This however, was a disappointment. Knowing Diana's background I wanted to read this with a very open mind but I couldn't help disliking her. Even if you ignore her political leanings she comes across as spoilt, snobbish, deluded and obnoxious. That doesn't make the book bad though, what makes it bad is that the stories are mostly very dull to the point where I broke my own rule and started skipping paragraphs because I was bored. I don't mind name-dropping but there is no explanation behind most of these names, the fact that she assumes you should know who they all are only makes her more of a snob. Also the lapsing into German or French and assuming that us mere mortals can speak multiple languages. I know GCSE level French but no German so those particular 'punchlines' were lost on me.
I didn't come away from reading this book knowing any more interesting facts of stories about the Mitford's or the Mosley's than I had learnt in other, far more entertaining books. She probably gets an extra star out of five just because she was a Mitford. So there.
...more
Diana Mitford felt stifled in her life with her family. When she went to Paris she got a sense of the enormity of the world and how she was admired for her beauty and wit. As soon as she could she made a prosperous marriage to the heir of the Guinness fortune and started her life surrounded by artists and poets and writers to fill the void she felt in her life. Yet this wasn't her true ca
*Special Content only on my blog,
Strange and Random Happenstance
during Mitford March Mach Deux (March 2014)
Diana Mitford felt stifled in her life with her family. When she went to Paris she got a sense of the enormity of the world and how she was admired for her beauty and wit. As soon as she could she made a prosperous marriage to the heir of the Guinness fortune and started her life surrounded by artists and poets and writers to fill the void she felt in her life. Yet this wasn't her true calling. Her true calling was to Oswald Mosley, the dynamic and married politician who founded the British Union of Fascists. She left her husband for him and spent her life dedicated to his causes and his happiness. They did eventually marry in Germany with Hitler as one of the only guests at the ceremony, which was one of the reasons they spent much of the war in prison. In
A Life of Contrasts
, Diana finally tells us her side of the story that captured headlines and made her one of the most memorable to those very notable Mitford sisters.
Frank Pakenham, the 7th Earl of Longford, had said of Diana in a review of her memoirs that she "lacked a dimension." I can think of no more perfect an insult than this for a woman who in her own writing comes across as a shallow, unfocused, self-centered, self-impressed, socialite. She is one dimensional, never bothering with anything below the surface. In fact, if you were to scratch her, I bet there would be more surface below the surface. Apparently being "the most glamorous Mitford Sister" means being the most superficial. Before reading about her life in her own words I wasn't predisposed to like her based on what I knew, but after reading Mary S. Lovell's book
The Sisters
, I was willing to give Diana the benefit of doubt. I was fully willing to let Diana surprise me with insights and details to the events of her life. To hear more about her feelings and thoughts on her marriages. But none of this presented itself. She had no depth coupled with a scattered writing style wherein she would change the subject every paragraph and sometimes every sentence. She never picked a thought and stuck with it unless it was to parrot Walter Mosley's ideologies to such an extent that I was made sick to my stomach and she literally disgusted me as a human being. I was left with the distinct feeling that the world would have been a better place without her in it, because really, what good did she ever contribute to society? Being pretty doesn't count, just FYI.
Diana's shallowness is evident in every line she writes in this book. Like minor celebrities she name drops like no tomorrow assuming that we will know who everyone is and be impressed with how much they love and adore her. Guess what Diana? Your day has come and gone and so have all your comrades in arms. Name drop all you want, all it shows is your own flaws in being needed to be validated by those around you because you had no inner life to sustain yourself. To need constant validation with artists demanding to paint her or draw her just made me want to smack her. The fact that Evelyn Waugh (one of the few celebrities I actually knew) was in love with Diana makes me not think more of Diana, but makes me think less of Evelyn.
Diana is also infuriatingly self-impressed, by all means Diana, don't translate all the French, Italian, and German for those who don't speak or read it to show us how worldly you are, I'm not going to bother to look it up on the assumption that it's just more of the same shit that came before. Also, with the book, she was given the chance to tell her side of the story, a story that has had many commentators and writers over the years, and she failed miserably. Her wedding to Bryan Guinness was glossed over in two seconds, as was her second marriage to Mosley. The fact that her sisters have written in more depth on her life shows that Diana has absolutely nothing to offer us.
