Jamaica Kincaid's novel is the haunting, deeply charged story of a woman's life on the island of Dominica. Xuela Claudette Richardson, daughter of a Carib mother and a half-Scottish, half-African father, grows up in a harsh, loveless world after her mother dies in childbirth. Xuela’s narrative provides a rich, vivid exploration of the Caribbean and the pervasive influence
Jamaica Kincaid's novel is the haunting, deeply charged story of a woman's life on the island of Dominica. Xuela Claudette Richardson, daughter of a Carib mother and a half-Scottish, half-African father, grows up in a harsh, loveless world after her mother dies in childbirth. Xuela’s narrative provides a rich, vivid exploration of the Caribbean and the pervasive influence of colonialism.
The Autobiography of My Mother
is a story of love, fear, loss, and the forging of a character, an account of one woman's inexorable evolution evoked in startling and magical poetry.
...more
Paperback
,
228 pages
Published
January 1st 1997
by Plume/Penguin
(first published 1995)
This question contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)
[Can someone explain the title? She tells us more than once how and when her mother died, so how can this be an autobiography of her mother? What did I miss?
(hide spoiler)
]
I am way to the left on criminal justice issues and am strongly opposed to capital punishment, but if there is one group of offenders forcing me to reconsider my commitment to the values I hold, it is probably that comprised of people who write in library books. I'd like a grant for a study researching both people who write in library books and people who engage in loud, long cellphone conversations in otherwise quiet and enclosed spaces (e.g., the bus from the Port Authority to Kingston, NY; th
I am way to the left on criminal justice issues and am strongly opposed to capital punishment, but if there is one group of offenders forcing me to reconsider my commitment to the values I hold, it is probably that comprised of people who write in library books. I'd like a grant for a study researching both people who write in library books and people who engage in loud, long cellphone conversations in otherwise quiet and enclosed spaces (e.g., the bus from the Port Authority to Kingston, NY; the train from Penn Station to Philadelphia). My theory is that there's a great deal of correlation between these two behaviors, and studying the subjects who engage in them would add to the body of scientific knowledge that could be used in the future to develop a program wherein perpetrators of these acts could be grouped together and transported to an out-of-the-way location; because honestly, I really don't believe in capital punishment, but even my lefty views must admit that some citizens infringe upon the rights of the rest of us in completely unacceptable ways. Therefore, I propose mandatory relocation of library-book-writers and obnoxious-cell-phone-users to a distant and underpopulated island.
A cold and ugly island, though, not a beautiful one like Dominica, where
The Autobiography of My Mother
is set. Though as Jamaica Kincaid makes clear, life on a Caribbean island isn't just always a Jimmy Buffettesque lark in the sand.
I liked this book, though I'm sure not everyone would, and I managed to enjoy it despite the infuriatingly stupid underlining and marginalia of a previous NYPL patron. It's the story of a girl whose mother died giving birth to her; this motherlessness defines the main character's identity and life, which the story chronicles. Much of the novel is about colonialism, and it is very brutal and intense, with a great deal of human cruelty, sex, and masturbation. I thought it was good. It really took me into the existence of someone I couldn't relate to at all, in a way that was both interesting and satisfying, and it made me think about colonialism and power in a new way. What more do we want?
One of the things I liked a lot about this book was that it did a lot of "telling" instead of "showing." When I took fiction-writing class in college, the standard go-to criticism of pretty much anything I or anyone else wrote was, "You do too much
telling
; you need to do more
showing!
" This seems to be the infallible rule of writing workshops, that "telling" is about the worst sin one can commit and "showing" is just an absolutely great thing to do, but honestly, I've never accepted this dogma at all. What the hell is wrong with some good old telling? I like being told things sometimes. Seriously! Who decided this was such a horrible thing to do? I
like
telling, and I like to be
told,
provided it's done right. In this book, the narrator tells you all sorts of things, and it's great. It's what makes the novel work. I am sure that if Jamaica Kincaid had shared the draft of this book with a gaggle of undergraduates, they all would have been on her ass about all the
telling
and would have explained that she needed to
show
more. To which I say: screw them! All those fiction workshop kids might take a deep breath and settle down, lest I decide to expand criteria for my island.
Anyway, this book wasn't flawless or amazing, but I did enjoy it. I felt no driving passion to get through the story and wouldn't have been upset if someone had taken it away from me halfway though, but I did like reading it and don't feel that time was wasted at all.
...more
Let me say from the outset, I absolutely loved this book, its language, its voice, its poetry, the complexity of its narrator, who could be so distant yet simultaneously get so under your skin. There is a raw but brutal honesty to it, that disturbs and is to be admired at the same time, it is so full of contrasts and so compelling and beats its rhythm so loud, I almost can't describe it.
In the autobiography of my mother, we encounter Xuela Claudette Richardson, who narrates her life looking back
Let me say from the outset, I absolutely loved this book, its language, its voice, its poetry, the complexity of its narrator, who could be so distant yet simultaneously get so under your skin. There is a raw but brutal honesty to it, that disturbs and is to be admired at the same time, it is so full of contrasts and so compelling and beats its rhythm so loud, I almost can't describe it.
In the autobiography of my mother, we encounter Xuela Claudette Richardson, who narrates her life looking back over seventy years, though the sense of her life reads as if it is being lived in the present, so vivid are the memories, so visceral the experiences. Her mother died in child birth and her father left with her with his laundry woman until she was seven, when he remarried and came back for her.
She recalls the moment vividly through the senses and how it made her feel.
"I thanked Eunice for taking care of me. I did not mean it, I could not mean it, I did not know how to mean it, but I would mean it now. I did not say goodbye; in the world that I lived in then and the world that I live in now goodbyes do not exist, it is a small world. All my belongings were in a muslin knapsack and he placed them in a bag that was on the donkey he had been riding. He placed me on the donkey and sat behind me. And this was how we looked as my back was turned on the small house in which I spent the first seven years of my life..."
Through the narrator looking back over years and at events that she re-experiences as she recalls them, we see how it was then, that something, whether it is the lack of maternal love or the makeup of this character, nature or nurture, contributes to her way of being in the world in an emotionally detached way. She responds to instincts and observes acutely her own responses and is able to look back on them and describe and account for them, but there is a sense of something missing, that appears through the recurring dream of a mother climbing up and away from her and the questions she asks herself throughout her life.
Her father's wife who is resentful toward Xuela and reminds her often that she can't be her father's daughter, soon bears two children, a boy and a girl. Though there is no love between them, Xuela doesn't hate her, she has sympathy for her.
