The man behind the much-loved, larger-than-life personality; not only an astronomer but also a self-taught musician and talented composer, and passionate supporter of cricket.
Paperback
,
276 pages
Published
2005
by Sutton
(first published November 6th 2003)
Sir Patrick's autobiography, first published in 2003, is a book I've been wanting to read for a while. Finally getting round to it, I'm somewhat disappointed. The great man of Astronomy hardly touches on his early years and is totally reticent with his war time exploits in the RAF. The book more or less begins at the age of 30. So what is contained here is the story of the Sky at Night broadcasts, Britain's, and the world's, longest running t.v. programme, padded out with the various thoughts of
Sir Patrick's autobiography, first published in 2003, is a book I've been wanting to read for a while. Finally getting round to it, I'm somewhat disappointed. The great man of Astronomy hardly touches on his early years and is totally reticent with his war time exploits in the RAF. The book more or less begins at the age of 30. So what is contained here is the story of the Sky at Night broadcasts, Britain's, and the world's, longest running t.v. programme, padded out with the various thoughts of Chairman Moore.
The experiences of the sickly child, whose illness robbed him of a University education is wafted aside as unimportant. The death of his war time sweetheart in a bombing raid, the reason given for his never having married is skirted by. The loss of his teeth at age 21 is unexplained. Moore of this, and less of his rants at political correctness and his misprints in the press. Actually, there is a good misprint in this book, where the Sky at Night's co-presenter Chris Lintott becomes Christ Lintott.
There is no doubt that Sir Patrick is a one off. A self taught astronomer, who constantly tells us he is just an amateur. A self taught musician who played the xylophone at the Royal Variety Performance as well as his cameo with Morecambe and Wise and a keen cricketer for the Lord's Taverners. In 2003 Patrick was 80 years old. It feels to me like there is some forty per cent of a life missing from this book.
...more
Some may complain about Moore's racist political views expressed here, or that he constantly teases about what he did during the war while refusing to reveal the details. Also you obviously only get his side of events, and some have claimed his professed modesty is not genuine. But I think the book succeeds in showing exactly what he considered important in his life. It's easy to forget he was the product of an earlier age. He doesn't talk about his emotions in the way a modern celebrity would b
Some may complain about Moore's racist political views expressed here, or that he constantly teases about what he did during the war while refusing to reveal the details. Also you obviously only get his side of events, and some have claimed his professed modesty is not genuine. But I think the book succeeds in showing exactly what he considered important in his life. It's easy to forget he was the product of an earlier age. He doesn't talk about his emotions in the way a modern celebrity would because he was raised with the stiff upper lip of Victorian Empire. But he is clear about the people, pastimes and causes he cares about. So as an autobiography I think it is pretty good.
A deeper question raised is whether Moore himself was a good man. It's something of an artificial distinction. Real people can't be divided neatly into good and bad: they are what they are, and provided they aren't asking us to vote for them or committing crimes I'm not sure we have a right to judge them. (Especially in cases like this when the judgement is on whether a man's *views* are acceptable, not his actions.) But overall I am still fond of him warts and all.
He wasn't very notable as an astronomer, but his passion for the subject enabled him to present hundreds of TV shows and write hundreds of books. He did a lot to popularise science. If a budding astronomer wrote him a letter, looked up his phone number and called, or even turned up at his door step and asked to look through his telescope he did everything he could to encourage them.
He did suffer from believing the Daily Mail propaganda, whereby fear of the other engenders a mindset of persecution. Given both the personal losses inflicted on him by foreigners in his youth (his fiancee, his knee, all his teeth) and the mass immigration of foreigners into his home country he witnessed in his old age I find this flaw forgivable. He was no little Englander: he travelled all over the world and there is no indication that he practised discrimination against any of his international collaborators. Thus his 'crimes' are really thoughtcrimes.
True he admits to being a lifelong Tory voter, but he was an honest Tory. I would trust his motivations to be far more selfless than any of the snivelling liars from any branch of the current LibLabCon party. (I think he would feel the same about them as I do - one of the few politicians he credits in the book as having any decency is Tony Benn.) Maybe being born into the upper class prevented him from really understanding the struggles of those less privileged, but he didn't actively hate them or try to kill them like Cameron and Osborne are doing.
Also in the plus column: he loved cats, campaigned against fox hunting, despised government and when his friends died he adopted their children. And being the GamesMaster must count for something.
...more
Not so much an autobiography as as series of reminiscences about his career: he famously covers the first 25 years of his life in three pages, and though he keeps mentioning the his RAF service and the fact his finacee was killed in the war, he doesn't tell us anything about it. This perhaps is not such a bad thing - after all it's his career that is of interest, and he is able to tell us something about all the major events in astronomy and space exploration in the second half of the C20th.
Wher
Not so much an autobiography as as series of reminiscences about his career: he famously covers the first 25 years of his life in three pages, and though he keeps mentioning the his RAF service and the fact his finacee was killed in the war, he doesn't tell us anything about it. This perhaps is not such a bad thing - after all it's his career that is of interest, and he is able to tell us something about all the major events in astronomy and space exploration in the second half of the C20th.
Where he does move away from the stars, I'm sorry to say that he comes across as a deeply odd, and perhaps foolish, man. Perhaps the hints he gives about his upbringing explain this: it would be nice to know more. All in all, this made me feel like reading a proper biography of him!
A warning: although he claims not to be right wing, his views on sexual and racial equality should not be read by the faint of heart!
...more
A good lesson in how to write a biography, I think. The first chapter dealt with childhood, teenage years and the Second World War in a few pages. Then it moved on and started on the career the author is known for. No dwelling on what is essentially superfluous information, just enough of it there to give background.
Sir Alfred Patrick Caldwell-Moore, CBE, Hon FRS, FRAS, known as Patrick Moore, is an English amateur astronomer, who is the most well known English promoter of astronomy. Moore wrote numerous books on the subject, as well as make public, television and radio appearances, over the course of his long life. He is credited as having done more than any other
There is more than one author with this name
Sir Alfred Patrick Caldwell-Moore, CBE, Hon FRS, FRAS, known as Patrick Moore, is an English amateur astronomer, who is the most well known English promoter of astronomy. Moore wrote numerous books on the subject, as well as make public, television and radio appearances, over the course of his long life. He is credited as having done more than any other to raise the profile of astronomy among the British general public.
...more