This is the story of one man's faith, told with unrivaled reflection and candor. William F. Buckley, Jr., was raised a Catholic. As the world plunged into war, and as social mores changed dramatically around him, Buckley's faith -- a most essential part of his make-up -- sustained him. In Nearer, My God, Buckley examines in searching detail the meaning of his faith, and ho
This is the story of one man's faith, told with unrivaled reflection and candor. William F. Buckley, Jr., was raised a Catholic. As the world plunged into war, and as social mores changed dramatically around him, Buckley's faith -- a most essential part of his make-up -- sustained him. In Nearer, My God, Buckley examines in searching detail the meaning of his faith, and how his life has been shaped and sustained by religious conviction.
In highly personal terms, and with the wit and acuity for which he is justly renowned, Buckley discusses vital issues of Catholic doctrine and practice, and in so doing outlines for the reader both the nature of CathoLic faith and the essential role of religious belief in everyday life. In powerfully felt prose, he contributes provocatively and intelligently to the national interest in the nature of religion, the Church, and spiritual development. Nearer, My God is sure to appeal to all readers who have felt the stirrings of their own religious faith, and who want confirmation of their beliefs or who are seeking a guide to understanding their own souls.
The renowned social and political commentator, William F. Buckley Jr., turns to a highly personal subject -- his faith. And he tells us the story of his life as a Catholic Christian. "Nearer, My God" is the most reflective, poignant, and searching of Bill Buckley's many books. In the opening chapters he relives his childhood, a loving, funny, nostalgic glimpse into pre-World War II America and England. He speaks about his religious experiences to a world that has changed dramatically. He is unafraid of revealing the most personal side of his faith. He describes, in his distinctive style, the intimacy of a trip to Lourdes, the impact on him of the searing account by Maria Valtorta of the Crucifixion, the ordination of his nephew into the priesthood, and gives a moving account of his mother's death. And there is humor, as Buckley gives a unique, hilarious view of a visit to the Vatican with Malcolm Muggeridge, Charlton Heston, Grace Kelly, and David Niven. Personal though this book is, Buckley has gone to others to examine new perspectives, putting together his own distinguished 'Forum' and leaning on the great literature of the past to illustrate his thinking on contemporary Catholic and Christian issues.
...more
Paperback
,
336 pages
Published
October 15th 1998
by Mariner Books
(first published 1997)
Unlike Buckley, I am a Protestant, and not an intellectual, but I savored this book.
I have never read someone with whom I disagreed so much that I was so drawn to and learned so much from. He speaks with profound insight, and always in a gentle manner.
Despite my major differences of belief; esp. the acceptance of the authority of the church in matters of doctrine and morals, I felt a true kinship with his searching, his questioning, and even his acceptance of the limitations of human percepti
Unlike Buckley, I am a Protestant, and not an intellectual, but I savored this book.
I have never read someone with whom I disagreed so much that I was so drawn to and learned so much from. He speaks with profound insight, and always in a gentle manner.
Despite my major differences of belief; esp. the acceptance of the authority of the church in matters of doctrine and morals, I felt a true kinship with his searching, his questioning, and even his acceptance of the limitations of human perception. He captures the essentials of Christianity in a compelling manner. Highly recommended for those who genuinely desire understanding and unity among followers of Christ.
...more
Goodreads has a description of this book which is better than any I could write, so I'll just give one very biased reason for reading this book:
William F. Buckley is a genuinely religious man.
Even a great religious writer such as C. S. Lewis sometimes sounds like he's trying to sell us something. William F. Buckley, on the other hand, knows that faith requires determination, resolve and contancy. He is not so much trying to persuade us of the truth of what he's saying as demonstrating what one m
Goodreads has a description of this book which is better than any I could write, so I'll just give one very biased reason for reading this book:
William F. Buckley is a genuinely religious man.
Even a great religious writer such as C. S. Lewis sometimes sounds like he's trying to sell us something. William F. Buckley, on the other hand, knows that faith requires determination, resolve and contancy. He is not so much trying to persuade us of the truth of what he's saying as demonstrating what one must do in order to stick to the truth.
