John Cale has been a key figure in rock music for decades. Born in 1942 in a small Welsh mining village, he was playing classical piano on BBC radio at the age of eight, and by ten he had discovered rock and roll on Radio Luxembourg. He studied music at Goldsmith's College in London and in 1963 moved to New York City, under the tutelage of Aaron Copland. Cale was quickly d
John Cale has been a key figure in rock music for decades. Born in 1942 in a small Welsh mining village, he was playing classical piano on BBC radio at the age of eight, and by ten he had discovered rock and roll on Radio Luxembourg. He studied music at Goldsmith's College in London and in 1963 moved to New York City, under the tutelage of Aaron Copland. Cale was quickly drawn into the heart of the artistic avant-garde via Lamonte Young's Theatre of Eternal Music and Andy Warhol's Factory, and then, together with Lou Reed, founded one of the most influential rock bands of all time, the Velvet Underground. Having left the band in 1968 after disagreements with Reed, Cale has pursued his career as a solo pianist, record producer, and composer on the international rock circuit for decades.
...more
Paperback
,
272 pages
Published
February 19th 2000
by Bloomsbury USA
(first published 1998)
A co-write with the dreaded Victor Bockris, which guarantees it is repetitive, nonsensical at times, and heavily slanted against Lou Reed. Which is fine, as Velvet Underground followers need to hear Cale's side of the story. Anyone looking for dirt on Lou Reed--or Brian Eno, for that matter--will find it here. And Cale's autobiographical revelations are often fascinating. Despite his imposing, aloof, and cocksure public demeanor, what's revealed is a surprisingly insecure, sometimes deeply unlik
A co-write with the dreaded Victor Bockris, which guarantees it is repetitive, nonsensical at times, and heavily slanted against Lou Reed. Which is fine, as Velvet Underground followers need to hear Cale's side of the story. Anyone looking for dirt on Lou Reed--or Brian Eno, for that matter--will find it here. And Cale's autobiographical revelations are often fascinating. Despite his imposing, aloof, and cocksure public demeanor, what's revealed is a surprisingly insecure, sometimes deeply unlikable, but apparently candid man with a bit of a victim's complex but a survivor's instinct. Caveat: The design of the interior and surreal artwork make it an interesting coffee table book, but difficult to read...but worth it for fans.
...more
When I set out to read this book I was expecting two things to happen: 1) I'd read about the life of a genius and be really jealous of him or 2) start to hate Cale for some flaws of his character. Neither actually happened. This was a sad book. A book about a person that expected so much of life and even though achieved a lot, it was never enough. Personal difficulties and resentments are seeping through each chapter. In a way if feels that in Cale's own eyes the peak of his career was achieved
When I set out to read this book I was expecting two things to happen: 1) I'd read about the life of a genius and be really jealous of him or 2) start to hate Cale for some flaws of his character. Neither actually happened. This was a sad book. A book about a person that expected so much of life and even though achieved a lot, it was never enough. Personal difficulties and resentments are seeping through each chapter. In a way if feels that in Cale's own eyes the peak of his career was achieved during Velvet Underground. The problem with this is that he was very very young at the time and the glory only lasted for about a year. From then on life seemed as a series of disappointments, always striving to repeat the magic of the VU, but never quite getting there.
I think John summarizes the book in this passage: "There was always this competition to see how low you could go and how fast you could rise. I was competing with myself. I'm getting sadder and sadder thinking about my lack of self-knowledge as I write this book. I'm distraught about my lack of any sense of my own worth, and about visions of myself."
The book was written in 1999. I truly hope that the following decade has brought some peace to the turbid depths of Cale's soul.
...more
I was thinking of giving it 4 stars since 1) I'm kinda giving EVERY good book 5 stars, I feel like, 2) sometimes, the way Cale words things can be a bit cryptic, and I wanted a bit more detail on some things... but that's NOT to say the man pulls punches. He pretty much tells you EXACTLY how he got along with Lou Reed, or what he feels the faults of various projects/ albums he was involved in were. And, to be fair, I can't really say he left anything out, or didn't deal with each topic with a gr
I was thinking of giving it 4 stars since 1) I'm kinda giving EVERY good book 5 stars, I feel like, 2) sometimes, the way Cale words things can be a bit cryptic, and I wanted a bit more detail on some things... but that's NOT to say the man pulls punches. He pretty much tells you EXACTLY how he got along with Lou Reed, or what he feels the faults of various projects/ albums he was involved in were. And, to be fair, I can't really say he left anything out, or didn't deal with each topic with a great deal of intelligence and retrospective self-knowledge... so 5 stars it is!
