One of the greatest prodigies of his era, John Stuart Mill (1806-73) was studying arithmetic and Greek by the age of three, as part of an astonishingly intense education at his father's hand. Intellectually brilliant, fearless and profound, he became a leading Victorian liberal thinker, whose works - including
On Liberty
,
Utilitarianism
,
The Subjection of Women
and this au
One of the greatest prodigies of his era, John Stuart Mill (1806-73) was studying arithmetic and Greek by the age of three, as part of an astonishingly intense education at his father's hand. Intellectually brilliant, fearless and profound, he became a leading Victorian liberal thinker, whose works - including
On Liberty
,
Utilitarianism
,
The Subjection of Women
and this autobiography - are among the crowning achievements of the age. Here he describes the pressures placed on him by his childhood, the mental breakdown he suffered as a young man, his struggle to understand a world of feelings and emotions far removed from his father's strict didacticism, and the later development of his own radical beliefs. A moving account of an extraordinary life, this great autobiography reveals a man of deep integrity, constantly searching for truth.
...more
Paperback
,
240 pages
Published
April 3rd 1990
by Penguin Classics
(first published 1873)
This second reading of Mill's Autobiography has given me a much more benign (if not beneficial) view of the exacting education his father, James Mill, imposed on him as an adolescent. In the intervening years after my initial reading and absorption of Mill's oeuvre I had romanticized that early education into something far more brutal than it now appears to me to have been. In fact, his father's austere pedagogy seems nothing more than an autodidact's projection of his own self-imposed, self-dis
This second reading of Mill's Autobiography has given me a much more benign (if not beneficial) view of the exacting education his father, James Mill, imposed on him as an adolescent. In the intervening years after my initial reading and absorption of Mill's oeuvre I had romanticized that early education into something far more brutal than it now appears to me to have been. In fact, his father's austere pedagogy seems nothing more than an autodidact's projection of his own self-imposed, self-disciplining routine: eg, rigorous outlining/note-taking of books and arguments; perpetual discussion; a sense of openness kept while assessing differing positions, etc. The tension that arises between them is really owing to their differing temperaments. James Mill was a man set in his ways who mildly lorded his views over his son, and was so convincing that his son stayed faithful to the cause, championing his father's and Bentham's legacy, until sometime in his early twenties he got depressed, read Carlyle and Wordsworth, fell in love, and pretty much did what all children locked in an Oedipal struggle do: developed his own distinctive identity. The Autobiography does a fine job of tracing this divergence between father and son, and also of clarifying what remained their fundamental agreement. That said, what made the book a little less appealing for me (on a second reading) was how much it focused on ideas and not on Mill's actual day-to-day life, a narrative decision that, I'm sure, involved some sort of Utilitarian calculation. Anyway, I liked it, but was not entirely thrilled by it. The first half is by far the better half of the book, as it deals more specifically with Mill's education and development, and let's be honest here: his adult life, while filled with publishing and philosophical success, was primarily taken up by his duties as an official at the East India Company, a role which he does not talk in detail about, only to mention that it involved for the most part mentally un-taxing office work congenial for a man of his philosophical and authorial aspirations. (Imagine someone working now for Google or Amazon in a managerial capacity writing the next best thing in philosophy!) Mill is of course essential reading, but not the connoisseur's pick for either a riveting style or his penchant for interesting gossip; that aside, his story is quite engaging.
...more
Think you're pretty smart? Think you've read a lot of books? Think you've had a rigorous education? Prepare to be utterly humbled. Excellent slim volume about a brilliant and also a very good man.
