Near the beginning of
The Autobiography of an Execution
, David Dow lays his cards on the table. "People think that because I am against the death penalty and don't think people should be executed, that I forgive those people for what they did. Well, it isn't my place to forgive people, and if it were, I probably wouldn't. I'm a judgmental and not very forgiving guy. Just a
Near the beginning of
The Autobiography of an Execution
, David Dow lays his cards on the table. "People think that because I am against the death penalty and don't think people should be executed, that I forgive those people for what they did. Well, it isn't my place to forgive people, and if it were, I probably wouldn't. I'm a judgmental and not very forgiving guy. Just ask my wife."
It this spellbinding true crime narrative, Dow takes us inside of prisons, inside the complicated minds of judges, inside execution-administration chambers, into the lives of death row inmates (some shown to be innocent, others not) and even into his own home--where the toll of working on these gnarled and difficult cases is perhaps inevitably paid. He sheds insight onto unexpected phenomena-- how even religious lawyer and justices can evince deep rooted support for putting criminals to death-- and makes palpable the suspense that clings to every word and action when human lives hang in the balance.
...more
This is a brilliant memoir/creative nonfiction that has intensified my opposition to the death penalty. The author runs a legal aid clinic that handles death row inmates' appeals in Texas, a state notorious for its large number of executions. I knew the system was seriously flawed, but I didn't realize it was THIS bad. I was frankly horrified by what I read.
There are several cases in this story, but the central case involves a man convicted of murdering his wife and children, who is facing execu
This is a brilliant memoir/creative nonfiction that has intensified my opposition to the death penalty. The author runs a legal aid clinic that handles death row inmates' appeals in Texas, a state notorious for its large number of executions. I knew the system was seriously flawed, but I didn't realize it was THIS bad. I was frankly horrified by what I read.
There are several cases in this story, but the central case involves a man convicted of murdering his wife and children, who is facing execution in a matter of weeks. His trial lawyer was really bad and basically presented no defense at all. As the attorney works on the appeal, he discovers clear and convincing evidence that his client is innocent. But can he stop the execution? To coin a cliché, I was on the edge of my seat wondering what would happen next.
This book qualifies as "creative nonfiction" because it's not strictly factual. The author disguised his clients and all the details of the crimes, and changed everyone's names, so that the real people involved could not be identified. He says so in the introduction to the book. There's also a useful essay in the back written by another lawyer, explaining the restrictions of attorney-client privilege and why Dow had to write the book this way.
This is a frankly stunning book. I think anyone interested in the criminal justice system and the death penalty -- on both sides of the debate -- should read it.
...more
I grew up in Texas and spent the majority of my adulthood there. Knowing this you might think I am for the death penalty and you would be wrong. The author is a death penalty attorney and law professor. He writes of many cases and references them and his family throughout the book. The main story of "Quaker" brought tears to my eyes. I have often wondered how "Christians" can play the part of God and put a person to death instead of just jailing them for life. I realize they refer to "an eye for
I grew up in Texas and spent the majority of my adulthood there. Knowing this you might think I am for the death penalty and you would be wrong. The author is a death penalty attorney and law professor. He writes of many cases and references them and his family throughout the book. The main story of "Quaker" brought tears to my eyes. I have often wondered how "Christians" can play the part of God and put a person to death instead of just jailing them for life. I realize they refer to "an eye for an eye" from the Bible, but where does it say "kill someone because you think they are guilty?" The cost of appeals for a death row inmate is so much higher than to just imprison a person for life. And if you are rich and white, 99% of the time you won't end up on death row. (I know there are a few exceptions but how often do you hear of them being executed?) Basically in Texas, the judicial system is a sad joke for those of color and little financial means facing a murder charge. DNA does not always exonerate a person there. I personally know of a famous former oilman who got away with murder in Texas who lives in the same neighborhood as a good friend of mine. He is rich and white. He became a Christian after his former wife's daughter's death and used this to his advantage in court. Between that and his expensive attorney, he now lives in a nice house with a new wife scott free.If he had been darker skinned and poor,good luck to him with a state appointed attorney. Those guys are not always bad - but many are burned out and get little to nothing in pay, so why should they bother to adequately research a client's case? Anyway, if you are on the fence regarding the death penalty, this book should persuade you against it. If you are for it, this book will probably make you think you are right. And if you are against it, this book will just make you angrier and sadder about the state of Texas's judicial system. I am proud to be a Texan but I am ashamed about the executions that take place just off of the freeway on the drive to Houston from Dallas.
...more
The first thought in reading
The Autobiography of an Execution
was that David Dow's life reminded me an awful lot of that of Mitch McDeere from
The Firm
. Not the mafia parts; just the long hours, beautiful wife, running and drinking and eating parts. I'm not sure if this was subconscious (I'm betting Dow has read Grisham), or if it just means that this is the life of a busy, driven Southern lawyer.
Of course, it shouldn't go without saying that Dow's book is much, much better than Grisham's. I am
The first thought in reading
The Autobiography of an Execution
was that David Dow's life reminded me an awful lot of that of Mitch McDeere from
The Firm
. Not the mafia parts; just the long hours, beautiful wife, running and drinking and eating parts. I'm not sure if this was subconscious (I'm betting Dow has read Grisham), or if it just means that this is the life of a busy, driven Southern lawyer.
Of course, it shouldn't go without saying that Dow's book is much, much better than Grisham's. I am against the racist institution of capital punishment, but I still appreciated how Dow took it for granted that his readers were. There is no preaching or inveighing in the book: Dow lets his experience speak for itself. And speak powerfully it does.
