Candid and brilliantly funny
, this is the story of how a tall, shy youth from Weston-super-Mare went on to become a self-confessed legend. En route, John Cleese describes his nerve-racking first public appearance, at St Peter’s Preparatory School at the age of eight and five-sixths; his endlessly peripatetic home life with parents who seemed incapable of staying in any hou
Candid and brilliantly funny
, this is the story of how a tall, shy youth from Weston-super-Mare went on to become a self-confessed legend. En route, John Cleese describes his nerve-racking first public appearance, at St Peter’s Preparatory School at the age of eight and five-sixths; his endlessly peripatetic home life with parents who seemed incapable of staying in any house for longer than six months; his first experiences in the world of work as a teacher who knew nothing about the subjects he was expected to teach; his hamster-owning days at Cambridge; and his first encounter with the man who would be his writing partner for over two decades, Graham Chapman. And so on to his dizzying ascent via scriptwriting for Peter Sellers, David Frost, Marty Feldman and others to the heights of
Monty Python.
Punctuated from time to time with John Cleese’s thoughts on topics as diverse as the nature of comedy, the relative merits of cricket and waterskiing, and the importance of knowing the dates of all the kings and queens of England, this is a masterly performance by a former schoolmaster.
...more
Paperback
,
432 pages
Published
June 4th 2015
by Arrow
(first published October 9th 2014)
Update Rant:
(
Because apparently I have to state the obvious
).This review is simply my personal opinion of this book, everyone else is entitled to their own opinion. Just as I do not begrudge readers who enjoy books I hate and/or hate books I love, I would appreciate if others would do the same.
My rating of this book has nothing to do with John Cleese as a person or his previous or current works
. This rating is based on my OWN OPINION of this single book. Being attacked for an unbiased review is
Update Rant:
(
Because apparently I have to state the obvious
).This review is simply my personal opinion of this book, everyone else is entitled to their own opinion. Just as I do not begrudge readers who enjoy books I hate and/or hate books I love, I would appreciate if others would do the same.
My rating of this book has nothing to do with John Cleese as a person or his previous or current works
. This rating is based on my OWN OPINION of this single book. Being attacked for an unbiased review is disgusting. Let go of the hate people!
FREE ADVICE!
“Holding onto anger is like drinking poison and expecting the other person to die.”
― Gautama Buddha
Luckily for trolls I just auto delete all rude ramblings. You're Welcome.
/End Rant
Review:
Well that was quite possibly the most tedious autobiography that I have ever had the misfortune of reading. I enjoyed the first 20%, but after that it quickly went downhill. The pointless rambles ,
constant copy/pasted sketches
and petty judgements of former colleagues did little to keep me interested. This doesn't feel so much of an autobiography as a boring and pointless collection of forgetful paragraphs.
2.5/5
Buy, Borrow or Bin verdict: BIN
Note: I received this book for free in exchange for an honest review.
...more
Teresa
I thought this would be a really enjoyable book but oh boy was I wrong! If I had read the reviews before my Mum bought it for me I would have picked t
I thought this would be a really enjoyable book but oh boy was I wrong! If I had read the reviews before my Mum bought it for me I would have picked the Lynda Laplante novel that was the alternative option! The only good thing is it was half price but I still feel cheated!
...more
Jun 12, 2015 03:57AM
Dana
That sucks Teresa, at least as you said it was half price though.
Jun 12, 2015 12:03PM
I received an advance copy of this autobiography from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
This is a very generous and unexpected autobiography. I say that because most books of these types merely retell the scandals, bask in the highlights, and dish the dirt on the nasty habits of famous people. Well, we all love that and if we are being honest, that is why we paid the price of admission.
Not so this time. While Mr. Cleese does tell us what he really thinks of some of the famous, and not s
I received an advance copy of this autobiography from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
This is a very generous and unexpected autobiography. I say that because most books of these types merely retell the scandals, bask in the highlights, and dish the dirt on the nasty habits of famous people. Well, we all love that and if we are being honest, that is why we paid the price of admission.
Not so this time. While Mr. Cleese does tell us what he really thinks of some of the famous, and not so famous, people in his life, the book isn’t really about that. Even when he does roast someone, it is usually in terms that are so over the top, and above all so damn funny, that it is hard to see any animosity in it. No lurid tales. No hatchet jobs on celebrities. What you do get is an extended tour inside the mind of a comic genius.
Mr. Cleese is a very intelligent, well read, and introspective man---who just happens to enjoy and be very good at absurd and farce. For me though, his brand of comedy is superior to the more recent absurdist humor of say a Will Farrell or Seth Green because through it all, it never loses its intelligence. You don’t feel that you lost IQ points just by watching the movie. Quite the opposite, actually. I always felt that Cleese and the other writers that he worked with had a respect for their audience that I feel is lacking in some modern writers. Give me A Fish Called Wanda every time.
Writers. This is a book about comedy writers. That is a real distinction here. Cleese points it out and that is something I took away from this book. Cleese, Chapman, Idle, Palin, and Jones were first writers, and only secondarily performers. Cleese doesn’t focus on description of performances, other than telling in hilarious and self deprecating detail as to how nervous he was before many important performances or how something got screwed up and why. What he does do is describe his views on what is funny, and even why we perceive it as funny. As someone who might have been happy living the life of an academic, he gives the reader a master class in comedy, and human nature. He also lets us in on what makes him tick, both as a comedy writer, and as a person, which in turn shaped his individual mindset and, from there, his very original sense of humor. It is almost as if a famous musician would explain what he was thinking as he wrote a iconic song, which they seldom do. I doubt they would want us to know. Not so with Cleese who seems to enjoy the analysis, as did I.