The question then arises, "Is Buckley evangelical?" Yes, of course he is. But he knows that readers seeking an answer to the eternal question are wary of hoodwinkery.
This is an honest book. I would think readers of any faith would see the fundamental truth of Buckley's message here: God exists and expects something from us.
...more
The late Mr. Buckley, famously erudite and charming (and as famously caustic and condescending: the spotlight also caught his shadow), confesses at the start: "I am not remotely qualified as a theologian or historian of Christianity [and:] my mode tends to be argumentative. ... This argumentative habit makes for poor exposition... [and this book's:] tone is not what I'd have hoped for. ... I am not trained in the devotional mode, nor disposed to it. ... I leave it at this, that if I could juggle
The late Mr. Buckley, famously erudite and charming (and as famously caustic and condescending: the spotlight also caught his shadow), confesses at the start: "I am not remotely qualified as a theologian or historian of Christianity [and:] my mode tends to be argumentative. ... This argumentative habit makes for poor exposition... [and this book's:] tone is not what I'd have hoped for. ... I am not trained in the devotional mode, nor disposed to it. ... I leave it at this, that if I could juggle, I'd do so for Our Lady. i suppose I am required to say that, in fact, I have here endeavored to do my act for her." And his whole act is here: the wit, the intellect, the impishness, the disdain, the namedropping, the logical rigor, the arresting conviction, the journalistic adventitiousness (Buckley would have liked that word), the odd and even stubborn failure to carry through with an obvious question, but above all the tender and loyal heart. His politics were the kind driven by fear, but here he writes of all that gave him assurance.
Buckley protests that he has little or nothing new to say (inevitable for a conservative?): "so habitual is it for me to learn and perform by contention, I have been derivatively influenced by others' contentions." Who hasn't been? His invitation to several friends - converts to Catholicism: a lifelong Catholic, he seeks the perspectives of (former) outsiders - to answer questions he wants to explore is an expression of that habit. So is his focus on a book of published letters between a priest and a layman, the former a Catholic convert and the latter soon to be converted, in effect a theological debate. He was attracted to the contentious, as he says. We knew that, before he said it. What is new here, in particular witness if not in content, is his testimony about the beneficial effects of religious practice. He offers three gems: his experience of chapel services and prayers in private school, his impressions on visiting Lourdes, and his correspondence with a nephew who became a Benedictine priest.
While he makes the error of our era - mistaking belief for religion - he nevertheless presents the distinction. Religious practice yields truth and meaning that logic cannot parse. It offers assurance and consolation beyond the power of argument. It gives challenge and clarity unattainable by reason. Buckley devotes much space to theological contention as if it would radiate light instead of heat. He asserts Church teaching as if it explained religious experience. He does these things because he loved contention and relied upon it as much as upon the authority of the Church. But when he writes of prayer or pilgrimage or vocation, he recognizes - if obliquely - that through these things we glimpse truth unanswerable by theology. Even untouchable by it. It is this boundary of experience - where it is forever unreachable by words, marked but unexplained by symbols - that God-talk is meant to navigate. Again, Buckley falls into the modern mire of knowing the words but not the grammar of this rhetoric. But in so doing, he illumines it. The true grammar of God-talk begins to shine through, casting shadows of contradiction that owe their sharpness, probably, to Mr. Buckley's contentious intellect. Not only do his accounts of religious practice touch the heart, but his unqualified wrestle with theology and tradition lights a flare over shoals he - without chart - learned to circumnavigate. I'm glad he wrote this book.