"Her tragedy was greater than mine; her mother did not love her, but her mother was alive, and every day she saw her mother and every day her mother let her know she was not loved. My mother was dead."
At 15, her father removes her from his home and takes her to live with a business partner and his wife as a boarder. She develops a close friendship with the wife, Madame LaBatte, observing with the same acuity their relationship and way of living and enters womanhood herself, observing and experiencing changes in her own body and the effect it elicits in others.
She makes decisions about her own womanhood, about her body, about mothering. And she lives her life in accordance with those decisions. She marries, she discovers love and seems never to lose that ability to see through the illusions that surround all those things without sacrificing pleasure and contentedness.
And at the end I ask, who is writing this story? Who is this mother who had no mother and no children? And in the dying pages, she will answer the question and we may realise we knew it all along.
the autobiography of my Mother plumbs the depths of maternal love and its lack, mother daughter relationships, self-love, absent fathers and the latent influences of enslavement and occupation, how they continue to distort reality even when they are no longer present.
I find it almost impossible to describe the reading experience, except that it left me asking "How did I not know about this book?" The voice is so unique and powerful and much more than an imagination, it is rooted in something strong and yet transparent and is utterly compelling. Don't read this for story, this is about writing and thus reading through the senses, Jamaica Kincaid creates prose that inhabits them all.
A somewhat longer and more complex work than the other book I just read by Kincaid, 'Annie John.' Similarly, though, it deals with fraught and complex emotional relationships. Or lack of relationships. The narrator here is a woman, Xuela, whose mother died in childbirth; and who lets that lack define who she is as as person.
Her father is a distant and venal man, and Xuela doesn't think much of him. By necessity, she is essentially on her own. However, as the book progresses, she seeks something(
A somewhat longer and more complex work than the other book I just read by Kincaid, 'Annie John.' Similarly, though, it deals with fraught and complex emotional relationships. Or lack of relationships. The narrator here is a woman, Xuela, whose mother died in childbirth; and who lets that lack define who she is as as person.
Her father is a distant and venal man, and Xuela doesn't think much of him. By necessity, she is essentially on her own. However, as the book progresses, she seeks something(?) in others: the narrator has an affair with a much older man, marries a white man who cares deeply for her but whom she does not love, and falls in love with a married man to whom she is only one of many women.
Xuela strives to find an identity and a place for herself in the world, but through all her striving is a dark fatalism which undercuts her: what she describes as a 'bleak, black wind' at her back. This can be read as stemming from her family situation, her community, her gender, and the legacy of colonialism - but it's also simply and matter-of-factly portrayed as just the way this character is, without apologies or excuses.
Is this actually Kincaid's reconstruction of her mother's life, or is the title a reference to the looming absence of the narrator's mother? I'm not sure.
...more
My mother died at the moment I was born, and so for my whole life there was nothing standing between myself and eternity; at my back was always a bleak, black wind. I could not have known at the beginning of my life that this would be so; I only came to know this in the middle of my life, just at the time when I was no longer young and realized that I had less of some of the things I used to have in abundance and more of some of the things I had scarcely had at all. And this realization of loss
My mother died at the moment I was born, and so for my whole life there was nothing standing between myself and eternity; at my back was always a bleak, black wind. I could not have known at the beginning of my life that this would be so; I only came to know this in the middle of my life, just at the time when I was no longer young and realized that I had less of some of the things I used to have in abundance and more of some of the things I had scarcely had at all. And this realization of loss and gain made me look backward and forward: at my beginning was this woman whose face I had never seen, but at my end was nothing, no one between me and the black room of the world. I came to feel that for my whole life I had been standing on a precipice, that my loss had made me vulnerable, hard, and helpless; on knowing this I became overwhelmed with sadness and shame and pity for myself.
So opens
The Autobiography of My Mother
, a fierce, complex discourse on love and lack of love in the context of colonialism. Although this paragraph sets up many of the themes that will be developed in the course of the book, it is not to be accepted as definitive. For one thing, this is the first and only time the narrator, Xuela Claudette Richardson, will represent herself as helpless or vulnerable. It's true, there's little if anything she can do to change the circumstances of her life; but she takes complete control of the way she lives in those circumstances. And she only rarely expresses pity for herself.
I'll admit, it took me a while to warm up to this book. Xuela's voice makes no attempt to conciliate the reader. Also, many of the statements she makes clash with each other; at first these contradictions irritated me – was the author being careless? Just throwing poetic phrases together? For just one example of many, she writes "I could say [my husband] loved me if I needed to hear I was loved, but I will never say it." – but she did say so a couple pages earlier. However, I came to realize that these were deliberate choices of the author. Most often, Xuela will both speak of herself or others as not loving or incapable of love, and also speak of them loving or being in love. This destabilization throws into question, for one thing, what she even means by "love". It is not safe to assume that this is obvious, even in context.
One thing Xuela never expresses is uncertainty – even when she contradicts herself, she makes her statements with a tone of absolute authority. She is determined to control her own voice, at the end of her life as she is telling her story, just as the course of her life has been ruled by her self-possession, her fiercely independent determination to be sufficient to herself and please herself, and no-one else. This has sometimes led her to ruthlessness. She is capable of feeling sympathy for others, occasionally, but will not allow herself to do so in any way that might make her vulnerable. Consider the following paragraph (which also demonstrates the author's control of style):
My life was beyond empty. I had never had a mother, I had just recently refused to become one, and I knew than that this refusal would be complete. I would never become a mother, but that would not be the same as never bearing children. I would bear children, but I would never be a mother to them. I would bear them in abundance; they would emerge from my head, from my armpits, from between my legs; I would bear children, they would hang from me like fruit from a vine, but I would destroy them with the carelessness of a god. I would bear children in the morning, I would bathe them at noon in a water that came from myself, and I would eat them at night, swallowing them whole, all at once. They would live and then they would not live. In their day of life, I would walk them to the edge of a precipice. I would not push them over; I would not have to; the sweet voices of unusual pleasures would call to them from its bottom; they would not rest until they became one with these sounds. I would cover their bodies with diseases, embellish skins with thinly crusted sores, the sores sometimes oozing a thick pus for which they would thirst, a thirst that could never be quenched. I would condemn them to live in an empty space frozen in the same posture in which they had been born. I would throw them from a great height; every bone in their body would be broken and the bones would never be properly set, healing in the way they were broken, healing never at all. I would decorate them when they were only corpses and set each corpse in a polished wooden box, and place the polished wooden box in the earth and forget the part of the earth where I had buried the box. It is in this way that I did not become a mother; it is in this way that I bore my children.