The title should be a tip off, so I don't think I'm giving anything away to reveal that Dow is not able to save anyone from death row. That's just not the way his job goes, most of the time -- even though he makes a very strong case for why it should. But he makes an equally strong case for why he does what he does, and for the limits of his profession. He doesn't try to find the good in his clients, or to forgive them, or even to figure out how they got to be where they are. The issue is simply that the death penalty is wrong, and in that way Dow is imminently relatable.
Finally, as a former Houstonian, it made me happy to know that someone like Dow (an atheist Jew, like my husband) is fighting the Texas killing machine. It's a fight worth fighting.
...more
The author, a death-penalty defense lawyer in Texas, discusses some of his cases (with identifying details removed) and all their nail-biting, guilt-inducing, soul-crushing drama and tragedy. He mentions several cases as once, but most of the book centers on the case of a man he calls Quaker, who got a sickeningly unfair deal at his first trial and who seems innocent based on the evidence Dow has. Undeniably driven to do this work, and justifiably angry at what he perceives as uncaring, blatantl
The author, a death-penalty defense lawyer in Texas, discusses some of his cases (with identifying details removed) and all their nail-biting, guilt-inducing, soul-crushing drama and tragedy. He mentions several cases as once, but most of the book centers on the case of a man he calls Quaker, who got a sickeningly unfair deal at his first trial and who seems innocent based on the evidence Dow has. Undeniably driven to do this work, and justifiably angry at what he perceives as uncaring, blatantly unfair, and hypocritical judges who sign death orders from afar, he is plagued by nightmares and sometimes overly harsh with his young son. He depicts his home life, with his wife whom he adores and his five-year-old, as a refuge, but one that too often is violated by the on-call nature of his work.
It makes for truly compelling reading, as Dow tells it, giving a vain scintilla of hope to the hopeless and mostly forsaken, only to deliver disappointment, and be disappointed, time and again. Dow tries at times too hard to be the poet, eschewing quotation marks, postmodern hipster style, and possibly infusing his son’s comments about life and cruelty with more weight than they truly carry. And at times he is in need of an editor, often dropping a subject and referring to a previous subject with an “it” or “he” so that it’s not clear whom he’s referring to. And perhaps an editor would have convinced Dow tone down the "women sure do hit on clueless ol’ me a lot" bits that only serve to make him look self-aggrandizing or wallowing in false modesty or both. He mentions in his afterword that a previous book of his was reviewed by a critic who said it had a lot of facts but nothing of him in it. Of course, everyone’s tolerance for authorial ego varies, and yes, I understand that he was trying to show the delicate balance defense attorneys must carve out to stay sane, but frankly I wish there had been less of Dow in this one, and more on the nuts and bolts of his late nights futilely trying to save the unsympathetic.
...more
If you're for the death penalty, I'm not convinced that reading books by lawyers such as David Dow seeking to save death-row inmates is really going to make any difference to what you think. So, what then, is the purpose of Dow's book, assuming he is preaching to an army of the converted...those who don't believe in the death penalty?
David Dow is an academic and a lead lawyer at Texas's non-profit anti-death penalty litigation center. The greatest strength of Dow's book is his frankness. Dow arg
If you're for the death penalty, I'm not convinced that reading books by lawyers such as David Dow seeking to save death-row inmates is really going to make any difference to what you think. So, what then, is the purpose of Dow's book, assuming he is preaching to an army of the converted...those who don't believe in the death penalty?
David Dow is an academic and a lead lawyer at Texas's non-profit anti-death penalty litigation center. The greatest strength of Dow's book is his frankness. Dow argues that most of the people he represents are undoubtedly guilty. Often, their crimes have been horrific--and most of the inmates for whom he advocates are not people he likes very much. Focusing on innocence, argues Dow, distracts people from the real injustices of the death penalty. People who are sentenced to death are disproportionately black and poor, represented by unbelievably crappy lawyers who miss filing deadlines, fail to raise pertinent points of appeal, and who essentially doom their clients to death by virtue of their inadequacy. Stepping in to try and clean up these messes are people like Dow and his team. Dow's work is mainly about buying time...as Dow explains, an extra thirty days of life becomes an enormous victory in the context of the alternative: death. If buying time means that a prisoner on death row dies of an AIDS-related illness rather than via state execution, then that death is counted as a success.
David Dow's memoir is about some of the death-row inmates whom he's represented as their attorney, and all the injustices and challenges that exist where he practices (Texas). He use to support the death penalty but opposes it now...and after reading the book it's easy to see why.
I can see some people being turned off by the way the book is written: he skips back and forth between his interactions with his family (wife, son, and a dog) and his clients. However, it didn't bother me at all; in fa
David Dow's memoir is about some of the death-row inmates whom he's represented as their attorney, and all the injustices and challenges that exist where he practices (Texas). He use to support the death penalty but opposes it now...and after reading the book it's easy to see why.
I can see some people being turned off by the way the book is written: he skips back and forth between his interactions with his family (wife, son, and a dog) and his clients. However, it didn't bother me at all; in fact, I rather liked the stark contrasts it produces. A very refreshing aspect of the book for me was the brutal honesty with which the author gives his views on his colleagues, judges, clients, wife's friends, etc.
I think everybody should read this book, no matter where you stand on the issue. Since the author has held both views on the death penalty, he understands the perspective of those who still favor it and does not get preachy but let's the stories speak for themselves. It's a fast read and definitely worth spending the time IMHO.
