Alternate cover for ISBN 9780380754328.
This autobiography is detailed, showing how the Russian-speaking youth moved from being an English-illiterate to the self-taught genius that all came to know. It relates how he heard people pronounce street names, examined the street signs & figured out how to read before he began his formal education. This is the story as told wh
Alternate cover for ISBN 9780380754328.
This autobiography is detailed, showing how the Russian-speaking youth moved from being an English-illiterate to the self-taught genius that all came to know. It relates how he heard people pronounce street names, examined the street signs & figured out how to read before he began his formal education. This is the story as told when he didn't feel that he was running out of time. It has a sense of fun (cf. The Endochronic Properties of Theotimoline 'practice paper' he wrote prior to his Ph.D examination). Ranging widely, it includes whole stories as examples.
...more
Hardcover
,
744 pages
Published
February 1st 1979
by Doubleday & Co. (Garden City, NY)
(first published January 1979)
When Isaac Asimov gets going on a subject, he can write extensively on it. This is Volume I of his autobiography, over 1,000 pages.
When his publisher first proposed this, he mentioned nothing ever happened to him. He tells the joke on himself, when he shows up with this huge manuscript, the publisher wonders aloud what it would be like if something HAD happened to him!
But it is not just about Asimov. It tells a lot about the history and customs in the US from 1920 to 1954. It contains lots of in
When Isaac Asimov gets going on a subject, he can write extensively on it. This is Volume I of his autobiography, over 1,000 pages.
When his publisher first proposed this, he mentioned nothing ever happened to him. He tells the joke on himself, when he shows up with this huge manuscript, the publisher wonders aloud what it would be like if something HAD happened to him!
But it is not just about Asimov. It tells a lot about the history and customs in the US from 1920 to 1954. It contains lots of information on the pulp indstry and publishing in the 1920's and 1930's. It contains a large number of personal anecdotes--some funny, some sad.
If you like Isaac Asimov--and I do ,a lot---this autobiography contains a great deal of interest. I have always found Asimov a good story teller, and this is a good story.
Recommended for fans of autobiographies; fans of SF, and especailly fans of Isaac Asimov.
...more
I have read this book a couple of times. Some it was laughing out loud funny, some poignant. This and the sequel I re-read during one of my exercise kicks and they were the only books that could distract me from the monotony of the exercise bike.
Probably one of the best autobiographies I've ever read. I feel as though I've known Asimov for years (albeit not just through his writings). Lots of fun. Wordy, but worth every little detail he adds.
Perhaps the most salient thing I gleaned from
In Memory Yet Green: The Autobiography of Isaac Asimov, 1920-1954
was that
Isaac Asimov
had a major case of Asperger's going, even if no one had identified the syndrome yet at the time he wrote this first extensive volume of his autobiography. From his often particular memories of even the most trivial events, to his clearly well-above-average intelligence coupled with his resistance to conventional education, as well as his frequent social awkwardne
Perhaps the most salient thing I gleaned from
In Memory Yet Green: The Autobiography of Isaac Asimov, 1920-1954
was that
Isaac Asimov
had a major case of Asperger's going, even if no one had identified the syndrome yet at the time he wrote this first extensive volume of his autobiography. From his often particular memories of even the most trivial events, to his clearly well-above-average intelligence coupled with his resistance to conventional education, as well as his frequent social awkwardness and cluelessness and his obvious ability to go on at length about one favorite subject, Asimov is almost a textbook case of an Aspie. (
Note:
I am not a clinician, but I do have Asperger's, and the signs are unmistakeable to a fellow Aspie.) That Asimov so obviously succeeded beyond his wildest expectations, both professionally and literarily (although the bulk of that is left to
In Joy Still Felt: The Autobiography of Isaac Asimov, 1954-1978
, the second volume of his autobiography), should inspire Aspies, both newly-diagnosed and old hats, that they can excel also.
It's equally clear that, for all his early self-questioning, Asimov's sense of his own ego was, shall we say, healthy. The man loved to talk about himself, as is obvious from over 1400 pages of memoirs, when he still had a full twelve years of career left before his death, but what redeems what would be obnoxious in almost everyone else is that Asimov is simultaneously self-deprecating and hugely engaging. Not for nothing was Asimov a popular public speaker and man-about-town. (That he was also an unrepentant lecher—and philanderer, to boot—becomes evident from Asimov's own admissions, beginning here.) Add to that that Asimov obviously was one of the most skillful writers of science fiction ever to have lived, and the overall effect of
In Memory Yet Green
is quite enjoyable.