Reading John Stuart Mill's life is like reading a book of fantasy. This man was to a very large extent a product of an experiment of his father - a child genius, a troubled man. I like this book for the same reason that I liked Justin Martyr's First Apology. The man seems so completely honest with himself and everything else that one feels very secure reading what he has to say. Mostly due to his strange upbringing and undoubtedly also due to his own sin, he is often wrong, but never boring and
Reading John Stuart Mill's life is like reading a book of fantasy. This man was to a very large extent a product of an experiment of his father - a child genius, a troubled man. I like this book for the same reason that I liked Justin Martyr's First Apology. The man seems so completely honest with himself and everything else that one feels very secure reading what he has to say. Mostly due to his strange upbringing and undoubtedly also due to his own sin, he is often wrong, but never boring and never dishonest. The autobiography portraits a true seeker of truth. And a seeker of truth that starts from a very different starting point as anyone else I know, or even anyone who has ever lived. He starts his search being crammed up on books with worldly wisdom and having very little knowledge of relationships and of God. It is a great shame that his friend John Sterling who could have and did teach him a lot about relationships and God died so early. To me the most touching moments in this book are the ones in which he describes how he found meaning in life through new friendships such as that of John Sterling and F.D. Maurice and from the Nature and from music. It is these moments that one feels light shining into the darkened soul of this troubled man and also to the darkened soul of myself.
...more
I thought that this book would be more interesting and insightful than it actually was. Amidst a boring recounting of various details of his life, there were three aspects of this book that I found interesting: (i) Mill's childhood education was extremely rigorous, time-consuming, and broad; (ii) Mill's depression midway through his life is a well articulated portrait of clinical depression; (iii) Various strategies that Mill employed in doing his work. For example, every time he would write som
I thought that this book would be more interesting and insightful than it actually was. Amidst a boring recounting of various details of his life, there were three aspects of this book that I found interesting: (i) Mill's childhood education was extremely rigorous, time-consuming, and broad; (ii) Mill's depression midway through his life is a well articulated portrait of clinical depression; (iii) Various strategies that Mill employed in doing his work. For example, every time he would write something, he would do a first draft, almost completely scrap it, and then write the second draft over. He would then be nearly finished with the project.
...more
Now we have a blueprint for manufacturing geniuses, so we may as well run an experiment with a control group to see if anybody can be turned into one. GO!
• Its account of Mill's early education. Mill was at first homeschooled, by his father; he began learning Greek when he was three and Latin at eight. Training in the classical languages wasn't unusual and hadn't been even in Shakespeare's time, but training at such an early age pretty certainly was.
• Mill's discussion of how, at age 20, he fell into what we now call depression (Mill terms it a "dry heavy dejection") and of how he got out of it. Suffice it to
Valuable for many reasons, among them:
• Its account of Mill's early education. Mill was at first homeschooled, by his father; he began learning Greek when he was three and Latin at eight. Training in the classical languages wasn't unusual and hadn't been even in Shakespeare's time, but training at such an early age pretty certainly was.
• Mill's discussion of how, at age 20, he fell into what we now call depression (Mill terms it a "dry heavy dejection") and of how he got out of it. Suffice it to say that his escape looks like a kind of cognitive therapy, an alteration in his habits of thought, which Mill worked out for himself.
• The dual view it gives. This edition's preface (written in 1924) says, "In many ways [Mill's
Autobiography
] is primarily an account of the social history of England in the first three quarters of the Nineteenth Century." More properly, because we now take social history to mean something else, it involves philosophy, public affairs such as education, the practice of politics, and political journalism. But the story is presented by way of Mill's active and restless engagement in those matters. As the preface goes on to say, "One sees an age, and one sees a man."
• Its illustration of 19th-century prose style and even punctuation (this edition follows a manuscript in Mill's own hand).
I read the
Autobiography
the first time during undergraduate school or soon after, I think because I had become interested in Mill's thought (though this book was hardly the best way to learn it in any depth). I read it the second time as part of my studies for a play on suicide. Mill never mentions suicide, but the crisis of purpose that he endured can lead in that direction, and the method of his escape can be what keeps one alive.
...more
It is good to know there is someone out there in the world with even less originality when it comes to titles than I have. Of course, it probably was the style of the time.
I'm encouraged anyway.
I liked
Autobiography
. Mill's writing is tight and well-written. His life is interesting and he does a good job examining the sources (books and people) that shaped his life. It does get a tad long when reading about said sources at 1 am, but otherwise I found it enjoyable and interesting. His enthusias
It is good to know there is someone out there in the world with even less originality when it comes to titles than I have. Of course, it probably was the style of the time.