...more
During his life, William F. Buckley Jr was a luminary of conservative thought, but he also possessed a faith in Christianity (specifically Catholicism) that helped buoy his social and political convictions in dark times. This book is a declaration and explanation of his personal faith, his own experiences augmented by the words and lives of people he's known, as well as historical figures. Buckley is at his best in this book when detailing his own experiences in the spiritual realm, especially i
During his life, William F. Buckley Jr was a luminary of conservative thought, but he also possessed a faith in Christianity (specifically Catholicism) that helped buoy his social and political convictions in dark times. This book is a declaration and explanation of his personal faith, his own experiences augmented by the words and lives of people he's known, as well as historical figures. Buckley is at his best in this book when detailing his own experiences in the spiritual realm, especially in his formative early years. His writing is a bit less effective when calling upon the beliefs and experiences of others, but still presented in a simple and logical manner. One of Buckley's strengths in the political world, which served to befuddle and infuriate his critics (and sometimes his friends)was the ability to present a logical argument bereft of emotional hyperbole, and he does the same thing here when writing about something as intangible and personal as faith. Emotional arguments can be easily demolished, but not so with arguments based on logic. In telling why
he
believes in something and not why
you
should, he creates a bulwark not easily assailed by tactics of denial and ridicule, which are the usual weapons used against people with strong religious beliefs. Whether on not you like Buckley, man or writer, you'll probably find something worth thinking about here.
...more
When I started to read this book, I had a look at at Goodreads One reviewer, who gave the book two stars wrote: "This religious testament by a wealthy Catholic who never entertained doubts about his beliefs will doubtless offer comfort and reassurance to those who share his background and mindset. Somewhat less spiritual nourishment is offered to the great majority of us who don't."
Well, I am neither wealthy nor Roman Catholic - but I know what an honest and disingenuous person WFB jr was. He to
When I started to read this book, I had a look at at Goodreads One reviewer, who gave the book two stars wrote: "This religious testament by a wealthy Catholic who never entertained doubts about his beliefs will doubtless offer comfort and reassurance to those who share his background and mindset. Somewhat less spiritual nourishment is offered to the great majority of us who don't."
Well, I am neither wealthy nor Roman Catholic - but I know what an honest and disingenuous person WFB jr was. He took his religion very seriously and wrote of it very personally He bared his soul in a way few of us would dare.
Possibly the critical book I have read on Catholicism, written not by a priest or theologian - but by someone who, in spite of the warts, wrote a loving portrait of his Church.
...more
William F. Buckley, Jr., the founder of modern American conservatism who just died recently, was a man of enormous intellect, wit, erudition and culture. This autobiography, organized around his grounding and formation in the Catholic faith and tradition, gives the reader a great deal of fascinating information about Buckley's upbringing, family, friends and associates, as well as some insight into his religious beliefs. Most interesting, witty, and compelling reading.
A serious thoughtful work about Christian Faith and the role and impact it had on Mr. Buckley's life and his spiritual development. It is, nonetheless, a slow read but sincere and well done.
This was an interesting book; a sort of autobiography of faith written by one of the architects of the modern American conservative movement. Buckley had a tremendous command of the English language (he wrote the introduction to the American Heritage Dictionary), but I generally find his writing a bit stilted, and have not read many of his longer works.
With that said, I enjoyed this book. Buckley's faith in God, his love of Catholicism, and his willingness to question the hard parts of our fait
This was an interesting book; a sort of autobiography of faith written by one of the architects of the modern American conservative movement. Buckley had a tremendous command of the English language (he wrote the introduction to the American Heritage Dictionary), but I generally find his writing a bit stilted, and have not read many of his longer works.
With that said, I enjoyed this book. Buckley's faith in God, his love of Catholicism, and his willingness to question the hard parts of our faith, as well as seek the counsel of the wise, make for an interesting read. I found the parts about the pre-Vatican II church to be most illuminating, and I have a better sense of why older folks aren't crazy about the 'new' mass ('new' as in the past 40 years!)
Catholicism continues to be my intellectual hobby, my cross to bear, and my spiritual home. Books like this, written by an intelligent, knowledgeable man, cast a great deal of light on the path I am traveling.
One final, unrelated point about William F. Buckley: he must be turning over in his frigging grave as we watches what his beloved conservative movement has turned in to.
...more
In his "autobiography of faith", William F. Buckley Jr. gives us an overview of some of the major influences that played a role in his development as a Catholic.