I kinda worship Brian Eno (A Year With Swollen Appendices might be my favorite book of all time), so it was sad to read about their collaboration on Wrong Way Up and how... errr badly they ended up feeling about each other.
He seems quite conflicted about rock and roll (versus concentrating on avant-garde classical work), but it's no surprise an educated, experimental-minded person would find many troubles in "the business" of rock and roll. (I certainly got the same weary feel from this book as from Bill Bruford's, another guy who didn't suffer the bullshit so easily.)
...more
I bought this book about ten years ago mainly because I am a Dave McKean fan. Also, being Welsh, I was intrigued by the title. Over the last few years I've become increasingly more interested in John Cale, The Velvet Underground, and Lou Reed, so it seemed time to read this.
This is an intensely honest and raw autobiography—Cale doesn't always make himself look good so I assume the honesty. The intensity and rawness is equally reflected in McKean's design and illustration. I think there is also a
I bought this book about ten years ago mainly because I am a Dave McKean fan. Also, being Welsh, I was intrigued by the title. Over the last few years I've become increasingly more interested in John Cale, The Velvet Underground, and Lou Reed, so it seemed time to read this.
This is an intensely honest and raw autobiography—Cale doesn't always make himself look good so I assume the honesty. The intensity and rawness is equally reflected in McKean's design and illustration. I think there is also a sense of Cale discovering himself during the process of this writing. "Process" might be a good word for this book. As mentioned in other reviews, there are a fair amount of typos. That, in addition to the heavy blocks of type running so close to the pages' edges had me wondering where the editor was. At the same time I appreciate the idea of laying it all out there.
There is a good amount of repetition in the book. A letter overlaid on the title page—I believe it is Victor Bockris writing—addresses this. Repetition is used for emphasis in poetry, music, and writing in general. I wonder (since some of what is being repeated seems a bit trivial) was this strictly intentional, or a bit of laziness in the editing process?
A tangent: Having read a few musician autobiographies, I've noticed repetition occurring in many of them. I wonder if the process of writing a handful of songs, then playing those songs on a tour for a year in addition to repeated interviews about those songs, ingrains some kind of need for repetition? Would you see it more prevalently in rock musicians as opposed to jazz/improvised musicians? —and what of more formally trained musicians?
Overall it's good, but I think it could have been great and wildly amazing. I think we have an artifact of a process here, a process of self-discovery and realization. Perhaps we would all be more self-aware and self-realized if we wrote autobiographies once a decade. I suppose this is why people keep journals?
...more
This was good for the information, but you have to work for it. What the hell was up with the editing? Or the lack of it? It reads like an exact transcription of Cale talking about his life--so much of it is him talking in circles, and there are typos like crazy. The layout of the text made it difficult to read at times, though after reading a
recent interview
with Cale, I found that was intentional and meant to resemble TV (which makes sense as I can't bear to watch most TV anymore...and anyway
This was good for the information, but you have to work for it. What the hell was up with the editing? Or the lack of it? It reads like an exact transcription of Cale talking about his life--so much of it is him talking in circles, and there are typos like crazy. The layout of the text made it difficult to read at times, though after reading a
recent interview
with Cale, I found that was intentional and meant to resemble TV (which makes sense as I can't bear to watch most TV anymore...and anyway, it seems it would have been more apropos had it been published a decade prior). Ah well. I'm a big fan of Cale's solo work as well as his time with the VU, so I'm glad I picked this up. I was amused to find this was co-written by the same guy who wrote
Lou Reed's bio
--which my dad read while he waited for me to finish music lessons in 9th grade and regaled me with juicy stories when I returned--so I am both curious to read Reed's side but reluctant if the ridiculousness of the text is Bockris' doing.
...more
I've read this a couple of years ago and as far as musician's autobiographies/memoirs go, this one is very good. It's a "warts and all" type of autobiography and Cale doesn't spare himself, unafraid of appearing in an unflattering light sometimes. I think the book was written around the time of Cale's divorce from his 3rd wife and also in rather fallow creative times if I remember correctly so a lot of the resentment and sadness seeps into the text sometimes. Not sure this would still be the cas
I've read this a couple of years ago and as far as musician's autobiographies/memoirs go, this one is very good. It's a "warts and all" type of autobiography and Cale doesn't spare himself, unafraid of appearing in an unflattering light sometimes. I think the book was written around the time of Cale's divorce from his 3rd wife and also in rather fallow creative times if I remember correctly so a lot of the resentment and sadness seeps into the text sometimes. Not sure this would still be the case now that Cale seems to be in a happy place in his private life nowadays.