If you are interested in hearing who had the drinking problems, who cheated on who, and who had the most sex with farm animals, this is not the right autobiography. If you are interested in an intelligent conversation with a comedy genius (who doesn’t consider himself to be one) about the nature of comedy and comedians, the history of British comedy, and his own place in the overall scheme of things, then you will enjoy this very thorough yet lightly conversational book.
...more
To clear the air, I should start by saying I love everything Python. And in interviews about the book, Cleese always came off as kind and as witty as ever.
So I expected to find more of that inside the book. I assumed this was reasonable request....
Luckily I was also aware that John Cleese has been known to be difficult at times, and as it turns out, this is the Cleese I should have been expecting.
This is the Cleese who seems to enjoy nothing more than spending his
Boy did this one suck to review.
To clear the air, I should start by saying I love everything Python. And in interviews about the book, Cleese always came off as kind and as witty as ever.
So I expected to find more of that inside the book. I assumed this was reasonable request....
Luckily I was also aware that John Cleese has been known to be difficult at times, and as it turns out, this is the Cleese I should have been expecting.
This is the Cleese who seems to enjoy nothing more than spending his time complaining about people. This seems odd for a comedian, and is very off putting to read since so many of these people are either in no position to respond (read: probably dead), or people he worked with for many years and shouldn't be so dismissive of. It is especially odd given how much John harps on how his Englishness prevents him from doing so.
It was also jarring how often he attempted to apply his understanding of psychology to many unnecessary situations. He will throw out the name of a book he has read, comment on how something is a Freudian penis, or just say what one of his many docs have thought about an event in his life. In the end, they just really felt forced and didn't contribute to the book.
This doesn't mean that the entire book was a flop, and there were many enjoyable parts, its just that all this detracted so much from the rest.
It is sad to say, but I feel let down by one of the ministry's top officials.
...more
So anyway, the first thing I ever saw John Cleese in was Fawlty Towers or A Fish Called Wanda. Can’t remember which, but there it is. I love MP though, and all that. It makes me laugh, Hell’s Grannies and all. A Fish Called Wanda is absolutely friggin awesome, and it’s a shame Fierce Creatures doesn’t get more respect.
So anyway, that is why my friend gave me this book for Christmas. Which is funny because I almost gave it to him? I ended up giving him Alan Cumming’s instead, something my frien
So anyway, the first thing I ever saw John Cleese in was Fawlty Towers or A Fish Called Wanda. Can’t remember which, but there it is. I love MP though, and all that. It makes me laugh, Hell’s Grannies and all. A Fish Called Wanda is absolutely friggin awesome, and it’s a shame Fierce Creatures doesn’t get more respect.
So anyway, that is why my friend gave me this book for Christmas. Which is funny because I almost gave it to him? I ended up giving him Alan Cumming’s instead, something my friend almost gave me.
So anyway, this book is almost as good as the ice cream maker I also got. I mean orange ice cream with chocolate bits.
So Anyway is a good title for this book because Cleese goes off on tangents and digressions and plays though cabbage fields before he gets to the point, though sometimes there isn’t one. The reader’s reaction to this is either to laugh or to get frustrated. I went for laughter, but not everyone will. There are also a bit too many sketches reprinted word for word.
So anyway, Cleese worked with Charlotte Rae for bit. Charlotte Rae can you believe it? It’s amazing how incestuous these famous people are. Sellers, Blackadder, and what not. Cleese also is collections softy animals, and there is this thing that he and Chapman did with them once.
So anyway, it was PG rated, don’t worry. There is the story of Chapman’s coming out. The most interesting bits, however, are the pre-television and acting bits, like his time in college and teaching. The book ends, with the expectation of a coda, with the start of Python. There is a bit on it, and it could have benefited from a bit more detail about the development. It’s strange because it feels like he is holding a bit back in the television section.
So anyway, Pippa isn’t Pippa Middleton if you are wondering.
...more
Chris
The only wife mentioned is Connie. There is one line about how Pippa got along with all his wives. Connie seems to be treated well in the book. I will
The only wife mentioned is Connie. There is one line about how Pippa got along with all his wives. Connie seems to be treated well in the book. I will say that Neil Simon seemed more open and honest when discussing his relationships during his memoirs.
...more
Jan 05, 2015 04:06PM
Cecily
That sounds far more balanced. I'm sorry for the sadness he's experienced, but some of the interviews he gave about the alimony tour put me right off
That sounds far more balanced. I'm sorry for the sadness he's experienced, but some of the interviews he gave about the alimony tour put me right off him.
...more
Jan 06, 2015 12:06AM
This book was like a sandwich made from really good bread but nothing else. It was highly entertaining, but absolutely incomplete. It was a fascinating and amusing insight into John Cleese's childhood and early career, but then simply and abruptly stops short. He gives detailed accounts of every production that he ever did prior to the Pythons, including transcripts of many sketches but once he arrives at his Python years, he stops so suddenly that you begin to search the cover for something abo
This book was like a sandwich made from really good bread but nothing else. It was highly entertaining, but absolutely incomplete. It was a fascinating and amusing insight into John Cleese's childhood and early career, but then simply and abruptly stops short. He gives detailed accounts of every production that he ever did prior to the Pythons, including transcripts of many sketches but once he arrives at his Python years, he stops so suddenly that you begin to search the cover for something about this being Volume One. Surely, he can't go into such detail about how he met this actor, how he got this job, what he thought about this person, etc and then just say "Then we started filming the Pythons-the end." He describes his relationship with Graham, but barely mentions any of the others. I understand that this was only a portion of his career, but I would think it was as significant at least as his early work. In addition, he describes his early relationship and marriage to Connie, but again just quits. He never discusses their breakup nor any of his other marriages. While it was an interesting peek into the beginnings of his life and career, it felt a bit like running off of a cliff. You are going along enjoying yourself and having the feeling that this is all leading to a certain point, but just as you arrive at that point, blam- it's over.