...more
Wow. This book should be required reading to be a human. So very deserving of the Barnes and Noble Discover Award! The writing was so gorgeous I was able to overlook the author's aversion to quotation marks -- lots of, "I said, thank you very much. He said, you're welcome. I said, let's go get some ice cream." Not sure what the reasoning was behind this stylistic choice, but hey, if I'm going to think William Faulkner is the great genius of the universe, I can't say I don't like authors who brea
Wow. This book should be required reading to be a human. So very deserving of the Barnes and Noble Discover Award! The writing was so gorgeous I was able to overlook the author's aversion to quotation marks -- lots of, "I said, thank you very much. He said, you're welcome. I said, let's go get some ice cream." Not sure what the reasoning was behind this stylistic choice, but hey, if I'm going to think William Faulkner is the great genius of the universe, I can't say I don't like authors who break the rules. Also, I'm kind of in love with Lincoln.
...more
It was okay. The legal parts were really good, but I was not digging all the detours into the family. I wanted to read a book about the legalities of capital punishment, not a father feeling guilty for not buying his kid a snowcone.
Also, I couldn't find any other reviewer here mention this, but my BS meter went off a few times. Many of the interactions he recounts with prisoners didn't ring true to me, and he seemed a little self-aggrandizing.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
I absolutely could not put this book down. The style was engaging, the tales were gripping and I found myself actually caring about (most of) the characters. I appreciate the honesty Dow provides the reader; namely that he used to be a supporter of the death penalty and that he does not judge those who still are. Instead, he provides us with an in-depth analysis of the appellate process and allows us to draw our own conclusion. He lays it all out - that most people are guilty (at one point he ev
I absolutely could not put this book down. The style was engaging, the tales were gripping and I found myself actually caring about (most of) the characters. I appreciate the honesty Dow provides the reader; namely that he used to be a supporter of the death penalty and that he does not judge those who still are. Instead, he provides us with an in-depth analysis of the appellate process and allows us to draw our own conclusion. He lays it all out - that most people are guilty (at one point he even acknowledges that his office spends very little time on some clients who don't have much of a chance of winning) but that sometimes the process just isn't fair.
I was fond of Quaker. That's an odd thing to say about a convicted murderer, but I was saddened by his execution. I remember the exact moment in the book when I realized "he's going to die." Yet, at the same point in the book Dow was detailing all the last minute scrambles and efforts to save whom he thought was an innocent man - and still hoping they would. When Dow saw Quaker for the last time, placed his hand on the glass and apologized, I felt his defeat. But perhaps more powerful to me was Quaker's acceptance. Though we'll never be certain who committed the crimes for which Quaker was exececuted, if he was indeed innocent, I can't think of a better reason to leave the world bitter and spiteful. But he didn't. He was just grateful someone gave a damn. Truly heartbreaking.
...more
David Dow represented hundreds of death row inmates. The vast majority were guily. Most were executerd. A few were mentally retarded. Almost all had horrendous upbringings and were severly damaged human beings. Some he disliked intensely. Some he regarded as just plain evil. And at least a few were innocent.
Dow's book sketches the reality of the death penalty in America and tells his own story -- that of a lawyer trying to stop his clients from being put to death and almost always losing. His w
David Dow represented hundreds of death row inmates. The vast majority were guily. Most were executerd. A few were mentally retarded. Almost all had horrendous upbringings and were severly damaged human beings. Some he disliked intensely. Some he regarded as just plain evil. And at least a few were innocent.
Dow's book sketches the reality of the death penalty in America and tells his own story -- that of a lawyer trying to stop his clients from being put to death and almost always losing. His work would seem to be stressful in the extreme and extremely discouraging, yet as Dow describes it, the reader comes to understand why it is important. In spare and simple prose, Dow describes his day to day work, his clients, and the effect his work has on his home and family life and his dreams.
If Dow himself is one focus of the book, the other is the death penalty itself. The book provides food for thought for both those who support and those who oppose the death penalty. The reality is that a lot of poor defendants don't get anything like competent legal representation, even when their lives are at stake. The reality is that racism is often a factor. The reality is that many defendants are given the death penalty on something less than airtight evidence. The reality is that prosecutors, judges and jurors are often far more concerned with punishing those they perceive or believe to be guilty of heinous crimes than in making sure they are only punished after getting a fair trial. The reality is that most of those who are found guilty and sentenced to death are in fact guilty.
But the really troubling reality is that a few of those condemned to death aren't guilty, didn't get a fair trial, and don't deserve to die. Another troubling reality is that all too often procedural rules are given greater weight than substantive fairness. Claims of actual innocence, with evidence to back them up, are sometimes blocked because they were not raised in the right court or at the right time. The incompetence of trial counsel, including famously, lawyers who slept through large parts of their clients' death penalty trials, is over overlooked, excused or justified. This is a very disturbing book. It will very surely disturb those who oppose the death penalty. It should disturb those who support it even more.
...more
This book is several things: an intimate and humane argument against the injustice of capital punishment, a critique of other anti-capital punishment literature, and, as Louisa Thomas, writing in
The New York Times
described Mary Clearman Blew's
This is Not the Ivy League
: "a kind of anti-memoir — an incredulous account, a catalog of confusion."
David R. Dow has been representing death row inmates for 20 odd years or so. Once a proponent of the death penalty, he got started in the business as
This book is several things: an intimate and humane argument against the injustice of capital punishment, a critique of other anti-capital punishment literature, and, as Louisa Thomas, writing in
The New York Times
described Mary Clearman Blew's
This is Not the Ivy League
: "a kind of anti-memoir — an incredulous account, a catalog of confusion."
