Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Illustrated and Bundled with Autobiography by David Hume)” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (Illustrated and Bundled with Autobiography by David Hume)

3.88 of 5 stars 3.88 · rating details · 10,224 ratings · 206 reviews
Philosopher David Hume was considered to one of the most important figures in the age of Scottish enlightenment. In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Hume discusses the weakness that humans have in their abilities to comprehend the world around them, what is referred to in the title as human understanding. This work, now commonly required reading in philosophy clas ...more
Kindle Edition , 148 pages
Published March 5th 2015 by www.WealthOfNation.com (first published 1748)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , please sign up .

Be the first to ask a question about An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter | sort : default (?) | rating details
Manny
I had seen so many references to Hume's Enquiry that I almost thought I had read it; but, when I actually got around to opening the book, I found as usual that things were not quite as I had imagined. I was not surprised by his relentless scepticism, or by his insistence on basing all reasoning on empirical evidence. These qualities, after all, have become proverbial. I was, however, surprised to find that I hadn't correctly grasped the essence of his argument concerning the nature of knowledge. ...more
Abailart
Returning to an old friend! The first text I was given to study as a philosophy undergraduate, and what pleasure to revisit.

I'm not sure that Hume changed my thinking as a young man so much as brought the delight of recognition. The sweeping away of superstition, fantasy systems, spiritual mumbo jumbo and so on has never for me disabled a propensity towards reflection or deep attachment to a cleaner, less encumbered mystery. Kant, too, found his religious faith strengthened by such clarity.

I was
...more
Ashvajit
I enjoyed the straightforward, no-nonsense style of this famous philosopher. Good though he is, however, his vision of life is that of pure empiricism - that all real knowledge is gained only through sense contact. In other words he appears to completely disregard a vital aspect of the human consciousness, i.e. the possibility of gaining knowledge through contemplating the mind itself, for instance through the practice of mindfulness and meditation. Furthermore he discounts the possibility of re ...more
Rowland Bismark
Bertrand Russell famously summarized Hume's contribution to philosophy, saying that he "developed to its logical conclusion the empiricist philosophy of Locke and Berkeley, and by making it self-consistent made it incredible." Hume is remarkable in that he does not shy away from conclusions that might seem unlikely or unreasonable. Ultimately, he concludes that we have no good reason to believe almost everything we believe about the world, but that this is not such a bad thing. Nature helps us t ...more
Ali Reda
Hume discusses the distinction between impressions and ideas. By "impressions", he means sensations, while by "ideas", he means memories and imaginings. According to Hume, the difference between the two is that ideas are less vivacious than impressions. For example, the idea of the taste of an orange is far inferior to the impression (or sensation) of actually eating one. Writing within the tradition of empiricism, he argues that impressions are the source of all ideas. Hume's empiricism consist ...more
Andrew
A few years ago I had, for lack of a better term, an existential crisis. I was completely unsatisfied with the explanations for existence/purpose that I had been given by parents/teachers/friends. It terrified me that no one had ever written about this concerns (obviously people had, I was just never introduced to them). I felt like an idiot for allowing my mind to dwell on concepts such as the basis of human understanding.

It's nice, it's calming to know that extremely intelligent people, and ma
...more
Chris
Hume eviscerates the belief that we can understand anything about the world on a rational and certain basis. At his most optimistic, Hume argues that all knowledge beyond direct observation is probable rather than certain. This was an important chastenment of Enlightenment rationalism, and is generally accepted today.

But Hume's argument seems to go much farther, and the more optimistic later sections are the result of his either not recognizing the strength of his earlier arguments or deliberatl
...more
Eric 'siggy'
Hume's Enquiry is a landmark document in epistemology, the study of what distinguishes justified beliefs from unjustified ones. It's about sixty pages, and is a rewriting of the first part of his more monolithic Treatise of Human Nature (1737), which he started writing at about my age (23!) and published three years later.

In short, the book aligns very well with the thinking of modern secular humanism -- and parts of it cover very similar ideas to what you'd find in contemporary skeptic and athe
...more
James
This is David Hume's summary of his central doctrines and themes of his empiricist philosophy. It was a revision of an earlier effort, A Treatise of Human Nature , published anonymously in London in 1739–40. Hume was disappointed with the reception of the Treatise, which "fell stillborn from the press," as he put it, and so he tried again to disseminate a more developed version of his ideas to the public by writing a shorter and more polemical work.
The end product of his labours was the Enquiry w
...more
Adam
It's a bit pointless to try to comment on this book, especially considering how much scholarship there is on Hume and how widely studied he still is by the intellectually curious and in Philosophy departments. He is an amazingly advanced thinker for the time, and is still important today, partly because although he doesn't seem to like Spinoza or any of the Rationalists, most of the basis for contemporary psychology, cognitive science and neuroscience is found in these two great philosophers' wr ...more
Andrew
What I like about Hume is the skepticism and empiricism. What I don't like about Hume is the doubting of causality. Too bad this is pretty much thought of as the Hume thing.