...more
Julie Barrett
Oh, that's good to know. Thanks for the info
Mar 04, 2015 06:39AM
Conor
I like where it ended. In fact, I wasn't surprised at all by the end of the last page. This was an account if John Cleese's life leading up to Monty P
I like where it ended. In fact, I wasn't surprised at all by the end of the last page. This was an account if John Cleese's life leading up to Monty Python. The Monty Python years have already been documented to death. If you want to read about Monty Python, you can pick from dozens of books.
...more
Jul 31, 2015 10:14PM
So. I love him. I love his wacky comedy. I think is a wonderful actor, and thus I jumped at the chance to read an ARC of his autobiography. And I’m super glad I did. I realize a lot of people think of three stars as closer to “meh”, but honestly I did like this a lot. It was great to get a look at hi
[I received a free ARC of this book via NetGalley. This fact has no bearing on my review]
So. I love him. I love his wacky comedy. I think is a wonderful actor, and thus I jumped at the chance to read an ARC of his autobiography. And I’m super glad I did. I realize a lot of people think of three stars as closer to “meh”, but honestly I did like this a lot. It was great to get a look at his life - his sort of…awkward wandering into comedic acting (and acting in general). Not to mention glimpses of his life before - where he came from and how that shaped who he is.
My only issue is sometimes it’s a little unfocused. He tangents very easily, and not always very smoothly. Granted, Monty Python is one giant tangent after another, but I’m not sure it works as well in book form as it does on screen.
That being said, this was a very interesting read, and Cleese gets some funny going in it, too.
I loved John Cleese’ writing style. I felt as though I was sat listening to him. I could virtually hear him reading out loud to me. I didn’t know a great deal about John Cleese before reading this- but thought he would be a really interesting character and love to discover autobiographies like this.
I liked the bit about his father going out to India after the war years and how this shaped his life.
Cleese was part of the real comedy years- along with lots of the comedy greats and it was lovely to
I loved John Cleese’ writing style. I felt as though I was sat listening to him. I could virtually hear him reading out loud to me. I didn’t know a great deal about John Cleese before reading this- but thought he would be a really interesting character and love to discover autobiographies like this.
I liked the bit about his father going out to India after the war years and how this shaped his life.
Cleese was part of the real comedy years- along with lots of the comedy greats and it was lovely to read his account of working with some of the heroes of the time.
I would highly recommend this book to any John Cleese fan- or anyone who loves a great autobiography who has an interest in British comedy.
With many thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for the chance to read this book.
...more
Let me get this out of the way - I am a huge Python fan and will read or watch pretty much anything to do with them. I do, however, find Cleese to be a bit abrasive and sneery at times, so I was unsure as to whether or not I'd enjoy reading this book.
Well, I must say that I found myself pleasantly surprised. I love it when you can really hear an author's voice coming through the text, and this book makes you feel that Cleese is in the same room, reading it aloud to you.
True, for Python nerds s
Let me get this out of the way - I am a huge Python fan and will read or watch pretty much anything to do with them. I do, however, find Cleese to be a bit abrasive and sneery at times, so I was unsure as to whether or not I'd enjoy reading this book.
Well, I must say that I found myself pleasantly surprised. I love it when you can really hear an author's voice coming through the text, and this book makes you feel that Cleese is in the same room, reading it aloud to you.
True, for Python nerds such as myself, some of the stories are a bit over-familiar, but it's really nice to hear about his pre-Python days in more detail. I had no idea that he'd spent so much time in America. The only drawback I found was that some parts of the book (particularly those regarding his relationships with women, especially his mother) are perhaps slightly over-tinged with being recalled via the therapist's couch.
All in all though, a thoroughly enjoyable, insightful book. I really hope he writes more, as Palin's diaries begin around the time that this book ends, and I would be interested to read the same stories from two different perspectives - not just the difference between two writers, but also between the immediacy of a diary and the considered, reflective viewpoint of an autobiography.
...more
I love reading memoirs, especially of different BBC actors I enjoy.
John Cleese did a great job of writing this book. Some of the books I have read just talk about their lives in film, plays, etc., but in this book JC actually writes about his childhood.
I would never have known he was bullied when he was younger. They thought he was a sissy, among other things. And he was tall at a very young age! At some point when he got a little older the bullying finally
www.melissa413readsalot.blogspot.com
I love reading memoirs, especially of different BBC actors I enjoy.
John Cleese did a great job of writing this book. Some of the books I have read just talk about their lives in film, plays, etc., but in this book JC actually writes about his childhood.
I would never have known he was bullied when he was younger. They thought he was a sissy, among other things. And he was tall at a very young age! At some point when he got a little older the bullying finally stopped when they found out he was pretty funny and one tussle with another kid ended it all.
This book had me cracking up! I soooooo wanted to add an excerpt from the book when he was young in school, but it was such a long one I didn't want to break it up to add it here. I mean it would have been my whole review! Basically it's about him being in class, looking over and seeing one of his classmates..um... doing things to his privates and another boy coming over to watch. I have to tell you that every day I'm worried about having a stroke or heart attack and after reading that and laughing so hard I thought I was going to blow a gasket on top of it all. The way he wrote it from his perspective is so funny, but I'm sure anyone that knows JC, can only imagine how funny that part was.
So the book goes on from when he was a young kid for a good bit and shows tons of pictures throughout the book from a baby to his years in plays and movies.