David R. Dow has been representing death row inmates for 20 odd years or so. Once a proponent of the death penalty, he got started in the business as an academic exercise: early on in his career he set out to compare the competancies of lawyers representing death row inmates in Virginia, Florida and Texas. What he found was troubling enough to take up the mantel of defense of men and women sentenced to death, most of them guilty of absolutely heinous crimes, not out ofany great sense of compassion for them but out of a strong belief in the Rule of Law, which, as we find in
Autobiography of an Execution
, most prosecutors, judges and defense lawyers don't seem to give a damn about. Dow's argument against the death penalty is this: if the system is this screwed up, no one can expect justice from the system. If the system by which the state administers justice is too screwed up to administer justice then that state does not have the authority to execute anyone.
I rest my personal opposition to the death penalty on a belief in the sanctity of human life, QED. This position falls flat however, when taking it in argument against someone (or some system) that does not recognize or believe in sanctity. Dow's position is very important, then, for abolitionists. He offers an abolitionist position that does not rely on a belief in the sanctity of human life.
AOAE is Dow's account of how the Rule of Law has broken down in capital cases in Texas; we are taken through five or six narratives (Dow is bound by legal code and ethics not to share identifying details about his clients, and these narratives represent cases that he and his colleagues have worked on, though names, dates and identifying details have been changed) that demonstrate what happens when a man or woman is sentenced to death. Dow takes the reader through a light crash course in the legal basics and what he and his colleagues go through to prevent their client's executions. Dow has a strong moral backbone and makes his case against capital punishment skillfully and subtlely. I was furious after reading of the institutionalized callousness of the death penalty machine: that a man may go do his death because a computer server was down and his lawyer left unable to file a motion in time. That a judge would write an op-ed saying that in angered him he couldn't schedule dinner parties on nights of executions because the last minute phone calls from lawyers trying to save a man or woman's life (no matter how heinous that person may be) disrupted his dinner. The ridiculous sense of priviledge and entitlement that those in power have blew my mind. I am a lowly bench scientist, but if there is work for me to do after five o'clock, I stay at work until its finished. I don't think that we should expect any less from lawyers or federal court judges.
Dow does not reward himself for his work; he is far tougher on himself, as a lawyer, as a father, and as a person, than he is on the machine that he fights so ruthlessly. I've never read a memoir by anyone who knows the facts of them selves so well, and yet is so honest in their refusal to fake a linear narrative of their lives. This is a true anti-memoir: Dow has far more questions for himself than he has answers for the reader. This is a fitting stance to take, as it puts the reader in the mind to question themselves, as well, and once in a questioning mood, perhaps question whether we, as a nation, may put a man or woman to death and call it justice, when we know so little of our own motivations.
There was some poor editing: Jeremy Winston has two life stories, making it too obvious that he is, in reality, at least two people. Also, if I, as a fellow bourbon drinker may quibble: Dow once mentions that after his first capital case, he took a case of Jack Daniels with him to his cabin on Galveston Island. Later, he refers to such as 'A case of bourbon'. Sir, if you were a true bourbon drinker, you would know this to be false.
An Autobiography of an Execution
is highly recommended as an excellent (anti) memoir, and for those readers who care about the administration of justice.
...more
There are many reasons I could give for why you should read a book about the death penalty: cold, hard, fact-based reasons, like the chilling statistic that to date 17 people who have been executed in this country have since been exonerated by DNA evidence, according to the Innocence Project (and that even one is too many). But really, my own opinions on the issue are irrelevant, and Dow's searing memoir can be approached equally well as a death penalty proponent, opponent, or as someone who has
There are many reasons I could give for why you should read a book about the death penalty: cold, hard, fact-based reasons, like the chilling statistic that to date 17 people who have been executed in this country have since been exonerated by DNA evidence, according to the Innocence Project (and that even one is too many). But really, my own opinions on the issue are irrelevant, and Dow's searing memoir can be approached equally well as a death penalty proponent, opponent, or as someone who has no real feelings on the issue at all. Dow, who defends death row inmates in Texas, occupied the first position before coming firmly around to the second, and his reasoning is much more ethically than morally based. Dow doesn't like most of his clients; he thinks even fewer of them are innocent. But the system he sees is a broken one, corrupted and corrosive -- death by a drunk executioner swinging a rusty blade. The stories that make up
Autobiography of an Execution
are exercises in frustration, Kafkaesque bureaucratic nightmare, and heartbreak. And yet: Dow tempers all this with prose that is more Hemingwayesque in its simple, stark power. And yet: the overall effect is as pulse-poundingly intense as the best John Grisham thriller -- and a thousand times more emotionally resonant, as it's all true, each life and death that of a real person. Forget politics: this is a book about people, and it should be read.
...more
David Dow took a subject that many of us in the US like to ignore, the death penalty, and personalized it in a nearly perfect way--not just by telling the true stories of the death row inmates he represents, but also by weaving it together with his own life and family.
We don't like to be reminded that we, as a country, sentence people to death. The author admits that the majority of his clients are guilty. They are. He doesn't tiptoe around the fact that his job is to keep them alive, even if i
David Dow took a subject that many of us in the US like to ignore, the death penalty, and personalized it in a nearly perfect way--not just by telling the true stories of the death row inmates he represents, but also by weaving it together with his own life and family.
We don't like to be reminded that we, as a country, sentence people to death. The author admits that the majority of his clients are guilty. They are. He doesn't tiptoe around the fact that his job is to keep them alive, even if it is just one hour longer. But, he powerfully (yet lightly and conversationally) states his case for their right to a (competent) defense, why the death penalty should be abolished, and what it means for our country to kill innocent people.