Yet, it was this shallowness counterbalanced with bizarre political tracks that made me furious with her. You could feel at those times that it wasn't her voice by that of her master's, Walter Mosley. She was too shallow to have any true beliefs of her own so when she latched onto her idol Mosley, well, she took him all, even his opinions. Now that I've reached the "political tirade" section of my review, I firstly want to address the Hitler question. Diana has taken a lot of flack over the years for being unwilling to change her view of Hitler after the outbreak of war and his true desires and ambitions were revealed. Personally, I don't think that this in particular is what she should be criticized for. Hitler had to have been a charismatic and personable man in order to amass such a following and accomplish all that he did. I'm sure in a one on one setting he could be delightful. Therefore I don't blame Diana for being unwilling to take something back when her own experiences where different to public opinion. It was her opinion, one she is perfectly willing to stick to.
What I do think Diana should be criticized for is her parroting of horrid antisemitism. Yes, she is entitled to this view, but that doesn't mean it makes me like her, accept her, or even settle my nauseous stomach at some of the things she said. I came to not only really dislike her on a human level, but I revolt against all her ideologies. She actually states that what happened in the Holocaust could have been prevented if the Jews had just left Germany. Apparently they had plenty of warning, so they should have just moved on. Forget that these people have homes and lives and families, if they had just got up and gone history could have been different. In fact, in her opinion, if everyone would just go back where they came from, everything would be better for her. She didn't even want immigrants in England! While she never really outright states that she hates those who are Jewish or Black, the fact that she wants everyone to go back to where they came from shows a severe xenophobia that appears to be the sole aspect of her personality that isn't about her appearance. Also, extra ironic seeing as she lived in France and was therefore an immigrant herself. So by all means, if you want to read about a narcissist who will occasionally expound vitriolically on Jewry, well, Diana Mitford Mosley is the Mitford for you. She definitely isn't the Mitford for me.
...more
I have a morbid fascination with Diana Mitford Mosley. She was one of the most hated women in Britain in her lifetime, not because she was an unrepentant Fascist, but that she could not admit that her cause was inherently in error. I suppose that is what got hold of me: she was a celebrated beauty who married into great wealth, and then when her children were very young, she left everything for Oswald Mosley, who started the Britain Union of Fascists (BUF). She was married in Germany at the home
I have a morbid fascination with Diana Mitford Mosley. She was one of the most hated women in Britain in her lifetime, not because she was an unrepentant Fascist, but that she could not admit that her cause was inherently in error. I suppose that is what got hold of me: she was a celebrated beauty who married into great wealth, and then when her children were very young, she left everything for Oswald Mosley, who started the Britain Union of Fascists (BUF). She was married in Germany at the home of Dr. Goebbles with Hitler present. At the time Poland was invaded, she was almost completing negotiations to obtain a German radio wave to be used by the BUF for propaganda purposes. Mosely was an unrepentant serial adulterer; he married a daughter of Lord Curzon after having a fling with her elder sister. When his wife died, he began a long affair with her YOUNGER sister, while Diana waited for him in her small London home. She was imprisoned without charge at Brixton prison when her youngest son (with Mosley) was an infant, and was held for 3-1/2 years for activities that were deemed hostile.
What is so aggravating, not just to me as a reader, but to practically anyone who was in her social circle and in fact Britain itself, is Diana's way of glossing over facts that don't suit her and adopting an air of innocence in regards to her own behavior. She refused to ever repudiate Hitler and writes as though she doesn't know what all of the fuss is about; he was such a nice, civilized man and certainly there were other dictators worse than Hitler who were allies of Britain. She doubts that as many as 2 million Jews were killed, and if so, the Jews were given ample warning to get out of Germany and if they didn't...well, then! What was Germany to do? I have to say I liked reading ABOUT her, but was consistently irritated reading this book, as her inability to face the truth that she hitched her star to a man whose behavior suggests complete narcissism; Mosley is another being who was always right in her eyes. Which is probably appropriate as Diana had several characteristics herself. Wasted intellect.