I'm encouraged anyway.
I liked
Autobiography
. Mill's writing is tight and well-written. His life is interesting and he does a good job examining the sources (books and people) that shaped his life. It does get a tad long when reading about said sources at 1 am, but otherwise I found it enjoyable and interesting. His enthusiasm for his wife is very apparent. I expected more about her.
It is interesting that he does not despair of his upbringing. Though he points out a few things that might have been better (like not having him teach his sisters Latin) he nevertheless notes to some degree the large success of it. He considers his abilities average. Perhaps posterity has cast his father in the role of villain unduly.
Mill is encouraging because he affirms human desire for inner fulfillment. He found it in "culture" - poetry, art, music. As society strives to be more scientific, mathematics,
reasoned
...this book is a reminder that a life devoid of inward emotional cultivation will eventually burn out before its time.
...more
An unexpectedly pleasant autobiography written by one of the 18th Century's leading thinkers in such riveting topics as political and social theory. I expected it to be pretty dry, but I think the better word for it is "reserved." He talks about his rigorous homeschooling by his father, his writing, and his shoulder-rubbing with all sorts of other 18th Century British thinkers (including Jeremy Bentham), and his time in parliament. But where his humanity and sweetness really comes through is whe
An unexpectedly pleasant autobiography written by one of the 18th Century's leading thinkers in such riveting topics as political and social theory. I expected it to be pretty dry, but I think the better word for it is "reserved." He talks about his rigorous homeschooling by his father, his writing, and his shoulder-rubbing with all sorts of other 18th Century British thinkers (including Jeremy Bentham), and his time in parliament. But where his humanity and sweetness really comes through is when he talks about his deep depression in his early 20s, and his wife and stepdaughter, both of whom he must have adored, and both of whom were apparently geniuses in their own right. He gives them quite a bit of credit for his books and for helping him formulate his thoughts. Interestingly, he was also an early and staunch advocate of women's suffrage.
...more
Much has been made of the regimen that J.S. Mill's father put his son through in his childhood - Greek, Latin when he was three etc. - that is detailed in the autobiography's first part. But it is humility and (I'll just say it) goodness that radiate from what he did afterwards that is what made this book so readable.
Mill is famous for "utilitarianism", a philosophy of focusing actions for the greater good. He would be the first to say that Jeremy Bentham did the lion's share of the work, but Mi
Much has been made of the regimen that J.S. Mill's father put his son through in his childhood - Greek, Latin when he was three etc. - that is detailed in the autobiography's first part. But it is humility and (I'll just say it) goodness that radiate from what he did afterwards that is what made this book so readable.
Mill is famous for "utilitarianism", a philosophy of focusing actions for the greater good. He would be the first to say that Jeremy Bentham did the lion's share of the work, but Mill was the one who put it on firmer ground. The "firmer ground" was Mill's forte - in all his work: on logic, on ethics, on government and so on, it wasn't the a priori claims that mattered, but the verifiable results. This put him squarely against religionists and he had absolutely no problem with that - a tough stance in the nineteenth century!
It seems no matter what the contemporary issue, Mill always found himself on (historically) the right side. The Irish Famine and its cause from English landlords? The rights of women? The American Civil War? The reform of the English constitution away from the landed rich and towards the working class? All of these things weren't obvious back then, but it goes to show that the adage that the arc of history bends towards justice and freedom is true, and we should learn from the people who see it when that arc is still at ground level. Mill definitely did and this book is a testament to that vision.
...more
I used to think it was a sign of neglect that my parents didn't ensure I had a more rigorous education. Now I understand that they were actually doing their best to help me avoid suicidal depression. Mom. Dad. Thanks guys. Sorry I doubted you.
A wonderfully well-paced and accessible autobiography that includes quick and clear summations of some of Mill's best ideas.
Recommended reading for economists!
The joy and pleasure I have derived from reading this book can hardly be over stated; indeed, in the last few weeks, I have spent many hours studying Mill's work; not because its content is so engrossing--on the contrary, many of Mill's 19th century intellectual quarrels and metaphysical topics expounded within this work are quite dull-- but because his ability to pen his thoughts, in such clear and precise language, is superior to any non-fiction prose I have hitherto had the pleasure to read.