I don't know how he masterfully married these seemingly heavy topics with personal anecdotes, but he accomplished it. I really enjoyed his conversations with his wise 6-year old and his wise wife. It is also powerful to glimpse at how someone with his job copes with the everyday stress of trying to save people in a system whose goal is quite contrary to this.
Some critiques of this book are of David Dow's purported ego. One has to have a strong ego to do the work he does and I am grateful for it. Some readers seem to miss the reasons names and particular details were altered, despite allegiance to the story itself. (Author's note, "...I have told these stories in a way that is faithful to the truth as well as to the individuals they feature.") In this it is most believable.
Yes, it's a story about how this lawyer--principles, passion and all--balance
Some critiques of this book are of David Dow's purported ego. One has to have a strong ego to do the work he does and I am grateful for it. Some readers seem to miss the reasons names and particular details were altered, despite allegiance to the story itself. (Author's note, "...I have told these stories in a way that is faithful to the truth as well as to the individuals they feature.") In this it is most believable.
Yes, it's a story about how this lawyer--principles, passion and all--balances his responsibility with living wholly himself. Painful balance. Anyone who has ever fought a "losing battle" knows how difficult it is to maintain such equilibrium.
The story of fighting for an innocent man explains most clearly why the death penalty is wrong. The lives of living individuals are regarded without value. Politics over-rides reason and compassion. Human failing is universal, whether one is a murderer or a judge.
At one point Dow refers to Sr. Helen Prejean, a committed activist against capital punishment, and her statement that support for the Death Penalty is a mile wide and an inch deep (he adds that one can die in an inch of water). Good read.
...more
2.5 stars. I picked this book out one, because I wanted to read an opposing viewpoint for capital punishment and two, I'm always curious about criminal defense attorneys--how and why theytry to protect and serve those who commit the most heinous crimes. This book disappointed on both expectations. The author explained those away in a couple paragraphs and chose to focus on the lives and stories of the death row inmates he has represented, which surprisingly diluted what I thought the author was
2.5 stars. I picked this book out one, because I wanted to read an opposing viewpoint for capital punishment and two, I'm always curious about criminal defense attorneys--how and why they try to protect and serve those who commit the most heinous crimes. This book disappointed on both expectations. The author explained those away in a couple paragraphs and chose to focus on the lives and stories of the death row inmates he has represented, which surprisingly diluted what I thought the author was trying to achieve. In fact, the book was built around one main case to illustrate the author's views of a corrupted system, which of course was one where the accused was innocent and he had to prove him such. While I believe the system is only as good as the people running it, I also think trying to prove that an exception to the rule somehow discredits every other law enforcement or judicial process is a poor argument. The book is a passionate voice of one who has decided to care about those whom everyone else makes a concerted effort not to care about, but also one who has an extremely pessimistic view of law enforcement.
...more
This book is a screed—but it’s a screed that everyone with any interest in understanding how the American legal system works should read. The author has a very interesting perspective, having worked for Texas death-row inmates, and he is, I would say, enraged at how the legal system has treated them. The book is written somewhat unconventionally—not separated into chapters, really, more just pauses, and with a rather plaintive writing style—but the content is so important, and engrossing, that b
This book is a screed—but it’s a screed that everyone with any interest in understanding how the American legal system works should read. The author has a very interesting perspective, having worked for Texas death-row inmates, and he is, I would say, enraged at how the legal system has treated them. The book is written somewhat unconventionally—not separated into chapters, really, more just pauses, and with a rather plaintive writing style—but the content is so important, and engrossing, that by the third page or so, you forget that it’s different at all. And certainly it’s well written, just a little differently than the non-fiction I usually read.
In several cases, his writing is so powerful that, upon rereading my notes, I’m struck by just how perfectly he has described the situation. One such example is when he describes how his own feelings on the death penalty have evolved: “I changed my mind when I learned how lawless the system is. If you have reservations about supporting a racist, classist, unprincipled regime, a regime where white skin is valued far more highly than dark, where prosecutors hide evidence and policemen routinely lie, where judges decide what justice requires by consulting the most recent Gallup poll, where rich people sometimes get away with murder and never end up on death row, then the death-penalty system we have here in America will embarrass you to no end.”
Interestingly, however, the primary focus of the book is about a death-row inmate he believes is innocent. For some, this may undermine his point above, about how guilty inmates are treated, but to me it was no less powerful. He reserves particular animosity toward the court of appeals with jurisdiction for Texas, and points out egregious examples of their upholding the death penalty even in cases with egregious racism in jury selection, with lawyers who didn’t point out their client’s extremely low IQ score, lawyers waited too long to identify proof of innocence, lawyers slept through trial, etc., and claims that the judges hide their lawlessness inside legalese. In another particularly poignant comment, he notes that “most people say that the murderer got treated better than his victim, and that pretty much sums up the attitude of the judges on the court of appeals as well.”
In one lighter moment, he recalls a conversation with a nun, who noted that the support for the death penalty is a mile wide and an inch deep. To which the author notes that you can drown in an inch of water. I found that exchange a particularly apt analogy for the death penalty’s staying power despite its massive legal and moral issues.
This book certainly isn’t uplifting, and at times is upsetting to read, which is all the more reason it’s an essential read. Highly recommended.