...more
Having read Anne de Courcy's biography of Diana I really wanted to read about her life in her own words. It was an interesting read - she was a very witty writer and obviously had a fascinating life, but I found it difficult to read in parts as she was always totally unrepentant about her fascism. She admits that the she didn't agree with people being killed in concentration camps but glosses over it by saying that, of course, the Russians did far worse and even the British had concentration cam
Having read Anne de Courcy's biography of Diana I really wanted to read about her life in her own words. It was an interesting read - she was a very witty writer and obviously had a fascinating life, but I found it difficult to read in parts as she was always totally unrepentant about her fascism. She admits that the she didn't agree with people being killed in concentration camps but glosses over it by saying that, of course, the Russians did far worse and even the British had concentration camps at one time. She also has nothing but glowing praise for Hitler and details his positive qualities incessantly. Initially I felt it was strange that she devoted just a few paragraphs to her affair with Mosley and subsequent divorce but in the last couple of chapters written shortly before her death, she went into much greater detail about the scandal and how it affected the people around her. One thing I found interesting was the great sense of sadness the chapters seemed to take on when looking at the 60s onwards - the losses of friends, family and then her parents, Nancy and Mosley obviously had a huge impact
...more
hmmm. The Mitfords were a fascinating family. I've read both Nancy and Jessica's more or less fictionalised accounts of their childhood, so when I found this book, I thought it might be interesting to see what their infamously pro-Nazi sister had to say. She was both beautiful and intelligent, and it started out with the trademark Mitford sarcastic wit about upper-class life in pre-war Britain. But as Hugh Thomas said in his review it's quite disconcerting when "the characters in a witty narrati
hmmm. The Mitfords were a fascinating family. I've read both Nancy and Jessica's more or less fictionalised accounts of their childhood, so when I found this book, I thought it might be interesting to see what their infamously pro-Nazi sister had to say. She was both beautiful and intelligent, and it started out with the trademark Mitford sarcastic wit about upper-class life in pre-war Britain. But as Hugh Thomas said in his review it's quite disconcerting when "the characters in a witty narrative suddenly stop being Lord Berners and Harold Acton ... and become Putzi Hanfstaengl, Magda Goebbels, and Hitler" (Diana was married to Oswald Mosley in Hitler's front room in 1936).
Even after she married Mosley and signed up whole-heartedly to his political views I still felt sympathy for her when, still breast-feeding a three-month old baby, she was arrested and imprisoned in Holloway for three years without ever being charged with anything. So her two youngest children lived through their earliest years without her. But her manipulative, disingenuous account of Mosley's career soon changed my mind. Mosley was a great guy, sadly misunderstood; his "security staff" were only protecting peaceful meetings from violent Marxists; Hitler was a charming man with impeccable manners, generous to his friends, who loved music. As for the Jews, there is little mention of them except when she points out with condescending common sense that really it was their fault for coming to Germany from Eastern Europe in the first place. Why, they had plenty of opportunity to leave before being exterminated, and "international Jewry" should have used its untold riches to provide a home for them in some suitably empty part of Africa.
Speaking of untold riches, once released from prison, with the war over, she and Mosley wasted no time buying a couple of stately homes and a yacht and resuming their former lives. She actually complains that two of their fellow prisoners, who had been living with her and Mosley in a house in the grounds of Holloway (rather than in dank cells like lesser prisoners), were released "penniless and with nowhere to go." They must have been desperately worried, she says, but there's no mention that she used any of her own wealth to help them, or indeed any of the other much poorer followers of Mosley who were her "friends" in jail and must have been destitute when released.
Thereafter the book is increasingly dull as the Mosleys flit about Europe with their similarly minded friends. Her whining about the "victimisation" of Mosley becomes increasingly tiresome and blinkered. "Many people ... reject truth in even the most trivial matters if it conflicts with a prejudice," she says. Quite.
So unsurprisingly, Decca remains my favourite sister, and if you want an introduction to the Mitfords, I recommend
Hons and Rebels
rather than this irritating account. I've given it two stars just because of the horrible fascination it exerted on me.
...more
If you are as fascinated with the fabulous Mitford sisters as I am, this is a must-read. Unfortunately, what you must learn is Diana is an unrepentant fascist and anti-semite who rationalizes it all in the most absurd fashion. It does round out the canon of books on the sisters...one way or another!
I find the Mitfords kinds of fascinating - Diana particularly (though Unity more, but she never wrote). This is interesting for her place at the sidelines of history and also for the astonishing lack of repentence. She clearly still believed not only Mosley was right but also Hitler.
I like so many find the Mitford sisters diverse and fascinating so when I saw this book in a secondhand shop I couldn't pass it up. Diana was considered to by many at the time to be the most attractive and desirable of her sisters in their social set. I agree with other readers that there is "none so blind as do not want to see" element in the book by her selective omission of information and denial about a dreadful and very dark period in history. Amazing that she gave up a life of wealth havin
I like so many find the Mitford sisters diverse and fascinating so when I saw this book in a secondhand shop I couldn't pass it up. Diana was considered to by many at the time to be the most attractive and desirable of her sisters in their social set. I agree with other readers that there is "none so blind as do not want to see" element in the book by her selective omission of information and denial about a dreadful and very dark period in history. Amazing that she gave up a life of wealth having married very young into the Guiness family then left the marriage and her children behind to follow a man of dubious morals who obviously had an enormous influence over her. Good read despite her choosing to omit historical facts we all know to be very grim.