Portions of this book are strictly biographical in the sense that he describes particular encounters with people (teachers, priests, fellow-believers) that shaped his way of thinking; the rest of the book is biographical mostly in the sense that he shares with us major historical, theological, philosophical, and cultural questions and id
In his "autobiography of faith", William F. Buckley Jr. gives us an overview of some of the major influences that played a role in his development as a Catholic.
Portions of this book are strictly biographical in the sense that he describes particular encounters with people (teachers, priests, fellow-believers) that shaped his way of thinking; the rest of the book is biographical mostly in the sense that he shares with us major historical, theological, philosophical, and cultural questions and ideas that he wrestled with, along with some of the thinkers that shaped his thought on the matter.
The first half of the book is very engaging, but it begins to lose steam toward the end. I found myself often in admiration of Buckley as a thinker and "great mover of deeds" (to borrow a phrase from "The Lord of the Rings") which gave me a greater appreciation of him, but I have to admit that this book is not nearly as engaging as his television programs.
I'm happy I read it and I learned at great deal from it, but I could think of a few Firing Line episodes I'd be more likely to recommend over this book (even when it comes to the topic of faith).
...more
The book was strangely enjoyable to read. This was very surprising following the first chapter, which I did not appreciate. The first chapter talked about Buckley's privileged childhood, globe-trotting with nannies and servants. This certainly did not endear him to me. From this point, I became swept away in his story telling, which I thoroughly enjoyed.
In some respects the book was a disappointment, as no answers were made to any of the questions posed. Buckley's form of an "answer" seems to be
The book was strangely enjoyable to read. This was very surprising following the first chapter, which I did not appreciate. The first chapter talked about Buckley's privileged childhood, globe-trotting with nannies and servants. This certainly did not endear him to me. From this point, I became swept away in his story telling, which I thoroughly enjoyed.
In some respects the book was a disappointment, as no answers were made to any of the questions posed. Buckley's form of an "answer" seems to be a description of an emotional feeling. Getting to grips with his lack of objective answers was certainly an education in itself. Now that I have finished the book, I am happy I read it, but have no idea how to rate it, or if I would recommend it for anyone else to read. Odd.
...more
This religious testament by a wealthy Catholic who never entertained doubts about his beliefs will doubtless offer comfort and reassurance to those who share his background and mindset. Somewhat less spiritual nourishment is offered to the great majority of us who don't. (I suspect Buckley's original title for this book was "Nearer, My God, Than You Are," but his publisher talked him out of it.)
A sophisticated, highly educated and witty look at a Mr. Buckleys search for truth- chock full of interesting ideas, quotes, anecdotes. I thoroughly enjoyed this book, and became less jaded towards Catholocism, to boot.
William Frank Buckley, Jr. was an American author and conservative commentator. He founded the political magazine
National Review
in 1955, hosted 1,429 episodes of the television show
Firing Line
from 1966 until 1999, and was a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist. His writing style was famed for its erudition, wit, and use of uncommon words.
Buckley was "arguably the most important public int
William Frank Buckley, Jr. was an American author and conservative commentator. He founded the political magazine
National Review
in 1955, hosted 1,429 episodes of the television show
Firing Line
from 1966 until 1999, and was a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist. His writing style was famed for its erudition, wit, and use of uncommon words.
Buckley was "arguably the most important public intellectual in the United States in the past half century," according to George H. Nash, a historian of the modern American conservative movement. "For an entire generation he was the preeminent voice of American conservatism and its first great ecumenical figure." Buckley's primary intellectual achievement was to fuse traditional American political conservatism with economic libertarianism and anti-communism, laying the groundwork for the modern American conservatism of US Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater and US President Ronald Reagan.
Buckley came on the public scene with his critical book
God and Man at Yale
(1951); among over fifty further books on writing, speaking, history, politics and sailing, were a series of novels featuring CIA agent Blackford Oakes. Buckley referred to himself "on and off" as either libertarian or conservative. He resided in New York City and Stamford, Connecticut, and often signed his name as "WFB." He was a practicing Catholic, regularly attending the traditional Latin Mass in Connecticut.
...more