...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
I picked this book up an a whim because it looked good. It was far better than I ever imagined. I breezed through it in the past couple days when I needed a break from college work. It really changed the way I feel about the death penalty. Although the book is fiction, it is based on the experiences of a real death penalty lawyer. He was extremely convincing in his reasons for disagreeing with the death penalty, such as human beings not having the right to take the lives of others, and everyone
I picked this book up an a whim because it looked good. It was far better than I ever imagined. I breezed through it in the past couple days when I needed a break from college work. It really changed the way I feel about the death penalty. Although the book is fiction, it is based on the experiences of a real death penalty lawyer. He was extremely convincing in his reasons for disagreeing with the death penalty, such as human beings not having the right to take the lives of others, and everyone deserving to be treated with dignity and respect, even if they have committed a heinous crime. Each time he picked up a new death penalty case, I assumed he would lose it because in the end he would help set Henry free and prove him innocent. How disappointed I was when Henry died in the end. What most surprised me was that it made little difference if the man charged with the crime was guilty or innocent, what mattered was the process. Did you fill out the paper correctly? File it in time? Was your prosecutor incompetent - not that it would matter...The system is so out of whack the I am sure there are times judges know they are executing an innocent man but allow it to happen all in the name of following the rules. I also really enjoyed that we got the relationship with the lawyer and his son, and to see how he needed to keep this part of his life separate from his work, or it would destroy him and his family. And it made me happy that in the end, he did not sleep with the judge!
...more
Dow’s new book is made up of part philosophy, part law school 101, part case history, part memoir and part detective story. The most compelling part of these is the detective story, (where he tries to figure out if one of his clients is actually innocent) the worst part was his telling us too much about his precocious 6 –year old son (and while I understand that he wants to show us his personal life to give the rest of the story context, this was too much).
Dow tells us that he used to believe in
Dow’s new book is made up of part philosophy, part law school 101, part case history, part memoir and part detective story. The most compelling part of these is the detective story, (where he tries to figure out if one of his clients is actually innocent) the worst part was his telling us too much about his precocious 6 –year old son (and while I understand that he wants to show us his personal life to give the rest of the story context, this was too much).
Dow tells us that he used to believe in capital punishment, but now no longer does. He now works exclusively with death row prisoners to get them stays of execution. His reasons for having a change of heart aren’t detailed in this book (although I think they may have been in his previous book “Executed on a Technicality”, that I have not yet read). It seems he is now against the death penalty because it isn’t fairly applied and the criminal justice system is skewed toward executing mainly poor minorities. He hints that he doesn’t think it is morally right either--murder is murder, but later says he is not sure what he would do if someone killed his family.
When I was younger I was adamantly against the death penalty. Now that I am older and have a young son, I am still theoretically against capital punishment; however I know that if someone sexually abused, tortured and killed my son, I could personally administer the lethal injection with no qualms. So I wonder if Dow would still be against the death penalty if the same thing happened to his son, of whom he absolutely adores and fawns over in this book.
Dow shows the absurdity of how the court system works and how it is not driven by justice, but by procedures, protocols, and politics. He also shows how it is easy for everyone within this system (from jury members, to judges, and most especially the Governor, to not take responsibility for executing someone no matter if they are guilty, mentally incompetent or innocent, with the statement of “There wasn’t anything I could do.”
In addition to the too much narrative about his son in this book, his writing was a little too disjointed for me. He was all over the map--back and forth between a past client, to meeting his wife, to the main current case, to his current personal life, back to another current client, a dream, philosophical thoughts etc. He needed a better editor. These issues aside, I did think the book was informative and thought provoking and I would recommend it.
...more
Whatever your feelings toward the death penalty, this is a fascinating read. It’s nonfiction, the story of Dow’s dealings as a death penalty lawyer who tries to keep people from being executed on death row — which does not mean he necessarily proves their innocence or downgrades their sentence. If someone dies from pneumonia instead, he considers it a “victory.” If he can push their sentence back a few days, a victory.
A few things I found interesting about this book:
It largely focuses on Dow an
Whatever your feelings toward the death penalty, this is a fascinating read. It’s nonfiction, the story of Dow’s dealings as a death penalty lawyer who tries to keep people from being executed on death row — which does not mean he necessarily proves their innocence or downgrades their sentence. If someone dies from pneumonia instead, he considers it a “victory.” If he can push their sentence back a few days, a victory.
A few things I found interesting about this book:
It largely focuses on Dow and his family and how being a death penalty lawyer affects him (though at the same time, Dow’s voice keeps it from being overly philosophical.)
While I understand that there is corruption in our justice system, this further emphasized exactly what people mean by “corruption.” A public defender falling asleep in trial. The defense making no defense argument. The prosecution disallowing any black individuals from being on the jury of a black man’s trial.
While Dow states several times that he doesn’t believe in the death penalty, and sometimes says that he used to but at the time was misinformed, it doesn’t feel like the book is trying to sway you in one direction or the other. It’s not trying to convince you that the death penalty is wrong. It’s trying to show you what it means to intervene on the behalf of someone on death row.
So if you’re at all interested in the subject matter, it’s a good read. One that is easy to come back to when you inevitably put it down for some time to let what you’ve read sink in.
...more
A comfortable read that fits in naturally with my liberal inclinations. Dow is a lawyer who represents death row clients in Texas and lets his frustrations show. His argument is that the death penalty is wrong regardless of circumstances even though he admits to the nature of most of the people he represents. The book is not preachy and doesn’t get into the frivolous economics of the argument. It instead relies on his nature as a human being and inclinations of right and wrong to draw that concl
A comfortable read that fits in naturally with my liberal inclinations. Dow is a lawyer who represents death row clients in Texas and lets his frustrations show. His argument is that the death penalty is wrong regardless of circumstances even though he admits to the nature of most of the people he represents. The book is not preachy and doesn’t get into the frivolous economics of the argument. It instead relies on his nature as a human being and inclinations of right and wrong to draw that conclusion. The crux of the book seemed to be that the system works towards making sure it is technically right when morally it could be lax. He doesn’t absolve himself in this at times pointing out that his responsibility is to extend the process, not to find a livable arrangement for his clients.