This paragraph expresses, for one thing, all the love and sympathy she could not or would not allow herself to feel. The fates of these imaginary children are those of her real-life half-siblings; and more figuratively, her husband, who "became all the children I did not allow to be born"; she spoke of wanting to push him into an abyss, but not in anger.
The pain of the book arises from her circumstances, in Dominica, as one of the people she always calls "the defeated" – the Carib and African people. There would be a lot more to discuss about this, but I will leave it for now. She writes:
I am of the vanquished, I am of the defeated. The past is a fixed point, the future is open-ended; for me the future must remain capable of casting a light on the past such that in my defeat lies the seed of my great victory, in my defeat lies the beginning of my great revenge. My impulse is to the good, my good is to serve myself. I am not a people, I am not a nation. I only wish from time to time to make my actions be the actions of a people, to make my actions be the actions of a nation.
...more
What does it mean when a first person story of the life of a woman, defined largely by her sexuality and her quest for identity, is entitled
The Autobiography of My Mother
? What does it mean when the narrator's mother dies at the narrator's birth and can only be grasped through the narrator's imagination? What does it mean when the motherless child can not be come a mother herself, not for a lack of fertility, but instead "freeing my womb from burdens I did not want to bear . . .burdens that w
What does it mean when a first person story of the life of a woman, defined largely by her sexuality and her quest for identity, is entitled
The Autobiography of My Mother
? What does it mean when the narrator's mother dies at the narrator's birth and can only be grasped through the narrator's imagination? What does it mean when the motherless child can not be come a mother herself, not for a lack of fertility, but instead "freeing my womb from burdens I did not want to bear . . .burdens that were a consequence of pleasure, not a consequence of truth"? How do you interpret a search for identity defined by the absence of mother and the desire not to become a mother in an environment shaped by colonialism?
"I am of the vanquished, I am of the defeated. The past is a fixed point, the future is open-ended; for me the future must remain capable of casting light on the past such that in my defeat lies the seed of my great victory, in my defeat lies the beginning of my great revenge. My impulse is to the good, my good is to serve myself. I am not a people, I am not a nation. I only wish from time to time to make my actions be the actions of a people, to make my actions be the actions of a nation."
...more
Having read the Poisonwood Bible recently, I can't help making a comparison, and it is woefully put to shame by this. Kincaid speaks to the complexities of identity on the rift between conquering and defeated people. Able to contain the sometimes contradictory parts of herself and her history, Xuela, the protagonist, reflects on the circumstances of a life shaped by race, class and gender. She is insightful and thoughtful, and while addressing her life in post-colonial (if it really is post) cir
Having read the Poisonwood Bible recently, I can't help making a comparison, and it is woefully put to shame by this. Kincaid speaks to the complexities of identity on the rift between conquering and defeated people. Able to contain the sometimes contradictory parts of herself and her history, Xuela, the protagonist, reflects on the circumstances of a life shaped by race, class and gender. She is insightful and thoughtful, and while addressing her life in post-colonial (if it really is post) circumstances, she does not sound like a primer on the subject. Written in deceptively simple form, Kincaid's words flesh-out an existence sensual and lived-in and melodic.
"Romance is the refuge of the defeated; the defeated need songs to soothe themselves, they need a sweet tune to soothe themselves, for their whole being is a wound..." p. 216
...more
About a third of the way through this riveting, beautifully written book (what a stylist!) I began to read it as an allegory--about power, ethnicity, wealth--as well as a personal account of ethnicity and this woman's road to self-invention. Ultimately, this turns out to be how all of us construct identity, and the bogus scaffolding on which we construct it and our lineage. The book is passionate and surprising.
This is the best of what post-colonial literature can be - hauntingly beautiful and deeply sad. Kincaid's voice is deceptively simple, repeating simple sentences throughout that grow in meaning as you read. The narrator is compelling if not always relatable. She does not love easily or when she is asked to. She does not feel rage either, she simply exists in her own truth. She accepts her fate but also resists it by becoming her own person with her own thoughts that are never given in response t
This is the best of what post-colonial literature can be - hauntingly beautiful and deeply sad. Kincaid's voice is deceptively simple, repeating simple sentences throughout that grow in meaning as you read. The narrator is compelling if not always relatable. She does not love easily or when she is asked to. She does not feel rage either, she simply exists in her own truth. She accepts her fate but also resists it by becoming her own person with her own thoughts that are never given in response to another. The connections to the Caribbean state of being are overt without being over-simplified. To a student of post-colonial literature, I'm not sure what would be new here, but what is here fits perfectly within the lessons learned of the post-colonial. Reads as a mood or observation rather than plot but that is appropriate for the work. Compelling and challenging.
...more
Recommended to Kassie by:
Washington and Lee University
This work is my new favorite. A work of loss, readers have much to gain from consuming Kincaid's words. The imagery in this work is lasting and the poetic diction captivating. This novel is a work of art in which the protagonist comes to love herself, comes to see herself apart from her race, and comes to see others in ways they cannot see themselves. Not only is this novel a work of art but it is one that will prove palliative for readers struggling to escape the past. Read this work aloud; be
This work is my new favorite. A work of loss, readers have much to gain from consuming Kincaid's words. The imagery in this work is lasting and the poetic diction captivating. This novel is a work of art in which the protagonist comes to love herself, comes to see herself apart from her race, and comes to see others in ways they cannot see themselves. Not only is this novel a work of art but it is one that will prove palliative for readers struggling to escape the past. Read this work aloud; be present; be heard. Kincaid captures what it means to be human apart from society's shadows.
...more
I went through this book in a 12 hr day. Life story of a woman born as her mother dies. It’s black writing, so it is fierce and natural in sensations and actions, but I felt quiet content, enjoying the way the words flowed through. It’s also written by a Caribbean woman and converted Jew (talk about a minority in a minority). It is not something you can read only once. I will read it again. It’s not a plot story (there’s not even dialogue). It’s story of conception of the world and the body you
I went through this book in a 12 hr day. Life story of a woman born as her mother dies. It’s black writing, so it is fierce and natural in sensations and actions, but I felt quiet content, enjoying the way the words flowed through. It’s also written by a Caribbean woman and converted Jew (talk about a minority in a minority). It is not something you can read only once. I will read it again. It’s not a plot story (there’s not even dialogue). It’s story of conception of the world and the body you are in.