I started this book a while ago just for kicks. Then I put it down for a long time when I moved out of Texas. But when I picked it up, it really hooked me. The first part of the book was fascinating because it describes a real education. A young man, admittedly not very smart, but diligent, is taught how to think and how to learn. And it is amazing what he learned from being included in adult conversations and being expected to learn as an adult.
I enjoyed the second part of the book because it i
I started this book a while ago just for kicks. Then I put it down for a long time when I moved out of Texas. But when I picked it up, it really hooked me. The first part of the book was fascinating because it describes a real education. A young man, admittedly not very smart, but diligent, is taught how to think and how to learn. And it is amazing what he learned from being included in adult conversations and being expected to learn as an adult.
I enjoyed the second part of the book because it is a fascinating look at radicalism. The political system was changing then in ways that are hard for us to imagine now. Women were getting the right to vote, the Civil War was being fought, slavery was coming to an end as an institution. It is heartening to read because the old system was just as entrenched then as it is now. So change is just as possible now. It's also interesting to think about what Mill would have thought about modern education.
Finally, I was amazed at how much credit he gave to his wife and his daughter. Every other person in his life he agreed to with major caveats (on sometimes miniscule points). But he gives his wife and daughter-in-law credit for the ideas and development of most of his thinking after their meeting. It is pretty incredible.
J.S. Mill was a weird dude, and maaaaaaaaan, he respected his dad. But his autobiography is interesting.
...more
At last, I finished this short but rather dull book!
It contains some interesting parts including:
- John's Stuart Mills exceptional education
- the books that influenced him
- the influence of his wife and daughter on his work
- his key actions in Parliement
However, it was very difficult to keep reading due to the author's convoluted style. I guess this aspect is even more a repelling to a non-native reader.
I don't know if it was typical of his time but I have sometime the feeling that the author w
At last, I finished this short but rather dull book!
It contains some interesting parts including:
- John's Stuart Mills exceptional education
- the books that influenced him
- the influence of his wife and daughter on his work
- his key actions in Parliement
However, it was very difficult to keep reading due to the author's convoluted style. I guess this aspect is even more a repelling to a non-native reader.
I don't know if it was typical of his time but I have sometime the feeling that the author was just showing off his writing skills. The book contains a lot of long and over complicated sentences. Over-usage of inversions, perhaps intended to create suspense, really makes the reading difficult and boring.
This is pity because I think that the life and actions of this man deserved a better narration.
Maybe I should have read a biography by an other author.
...more
Read it to learn about his childhood education. It's fascinating. Note the lack of ANY female presence in his life until his late wife. Ask yourself, what is his motive for this biography? Better, what was his motive for "On Liberty"? Might it be his bizarre relationship? Her intellectual thoughts rubbing off? Lot going on with Mill.
An interesting life was JS Mill. The last half of the book is about his politics and his publishing activities which were less interesting. I also liked the parts with the description of his wife being an intellectual equal to him, his praise for her, and also her influence on his writing. And subsequently, his daughter's. His childhood is also good to read about. I especially liked the descriptions of his father and how he would walk in the woods with JS Mill and ask him to tell him what he got
An interesting life was JS Mill. The last half of the book is about his politics and his publishing activities which were less interesting. I also liked the parts with the description of his wife being an intellectual equal to him, his praise for her, and also her influence on his writing. And subsequently, his daughter's. His childhood is also good to read about. I especially liked the descriptions of his father and how he would walk in the woods with JS Mill and ask him to tell him what he got out of certain books, or to discuss certain issues. A very good, thorough, education he received from his father - one of careful reading, careful thought, and careful speech.
given the man and his work, this book should have been far more interesting than it was. so much of it was lists of the books he read and the things he wrote, whereas personal facts, character descriptions, and actions are few and far between.