The book centers around a case where Dow believed his client is actually innocent of the charges (one of a very few). It shows the legal arguments and appeals process as well as details of how a client would find out his final appeal is rejected. It tries to portray the costs that his stance takes on his personal life, the judiciary, and society in a larger scale.
...more
towards the end of david dow's 'the autobiography of an execution', he writes:
"The cases I have written about are not unusual. My other cases, every death-penalty lawyer's cases, are just like them. What's missing is the proof that what you have just finished reading is mundane. The day after Henry Quaker got put to death, my colleagues and I went back to the office and did it all over again, and all the same things happened."
and this is maddening. this should be enough to convince any rational
towards the end of david dow's 'the autobiography of an execution', he writes:
"The cases I have written about are not unusual. My other cases, every death-penalty lawyer's cases, are just like them. What's missing is the proof that what you have just finished reading is mundane. The day after Henry Quaker got put to death, my colleagues and I went back to the office and did it all over again, and all the same things happened."
and this is maddening. this should be enough to convince any rational human being that the death penalty is flawed. one innocent person put to death is one too many.
dow's book is at turns suspenseful, illuminating, morose, maddening, sentimental, hard-boiled, and provocative. it's a book that is not easy to classify. it's more memoir than anything, due to the subject matter -- due to attorney-client privilege, dow has been forced to cobble a true story out of true stories without actually telling the true story. that's pretty much the definition of memoir, but in a book about crime and justice, we usually want facts and dates and names and details. it's a tall order for a writer to win our trust enough to tell a true story that is not actually 'true.' but he succeeds.
at points i did find that dow's home life details intruded on the story that i wanted to hear. i am not so sure how much of that was his fault, and how much of it was that i was interested in reading a different book. i found the juxtaposition of his picture-perfect family and his penchant for expensive whiskeys and cuban cigars against the backdrop of desperate death row inmates who lived in poverty to be a bit distracting and maybe even distasteful. but that is a minor gripe. someone doing the thankful work that dow does surely deserves such little victories in life -- for there are not many to be had in his professional life.
"I'd do exhaustive research, write a powerful legal argument, and then watch no one pay it any heed. The problem with this lawyerly approach is that nobody cares about rules or principles when they're dealing with a murderer. The lawyer says that the Constitution was violated every which way, and the judge says, Yeah, but your client killed somebody, right? For all our so-called progress, the tribal vengefulness that we think of as limited to backward African countries is still how our legal system works. Deuteronomy trumps the Sixth Amendment every time. Prosecutors and judges kowtow to family members of murder victims who demand an eye for an eye, and the lonely lawyer declaiming about proper procedures is a shouting lunatic in the asylum whom people look at curiously and then walk on by."
...more
There's good news and a little bit of bad news: the good news is that this book blew me away. The writing is fluid, the story is gripping, and I could hardly put it down. The bad news is that it left a bad taste in my mouth because of the "mostly non-fiction" aspect. In an author's note at the beginning, Dow explains that in order to protect attorney-client confidentiality, he's changed and composited various facts and characters, but he claims the substance of the book is all true. The trouble
There's good news and a little bit of bad news: the good news is that this book blew me away. The writing is fluid, the story is gripping, and I could hardly put it down. The bad news is that it left a bad taste in my mouth because of the "mostly non-fiction" aspect. In an author's note at the beginning, Dow explains that in order to protect attorney-client confidentiality, he's changed and composited various facts and characters, but he claims the substance of the book is all true. The trouble is there's no way to trust that he got that right. After I finished, I felt uneasy not knowing what was completely true, what was false, and what was somewhere in between. Was this character a composite of multiple people? Did these events really happen in that order? Was that he actually a she? The whole exercise didn't sit well with me, which is a shame because I loved the book while I was reading it, and it would have held up great were it truly non-fiction or even just a novel.
...more
A harrowing read which exposes the barbarism and capriciousness of the supposed guardians of the rule of law. Dow pulls no punches, pointing out that our societal indifference to the death penalty is manifested throughout the system - from the legislatures that egg on the machinery of death to the judges that can't get elected or appointed if they seek to tamper the primal bloodlust. He reminds us that there are still good people doing the right things - innocents on death row, changed inmates w
A harrowing read which exposes the barbarism and capriciousness of the supposed guardians of the rule of law. Dow pulls no punches, pointing out that our societal indifference to the death penalty is manifested throughout the system - from the legislatures that egg on the machinery of death to the judges that can't get elected or appointed if they seek to tamper the primal bloodlust. He reminds us that there are still good people doing the right things - innocents on death row, changed inmates who have repented, prison guards and cops who go to death penalty vigils - but through our indifference and callousness the death penalty especially in Texas caters to our worst instincts. The death penalty system, as Dow makes abundantly clear, is a war against our better selves.
...more
My 3 star rating reflects my taste more than the quality of the book. Ultimately I think I just read the wrong book by Dow. I believe his non fiction work "Executed on a technicality" would be more to my liking than this memoir and plan to read it sometime soon. I loved the parts of the book about what his team of lawyers do to keep death row inmates from being executed. He provides a fascinating look into the numerous appeals and wild last ditch efforts that they try for these inmates who are m
My 3 star rating reflects my taste more than the quality of the book. Ultimately I think I just read the wrong book by Dow. I believe his non fiction work "Executed on a technicality" would be more to my liking than this memoir and plan to read it sometime soon. I loved the parts of the book about what his team of lawyers do to keep death row inmates from being executed. He provides a fascinating look into the numerous appeals and wild last ditch efforts that they try for these inmates who are mostly murderers.
