Major's early life was extraordinary; his rise through Parliament meteoric. Soon a favourite of Margaret Thatcher, he became Foreign Secretary and then Chancellor of the Exchequer. When Thatcher fell, he fought and won a shrewd campaign to succeed her.
Hardcover
,
774 pages
Published
October 11th 1999
by HarperCollins
(first published January 1st 1999)
A truly revealing - and at times very humorous - account of a man, who history and conventional wisdom have derided as "the boring bloke between Thatcher and Blair". Instead, John Major was in power for six and a half years, during which some of the most important events of the post-Cold War era occurred (and that's before you even consider the pivotal role he played in the latter years of the Thatcher government). Understanding Major's take on those events then is vitally important, and this au
A truly revealing - and at times very humorous - account of a man, who history and conventional wisdom have derided as "the boring bloke between Thatcher and Blair". Instead, John Major was in power for six and a half years, during which some of the most important events of the post-Cold War era occurred (and that's before you even consider the pivotal role he played in the latter years of the Thatcher government). Understanding Major's take on those events then is vitally important, and this autobiography - unlike his successor's at times barely readable dirge 'Journey' - Major's attempt is a serious and eloquent defence of his time in Number 10. All autobiographies are exercises in self-justification, but some come closer than others to painting a well-rounded picture of the context in which decisions were made, and how events unfolded. This book is one of those few that succeeds.
...more
I was lucky enough to be in London when I was reading this book. The only problem was that I had been back in the States for 3 weeks before I finished it!!! There was an extraordinary amount of detail that just didn’t interest me (i.e., Major went into an inordinate amount of detail when he talked about Cabinet reshuffles, giving me the names and personal history of every practically every cabinet member.). He also often got into too much details when talking about other political issues: the mo
I was lucky enough to be in London when I was reading this book. The only problem was that I had been back in the States for 3 weeks before I finished it!!! There was an extraordinary amount of detail that just didn’t interest me (i.e., Major went into an inordinate amount of detail when he talked about Cabinet reshuffles, giving me the names and personal history of every practically every cabinet member.). He also often got into too much details when talking about other political issues: the monetary unit, economics in general, the Balkans, world summits, etc. My mind too often just tuned it out. While the book helped me to learn a lot about Major’s premiership and the landscape of British politics, I was left wondering a lot about the British political system. I know that Major assumed his audience would know this system, but I had many moments where I was in utter confusion. Members of parliament can be elected to represent areas in which they don’t live? The Prime Minister determines when to call an election, and the only requirement is that it be no more than 5 years after a previous one? There is no time between an election and the PM taking over, so a new PM is elected and takes over the next day? As I was reading this, I was really hoping to be able to investigate all of these issues, but that made me start wondering how much of our American system I also don’t understand…I’m sure there is a lot. Yet, I think most Britons understand ours better than I understand theirs. So, I have work to do.
...more
Considering the amount of detail and the size of book it was well written and really interesting. It changed my views on John Major and definitely he is nothing like the picture we were presented with at the time by 'Spitting Image'. I'm not a Conservative fan but he had some really interesting ideas / philosophies and it is disappointing that so many of the MP's elected under the Conservative banner were more interested in their own self importance rather than being willing to support the party
Considering the amount of detail and the size of book it was well written and really interesting. It changed my views on John Major and definitely he is nothing like the picture we were presented with at the time by 'Spitting Image'. I'm not a Conservative fan but he had some really interesting ideas / philosophies and it is disappointing that so many of the MP's elected under the Conservative banner were more interested in their own self importance rather than being willing to support the party / government that had got them elected in the first place. The views, which may be biased, on 'New Labour' are very interesting and it makes one wonder how they could so easily adopt Conservative policies as their own and get away with it.
This was a long read but fascinating for me to go back over the Major government as it was the first one I could have voted for and so I was more politically aware than I was previously.