It is always cool learning things about people you see on tv, in my opinion anyway, and I had no idea he was a teacher and that he was going to be a lawyer before the BBC got hold of him. Just so many things we never know.
I think anyone that is a fan of John Cleese would find this book very interesting. I know I did.
*I would like to thank Blogging For Books for the print edition of this book in exchange for my honest review.*
I expected to hate this one based on some of the reviews, but the bitterness -- which, let's face it, is a trait he's long been known for -- really is nowhere near as pervasive as some have made it sound. I think what is throwing some is that the book is almost exclusively about his childhood and university/very early career experiences, and he writes it not as a comedy book but as a serious memoir, so it's not going to read like a Python sketch.
He is, unsurprisingly, a wonderful writer, but in
I expected to hate this one based on some of the reviews, but the bitterness -- which, let's face it, is a trait he's long been known for -- really is nowhere near as pervasive as some have made it sound. I think what is throwing some is that the book is almost exclusively about his childhood and university/very early career experiences, and he writes it not as a comedy book but as a serious memoir, so it's not going to read like a Python sketch.
He is, unsurprisingly, a wonderful writer, but in terms of developing a sense of reader investment, he is average. It's not a "Bossypants" (or even close), but it's also certainly not bad. It's a book you read once, get some interesting trivia bits from, and donate to the library booksale.
Don't buy this book if you want jokes. Do buy (or, probably much better, borrow) it if you're interested in legends looking back and being introspective.
...more
So Anyway... I bought this because I am (was) a fan of John Cleese. There is no doubting the man's comedic abilities and Fawlty Towers remains one of comedy's finest television programs but this... This... I failed to really get into it. I found it quite boring. That's not to say he hasn't worked hard or even had an interesting life - I just found the overall style with which he told it to be dull. I made it halfway through this book before giving up on it completely and giving it to someone els
So Anyway... I bought this because I am (was) a fan of John Cleese. There is no doubting the man's comedic abilities and Fawlty Towers remains one of comedy's finest television programs but this... This... I failed to really get into it. I found it quite boring. That's not to say he hasn't worked hard or even had an interesting life - I just found the overall style with which he told it to be dull. I made it halfway through this book before giving up on it completely and giving it to someone else who may or may not enjoy it. To me it almost felt as though Cleese wasn't really interested in writing this and was - instead - more focused on the payday it would bring him.
If you want a funny, inspiring, amazing read - go with "Billy" by Billy Connolly and give this one a skip.
...more
Marilyn
I think Billy Connolly is a crude and rude comedian. I guess it's all in your taste. John Cleese is a real gentleman with good manners. I have heard t
I think Billy Connolly is a crude and rude comedian. I guess it's all in your taste. John Cleese is a real gentleman with good manners. I have heard that some of his stand-up routines are a bit crude also, but as a person, he is polite, intelligent, and respectful etc etc. I have not seen anything of Billy that I like. I am sorry that he is a Scot as I come from a long line of Scots.
...more
Dec 16, 2014 10:39PM
Marilyn
I don't think John had the money in mind when he wrote this book.
Dec 16, 2014 10:40PM
If I say this was the best (and worst) autobiography I have ever read, that is because it is the only autobiography I have ever read. It is not a genre I have previously ventured into. However, this (as it turns out), thoughtful Christmas present from very dear friends was an inspired gift which I enjoyed reading immensely. I am a huge Python fan and I had the privilege, when I was the Business Manager of The International University – Europe (in Bushey, near Watford, England), of having the Pyt
If I say this was the best (and worst) autobiography I have ever read, that is because it is the only autobiography I have ever read. It is not a genre I have previously ventured into. However, this (as it turns out), thoughtful Christmas present from very dear friends was an inspired gift which I enjoyed reading immensely. I am a huge Python fan and I had the privilege, when I was the Business Manager of The International University – Europe (in Bushey, near Watford, England), of having the Python team film the sex education scenes for ‘The Meaning of Life’ in one of our classrooms. I still enjoy seeing one of our staff accidentally walking across the quadrangle in the background through the window in one scene.
The book thoroughly and very interestingly covers many stages of Cleese’s life, from early childhood on. There are (only to be expected) several ‘laugh out loud’ moments which appear nowhere else as they relate to his personal life experiences. To mention just a couple of things I enjoyed; one was a statement upon his leaving a short stint of teaching at Clifton, having become bored and being ready to move on: “What a really great frame of mind in which to die. I’m bored. I’m out of here!” Hear, hear.
Another was a laugh out loud moment for me, where Cleese describes trying to teach a group of young boys how to play their various positions in a football match. Each time he explained things and blew the whistle, they all chased after the ball in a group together, at one point extending the game into a nearby cabbage field (see pp. 97-8 to enjoy that moment). One final one; if you are familiar with the Cleese monologue, where he is a head teacher explaining to the boys, if they are going out with their parents, they should move their sports equipment to the lower peg, after getting a haircut (if their peg number is between 1 and 37) and so on; it turns out that it was a real set of instructions he heard from Mr. Tolson at school. It was so funny as originally spoken that when it became the idea for a sketch, Cleese found he could not improve on it and what we see and hear in the sketch is exactly what the boys originally got. That makes it even funnier to me now. The original speech concluded, Tolson having completely lost his way – “…should present the chit to the master on duty and then…” (after an embarrassingly long pause) “…should all get their hair cut.” You couldn’t write this stuff, as they say, and apparently Cleese didn’t have to. It was simply brilliant as it was.
If I have any criticism about the book, I was disappointed that it only mentioned ‘A Fish Called Wanda’ somewhat in passing and there is no coverage of anything concerning the writing and making of Fawlty Towers with Connie Booth. In fact there is not much mention of Connie after they were married – or for that matter any later wives at all. I would also have liked to read about the making of the Python movies, yet they are hardly mentioned.