Even if you're not a John Cale fan the book is well worth reading if only because Cale has had an extraordinary trajectory that would be impossible today. The son of a coal miner and a school teacher, growing in a Welsh household divided by language and ruled by religion, he went on to study avant-garde composition and music in London before moving to NYC in the early 1960s and participate in Fluxus and classical contemporary music adventures before founding the Velvet Underground with Lou Reed (and Sterling Morrison and Moe Tucker). This is not the life of someone who witnessed historical events but of someone who *made* history.
This same story would be impossible today because of the disappearance of support for the arts in schools and the takeover of cultural production by the offspring of the upper middle-class and the elite and the erasing of economic opportunities for the gifted children of the working class. Cale doesn't comment on this but some of the subtext of the book really shows a changing landscape for artists and musicians alike. It depicts the life of someone devoted to music and not to success. His long career shows an impeccable track record by an artist who made some of the most seminal records of the 1960s (with VU), 70s (Fear, Paris 1919, Slow Dazzle, etc.) and 80s (Music For A New Society), has produced landmark albums for other influential artists (Patti Smith, The Stooges, The Modern Lovers, Happy Mondays) and collaborated with musicians such as Terry Riley, LaMonte Young and Brian Eno and most recently Danger Mouse. Yet he's a very underrated musician who still makes records (check the recent Extra Playful EP) and tours regularly.
What's Welsh For Zen retraces his career from his Welsh childhood until the late 1990s, and follows the story of someone whose path is history, as I said above. It also gives a good insight into the process of making some of the albums and how the shortcomings of record labels can sometime affect the final product.
The book has a very interesting layout and many photographs and includes interviews and snippets by other people. Beyond recalling Cale's life and career it gives a good introduction to 50 years of rock music and avant-garde music alike.
It can be harrowing at times when Cale recalls the molestation he suffered as a child, his harsh upbringing and the lack of communication with his family, or his drug use as an adult but it's one of the most interesting music reads you can do.
A minus was the poor editing and proofreading, which seems to be rather the norm with ALL books about music I've ever read. Seriously, publishers, what's your issue with editing a book about music correctly?
I'm a pretty big fan of both John Cale's solo music as well as his time in The Velvet Underground. This book gives a lot of info straight from the man himself. He also is very honest and doesn't try to gloss over certain things to make himself look like Mr. Perfect. However, I feel he spent an awful amount of time going on about what a prick Lou Reed is. I do not know Lou Reed, I know a lot of people don't like him and I'm sure they have a good reason. But I get it, he's a prick you hate him etc
I'm a pretty big fan of both John Cale's solo music as well as his time in The Velvet Underground. This book gives a lot of info straight from the man himself. He also is very honest and doesn't try to gloss over certain things to make himself look like Mr. Perfect. However, I feel he spent an awful amount of time going on about what a prick Lou Reed is. I do not know Lou Reed, I know a lot of people don't like him and I'm sure they have a good reason. But I get it, he's a prick you hate him etc. etc. I know after reading this John Cale couldn't have been the easiest person to deal with either. However, that being said its full of interesting info and pretty to the point.
...more
beautifully and gruesomely candid. i respect john cale even more for writing so honestly about himself and sharing his hard-earned and well-deserved insights. felt like having a conversation w/a friend.
The autobiography of John Cale. Full of quotes by contemporaries, scraps of lyrics, and Cale's own perspective on the Velvet Underground, especially his relationship with Lou Reed. Those guys were all strung out on drugs and not just your happy acid, either. But the way they saw themselves is fascinating. And then of course, there is Patti Smith.
It's great! Just a bit tough getting through his early years. Once he grows up and moves to America it's a page-turner. The style is kind of graphic novelish which sounds as though it could be dumb, but it actually makes it very entertaining. The way a colourful persons memoirs ought to look.
While Cale specificaly chose typographical obstacles to making this an easy read, the autobiography is a fascinating tour of the career, accomplishments and missteps of this VU founder, punk hero, and avant-garde musician.
read this book if you love the velvet underground -- visually riveting, and gives a true glimpse into cale's life and real relationship w/ lou reed. kind of sloppy editing and grammar though