Mill's Autobiography is very interesting from a historical perspective. It reveals his close relationships with a lot of other thinkers and writers. It is however more of an autobiography of his mental development without much insight into his personal life. It reads like an attempt by Mill to set himself up as a role model for young English gentlemen and junior thinkers; showing the way of learning and cooperating with other like-minded young people.Unlike Benjamin Franklin's autobiography in w
Mill's Autobiography is very interesting from a historical perspective. It reveals his close relationships with a lot of other thinkers and writers. It is however more of an autobiography of his mental development without much insight into his personal life. It reads like an attempt by Mill to set himself up as a role model for young English gentlemen and junior thinkers; showing the way of learning and cooperating with other like-minded young people.Unlike Benjamin Franklin's autobiography in which the latter sets himself up as a completely self-made do-it-yourself man, Mill deeply stresses on the importance of mental cultivation through social interaction and familial influence
...more
This book was heavygoing (read: Dull) I thought initially that it was rather odd that Mill would talk about his political career at the end of the book, but what I was hoping for would not really be adequate or possible in an autobiography (an account of his death and final moments).
What I did enjoy was the beginning, this man's education was incredible and the influences he engaged with hardly humanise the man. What does humanise him is his relationship with Harriet Taylor and Taylor's daughte
This book was heavygoing (read: Dull) I thought initially that it was rather odd that Mill would talk about his political career at the end of the book, but what I was hoping for would not really be adequate or possible in an autobiography (an account of his death and final moments).
What I did enjoy was the beginning, this man's education was incredible and the influences he engaged with hardly humanise the man. What does humanise him is his relationship with Harriet Taylor and Taylor's daughter later on. This was a man which whom perhaps the term 'Romantic' be apt if not in the content of his beliefs, at least in his spirit.
...more
This was an assignment read, but in the end it was probably the best thing I'd read all semester. Dry, Victorian-ish, yet powerfully optimistic about mankind. Despite his rather depressing upbringing, JSM had a wit and razor mind that leads me to believe he would be a wonderful dinner guest.
Plus the decades long love affair, which he barely mentions, is titillating in the extreme. Perhaps not the first feminist, but a true one nonetheless.
Autobiografie van een in veel opzichten interessante figuur: zijn zeer ongebruikelijke opvoeding en de wijze waarop hij zich intellectueel geleidelijk heeft losgemaakt van de invloed van zijn vader vormen thema's die stof tot nadenken geven. Het gewrongen proza en de minutieuze verdediging van elk ooit geschreven artikel maken het lezen hiervan echter zoiets als fietsen in nat zand.
Rather than a biography, the work seemed like an extended CV of his qualifications. While Mill had an impressive life, I didn't feel that the piece was ever intimate enough.
Even when he talks about his deceased wife, it is under the light of how she helped him advance his career. Perhaps that's the genre of his time.
Such an unexpectedly great book. I didn't think much about an autobiography, but I found so many of Mill's ideas and thoughts very resonating, and connected with him on multiple points. His views on religion are also surprisingly modern. And I found his personal struggle with analytic thought and emotions quite interesting.
John Stuart Mill, British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and Member of Parliament, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an exponent of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham, although his conception of it was very different from Bentham's.
“Those only are happy (I thought) who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness; on the happiness of others, on the improvement of mankind, even on some art or pursuit, followed not as a means, but as itself an ideal end. Aiming thus at something else, they find happiness by the way. The enjoyments of life (such was now my theory) are sufficient to make it a pleasant thing, when they are taken
en passant
, without being made a principal object. Once make them so, and they are immediately felt to be insufficient. They will not bear a scrutinizing examination. Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so. The only chance is to treat, not happiness, but some end external to it, as the purpose of life. Let your self-consciousness, your scrutiny, your self-interrogation, exhaust themselves on that; and if otherwise fortunately circumstanced you will inhale happiness with the air you breathe, without dwelling on it or thinking about it, without either forestalling it in imagination, or putting it to flight by fatal questioning.”
—
38 likes
“Experience has taught me that those who give their time to the absorbing claims of what is called society, not having leisure to keep up a large acquaintance with the organs of opinion, remain much more ignorant of the general state either of the public mind, or of the active and instructed part of it, than a recluse who reads the newspapers need be. ”
—
7 likes