Nevertheless, there are some downsides to the book. First, it starts off incredibly slowly. Before Asimov gets into the meat-and-potatoes of his career, along with a fascinating history of early 20th-Century science fiction and SF/F fandom, the narrative is somewhat slow. Second, as a more or less Orthodox Jew myself, I found Asimov's repeated denigration of observant Judaism, particularly in the first half of
In Memory Yet Green
, a bit grating. At the same time, however, once Asimov starts telling of the origins of the World Science Fiction Convention and the famous Futurians, and of the careers of
Robert A. Heinlein
,
Frederik Pohl
,
Harlan Ellison
, and
L. Sprague de Camp
(to name but a small few whom Asimov counted as longtime friends),
In Memory Yet Green
becomes fascinating, if not indispensable. And I can forgive Asimov's criticism of organized religion, if only because not once does he dispense with his profound cultural and social identification with Jews and Jewishness; a friend who enjoys the Eastern European Jewish delicacy
p'tcha
was quite amused and appreciative of Asimov's loving of same. (This connection with Judaism resonated, particularly when Asimov told of the running undercurrent during his time at the Philadelphia Navy Yard during World War II that many of the military personnel in Philadelphia believed the war was being fought on behalf of the Jews, against American interests; having recently read
Joseph W. Bendersky
's
The Jewish Threat: Anti-Semitic Politics Of The U.S. Army
, which posits much the same thesis academically.)
So ultimately,
In Memory Yet Green
, despite a few false starts and irritating elements, was quite an entertaining read, and I do recommend it to those who wonder how modern science fiction got to be the phenomenon it is today.
...more
Энциклопедическая эрудиция, тонкая самоирония, полная открытость перед читателем, идеальная память... Эти мемуары читаются как репортаж развесистого симпатяги, который готов говорить обо всём, что он видит и что приходит ему на ум. Мысль уклонилась вправо, в сторону, вверх, наискосок, поклон, а вот ещё кусочек - так много всего забавного, важного, познавательного, столько интересных наблюдений, портретов, тем, книг!
Как ему удавалось при всей этой свободе движений ни разу не потерять равновесия,
Энциклопедическая эрудиция, тонкая самоирония, полная открытость перед читателем, идеальная память... Эти мемуары читаются как репортаж развесистого симпатяги, который готов говорить обо всём, что он видит и что приходит ему на ум. Мысль уклонилась вправо, в сторону, вверх, наискосок, поклон, а вот ещё кусочек - так много всего забавного, важного, познавательного, столько интересных наблюдений, портретов, тем, книг!
Как ему удавалось при всей этой свободе движений ни разу не потерять равновесия, не сдвинуть фокус, не выйти из луча прожектора? Поразительно. На примере этой книги легко показать, что автор суть текст. В художественных произведениях и в популяризаторских книгах он был более скован условностями и задачами, но эта книга было и его, и о нём, и в ней он мог перелиться в текст совершенно свободно. И он это сделал с фантастической органичностью. Между Азимовым и его текстом нет никакого зазора. Они - одно целое. И если Азимов вам интересен как человек, то вы можете купить эту книгу - и получить именно его, завёрнутого в суперобложку.
Нужно ли это переводить? Не уверен. Но то, что это стоит читать - безусловно. Каков герой! Аптечный сиделец, отличник-прогульщик, запойный журналоед, дебютант в 18 лет, практически классик в 24 года, позитронный мозг, встроенный в пишущую машинку. Кэмпбелл выдерживал его без публикаций до тех пор, пока этот восторженный щенок не научился ставить перед собой действительно серьёзные задачи, решать их, усложнять на порядок, снова решать. Публика не успевала развиваться нужными ему и Кэмпбеллу темпами, университетские профессора шипели ему вслед, погремушками хвостов загоняя его в угол. Он уходил сквозь стену. Он знал, как.
Вы думаете, это было фуэте? Это была битва. Кровь, предательства, напрасные надежды, минные поля и просроченные чеки. Там было всё. Удивительно: Джек Уильямсон в воспоминаниях тоже был скрупулёзен в отношении всяких мелких деталей, но из его мемуаров я запомнил именно что отдельные детали. Спрэг де Камп в мемуарах создал великолепные портреты своих друзей и знакомых, а сам остался в них большей частью ароматом трубочного табака и мягкой повествовательной интонацией. Аимову удалось всё это срастить с собой, остаться неразделимым со временем, идеями, соратниками, историей и фантазией.
Если романы Азимова сделали меня его читателем, то его мемуары приучили меня видеть в нём друга.
Да, я не объективен. Даже не пытаюсь. Ну и чёрт со мной.
...more
As endless as I remember from when I was a teenager, Asimov was my favorite writer, and I finished every book I started on principle. I'm much better at skimming uninteresting sections these days, and I have different principles when it comes to reading, shall we say. What else was bothersome? Asimov's deepseated prejudices against anyone who had a slightly different sort of intelligence than he did, anyone who isn't, in fact, Isaac Asimov, becomes extremely grating. His assumptions about whole
As endless as I remember from when I was a teenager, Asimov was my favorite writer, and I finished every book I started on principle. I'm much better at skimming uninteresting sections these days, and I have different principles when it comes to reading, shall we say. What else was bothersome? Asimov's deepseated prejudices against anyone who had a slightly different sort of intelligence than he did, anyone who isn't, in fact, Isaac Asimov, becomes extremely grating. His assumptions about whole groups of people, especially Americans not from the East Coast, are often ludicrous.
But these are quibbles.