Never mind, the book was brilliant and perhaps, as is often the case, he will write another book covering all that. I do hope so.
...more
A gentle, pastoral reflection on Cleese' youth all the way up to starting Python. Home, Cambridge, and his time in New York finding his softer side and better half. Far better than I was expecting and, if Cleese is one of your pop-culture Dads then this is a lovely grown up lullaby from him. Also if you are interested in the mysteries of process and the percentage of happy accident that goes into creative success there's plenty of that too. Not nearly enough digs at Michael Pallin and not nearly
A gentle, pastoral reflection on Cleese' youth all the way up to starting Python. Home, Cambridge, and his time in New York finding his softer side and better half. Far better than I was expecting and, if Cleese is one of your pop-culture Dads then this is a lovely grown up lullaby from him. Also if you are interested in the mysteries of process and the percentage of happy accident that goes into creative success there's plenty of that too. Not nearly enough digs at Michael Pallin and not nearly enough stories about Eric Idle being an arsehole. In fact Cleese seems to have been largely in beef with Terry Jones when the book came out. He so obviously loves and misses Graham Chapman, and the passages on their times together, particularly Cleese's cheerful bafflement at his coming out, are very moving.
Considering that this book skips the years 1970-2013, I wonder whether a sequel is in the works. Still, I greatly enjoyed the insights into the craft of comedy, and it sent me to YouTube to look up "At Last the 1948 Show," "Do Not Adjust Your Set," the Goons, the Goodies, and many other comics & comedies I hadn't heard of before...
I enjoyed every last word. So many celebrity autobiographies are just ghostwritten bits of fluff, with a few jokes and a smattering of gossip. This is not that. It's a careful and very funny chronicling of his life up to the making of the Monty Python series. My only complaint is that it really is a volume one. Although he makes some mention of Fawlty Towers, The Holy Grail etc., he doesn't actually take the reader there. He jumps from the formation of the Pythons right to the reunion theatrical
I enjoyed every last word. So many celebrity autobiographies are just ghostwritten bits of fluff, with a few jokes and a smattering of gossip. This is not that. It's a careful and very funny chronicling of his life up to the making of the Monty Python series. My only complaint is that it really is a volume one. Although he makes some mention of Fawlty Towers, The Holy Grail etc., he doesn't actually take the reader there. He jumps from the formation of the Pythons right to the reunion theatrical performances a few years ago, completely skipping over the making of great films, a couple of wives etc.
I really hope he is somewhere right scribbling furiously and laughing to himself as he prepares to serve us up volume 2.
...more
John Cleese's autobiography/memoir "So, Anyway..." is a must-read for all fans of his work from Monty Python onward but who are not so familiar with his earlier collaborations with David Frost, Peter Sellers, Marty Feldman, etc. As expected, his life story is presented in his distinct style and you can practically hear him dictate certain passages in certain well-known character voices. In many ways, it also serves as biography of his closest friend and collaborator Graham Chapman who sadly did
John Cleese's autobiography/memoir "So, Anyway..." is a must-read for all fans of his work from Monty Python onward but who are not so familiar with his earlier collaborations with David Frost, Peter Sellers, Marty Feldman, etc. As expected, his life story is presented in his distinct style and you can practically hear him dictate certain passages in certain well-known character voices. In many ways, it also serves as biography of his closest friend and collaborator Graham Chapman who sadly did not live long enough to write his own book. It is also a primer on the art of comedy writing which Cleese analyzes and explores in detail. But is it funny? Absolutely! Like many of his projects there are chuckles, guffaws and side-splitters throughout. I just was left wondering what his apparent dislike of Terry Gilliam is all about. He hints at it often, but I guess I need to read a gossip column or two to find out the story behind it.
Bios are morbidly fascinating usually but this one is morose and monotonous. There is never a pulse of sense of joy and even the most fascinating moments are told with such a dour lifeless tone as to make me feel his intent was to bore and annoy more than entertain and illuminate.
I learned today that I will receive a free copy as result of entering a Christmas lottery of the Dutch publishing house, Hurrah I would say as a free book is always a blessing.
This was an interesting read after Tina Fey's and Amy Poehler's books -- which were all about their years of toil in improv and sketch shows, with day jobs and night classes and shitty apartments, scrappily bootstrapping their way onto your television sets over the course of many, many years of hard work and heartbreak. Apparently being John Cleese (and being Cambridge chums with David Frost) means you get to skip all that and just have the BBC offer you a bunch of radio and TV programs while yo
This was an interesting read after Tina Fey's and Amy Poehler's books -- which were all about their years of toil in improv and sketch shows, with day jobs and night classes and shitty apartments, scrappily bootstrapping their way onto your television sets over the course of many, many years of hard work and heartbreak. Apparently being John Cleese (and being Cambridge chums with David Frost) means you get to skip all that and just have the BBC offer you a bunch of radio and TV programs while you're still in university, then you can audition for a Broadway show as a joke and get the part anyway, then you can write movies for your childhood icons like Peter Sellers, then you can ring up a bunch of your genius pals and convince the BBC to give the six of you another show even though you don't know what it's going to be about yet, and your place in history is secured forever, even if you are freakishly tall and sexually repressed. Nice work if you can get it!
Still, I laughed out loud many times and will continue to do so long into my dotage every time I think of the name "Mr. Hyaena-Explosion" (the name Cleese used for a reservation in a German restaurant purely to get a laugh out of Graham Chapman in their early writing days).
...more
Are you a Monty Python fan? No, then why are you reading this? Oh, you want to find out more about the twisted mind that came up with Fawlty Towers, A Fish Called Wanda, and Fierce Creatures? Well, this tome will help, but beware, it is a long and winding road.