The parts I disliked were the personal stories with overly saccharine conversations with his young son, analysis of his own dreams and nightmares, etc. It was somewhat interesting to learn the ways he copes with doing this emotionally demanding work and the ways it takes a toll on his family but after a while the personal stuff gets tedious.
My other big criticism is that the most prominent case in the book, Quaker, is a man he believes is innocent, which is rarely the case (he says 7/100) and using that as the primary focus of the book is at odds with his sharing his philosophy on the death penalty that "even the guilty should be spared...the abolitionists' single minded focus on innocence makes them seem as indifferent to principles as the vigilantes are." The more common cases were more interesting examples of the way in which the work unfolds that he does on behalf of death row inmates, the low rate of "winning" i.e. a stay, and how the legal system has failed them with incompetent public defenders, biased judges and no chance for a fair trial. The Green case, which is probably only included because it is tied to the Quaker case is the highlight of the book; you have to admire Dow's unwavering beliefs even when representing a true low life: "I do not like all my clients, and I did not like Green. He made the same mistake that death penalty supporters routinely make. He assumed that because I represent guys like him, I must like guys like him. He assumed that because I am against the death penalty and don't think he should be executed, that I forgive him for what he did. Well, it isn't my place to forgive people like Green and if it were, I probably wouldn't."
Overall it was an interesting book and if you like memoirs it may be the best bet for you to learn more about the life of a death penalty lawyer but as for me I'm going to give his other book a try that has less of him and more about how the death penalty works.
"I used to support the death penalty. I changed my mind when I learned how lawless the system is. If you have reservations about supporting a racist, classist, unprincipled regime, a regime where white skin is valued far more than dark, where judges decide what justice requires by consulting the latest Gallup poll, where rich people sometimes get away with murder and never end up on death row, then the death penalty system we have here in America will embarrass you to no end." David R. Dow
...more
This book provided an interesting inside view of the litigation process from the perspective of a death penalty lawyer. He artfully shows all sides of an argument while still showing a person in conflict over what his job entails, and it's losing record for 'saving' those on death row. I good read, regardless of which side of this issue you fall on.
No matter what one's stance is on capital punishment, this well-written personal log is an interesting, if not moving, account of what it's like to be a defense lawyer for prisoners on death row awaiting execution, what goes into the process of execution, and what sort of toll it takes on one's psyche. It's definitely a thoughtful and worthwhile read.
There is some information included about how the author wrote about real cases and events without betraying any confidence. I don't quite see how that is possible, but the book is fascinating reading. This is a Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction experience.
It took me a LOT longer to read this book than it should have, but it was well worth it. It was a well-written book, that tugged the reader both emotionally and rationally. Wherever you stand on the death penalty, you should read this book.
The Autobiography of an Execution is a compelling look at death penalty cases from the perspective of a death penalty lawyer. One of the things that makes this book unique is that Dow doesn't focus on cases of the wrongly executed, which would easily gain more sympathy from readers. Instead we're shown an array of condemned men, from the inexcusably guilty to the mentally incompetent killer to the one who was, in all likelihood, innocent.
Most people unfamiliar with the inner workings of our jus
The Autobiography of an Execution is a compelling look at death penalty cases from the perspective of a death penalty lawyer. One of the things that makes this book unique is that Dow doesn't focus on cases of the wrongly executed, which would easily gain more sympathy from readers. Instead we're shown an array of condemned men, from the inexcusably guilty to the mentally incompetent killer to the one who was, in all likelihood, innocent.
Most people unfamiliar with the inner workings of our justice system would assume the appeals process is in place in order to ensure the guilt of those convicted prior to their execution. This is absolutely not the case. Appeals are about technicalities and administrative errors. They're about filing exactly the right motion, worded exactly the right way, at exactly the right time. Dow takes us along through his workdays, showing us just how broken and corrupt our justice system has become.
Another aspect making this a compelling read is Dow's willingness to make it personal. He invites us into his world, letting us see how emotionally draining it is to race against the clock, only to then watch his clients die at the hands of the state. The transition between the darkness of his work and the bright light of his family is a difficult hurdle to jump over and over again. That bright light, though, is what keeps him grounded and allows him to work within such a bleak environment.
When I consider the death penalty, I most often think of the men and women locked away waiting for us to kill them. I think about guilt and innocence, and the fact that executing even one innocent person is unacceptable. David Dow does a superb job of showing me the lawyer's viewpoint. Maybe looking for the innocent needle in the guilty haystack is the wrong approach to reform. If the system worked the way it was supposed to, we would have no fear of executing an innocent or a mentally retarded person. Better yet, maybe this book can serve as a lesson that a reasonable society shouldn't have the death penalty at all.
...more
I could not put this down once I started. This book shows why even though I'm a lawyer, I generally hate lawyers, judges, prosecutors and cops. The system is not about justice or truth, it's about money and politics.
“Socrates had it backward. He thought the unexamined life is not worth living. I think no one's life holds up to examination. The more time you spend thinking the more you notice that everyone else is doing something better or more important than you.”
—
2 likes
“Lessons in life are context specific. Contexts are never the same. If there are no lessons you can use does that mean there are actually no lessons”
—
2 likes