Hume was a very, very necessary step in the evolution of philosophy. He overcame the irrational rationalism of Descartes and Berkeley, and paved the way for German idealism, which of course led to Schopenhauer, Marx, Nietzsche, etc. And really, I find Hume's brand of Enlightenment thought so much more palatable than Kant's or
...more
White
This book is perhaps the most sophisticated book on philosophy that has ever been published. In its core it touches on psychology, physics, and the physiology of the brain, biological claims to survival, and then some. This book portrays the science of philosophy.

As I go through my career, references to Hume come up in my thoughts. As I read psychology books, physics books, and such, references to Hume come up in my thoughts. Connections to Hume are everywhere. No other author has been so much o
...more
Caroline
After his three-volume Treatise of Human Nature dropped like a rock to the bottom of the pool of British philosophic writing, Hume set out to write a briefer, more accessible version -- the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. One of the early points it makes is that most endeavors to write about the nature of thought are hopeless and nearly impossible to understand. With that disclaimer, Hume sets out to contradict himself by writing lucidly about, while candidly acknowledging the severe lim ...more
Jeff Crompton
I decided to read this book because a quote from it has long been one of the foundations of my thinking: "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." That being said, I can't say that I completely followed Hume's reasoning - I have only dabbled in philosophy, and I'm not used to reading such densely-argued writing. The Enquiry is probably a book I should read again in order to gain a better grasp, but I can't see that happening anytime soon. I was able to appreciate Hume's emphasis on re ...more
Þróndr
It is rare that I read an entire book twice in a row, but I made an exception for Hume's Enquiry . Yes, he’s that good. – I wasn’t quite as happy with the Kindle version of this book though, since there are no direct links in the text to Hume's own notes - which doesn’t exactly allow for a smooth reading experience.
The Oxford World’s Classics edition includes the Abstract of the Treatise of Human Nature , the essay Of the Immortality of the Soul , excerpts from letters and from the Dialogues conce
...more
Dave Peticolas

Hume's classic philosphical investigation into the nature and limits of human knowledge and its acquisition.

John Yelverton
More nonsense from one of the most over appreciated philosophers of all time.
Sidharth Vardhan
Somwhere in this book Hume reminds us to "Be a philosopher; but, amidst all your philosophy, be still a man" - it is a kind of thing you would say to a philospher rather than hear from same. Hume does maintain on this principle and while he is not afraid of going into abstract reasonings and doubts for mere pleasure of doing so; he is always willing, rather he insists we keep coming back to our daily life to check validity of our conclusions.

He goes on to prove that all our knowledge is derived
...more
Matt
Hume is about as level-headed as they come. He is not interested in proving things, he just wants to be honest about what we can even attempt to understand. Some things can be understood intuitively or demonstratively. Like geometry, algebra or anything else discoverable by thought alone. Then there are some things that are matters of fact. The sun rises in the morning. It rained yesterday. Hume cares mostly about how we can know these matters of fact. Because it is these matters of fact which a ...more
Ensiform
The edition I read contained an introduction and footnotes by Antony Flew, three letters from Hume, a letter by Adam Smith written after Hume died, Hume’s autobiographical fragment “My Own Life,” an abstract from his Treatise on human nature, and an excerpt from it concerning causes. The main text: it’s brilliant! Hume lays out his arguments craftily and clearly, and the result is an explosion of the reader’s preconceptions about the mind and, most dazzling of all, religion. Hume maintains that ...more
Yann
Qu’ai je découvert dans cet ouvrage de Hume que je n’ai pas lu dans l’ouvrage éponyme de Locke ? Juste quelques détails, mais qui ont leur prix. Hume embrasse les mêmes thèmes que son compatriote, mais en les survolant par allusion, avec plus de grâce et d’aisance, sans doute, mais aussi bien moins de rigueur et de scrupules. Où sont passés cette inquiétude de définir précisément chaque terme, de construire l’ouvrage suivant un plan, de prévenir chaque objection, de détruire toute ombre de doute ...more
Sam
This intro to an essay I wrote on this book pretty much sums it up:
David Hume delves into all doctrines of life in his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, unearthing the fallibility of all human-made dogmas. His stance lends no credence to the predictability of the future, and instead infringes upon the reliability of any human experience outside of the experience itself. Hume sees every cause and effect as an isolated happenstance, and even with similarities in experiences, places no stoc
...more
Roxanne Russell
When I made the final decision to pursue a PhD in Instructional Technology, I read this book in the months before starting as a way of plunging into the study of education. I don't think I could have chosen any better- excellent!