...more
Fascinating stuff. The last Mitford book of any significance left for me, & reveals Diana to be perhaps the most interesting - but far from the most likeable (I think Debo gets that nod) - of the sisters. Too many unfamiliar names, & the French & German needed translations (certainly the German for me), & she really is completely unrepentant. World Jewry should have sorted the Jews out, what were the Germans supposed to do?! Hitler was simply charming! I listened to her Desert Is
Fascinating stuff. The last Mitford book of any significance left for me, & reveals Diana to be perhaps the most interesting - but far from the most likeable (I think Debo gets that nod) - of the sisters. Too many unfamiliar names, & the French & German needed translations (certainly the German for me), & she really is completely unrepentant. World Jewry should have sorted the Jews out, what were the Germans supposed to do?! Hitler was simply charming! I listened to her Desert Island Discs afterwards - astonishing confidence in her views. She neglects to mention Mosley's serial adultery, or that Nancy denounced her which led to her imprisonment. The descriptions of Farve, & Mitford family life, are as delightful as ever; this is a really interesting, & sometimes a teensy bit disturbing, look into this woman's life. Definitely worth doing to the Mitford canon.
...more
I have mixed feelings about this one, although I thoroughly enjoyed it.
First of all, I totally underestimated how shocking it would be to read the memoirs of an almost completely unapologetic nazi, although that makes it that much more interesting.
The problem I see is that this book completely lacks the self-reflection that makes an autobiography good. The style is very matter of fact, pretty much a description of events without pause. However, Diana's life was so fascinating that it alone makes
I have mixed feelings about this one, although I thoroughly enjoyed it.
First of all, I totally underestimated how shocking it would be to read the memoirs of an almost completely unapologetic nazi, although that makes it that much more interesting.
The problem I see is that this book completely lacks the self-reflection that makes an autobiography good. The style is very matter of fact, pretty much a description of events without pause. However, Diana's life was so fascinating that it alone makes a compelling read. She is also a good writer, funny and witty, and this turned out to be yet another Mitford page turner.
...more
often portrayed as an aristocratic nobody by those who do not always read with open minds,this very brief tour through her life is thought provoking and very much an emotional journey.
Diana was cursed or blessed with a face that was beautiful as it was serene............Mosely her second husband loved her for her completeness and her strength when the chips were down.She never wavers from her beliefs and talks of the Hitler that few knew .......I enjoyed this book very much and feel it is worth
often portrayed as an aristocratic nobody by those who do not always read with open minds,this very brief tour through her life is thought provoking and very much an emotional journey.
Diana was cursed or blessed with a face that was beautiful as it was serene............Mosely her second husband loved her for her completeness and her strength when the chips were down.She never wavers from her beliefs and talks of the Hitler that few knew .......I enjoyed this book very much and feel it is worth reading to see who this woman really was under the furs and jewels
...more
I hadn't known that Diana Mitford had written an autobiography until I saw this volume at the Amarynth Bookstore in Evanston, Illinois. Being interested in the mentality of fascists and Nazis, I picked it up and read it immediately.
Mitford came from a background of wealth and aristocratic connections. Reaching out, as she did as a young woman, to Hitler and his circle was quite a stretch from her usual associations, a stretch not very well accounted for in this book except in that Hitler was ver
I hadn't known that Diana Mitford had written an autobiography until I saw this volume at the Amarynth Bookstore in Evanston, Illinois. Being interested in the mentality of fascists and Nazis, I picked it up and read it immediately.
Mitford came from a background of wealth and aristocratic connections. Reaching out, as she did as a young woman, to Hitler and his circle was quite a stretch from her usual associations, a stretch not very well accounted for in this book except in that Hitler was very generous to her and her lover and later husband, Oswald Mosley, head of the UK's own fascist organization. Indeed, despite being close to people like Winston Churchill, she really doesn't seem very politically sophisticated--nor very prone to be overawed by any politicians.
For an inside view of the pre-war British ruling class and some insight perhaps into why it was that so many of them were sympathetic to fascism and national socialism, this may be a book to start with.