I think we are in the narrator’s memory from her old age, but she starts us from her birth. She ain't going anywhere. She moves around, but this isn't about a writer or a mother or a wife. It's just about her, and she just is. You all made it through pages of describing the sky, trees, dirt. The main character feels like she exists among her natural surroundings (whereas she knows she's out of place in things such as school, marriage, family). The way she describes her setting is amazing writing, painful and intense to the reader, but very impersonal to the narrator. She is a being of nature and that’s how she wanted to live. Like the mountains, they are impersonal. Not like a nation, that is personal as are the names in its histories make you feel in a certain way. She was “a girl who prepared her own food.” She does things herself...makes food in childhood, works as she comes of age, does not ask. This also means no relationships that she holds in her heart. She is no one's daughter, and none are hers.
For this reader, she rids the human world of meaning - you know things like justice, sin, and morality. They don’t really exist but for human perception. I think Xuela (her) understood this from her fist sense of awareness, so she decided not to follow any meaning or course in life, but she watches and ponders all those around her who do. Her father, who does not love, working a official job and rising up, stealing and going to church; her caretaker, with many children she does not have pleasure in, morns a broken plate that tells her about paradise; her stepmother out to kill Xuela as a threat, and has a son she wishes to live through cause he is a boy and daughter she does not admit is alive cause she is a girl; her two main lovers with the anger of their past wives for sleeping with another and their own meanings they grab onto in life; and her mother whom she knows she doesn’t know at all, but can only imagine. She has so many questions for all these people, she never asks them but to herself. Do you guys think all these lives would have been different had she asked the questions she thought?
He reactions are very matter of fact and pure. They are not cruel or kind (though certainly are to another viewer who lives in morals), they just are. Her lusts, her thoughts, sadness, pleasure, anger, sights come out and she is honest with them. There’s no force out, no repression inward. Nothing sentimental. No need to be a mother or a teacher or to do something with her life. I will eat, sleep, make love, and die. This is what I felt, this is what happened to me, this is what I don’t know, this is what I realize. No one loves me, I don’t love anyone, but I don’t hate either, I have no point in hating. She kills a turtle in a horrible way when she feels displeasure for them hiding, she helps her sister abort a child because she’s there.
Something awesome in this book like in no other I‘ve ever read: her enjoyment of her body. You see her look at, smell, feel herself without shame. It’s not vein. Only exploration and knowing of it’s beauty. How many women have you met who actually do that? We all cover our smells, hide our blood. It goes deeper, unlike her stepmother and the other women in this book, Xuela is not afraid of herself. Quite the opposite. She loves herself. No one “beheld” her living, so she did it to herself. But I wonder what she would have felt if she came to behold another. A child, a love, a stranger...
There is also something that drops off so quickly in this book. Writing. She begins writing letters as a small child and knows that her expression on paper can perhaps not change, but set off the motion for change of her life's situation. At that point I thought this book was gonna be about writing. Yet she does not pursue it, and writing ceases in the story. Why do you think? Did she not need to express to anyone anymore throughout the story? Did she not need to change the situation? Maybe we can view the whole book as her writing, just expressing to herself, not trying to change anything (though perhaps setting some readers in motion). She knows how self conscience she is.
Thoughts on motherhood. What do you think? She knew she did not want to be a mother, to belong to anyone or anyone belong to her, and who would want to bring another child into this world of meaningless meanings? Do you think she considered that with her children, or it was simply, I don’t want to have a child, so I won’t. Perhaps it was both. Oh, we so debate the existence of personhood. Even once children are born, we don’t consider them people, but that as they grow up, they are becoming a person. How much more indefinable is it when we consider a fetus and woman’s rights. But whatever she thought with pushing them into the "abyss", she seemed to feel the only certainty in anything was death, so it really was not a big deal, and yet it was. I almost feel she kills all those unborn children in love rather than carelessness. I think Kincaid wished her own mother had never had children.
The key to great writing is great story telling and Jamaica Kincaid is a great storyteller. Her prose is beautiful, spare, blunt, compact and to the point. Her writing cuts you to the heart. Of course I'm biased because I love Jamaica Kincaid. She is one of the best raconteurs ever! So engrossed am I in her storyline that even though I’m eager for the next development I’m saddened by the ever expanding vignettes because I know that the book will e
The Autobiography of My Mother by Jamaica Kincaid
The key to great writing is great story telling and Jamaica Kincaid is a great storyteller. Her prose is beautiful, spare, blunt, compact and to the point. Her writing cuts you to the heart. Of course I'm biased because I love Jamaica Kincaid. She is one of the best raconteurs ever! So engrossed am I in her storyline that even though I’m eager for the next development I’m saddened by the ever expanding vignettes because I know that the book will end and my foray with the characters will end.
The title itself is intriguing since an autobiography by definition is an account written by him or herself since the mother in the story is deceased everything is seen through the eyes of the daughter, Xuela.
This immediately sets the story on its head providing an inverse tale of a mother/daughter relationship without the mother being physically able to tell her story. This novel introspection of a woman haunted through a lifetime by her own guilt at perhaps killing her only opportunity to have experienced true love.
Xuela continues to search for love always via the mother she never knew, the mother whom though she never directly comes out and says so, Xuela believes she killed just by being born.
Xuela experiences a dichotomy of self. Surrounded by others, in the midst of a sea of humanity and even during intimate relations with various lovers she is disconnected from other humans in a way unfathomable for most of us.
Basically unloved and unwanted by an indifferent father Xuela disassociates from every other man in her life. Xuela never developed the ability to experience love fully with soul as well as body, even with men who become her “lovers”. Her lovers and the people she interacts with are like ghost figures, much like the mother she envisions in her dreams, never quite fully accessible to Xuela’s heart.
Ms. Kincaid explores the many levels of Xuela’s dissonance with her fellow humans through the race and gender restrictions of the time period.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Kincaid’s books deal with many mother/daughter issues. The Autobiography of My Mother is a narrative on the mother the daughter never knew and Annie John, the novel I’m currently reading is a tale of the deteriorating relationship between a mother and daughter who know each other perhaps all too well.
...more
First let me say that I struggled with what rating to give this book and how to approach a review in general. I feel conflicted. I don’t know if I feel conflicted in regards to my view of this book or if the character and her confliction have affected me.
This book was nothing like I imagined it would be from reading the synopsis on the back of the book. The assumption is that this is a book about a woman whose mother dies giving birth to her and this is a story of her search into who this absen
First let me say that I struggled with what rating to give this book and how to approach a review in general. I feel conflicted. I don’t know if I feel conflicted in regards to my view of this book or if the character and her confliction have affected me.
