This is the unusual and compelling story of Diana, a tantalizingly beautiful woman who sought love in the strange by-paths of Lesbos. Fearless and outspoken, it dares to reveal that hidden world where perfumed caresses and half-whispered endearments constitute the forbidden fruits in a Garden of Eden where men are never accepted.
This is how "Diana: A Strange Autobiography"
This is the unusual and compelling story of Diana, a tantalizingly beautiful woman who sought love in the strange by-paths of Lesbos. Fearless and outspoken, it dares to reveal that hidden world where perfumed caresses and half-whispered endearments constitute the forbidden fruits in a Garden of Eden where men are never accepted.
This is how "Diana: A Strange Autobiography" was described when it was published in paperback in 1952. The original 1939 hardcover edition carried with it a Publisher's Note: This is the autobiography of a woman who tried to be normal.
In the book, Diana is presented as the unexceptional daughter of an unexceptional plutocratic family. During adolescence, she finds herself drawn with mysterious intensity to a girl friend. The narrative follows Diana's progress through college; a trial marriage that proves she is incapable of heterosexuality; intellectual and sexual education in Europe; and a series of lesbian relationships culminating in a final tormented triangular struggle with two other women for the individual salvation to be found in a happy couple.
In her introduction, Julie Abraham argues that Diana is not really an autobiography at all, but a deliberate synthesis of different archetypes of this confessional genre, echoing, as it does, more than a half-dozen novels. Hitting all the high and low points of the lesbian novel, the book, Abraham illustrates, offers a defense of lesbian relationships that was unprecedented in 1939 and radical for decades afterwards.
...more
Paperback
,
282 pages
Published
June 1st 1995
by New York University Press
(first published 1939)
I came across Diana: A Strange Autobiography because it was the oldest looking book on the gay/lesbian shelf of Charlottesville's premier used bookstore. (Daedalus Books, not that there's any doubt.) It was copyright 1939, had a really foxy drawing of a woman embracing herself on the title page, and chapter titles like "Am I a Lesbian?", "I am a Lesbian!" and "Jane the Huntress." Most interesting at first glance, though, was the Introduction written by a Victor Robinson, MD who explains the book
I came across Diana: A Strange Autobiography because it was the oldest looking book on the gay/lesbian shelf of Charlottesville's premier used bookstore. (Daedalus Books, not that there's any doubt.) It was copyright 1939, had a really foxy drawing of a woman embracing herself on the title page, and chapter titles like "Am I a Lesbian?", "I am a Lesbian!" and "Jane the Huntress." Most interesting at first glance, though, was the Introduction written by a Victor Robinson, MD who explains the book is "the confession of one who was destined by Nature to gather forbidden fruit in the gardens of deviation, and who saved her life from frustration by knowing herself." Doctor Robinson firmly plants himself in the 'nature' camp, asserting that lesbianism is "not a question of ethics, but of endocrines," and reassures readers that reading Diana's hot tale of lesbian love will not lure any ladies over to the other side. "There is no danger that the woman biologically craving the male, will seek that strange light," he writes. "Only the sisterhood enters to remain, and those who are borne here on the hormonic tides of inversion, cannot by laws or maxims or ostracism, be kept from that dark temple."
On the very next page, Diana stakes a claim for the 'nuture' camp, writing in her author's forward that "my lesbianism is, I believe, the result of long environment peculiarly fitted to foster whatever inclination to homosexuality I had as a child." She remains firmly on the nuture side of the debate for the entirety of the book. After all, it was the 1930s and Freud and Jung were the freshest ideas around. For the author, it seems that understanding homosexuality as an acquired quality rather than one present from birth (Dr Robinson's endocrines) was more liberatory. She explains that thinking of homosexuality as an innate quality made her feel like a "freak of nature" and understanding it as a product of her upbringing was preferable. It's quite a different sentiment than we are used to now, and one of the many reasons why this book is such an invaluable contribution to understanding queer history and thought.
Diana: A Strange Autobiography is so fun to read. There were literally hundreds of sentences I wanted to highlight because they were so charming and great. The story is also quite pulpy at times, so much so that I doubted its authenticity at first. I should note here that I bought my copy of the book three or four years ago, and read the first chapters then, before the episode of PBS'
History Detectives
revealed that book was, in fact, written by an honest to god lesbian, though most scholars of the book treat it as a novel that skillfully plays with archetype rather than as a pure memoir, whatever that is.