There is lots and lots of interesting information within, lots of mid 20th century science fiction history. Furthermore, Asimov's endless totting up of check amounts for short story sales becomes a kind of soothing mantra after a few hundred pages, especially since we all know the amounts were going to grow and disaster did not lie ahead. In fact, the genesis of stories and the circumstances surrounding their creation is often more interesting than a mediocre biographer's interpretation of his subject's work, and Asimov piles on such details. It's a good autobiography; he just needed a real editor.
...more
well, I don't know how to rate this thing. As an autobiography it's kind of terrible. By the end I somehow had stockholm syndrome and enjoyed it. Look, I make stupid agreements, and I stick to 'em.
Thoughts after visiting his archive:
This guy was a jerk. He's got this air of folly about him, and one that makes me want to excuse everything. He's not trying to be a jerk, he's well meaning and just doesn't know any better. He's just trying to be honest and straight forward.
Well, he says nasty thin
well, I don't know how to rate this thing. As an autobiography it's kind of terrible. By the end I somehow had stockholm syndrome and enjoyed it. Look, I make stupid agreements, and I stick to 'em.
Thoughts after visiting his archive:
This guy was a jerk. He's got this air of folly about him, and one that makes me want to excuse everything. He's not trying to be a jerk, he's well meaning and just doesn't know any better. He's just trying to be honest and straight forward.
Well, he says nasty things like, "Hey, I'm sorry I've been trying to squirm out of this thing I agreed to do for a while, but I will only do it on this day. Oh, and aren't you so glad that I am doing you the enormous favor of only charging what we agreed to rather than asking you to double the cost which is what I now charge. You really are lucky, and I'm really a gracious guy," a little too often. There's no in this, just nasty self absorption.
...more
Entertaining, informative, and perhaps the most well-written book of this fascinating man's whole career. He is at turns candid, self-deprecating and -- um, what's that term that means the opposite of "self-deprecating"? Oh yeah, an EGOMANIAC. But a charming one.
This autobiography provides an intimate look into the progress of one the great science authors (both fiction and non-fiction). The personal details and life experiences are both entertaining and inspiring. This volume and its companion
In Joy Still Felt
are worthwhile reads revealing both the mundane and outstanding sides of some of Asimov's life.
A good insight into what Isaac thought about his life, and the events in it.
While you get get an idea about a writer from his/her writings, what authors have to say directly about their lives, themselves, and what happened to them makes them more human somehow.
And I think Isaac is pretty honest about himself in this book.
A fun and unexpectedly funny autobiography. Learned a lot about the psyche of the New York immigrant pre-WW2 and about the various elements of life that only a Russian-born Jew living in Brooklyn could write about.
Isaac Asimov was a Russian-born, American author, a professor of biochemistry, and a highly successful writer, best known for his works of science fiction and for his popular science books.
Professor Asimov is generally considered the most prolific writer of all time, having written or edited more than 500 books and an estimated 90,000 letters and postcards. He has works published in nine of the te
Isaac Asimov was a Russian-born, American author, a professor of biochemistry, and a highly successful writer, best known for his works of science fiction and for his popular science books.
Professor Asimov is generally considered the most prolific writer of all time, having written or edited more than 500 books and an estimated 90,000 letters and postcards. He has works published in nine of the ten major categories of the Dewey Decimal System (lacking only an entry in the 100s category of Philosophy).
Asimov is widely considered a master of the science-fiction genre and, along with Robert A. Heinlein and Arthur C. Clarke, was considered one of the "Big Three" science-fiction writers during his lifetime. Asimov's most famous work is the Foundation Series; his other major series are the Galactic Empire series and the Robot series, both of which he later tied into the same fictional universe as the Foundation Series to create a unified "future history" for his stories much like those pioneered by Robert A. Heinlein and previously produced by Cordwainer Smith and Poul Anderson. He penned numerous short stories, among them "Nightfall", which in 1964 was voted by the Science Fiction Writers of America the best short science fiction story of all time, a title many still honor. He also wrote mysteries and fantasy, as well as a great amount of nonfiction. Asimov wrote the Lucky Starr series of juvenile science-fiction novels using the pen name Paul French.
Most of Asimov's popularized science books explain scientific concepts in a historical way, going as far back as possible to a time when the science in question was at its simplest stage. He often provides nationalities, birth dates, and death dates for the scientists he mentions, as well as etymologies and pronunciation guides for technical terms. Examples include his Guide to Science, the three volume set Understanding Physics, and Asimov's Chronology of Science and Discovery.
Asimov was a long-time member and Vice President of Mensa International, albeit reluctantly; he described some members of that organization as "brain-proud and aggressive about their IQs" He took more joy in being president of the American Humanist Association. The asteroid 5020 Asimov, the magazine Asimov's Science Fiction, a Brooklyn, NY elementary school, and two different Isaac Asimov Awards are named in his honor.
“Despite all that education and experience can do, I retain a certain level of unsophistication that I cannot eradicate and that my friends find amusing. In fact, I think I sometimes detect conspiratorial plottings among my friends to protect me against my own lack of sophistication. I don't mind. I suspect that I am never quite as unsophisticated as they think I am, but I don't mind.”
—
10 likes