This book was nothing like I imagined it would be from reading the synopsis on the back of the book. The assumption is that this is a book about a woman whose mother dies giving birth to her and this is a story of her search into who this absent mother was. I felt because both of my parents fly with the angels, I might relate to a story of this type. On one hand I was able to relate in a lot of ways but then on another completely different hand I don’t know if it was the main character or the author herself, annoyed me.
In essence this was a book about a woman who’s mother did die while giving birth to her and her constant struggle to comprehend life and define her identity in the world considering this tragic beginning. The loss of a parent in general is hard but the loss of a mother to a girl/woman is devastation. I get that, completely. The author/main character has a very poetic and fluid way of expressing her feelings and telling the reader how she lives her life. Her mother never was present, her father pushes her away because he’s got his own demons and her step family hates her for what she represents. This is a woman who feels she is not loved, has never been and believes she never will be. She yearns for love so badly and seems to look for it in all the wrong places. Although, I’m sure she’d deny this observation. She claims to love herself so much since no one else does. She can’t keep her hands (or other’s hands for that matter) off of herself. She’s obsessed with it. It really seems a desperate depression tied into the absence of her mother and lack of parental love that she is missing. This distorted mentality manifesting itself into some physical need. She is a wounded woman living her life under the guise of self love. I actually found her very selfish, immature and in need of prayer and a good therapist.
This book has a lot great prose and verse that I found quotable. It reminded me a lot of something’s I’ve read by Toni Morrison or Alice Walker; spiritual, poetic, sometimes lofty. Towards the middle of the book there was an appearance of a lot of what I assume is the author’s idealism or belief system in a sprawling rambling full chapter, which I found myself scanning through. There was a lot of spiritualism that I personally didn’t agree with and didn’t enjoy. At times, the story seemed to jump around. We actually didn’t find out the town or the main characters name until into the book a good way.
All in all, I related on a certain level to the sense of loss and how it affects a life but this character went to a place that I can’t comprehend with her emptiness. It was sad but not morbid. Repetitive is a good word. It was almost as if this talented author found a way to say through 227 pages of print, in various ways, “My mother died giving birth to me, my father is self possessed, I’m hurting but I deny it, I’m empty, my guard is up and I won’t let anyone in.”
I do actually recommend it. I’m a real life observer of characters and do believe that people could relate to one thing or another or maybe all of the characters in this book. It wasn’t what I was expecting but I will say, 3 stars.
...more
This novel is a how-to manual on diction. The language that Kincaid uses would make anyone stand in awe. Xuela, the main character, struggles with her identity because she lives on an island that has been colonized by the British. She has been told all of her life that she is not as important as the white people that are in charge of her country. Xuela herself is not easy to like. She is inappropriate, brutal, and refuses to love anyone but herself. This book is hard to get through. There is no
This novel is a how-to manual on diction. The language that Kincaid uses would make anyone stand in awe. Xuela, the main character, struggles with her identity because she lives on an island that has been colonized by the British. She has been told all of her life that she is not as important as the white people that are in charge of her country. Xuela herself is not easy to like. She is inappropriate, brutal, and refuses to love anyone but herself. This book is hard to get through. There is no character to connect to, the main character has no drive, and there is no true plot. Kincaid's use of language is what saves this book. She uses unimaginably beautiful language to describe horrible and ugly things. I would not recommend this book as a pleasure read. If you want a good example of language and diction this is your book.
...more
I first read Jamaica Kincaid in a creative writing class. She is and was the epitome of rhythm, storytelling, diction, and imagery. I enjoyed the pace and style that this book was written in and look up to Kincaid's ability to mesh description and feeling.
As far as the story itself - I was left wanting more. Strongly addressing gender and race issues, the message of the story is one of defeat. Xuela, the main character, was never able to mentally transcend above the circumstances that life prese
I first read Jamaica Kincaid in a creative writing class. She is and was the epitome of rhythm, storytelling, diction, and imagery. I enjoyed the pace and style that this book was written in and look up to Kincaid's ability to mesh description and feeling.
As far as the story itself - I was left wanting more. Strongly addressing gender and race issues, the message of the story is one of defeat. Xuela, the main character, was never able to mentally transcend above the circumstances that life presented her. An overall tone of pity and selfishness, she remains bitter in this book's entirety and every situation constructs herself to be the victim. Maybe that is the beauty of it, but personally, I became frustrated with Xuela's inability to take initiative.
...more
I'm re-reading this. There are a handful of writers who write in such a lilting, lyrical way that you are simply lulled into another world - for me this is Jamaica Kincaid, Jack Kerouac and Lee Young Li - there is something about the rhythm (sp - sorry I'm dyslexic and spelling is not my strong suit) of their language that just sucks you in. This book is simply amazing. The world she describes as a individual with utterly no resources or protection, as she just claims these things for herself in
I'm re-reading this. There are a handful of writers who write in such a lilting, lyrical way that you are simply lulled into another world - for me this is Jamaica Kincaid, Jack Kerouac and Lee Young Li - there is something about the rhythm (sp - sorry I'm dyslexic and spelling is not my strong suit) of their language that just sucks you in. This book is simply amazing. The world she describes as a individual with utterly no resources or protection, as she just claims these things for herself internally is hard to describe. She's such a powerful author - I've loved all of her books. I'd highly recommend this and I don't really want to finish it again.
...more
After learning a little about Reactive Detachment Disorder and synapse development in infants, my heart is softened towards this book. I couldn't make sense of the character before; I found her as only flat, heavy weight on paper. While her heaviness is not relieved in the slightest, I can now better understand her depth and the value of her story.
**end edit**
A book to be endured, not enjoyed. Kincaid is a powerful writer, I wouldn't argue against that. Every page is heavy, every word i
**edit**
After learning a little about Reactive Detachment Disorder and synapse development in infants, my heart is softened towards this book. I couldn't make sense of the character before; I found her as only flat, heavy weight on paper. While her heaviness is not relieved in the slightest, I can now better understand her depth and the value of her story.
**end edit**
A book to be endured, not enjoyed. Kincaid is a powerful writer, I wouldn't argue against that. Every page is heavy, every word is weighted. It was another concrete block stacked over me with every piece of the picture, and forgive me, but I need a little light.