...more
Things in life are all about perspective. Before reading this, I had no idea who Diana Mitford was and frankly after reading this I'm still not sure if I do. I know who she is in the historical sense, but as a person not so much. I don't know if she really figured out who she was beyond her traditional female roles...mother & wife. I've read other reviews of this book & most are negative in that she didn't show any remorse for her actions. And I can see how easy it is for individuals to
Things in life are all about perspective. Before reading this, I had no idea who Diana Mitford was and frankly after reading this I'm still not sure if I do. I know who she is in the historical sense, but as a person not so much. I don't know if she really figured out who she was beyond her traditional female roles...mother & wife. I've read other reviews of this book & most are negative in that she didn't show any remorse for her actions. And I can see how easy it is for individuals to take that stand (& to honest at moments I did as well), but she has already rationalized what she did in her mind. So, in her mind she didn't do the wrong thing and thus would have no remorse. I did find her experiences at times difficult to read because they were so egocentric. Nevertheless, I learned few things about how others may have perceived the war (even if I don't agree).
...more
Despite her controversial political stands, Diana's writing is very elegant. She is a very warm person, and totally devoted to her family and friends. I recommend this to anyone interested in the Mitford family or in the 1930's.
I think Diana was Nancy's equal as far as delightful prose goes. She presents fair and respectful portraits of her friends and acquaintances over the years, including some of the most publically reviled personalities of the twentieth century.
I think she does essays better than whole books, though. See also: The Pursuit of Laughter, for some of her collected essays and reviews.
A must-read for those interested in the Mitfords, Hitler, Oswald Mosley, the Second World War and the British aristocrac
I think Diana was Nancy's equal as far as delightful prose goes. She presents fair and respectful portraits of her friends and acquaintances over the years, including some of the most publically reviled personalities of the twentieth century.
I think she does essays better than whole books, though. See also: The Pursuit of Laughter, for some of her collected essays and reviews.
A must-read for those interested in the Mitfords, Hitler, Oswald Mosley, the Second World War and the British aristocracy.
...more
Diana was the Mitford sister who married a British Fascist and was imprisoned during WWII so it was interesting, and sometimes eye-opening, to read her take on her life and the history of the last century. She had a unique vantage point because she was related to Churchill and knew Hitler--and a late chapter in the book describs the many ways she believed they were alike. Reading her sister Nancy's books I was happily infected with her determined love of life. Though there are enjoyable parts of
Diana was the Mitford sister who married a British Fascist and was imprisoned during WWII so it was interesting, and sometimes eye-opening, to read her take on her life and the history of the last century. She had a unique vantage point because she was related to Churchill and knew Hitler--and a late chapter in the book describs the many ways she believed they were alike. Reading her sister Nancy's books I was happily infected with her determined love of life. Though there are enjoyable parts of this book, such as when she describes visiting with interesting intellectual and artistic friends, Diana's determination is to defend her husband's beliefs so reading her more dreary.
...more
I thought I had already reviewed this book so sorry if this is a duplicate. It is the last in a series about of books about the Mitford sisters that I have read this summer and it is definitely the worst. It should show as being authored by Diana Mosley as Diana Mitford married first Bryan Guiness and then Sir Oswald Moseley. It was written in 1977 and deals with her life up until that point but skates over her relationships with Hitler and various controversial political associations in a very
I thought I had already reviewed this book so sorry if this is a duplicate. It is the last in a series about of books about the Mitford sisters that I have read this summer and it is definitely the worst. It should show as being authored by Diana Mosley as Diana Mitford married first Bryan Guiness and then Sir Oswald Moseley. It was written in 1977 and deals with her life up until that point but skates over her relationships with Hitler and various controversial political associations in a very facile way. I did not like it at all, as you can all probably tell but did at least finish it!
...more
Fascinating family, the Mitfords - so many strong and varied personalities. Diana was personally acquainted with Hitler and I was always curious to hear her side of that, since anything else I'd read about them concentrated on her sister Unity's close friendship with Hitler. As I read her story, I was getting the real version of events and people that her sister Nancy immortalized in her books "The Pursuit of Love" and "Love in a Cold Climate".
The unrepentant fascist Diana was never my favourite Mitford girl (team Decca), and some of this makes for uncomfortable reading ("the blacks" shouldn't have come to the UK, the Jews should have stayed out of Germany etc) but its still an interesting read.
An interesting read for anyone interested in the Mitfords but her unrepentant fascism and her mendacious read of history - a world in which the 1945 Atlee government is seemingly characterized as more oppressive than Hitler's Germany - make this a difficult and at times infuriating read.
Words fail me. I am really not aware of half of what she says, what with all the unexplained name-dropping and the shallowness and the unbelievable lack of self-criticism, but what a book. I'm shocked, and amazed, and glad it's over. So, life includes such lives. Who knew.
Def not as good of a writer as decca or even Debo, and her excuses for hitler are pretty unpalatable. Still an interesting read, as someone who was BFF with Evelyn waugh, Lytton strachey, etc etc