In So, Anyway..., John Cleese breezily writes out a partial tale of his life, speaking directly to the reader in sixteen chapters. He covers his early life and schooling in some depth and makes it interesting by letting the reader know wha
Are you a Monty Python fan? No, then why are you reading this? Oh, you want to find out more about the twisted mind that came up with Fawlty Towers, A Fish Called Wanda, and Fierce Creatures? Well, this tome will help, but beware, it is a long and winding road.
In So, Anyway..., John Cleese breezily writes out a partial tale of his life, speaking directly to the reader in sixteen chapters. He covers his early life and schooling in some depth and makes it interesting by letting the reader know what shaped him as a comedian and as a man. Then comes his University life in Cambridge where he met future Monty Python collaborators, got his first taste of performing, got his degree (barely) and then tossed it aside to enter the world as a writer and performer for the BBC. The last eight chapters cover Cleese's work, performance, and travel adventures. Those adventures included being in a musical without being able to sing, touring with the Cambridge Circus in New Zealand and then America without losing his BBC position, and getting married (for the first time). Then, Cleese informs the reader on the BBC shows for which he wrote and/or performed in, and the movie scripts he and Graham Chapman worked on writing for Peter Sellers and others. Finally, Cleese describes the coming together of talent which created The Monty Python Show in 1969. Unfortunately, that is where So, Anyway... ends, right where many folk's interest congregate. Cleese does provide a postscript chapter that discusses the success of The Monty Python Reunion Show in 2014 revealing how some of the Monty Python sketches were created. But that is just a teaser for what could be revealed. Hopefully, John Cleese is busy writing the rest of his story and provide a willing audience his insight on the creation of Fawlty Towers, A Fish Called Wanda and other movies and television shows.
...more
Firstly, John Cleese is not my favourite Python, Mr Palin holds that accolade but this is an extremely funny & well written book. Don't expect a rich depth into the Monty Pythons back catalogue though, I'm pretty sure it was over 80% through before they all meet up.
Learning about his youth at school & then onto Cambridge was a delight and an insight into the man he would become. The affection held by his Father & the strange disinterest from his Mother was told in great detail &
Firstly, John Cleese is not my favourite Python, Mr Palin holds that accolade but this is an extremely funny & well written book. Don't expect a rich depth into the Monty Pythons back catalogue though, I'm pretty sure it was over 80% through before they all meet up.
Learning about his youth at school & then onto Cambridge was a delight and an insight into the man he would become. The affection held by his Father & the strange disinterest from his Mother was told in great detail & with great humour.
What I didn't know was the depth of work Cleese had done before Python & the wealth of talent he worked with, I assumed that they all met up at some university & it went on from there (the fact that they went to different ones was not something I knew) Cleese wrote & worked with some of the greatest comedic minds of the time & the list is staggering; David Frost, Peter Cook, Dudley Moore, Peter Sellers, Ronnie Corbett, Ronnie Barker, Marty Feldman, Tim Brooke-Taylor, Bill Oddie, Graham Gardner and the list goes on & on.
His working relationship with Graham Chapman is outlined in the book & would have been something that I would have liked to have known a lot more about (assume that will come in another book at another time) and the book finishes off, timely, with the culmination of the recent O2 shows. Monty Python is almost a footnote in the book, and I could have felt cheated, but the wealth of other information given more than makes up for this.
All in all, an excellent book and one that will be as many a Christmas present.
I feel like I need to clarify my rating for this book, because 3 stars isn't really fair. I guess I took away a star because I wanted to hear more (and I heard Mr Cleese will in fact be writing more, so I look forward to it).
At times it did go slowly, and I'm afraid there were parts I missed, so I'll definitely reread the book to catch more. Looking forward more towards the audio book, as something tells me this is something one needs to hear rather than read.
I know biographies are usually mea
I feel like I need to clarify my rating for this book, because 3 stars isn't really fair. I guess I took away a star because I wanted to hear more (and I heard Mr Cleese will in fact be writing more, so I look forward to it).
At times it did go slowly, and I'm afraid there were parts I missed, so I'll definitely reread the book to catch more. Looking forward more towards the audio book, as something tells me this is something one needs to hear rather than read.
I know biographies are usually meant to put their subjects in a kinder light but I walked away from this one glad to have gotten to know Mr Cleese (at least to the extent he permits) and having a greater sense of appreciation for the person he is.
...more
It couldn’t be more appropriate that I was starting my sophomore year in high school when a British comedy show premiered on WTTW Chicago in the 10:30 p.m. slot on Sunday nights.
It started out with the kind of announcement that preceded the shows that most interested me in those days. “The following program, Monty Python's Flying Circus, contains nudity and may be considered unsuitable for younger or more sensitive viewers."
The first episode I watched contained "A Dull Day in the Life of a City
It couldn’t be more appropriate that I was starting my sophomore year in high school when a British comedy show premiered on WTTW Chicago in the 10:30 p.m. slot on Sunday nights.
It started out with the kind of announcement that preceded the shows that most interested me in those days. “The following program, Monty Python's Flying Circus, contains nudity and may be considered unsuitable for younger or more sensitive viewers."
The first episode I watched contained "A Dull Day in the Life of a City Stockbroker."
The nudity could not have appeared in an American produced television show at the time. Here, it was a throwaway gag. Another reason the sketch wouldn’t have appeared on an American produced television show was that it didn’t have a punchline.
What was innovative about
Monty Python’s Flying Circus
was its utter absurdity. Its title was absurd. It’s use of John Phillip Sousa’s “Liberty Bell March” for a theme song was absurd. When John Cleese’s desk appeared in a random setting and he said, “And now for something completely different,” he meant it.