...more
I think I can safely say that I didn't get as much out of this as many of the goodreads reviewers did. Even if I have nothing in common with the narrator, a good novel makes me able to get my head around them or better, enter their world. I felt shut out. From the get-go she was a hard and shaded character. I did not feel invited to understand her. It was a dark book that left me cold. Kincaid did keep me reading because she's such a fine writer. For me, a difficult book to recommend. Definitely
I think I can safely say that I didn't get as much out of this as many of the goodreads reviewers did. Even if I have nothing in common with the narrator, a good novel makes me able to get my head around them or better, enter their world. I felt shut out. From the get-go she was a hard and shaded character. I did not feel invited to understand her. It was a dark book that left me cold. Kincaid did keep me reading because she's such a fine writer. For me, a difficult book to recommend. Definitely not for everyone, but I think people who enjoy reading about the underbelly of society find much to like here.
...more
Beautiful and sad. Of all the postcolonial/postmodern/etc. books I've read, this probably succeeds the most at
being a novel
. Not only is the prose exquisite (both gorgeous and so fluid that I had to force myself to slow down to savor it), but the politics are overt without ever interrupting the story. Xuela's national/ethnic/gender/class position is fraught, and that's inseparable from her life story. But Kincaid keeps Xuela herself, not her oppression, at the center of the story, and that make
Beautiful and sad. Of all the postcolonial/postmodern/etc. books I've read, this probably succeeds the most at
being a novel
. Not only is the prose exquisite (both gorgeous and so fluid that I had to force myself to slow down to savor it), but the politics are overt without ever interrupting the story. Xuela's national/ethnic/gender/class position is fraught, and that's inseparable from her life story. But Kincaid keeps Xuela herself, not her oppression, at the center of the story, and that makes it not only more artistically interesting, but brings home the social commentary as well.
...more
The blurb on the front of the book from Michiko Kakutani uses the words "incantatory...lyrical" which is an excellent description of Kincaid's prose style. However, the narrator's voice is so lyrical, so distant that to me the book lacked emotional intensity. Xuela, the narrator, observes her life from an emotional remove, analyzing the people around her more as representatives of colonial power relations than as real people. For me her voice was cold and gave me no sense of connection to her or
The blurb on the front of the book from Michiko Kakutani uses the words "incantatory...lyrical" which is an excellent description of Kincaid's prose style. However, the narrator's voice is so lyrical, so distant that to me the book lacked emotional intensity. Xuela, the narrator, observes her life from an emotional remove, analyzing the people around her more as representatives of colonial power relations than as real people. For me her voice was cold and gave me no sense of connection to her or the world around her.
...more
This is one of those books I am glad to have read, but I don't know that I'll read it again unless a specific reason arises. It is a very uncomfortable story. Other reviewers have given synopses, so I'll skip that part. The aspect of the book that I found most striking is the way Kincaid makes the personal-is-political trope so seamless. There are moments when, as a reader, I saw the shadow of colonialism out of the corner of my eye, as it were, while Xuela was describing some very intimate mome
This is one of those books I am glad to have read, but I don't know that I'll read it again unless a specific reason arises. It is a very uncomfortable story. Other reviewers have given synopses, so I'll skip that part. The aspect of the book that I found most striking is the way Kincaid makes the personal-is-political trope so seamless. There are moments when, as a reader, I saw the shadow of colonialism out of the corner of my eye, as it were, while Xuela was describing some very intimate moment. When colonialism is the topic at hand, the cascading effect it has—the way it erodes every part of life on the island down to the most intimate, like the color of a lover's pubic hair—becomes apparent.
Xuela, the character, is not easy to like. There is nothing soft or warm about her. We as readers don't have an impulse to protect her because, as her narration makes clear, she wouldn't accept protection from anybody. She also won't accept love. Indeed, if there's a theme in this book that is stronger than the impact of colonialism, it's the idea that love is something taught, and Xuela has never been taught. I was longing for my Psychoanalytic Criticism classmates as I read this because of the ripple effect Xuela's lack of an early love object has on her whole life.
The writing is extraordinary. So many times, I wanted to pull out a specific sentence or paragraph for the application it has to contemporary life and share it on social media or buy a billboard or something. Kincaid is especially good at examining the psychological consequences of a Have-Not, like Xuela's father, becoming a Have. The acquisitiveness that westernization imparts is a unique evil, and Kincaid shows all the ways it destroys not only the people it infects but also everyone around them and the society they inhabit.
In sum, this is not a "fun" book, but it's a worthwhile one. If you are interested in the study of loneliness, it's essential reading. Good lord, that sounds depressing, but it's true. It's a quick read, and you will feel enriched for having experienced it.
...more
I will start off and say that I loved the writing. It was poetic and lyrical and very trancelike. I could even relate to the protagonist and her yearning for her mother. But there was so much about the plot I didn't like. I'm not sure of the connection between losing your mother and being oversexed all the time. The main character seemed to always be touching herself - I don't know, maybe she was trying to connect with her mother through her femininity, but she literally always her hands between
I will start off and say that I loved the writing. It was poetic and lyrical and very trancelike. I could even relate to the protagonist and her yearning for her mother. But there was so much about the plot I didn't like. I'm not sure of the connection between losing your mother and being oversexed all the time. The main character seemed to always be touching herself - I don't know, maybe she was trying to connect with her mother through her femininity, but she literally always her hands between her legs. And she describes the way she likes to smell herself. Again I'm guessing it's a type of way to connect to her mother. I also noticed that there were three distinct sexual relationships. One in which she is raped, one in which she is the dominant one with the doctor, and one that seems the most balanced, with Roman. I guess the author is trying to show how she tried to make up for the loss of intimacy with her mother through other means. The book was a little all over the place, but I could appreciate the writing.
...more
Mijn tweede boek van Jamaica Kincaid is wederom geen groot succes. Aan de ene kant vind ik haar echt een scherpe schrijfster over de gewelddadige doorwerking van het kolonialisme in de moderne tijd, maar aan de andere kant heeft zij ook iets dat mij persoonlijk irriteert. Haar bloemrijke en overdadige taalgebruik beklijft niet. Haar personages blijven doelbewust hangen in levenloze concepten in plaats van dat zij overkomen als levende en warme constructies. Elk sentiment wordt keurig vermeden. H
Mijn tweede boek van Jamaica Kincaid is wederom geen groot succes. Aan de ene kant vind ik haar echt een scherpe schrijfster over de gewelddadige doorwerking van het kolonialisme in de moderne tijd, maar aan de andere kant heeft zij ook iets dat mij persoonlijk irriteert. Haar bloemrijke en overdadige taalgebruik beklijft niet. Haar personages blijven doelbewust hangen in levenloze concepten in plaats van dat zij overkomen als levende en warme constructies. Elk sentiment wordt keurig vermeden. Het irritante is dat zij ergens ook een vlijmscherpe analyticus is die mij met gekozen metaforen en toon van vertellen weet aan te spreken op representaties over mijn eigen beladen geschiedenis. Inhoudelijk is het een bijzonder sterk werk, maar er is iets in haar schrijfstijl dat mij afstoot en zelfs weerzin opwekt. Maar misschien zit hem daar juist weer de kracht ervan.