My book notes:

Section 1: On the different species of philosophy

In this section Hume distinguishes philosophy for the sake of philosophy from applied philosophy. He wishes to argue for a more scientific approach to exploring "human understanding."
p. 2 If they can discover
...more
Zach
"The most lively thought is still inferior to the dullest sensation." p. 11

"To me, there appear to be only three principles of connection among ideas, namely, Resemblance, Contiguity in time or place, and Cause or Effect." p. 15

"If I ask you why you believe in any particular matter of fact, which you relate, you must tell me some reason; and this reason will be some other fact, connected with it. But as you cannot proceed after this manner, in infitum, you must at last terminate in some fact, wh
...more
Scott Forward
"We have sought in vain for an idea of power or necessary connection. Some events seem conjoined but never connected. We have no idea of connection or power. And such ideas are absolutely without any meaning, either by philosophers or by any in common life. Because of our mind expecting an effect due to the custom of our experience, we project onto a cause a power that is not there. We project onto two events a connection which we feel in the mind and from which we form the idea of power or nece ...more
Eric Phetteplace
Jun 02, 2010 Eric Phetteplace rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition
Recommends it for: Skeptics, Philosophers, Atheists
Recommended to Eric by: Gilles Deleuze, Quenten Meillassoux
Shelves: philosophy
I was really impressed with this book and enjoyed it far more than I expected I would. Hume's prose is exceptional and his use of examples, such as the billard balls and candles which come up in a few places, is of massive assistance in elucidating his notion of human reason, epistemology, belief, and skepticism. Sections IV and V, where he develops the idea he is most famous for (that causation is founded upon belief and conjunction, not reason and connection), are absolutely stunning, some of ...more
Kyle Muntz
In my opinion, this is maybe the most important book of philosophy written before the 20th century. This is the second time I've read it (once when I was about 16), and it's had a pretty drastic effect on my worldview; more than I realized until I went back, and saw how some of these same arguments were still effecting things I think now. Hume's philosophy isn't exactly an end in itself, but it provides an epistemological standard that, essentially, all knowledge has to meet or it isn't knowledg ...more
Ahmed Elsherbiny
بشكل ما، ومن جهة معينة للنظر، لا نبالغ إذا اعتقدنا أن تاريخ الفلسفة، من نظرية معرفة وميتافيزيقا بشكل أكثر تحديدًا، يمكن أن ينقسم حول هذا النص إلى ما قبله وما بعده. فعلاوة على ما يشتهر به من أنه صاغ بشكل واضح ما عُرف بعد ذلك تحت مسمى "مشكلة الاستقراء"، يبلغ هذا النص بالأساسوية في المعرفة منتهى أزمتها، كما أنه لا يتوانى عن إعمال معوله في التصورات الأساسية للميتافيزيقا والفيزياء لذلك الوقت بجسارة لا تعوزها الدقة. وعلى مدار القرنين ونصف القرن التاليين، ستعمل الفلسفة الغربية على تلافي تلك الأزمات: أز ...more
pearl
I actually did not enjoy this as much as I'd hoped. I don't even know if I can explain it... Hume's insights into the human psyche are still powerful and relevant. His writing style, though ornamented, bears a gentle glow of benevolence that is hard to dislike (well, benevolent, that is, until the very last line-- hooboy ). Yet, when I finished reading the Enquiry, I couldn't help but feel slightly underwhelmed? Maybe my previous familiarity with the problem of induction/causation dulled me to its ...more
Ollie Hogg
Despite not really being able to see the actual applicability of Humean philosophy, it is so very refreshing to read such clarity in a philosophical text. He writes with precision and, although still being tough to manage at times, ultimately this renders his meaning crystal clear.

His tight epistemological approach gives his arguments depth and precision, which is monumentally handy for the inexperienced philosopher (as I myself was upon first reading, and still am to an extent). I was taught t
...more
  • Principles of Human Knowledge & Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonius
  • Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
  • An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
  • Language, Truth, and Logic
  • From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays
  • The Problems of Philosophy
  • Discourse on Metaphysics & Other Essays
  • Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy)
  • Naming and Necessity
  • Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong
  • Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking
  • Philosophical Investigations
  • Meno
  • Ethics
45726
David Hume (/ˈhjuːm/; 7 May 1711 NS (26 April 1711 OS) – 25 August 1776) was a Scottish historian, philosopher, economist, diplomat and essayist known today especially for his radical philosophical empiricism and scepticism.

In light of Hume's central role in the Scottish Enlightenment, and in the history of Western philosophy, Bryan Magee judged him as a philosopher "widely regarded as the greates
...more
More about David Hume...
A Treatise of Human Nature An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion/The Natural History of Religion (Oxford World's Classics) Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding / Concerning the Principles of Morals

Share This Book

“In our reasonings concerning matter of fact, there are all imaginable degrees of assurance, from the highest certainty to the lowest species of moral evidence. A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence .” 101 likes
“Be a philosopher; but, amidst all your philosophy, be still a man.” 52 likes
More quotes…