Perhaps most shocking for contemporary readers is that a book published in 1939 would not only be unabashedly unashamed of lesbianism, but would also contain numerous and beautifully honest accounts of her physical relationships. Most heartbreaking for contemporary readers is how many of the problems Diana faces are still so current, reminding us how much prejudice remains to be struggled against. It's not much of a giveaway to say the book ends on a happy note, with Diana in a fulfilling relationship. And the description of the book's actual author, Frances V. Rummell, by her niece, is equally positive. "She was a very bright woman. I think she enjoyed life. She was a big personality. She came into the room, you knew she was there. I was very fond of her."
...more
Like most people who've ever heard of this book, I first learned of it on the PBS TV show, The History Detectives, where an original edition of it was featured on an episode. I'm a big HD fan & this was an excellent episode; in the course of trying to discover the true author of Diana, Tufuku exasperatedly explains to viewers that gays and lesbians experienced uncalled for amounts of discrimination in mid-20th century America. Discrimination! I was curious about this 1939 book that somehow a
Like most people who've ever heard of this book, I first learned of it on the PBS TV show, The History Detectives, where an original edition of it was featured on an episode. I'm a big HD fan & this was an excellent episode; in the course of trying to discover the true author of Diana, Tufuku exasperatedly explains to viewers that gays and lesbians experienced uncalled for amounts of discrimination in mid-20th century America. Discrimination! I was curious about this 1939 book that somehow avoided offing its lesbian lead character in tragic murder or suicide, as many books in this genre would do for decades to come. Possibly thanks to the HD exposure, a new edition of Diana was released recently. When a good friend and fellow HD fan gave me a copy for Christmas, I was excited, but also a little hesitant; just because a book is historically interesting doesn't mean it is well written. But as a novel, it turned out not to be half bad. And it is worlds ahead of its time in showing a self aware lesbian hero in a positive light.
...more
It's really amazing how far society can advance in terms of acceptance (and still has so far to go) and how our understanding of the human psyche has evolved. This was fascinating from an historic perspective, as a time capsule on a certain time and when certain theories held sway. It made me wonder how our own cultural production in 60 years will be viewed and whether those readers will see this moment as quaint, confused, and even a little bit pitiful.
Published in 1939, Diana: A Strange Autobiography is both amazingly outdated and amazingly refreshing in its portrayal of one lesbian's life. Full of passages that both calmed and frightened me, the book never once released its hold. The stuff that either saddened or shocked, thankfully, no longer is believed by most sensible people today (i.e. insulting and downright false stereotypes about gay women). What surprised me the most, though, was how much still applies today (the need, for instance,
Published in 1939, Diana: A Strange Autobiography is both amazingly outdated and amazingly refreshing in its portrayal of one lesbian's life. Full of passages that both calmed and frightened me, the book never once released its hold. The stuff that either saddened or shocked, thankfully, no longer is believed by most sensible people today (i.e. insulting and downright false stereotypes about gay women). What surprised me the most, though, was how much still applies today (the need, for instance, to hide who you really are from your own family.)
There are both reflections and actual incidents from the book that speak to the reader's heart. Our narrator realizes she has feelings for a fellow student and begins rearranging her schedule so she doesn't bump into her. She does everything possible to avoid placing herself in situations where she could make Ruth (the girl she likes) feel uncomfortable or make herself fall even harder. How many of us (really, our sexuality doesn't matter here) immediately try and squelch our true feelings when we like someone we know we shouldn't? Lots, of course, but when you read of Diana's experiences you feel as if no one has ever captured how you feel quite like she does.
Diana believes the most antiquated things about homosexuality, which isn't surprising considering the author was writing this in the 1930s. For every nutty idea (women are gay because they're brought up around boys growing up or lesbians just cannot stay in a committed relationship) there is a counter idea that is simply lovely and yet sensible at the same time:
"If love ever came to me, I would accept it. If it did not, my life would not be frustrated. Love, I would remember, was only one of many things, and sometimes, a very small one...I was sick of thoughts made of hope."
As it turns out, Diana ends up discovering a lot of what she believed about lesbians and love to be wrong. She struggles with loneliness and a broken heart for a long time before she finds the closest thing to a happy ending...a particularly unique thing for way back then. :)
...more
This was a fascinating novel. Diana provided an entirely new facet to my understanding of the homosexual intellectual and emotional experience. Diana was undoubtedly introspective and wise beyond her years.
The reader witnessed a woman who slowly came out to herself and to those whom were close to her. This was no easy feat.