...more
Got completely absorbed in this book. Very...absorbing.
Some quotes before I let it travel into another's hands:
"Life is of course not a mystery, everyone born knows only too well its entire course; the mystery is a trick designed for the cursedly curious" (122).
"They bade each other goodbye and returned to their homes, where they would drink a cup of English tea, even though they were quite aware that no such thing as a tea tree grew in England, and later that night, before they went to bed, th
Got completely absorbed in this book. Very...absorbing.
Some quotes before I let it travel into another's hands:
"Life is of course not a mystery, everyone born knows only too well its entire course; the mystery is a trick designed for the cursedly curious" (122).
"They bade each other goodbye and returned to their homes, where they would drink a cup of English tea, even though they were quite aware that no such thing as a tea tree grew in England, and later that night, before they went to bed, they would drink a cup of English cocoa, even though they were quite aware that no such thing as a cocoa tree grew in England" (142).
"She was very pleased to be who she was, and by that she meant she was pleased to be of the English people, and that made sense, because it is among the first tools you need to transgress against another human being--to be very pleased with who you are" (156).
...more
The diction within this book is like the most beautiful art. The language Kincaid uses,for even the most painful experiences within the life of the protagonist mimics looking at a wonderful painting. I found myself crying at certain points, because of the raw emotions Kincaid presents in times of emotional hardship, but
I really disliked this book. I felt that the writing was annoying and I couldn't sympathize with the main character at all. I felt that the beginning part was particularly bad, when it described her life as a young child -- not believable at all. It got slightly better from there. Wonder what the book club thinks!
This book is an excellent example of simple prose that is riddled with double meanings and a subversiveness of colonial impositions/power on a colonized land. It is not a simple coming-of-age novel with sexual nuances but a deeper tale of discovering an irrecoverable identity. Definitely a must read!
I loved this book. What a difficult life she's lead. She kept saying that her mother died the moment she was born, and I want to trust her as a narrator. However, upon looking at the back cover, it is classified as "fiction." Now, this calls into question of an unreliable narrator. Did she really live this life? If she did, my heart breaks for her. However, she is full of love for herself, which most people of a dominant race never achieve. However shallow she may be, she is still able to love h
I loved this book. What a difficult life she's lead. She kept saying that her mother died the moment she was born, and I want to trust her as a narrator. However, upon looking at the back cover, it is classified as "fiction." Now, this calls into question of an unreliable narrator. Did she really live this life? If she did, my heart breaks for her. However, she is full of love for herself, which most people of a dominant race never achieve. However shallow she may be, she is still able to love herself. I want this story of her life to be true, I want it so much, because if it is a work of fiction, it kind of ruins the whole disturbingly honest book I've just devoured.
...more
This is my favorite book of all time, so I thought perhaps I need to review it; I read this book in college as part of a Women's Lit class, and it ended up empowering me in so many ways.
I love this book because when people ask me what my favorite book is, I say"Autobiography of my Mother," and then they're not sure what I mean- do I mean my own mother's actual autobiography? And then I have to clarify, no, no, I mean the book "Autobiography of My Mother" by Kincaid.
I actually lost a job (partial
This is my favorite book of all time, so I thought perhaps I need to review it; I read this book in college as part of a Women's Lit class, and it ended up empowering me in so many ways.
I love this book because when people ask me what my favorite book is, I say"Autobiography of my Mother," and then they're not sure what I mean- do I mean my own mother's actual autobiography? And then I have to clarify, no, no, I mean the book "Autobiography of My Mother" by Kincaid.
I actually lost a job (partially) because of another novel by Kincaid, and that is, in part, why I love her.
She challenges the status quo. She writes about history in a way that enrages people. They prefer their own quaint notions of history.
But you cannot take away someone's story.
You could remove the book from the book room (yes, this was the "solution" at the school whose principal was so offended by this writing...sad). However, the voice goes on, and has a story.
Kincaid's voice taught me to celebrate my own voice, to hold onto it, to believe it, even when it angered others.
"She would never describe herself in this way, she would shrink from such a description, such a description has at its core the act of self-possession, and at that moment my self way the only thing that I had that was my own."
...more
Hail king Kincaid, for she is ferocious uncompromising honest and brave; Jamaica Kincaid spends a lot of her time dispensing what a critic so accurately put, awful truths; truths people spend a lot of time trying not to acknowledge. Understanding this Jamaica Kincaid takes us on a journey of discovery we did not intend to travel on, Or want to; but once on it we are familiar with the landscape even though we've never been there before; however our existence now, depended on our familiarity with
Hail king Kincaid, for she is ferocious uncompromising honest and brave; Jamaica Kincaid spends a lot of her time dispensing what a critic so accurately put, awful truths; truths people spend a lot of time trying not to acknowledge. Understanding this Jamaica Kincaid takes us on a journey of discovery we did not intend to travel on, Or want to; but once on it we are familiar with the landscape even though we've never been there before; however our existence now, depended on our familiarity with said landscape, then.
In "The Autobiography Of My Mother" Jamaica Kincaid has us on this road. Strange at it May seems Jamaica Kincaid's autobiography of her mother is similar to the autobiography of my mother, your mother, our mothers, of mothers past and mothers to be. For in revealing Xuela story which started with the death of her mother. Jamaica Kincaid's story is the story of her mother. Her mother like Lamarckism or osmosis is revealed in Kincaid's amniotic fluid, like the Colonial history of her beloved island is revealed to Jamaica Kincaid in a foreign land. Xuela did not have to live on that little island or meet her mother; they're, consequences of her upbringing like genetic evolution or ideology repeated over and over; her identity her island pride revealed in another country; a set of contradictions and ambivalence that come to define, or fuck with, our lives.