It’s not that other comedy writers couldn’t come up with things as funny as the Monty Python team did, it’s that they would realize the idea didn’t go anywhere and throw it in a wastebasket. By simply stopping sketches with an animation, or an apology from the BBC, or a policeman declaring that things had gotten too silly, the Python team had a much wider range of funny ideas at their disposal.
In John Cleese’s memoir about his life before Monty Python, he cites
The Goon Show
as an influence the way that American comedy writers of a certain age cite Sid Caesar’s
Your Show of Shows
. My parents liked Your Show of Shows. The Goon Show was to John Cleese what
Monty Python’s Flying Circus
was to my generation.
Monty Python was completely different for many people. The first seasons of
Saturday Night Live
were certainly edgier because of its success. Eric Idle and Michael Palin each hosted SNL four times. Prior to Monty Python, John Cleese wrote for David Frost’s satirical news program
That Was The Week That Was
, which aired in an American version a decade before Chevy Chase anchored the first Weekend Update.
Cleese’s account of his life prior to joining the Cambridge Footlights Club, which started his career in comedy, isn’t extraordinary. At age seventy-five, it’s understandable that John Cleese should write a traditional memoir. There are already accounts of the Python years.
He doesn’t write much about the experience of
Monty Python’s Flying Circus
, or the Python films, or
Fawlty Towers
, or
A Fish Called Wanda
, or his career in writing humorous industrial training films. He does write about how the Monty Python reunion shows came about.
I now understand how a show I thought to be completely different evolved from shows that were slightly less funny and not quite as original. I also understand the singular contribution of Cleese’s writing partner Graham Chapman and how Monty Python couldn’t go creating new material without him. He was the one who somehow knew that sketches about flying sheep, and dead parrots, and naming various kinds of cheeses were actually funny.
...more
SO, ANYWAY… (2014). John Cleese. ****.
This is a patchy autobiography by one of the most innovative comedians working today. He does spend an inordinate amount of time on his boyhood at the expense of his later successes with the “Pythons.” He was an only child who grew up too fast, and paid for it with loneliness. He makes the constant plea to be liked throughout the book, and tries to do everything that can be done to ensure that that happens. It is really the second half of the work that kept
SO, ANYWAY… (2014). John Cleese. ****.
This is a patchy autobiography by one of the most innovative comedians working today. He does spend an inordinate amount of time on his boyhood at the expense of his later successes with the “Pythons.” He was an only child who grew up too fast, and paid for it with loneliness. He makes the constant plea to be liked throughout the book, and tries to do everything that can be done to ensure that that happens. It is really the second half of the work that kept my interest, however. The various groups that he became part of and, in many cases helped to form, provided innovative comedy that I fell into in the 1980s onwards. In addition to trying to make a living, Cleese was on the constant lookout for a working definition of comedy. I don’t really think that he found it. His sense of humor was very different for the times, and he was lucky enough to be able to find like-minded collaborators. In all, he gives us a priceless, almost believable story of his life to date. Scattered throughout his book, he manages to strew quotations from other artists that help him make his point. “When Sit Thomas Beecham said, ‘The English may not like music, but they absolutely love the noise it makes.’” This made his point about his music training at his prep school, and summed up what he felt was the British attitude towards music When he was trying to come up with a raison d’etre for this work, he commented: “I know this book is supposed to be an autobiography, but the fact is that most of you don’t give a tinker’s cuss for me as a human being or feel for the many different forms of suffering that make me so special. No, you are just flipping through my heart-rending life story in the hope of getting a couple of good laughs, aren’t you?” There’s still a bit of insecurity of the young boy left there, isn’t there? Recommended.
...more
It's written by John Cleese - need I say more (Grew up with British Television loving parents so I was introduced quite early to the brilliance of Cleese and his mates)
Just thoroughly enjoyed his candor with the fact that he was writing his book his way and just didn't give a fuck what anyone thought. He just shares his thoughts and his experiences and doesn't mince words
Enjoyed his reasoning for including some of the skits in the book and his reasoning is hilarious (oh and so a
The Good Stuff
It's written by John Cleese - need I say more (Grew up with British Television loving parents so I was introduced quite early to the brilliance of Cleese and his mates)
Just thoroughly enjoyed his candor with the fact that he was writing his book his way and just didn't give a fuck what anyone thought. He just shares his thoughts and his experiences and doesn't mince words
Enjoyed his reasoning for including some of the skits in the book and his reasoning is hilarious (oh and so are the skits)
I feel a connection with him based on the fact that I also detest know-it-alls (See pg 26).
I enjoyed his commentary on the British Press and very much appreciated his candor
Loved the story about Geoffrey Tolson and the instance which led to the creation of the beginning of the sex lesson scene in The Meaning of Life.
Fascinating paragraphs on the description of humour
Ok its silly I know but I really enjoyed his commentary on Canadians
Loved how he described Graham Chapman's coming out and the conversation between Pippa and Cleese about Graham coming out - wonderful stuff and quite worth the price of the book
Thought he quite eloquently expressed the difficulty as a celebrity in dealing with request for autographs, charity, etc. And how he has dealt with it. (See pages 320-322)
As a fan of many British actors, I enjoyed hearing stories about Peter Sellers, David Frost, Marty Felman, Peter Cook etc
Learned that he was French-kissed on camera by Tim Curry (Check it out
http://youtu.be/r3q8QsXGzvY
) - Damn I wish Tim Curry had written a biography
I finally understood that Cleese is a writer who performed, not the other way around
The Not So Good
Far more serious than I expected. Not really a bad thing, more of a heads up
I wanted more stories about his time working on the Monty Python movies and a Fish Called Wanda
A little too much psychology for me, but again, not a bad thing just a heads up and it is his book so he can talk about whatever he wants to
Favorite Quotes/Passages (Sorry so many to choose from, I just didn't)
"I think Dad was secretly proud of his Jewish connections; in an age where there was so much prejudice, he did what he could to work against it, although hew was prepared (with Mother) to make an exception of the Welsh. This is a well-established West Country trait, and rooting it out will take may generations I fear."