I do remember that John Major had a very bad press often, and reading the autobiography I sometimes struggled to work out why. He was never a dramatic politician, normally conciliatory and forced to be more so by the Euro-sceptic faction in the Conservative party.
I have greater respect for him as a Prime Minister
This was a long read but fascinating for me to go back over the Major government as it was the first one I could have voted for and so I was more politically aware than I was previously.
I do remember that John Major had a very bad press often, and reading the autobiography I sometimes struggled to work out why. He was never a dramatic politician, normally conciliatory and forced to be more so by the Euro-sceptic faction in the Conservative party.
I have greater respect for him as a Prime Minister now than I did at the time.
Though it is said to be a revealing autobiography he conveniently does not mention the four year affair with Edwina Currie that came to light in her memoirs later in 2002
...more
If the market is to be believed, then this book is close to worthless. You can actually pick up a paperback copy for a penny on Amazon. This is a lamentable as the memoir, at the very least, provides an interesting look at how political parties commit suicide under the strains of irreconcilable centrifugal forces.
The key to understanding John Major's premiership is an offhand remark he made into a hot mic in Canada during a G7 meeting: "I run a coalition government." Perhaps the use of the word
If the market is to be believed, then this book is close to worthless. You can actually pick up a paperback copy for a penny on Amazon. This is a lamentable as the memoir, at the very least, provides an interesting look at how political parties commit suicide under the strains of irreconcilable centrifugal forces.
The key to understanding John Major's premiership is an offhand remark he made into a hot mic in Canada during a G7 meeting: "I run a coalition government." Perhaps the use of the word 'run' is inaccurate as that implies some sort of command and authority. He had neither. Though good leadership can fix a lot it can't fix everything. He constantly reminds us of this limitation on nearly every page. Such are the man's failings.
His term started inauspiciously when Margret Thatcher died an unnatural political death. The Conservative party's schizophrenia her legacy and the way forward produced ghastly divisions within the ruling party. My feeling is that Major was chosen as a compromise candidate who could be easily controlled. Thatcher even said in the papers that she was the backseat driver of his government. One is stunned at Major's unwillingness to publicly attack his predecessor when humiliated thus.
Had the Conservatives lost the '92 election none of this would have mattered. It actually would have been healthier as Ken Clarke and Michael Portillo have argued. There would have been an end to Thatcherism. Instead the victory was a perversion in that Major did not become a stronger leader with a concrete mandate in hand. Instead, the pro- and anti- Thatcher factions each took the victory as vindication of their own positions and retrenched. Major was left unenviably in the middle trying to hold it all together.
As if that wasn't bad enough, the Black Wednesday episode shattered any credibility Mr. Major earned in the '92 fight. Of course, the way he tells it here Norman Lamont is to blame for the whole fiasco. This is terribly inaccurate and is a case of not wanting to hold the soiled diaper. It is, nonetheless, gripping to read.
From here it was a nonstop stay at the trauma ward. Beset by constant rebellion from the so called "euro skeptic" faction, the government was totally reactive and unable to set the agenda.
Above all, this is an extraordinarily sensitive and introspective person trying to exercise authority over a party that only respected force. For more than a decade preceding they were actively discouraged from building proper, independent political and administrative reflexes that form the bedrock of government by cabinet. Instead, unknowing what to do what that freedom that Thatcher's departure gave them, they sniffed out any weakness and struck. We are left, as he is, speculating about what could have been rather than what was. And that is a tragedy worthy of pity but not our respect.
...more
I wanted to read this book both because of the Speaker Series and because I will be going to London later this year. It has taught me about some of the culture and politics of that great land. Yet, John Major drones on about topics in way too much detail. I usually enjoy the first 10 pages of every chapter at which point he chooses to drag the subject into areas that often don't seem related.
Edwina Currie was angered she didn't even get a mention! Interesting insight into the role of Chief Sec to Treasury and Major's early life. Funny when he is too nerdy to tackle Margaret Thatcher