But what is so awful about that. Well this is the interesting part. Kincaid is sexual, very sexual without apology or shame; which is a big deal because sexuality is accompanied with these contradicting interlopers, shame and guilt; who make themselves present in all matters sexual; hell-bent on defining us as sluts. Their presence are her nemesis, there to be conquered with her empowered sexuality; shame and guilt make their appearance in "Girl," criticizing for squeezing for not been the kind of person whom a baker will not let squeeze the bread, playing marble; the way Xuela wears her hair or Lucy's smells. Kincaid's mother like her island’s morality is there to engage her. And if you pay attention they will reveal awful truths. Not just in your life but that of your mother. However unremitting, Kincaid is revealing a need for love and a need to engage. This love will eventually define her; like her little island and dead mother available only in the arms of someone else’s husband to be conquered; or in foreign land and, symbols: white husband, white lady; also to be conquered by this woman who arrived on a banana boat.
Xuela Claudette Richardson our protagonist is sensual like Kincaid; she revels in sexuality exposed in her unloved life. What Xuela seeks in her sexuality is the feeling, she is missing, a nemesis, not a lover; She is looking for someone to love or, hate; Her sexuality like the Phoenix rises from the ashes of her mother, like all of us. Kincaid: " accept that we're living in incredible contradictions and ambivalence." Xuela is lonely without her mother and father. And she substitutes that loneliness with her sexual appetite. She is hungry, but she is aware of her hunger. And she takes control. She is not overwhelmed by sex; she embraces sex like a friend a companion whose company she enjoys, a slut like mother like daughter. Like the death of her mother she comes to terms with sex, it's natural.
And control Xuela does. She describe her lover: "He was like most of the men I know, obsessed with an activity he was not very good at..." Xuela is not in need of sex, the activity; she is need of sex, the feeling; a feeling misplaced in contradictions and disappointments - her mother. In sex Kincaid is a conqueror -Why did mother had to die? But her mother is alive, alive in her, revealing herself in causalities of Xuela's life. For Xuela had "...long ago came to recognize this as perhaps an unremitting part of the way I really am and so I looked for a man who could offer relief from this sensation." Kincaid tells us this story, as she is about to unravel her breast with its pointed fruit purple nipples, which are in a state of constant sensation.
Xuela needs a man to suck her nipples to relieve the Irritable sensation; Kincaid Is controlling; conquering like her mother.
While Xuela was alone caressing herself; her hands purposely trapped In the hair between her legs, she is reminded of the man; the man she knew; a man she dreamed of; a man who was away; a man she wanted on top of her, not the man currently on top; for he is not at all the person she dreamt of laying on to of her. For that dream belong to another woman's husband. And it made sense that she would be attracted to this other woman's husbands benign though it maybe it is a conquest. And Xuela like Kincaid is a conqueror.
Emotionally and physically Xuela is on the attack. Her little island, colonized by Britain, is also, guarded from innuendoes of uncivilized creatures fit for banana production. The colonizers metaphorically represented with white skin color and English culture also vanquished; Kincaid rages against the Colonial spirit, "a spirit that lives on in hierarchies based on skin color." Moira her lover's wife came to symbolize the epitome of colonial culture; "she was pleased to be of the English people" from where she drew her sense of identity; full of charitable sympathies for others, contradictions and complains. She too will be vanquished.
Like Kincaid's provincial West Indies counterpart, the Jamaican dancehall queen, the one they called Lady Saw who boasts: " I Got Your Man And You Can't Do Anything About It / You May Think He Is Comin' Back To You But… I Doubt It / Don't Make No Sense, You Even Call Ur Man, Try To Work Out It /'cause I Got Your Man And You Can't Do Anything About It." Kincaid however is worldly and brutal with her attacking, even deadly. In describing Moira, Kincaid gives an accurate accounting of the vain selflessness of colonialism. She Moira, a lady: " a combination of elaborate fabrications, a collection of external, facial arrangements, and body parts, distortions, lies, and empty efforts." Moira is far above Common women who moans during sex and grunts when dropping a shit, Unladylike; Xuela is a woman, common indistinguishable from the next. Lady Moira, far from sympathetic to others is a contradiction and ambivalence of self-hate of dehumanization of falls sympathies, a liar to herself.
Blunt, brutal shameless is Kincaid, and wow Selfish, at least with her protagonist Xuela.
In describing her sex with Phillip, the moment it started to wane and she was not a prisoner of that primitive and essential feeling, orgasm, and sex, at the time when Phillip was attenuating to her punany. Her mind turns to Roland for a new source of pleasure- Wow! - This is so fucking human- and one of those awful truths; well, really human truths. Again, Kincaid hints at the influence of her mother’s in dealing with the pleasures in her life. For he Ronald was a married stevedore the same kind of men as her father; He too will be conquered symbolically. Not that conquering is easy, for him to be conquered she most first love honestly, truthfully. For Ronald serves an essential emotional symbol. Xuela aware of the consequences asserts: "who would betray whom, who would've captive, who would be captor, who would give and who would take, what would I do." And what she does is Kickass, brutality, honestly: "for I could not have loved Ronald the way I did if he did not loved other women." She declared after Ronald's wife slapped, clocked, and boxed her upside her head - hard! To which Xuela replied without bitterness, "I consider it beneath me to fight over a man."
And in the middle of a "fight" Xuela gives perspective. Whilst her clothing is rent her mind is on the sensation of Phillip sucking her nipples encouraging her breast; dividing herself in two: for Xuela could not decide which sensation she wanted to dominate over the other: one breast into Phillip's mouth or the sensation of the saliva evaporating on the one that just left his mouth. In the middle of a “fight” with a heavy handed married women whose impulse is to possess a husband; even producing a list of names, of other women; presumably whom she’d slapped. Undaunted Xuela declares she possesses herself. Phillip will be added to her list; and that his wife's anger like her Sunday best intention is misplaced.
Again Kincaid is wright. We’re misguided like Phillip's wife whose ambivalence sees her conquering a husband; fighting over a man; a man, a misdirected symbol of her anger. Anger lost and found in ‘The Autobiography Of My Mother,” her mother. Xuela is right of course. It is your self that you have to Possess. The people we encounter are there to help us navigate this unfamiliar terrain now; so familiar to us, then. Like angry lovers, they reveal nothing for they too are on the same quest of discovering their mothers in their own autobiography sometimes loving it, sometimes hating seldom revealing the awful truth.
Jamaica Kincaid is a novelist, gardener, and former reporter for The New Yorker Magazine. She is a Professor of Literature at Claremont-McKenna College.
“I was a new person then, I knew things I had not known before, I knew things that you can know only if you have been through what I had just been through.”
—
26 likes
“No matter how happy I had been in the past I do not long for it. The present is always the moment for which I love.”
—
25 likes