"BRITISH JOURNALISTS tend to believe that people who become good at something do so because they seek fame and fortune. This is because these are the sole motives of people who become British journalists. But some people, operating at higher levels of mental health, pursue activities because they actually love them."
"A good sense of humour is the sign of a healthy perspective, which is why people who are uncomfortable around humour are either pompous (inflated) or neurotic (oversensitive)"
"It's just a shame that for seven months of the year it's so cold that only Canadians would put up with it."
"Nowadays I have a simple rule: you can ask me anything you like, provided I can say "No"."
4 Dewey's
I received this from Penguin Random House in exchange for an honest review
...more
First of all, I shouldn't have been surprised to discover just what an excellent writer Cleese is. After all, he was the primary writer of all great Python sketches. Second, I *wasn't* surprised by how funny the book was. Every time I read, I made such hysterical snorking noises my family thought I was choking. Third, this a very gracious book. Instead of tell all, scandal-mongering, dirty laundry airing, and colleague bashing, there is restraint and good taste.
Truly excellent memoir. I knew that I would find something John Cleese wrote to be very funny but I didn't realize how much I would enjoy learning about his life. I go into any autobiography feeling a little skeptical - what is the story this person is willing to tell, how honest will they be, might they be trying to get out a particular side of their life in this book that I am reading? In this book I was expecting it to be filled with stories of hilarious sessions with co-writers and actors an
Truly excellent memoir. I knew that I would find something John Cleese wrote to be very funny but I didn't realize how much I would enjoy learning about his life. I go into any autobiography feeling a little skeptical - what is the story this person is willing to tell, how honest will they be, might they be trying to get out a particular side of their life in this book that I am reading? In this book I was expecting it to be filled with stories of hilarious sessions with co-writers and actors and maybe even spill a little bit of gossip but this was absolutely not the case.
The first half of the book was an enjoyable story of someone's family life, parents, relatives and school environment. John Cleese writes so plainly and with great humour but it was also a good read. He lived through interesting times and relates this all very well. Once his university years begin and he starts his professional life he continues to share the background on individual people very clearly and then tells how they interacted with him. It's always a treat to read about the choices a famous person has made and this is a book that gives you behind-the-scenes and inside his head in equal measure.
I'm not sure it will satisfy anyone who wants a tell all about the Python crew. That part of his life doesn't receive a whole lot of attention and might even be considered to be skimpy if you compare it with other professional projects but there is enough there to make it feel well rounded. I was quite surprised that he didn't choose to include very much about his personal life - children, marriages, or even the death of his parents - but an autobiography is filled with the details the author chooses to include and we have to read it, take it as it is. So, I'm not going to say that this is the best autobiography that I've ever read but there was a lot to learn and enjoy. Maybe don't include it on your list of must reads but if you come across it in your shelf browsing it will be a pleasure to read.
...more
Highly recommended to those with an interest in Cleese or Python. The narrative only goes up to the first season of Monty Python's Flying Circus, in 1969, but that is fine, since the story after that is well documented, while the material here, about the years with David Frost in particular (though never mentioned is Eric Idle's devastating parody of him as "Timmy Williams" on Flying Circus), are illuminating. I hadn't realized that Cleese was more than just an afficionado of psychology; he very
Highly recommended to those with an interest in Cleese or Python. The narrative only goes up to the first season of Monty Python's Flying Circus, in 1969, but that is fine, since the story after that is well documented, while the material here, about the years with David Frost in particular (though never mentioned is Eric Idle's devastating parody of him as "Timmy Williams" on Flying Circus), are illuminating. I hadn't realized that Cleese was more than just an afficionado of psychology; he very nearly pursued it as a career (though leaning towards the popular kind; he mentions casually that he went to a couples-counseling retreat at Esalen!), and there are frequent references to the psychology of comedy, especially with respect to Fawlty Towers. Also quite a bit on his upbringing, including a certifiable loony mother; his stint as a master at a boys' boarding school (drawn on liberally for The Meaning of Life); and on his friendship with Graham Chapman. Despite assertions in a recent Chapman documentary that Cleese, Chapman's best friend, was the ONLY person who was surprised when he came out as gay, Cleese says here that Marty Feldman was just as surprised.
...more
John Marwood Cleese is an English actor, comedian, writer, film producer, and singer.
Cleese is probably best known for his various roles in the British comedy
Monty Python's Flying Circus
, his role as Basil Fawlty in
Fawlty Towers
and his various roles in the British comedy
The Frost Report
. He also played the role of Archie Leach in the American / British comedy film
A Fish Called Wanda
.
“I noticed years ago that when people (myself definitely included) are anxious they tend to busy themselves with irrelevant activities, because these distract from and therefore reduce their actual experience of anxiety. To stay perfectly still is to feel the fear at its maximum intensity, so instead you scuttle around doing things as though you are, in some mysterious way, short of time.”
—
4 likes
“True, there was a vague assumption that doing so would bring me closer to God, but then who was God when he was at home? And why did he keep losing it with his chosen people, when he could easily have changed his mind, and picked a more co-operative bunch?”
—
2 likes
Jun 12, 2015 03:57AM
Jun 12, 2015 12:03PM