Reformer, rancher, conservationist, hunter, historian, police commissioner, soldier, the youngest man ever to serve as president of the United States--no other American public figure has led as vigorous and varied a life as Theodore Roosevelt. This volume brings together two fascinating autobiographical works. The Rough Riders (1899) is the story of the 1st U.S. Volunteer
Reformer, rancher, conservationist, hunter, historian, police commissioner, soldier, the youngest man ever to serve as president of the United States--no other American public figure has led as vigorous and varied a life as Theodore Roosevelt. This volume brings together two fascinating autobiographical works. The Rough Riders (1899) is the story of the 1st U.S. Volunteer Cavalry, the regiment Roosevelt led to enduring fame during the Spanish-American War. With his characteristic elan Roosevelt recounts how "these grim hunters of the mountains, these wild rough riders of the plains," endured the heat, hunger, rain, mud, and malaria of the Cuban campaign to charge triumphantly up the San Juan Heights during the Battle of Santiago. In An Autobiography (1913), Roosevelt describes his life in politics and the emergence of his progressive ideas. Surveying his career as a state legislator, civil service reformer, New York City police commissioner, assistant secretary of the navy, governor, and president, Roosevelt writes of his battles against corruption, his role in establishing America as a world power, his passionate commitment to conservation, and his growing conviction that only a strong national government and an energetic presidency could protect the public against the rapacious greed of modern corporations.
...more
Hardcover
,
864 pages
Published
October 7th 2004
by Library of America
(first published January 1st 1899)
I enjoyed this short book quite a bit. There were three things that really struck me.
First, Roosevelt's approach to war was extremely interesting. It was very much an adventure to him. Although there was absolutely no need for this war, he considered it a just cause, and he openly promoted it. The war was an opportunity for men to prove their mettle, and he was proud when his men did. So it was very much an adventure, something to be celebrated in his mind. But at the same time, he didn't skimp
I enjoyed this short book quite a bit. There were three things that really struck me.
First, Roosevelt's approach to war was extremely interesting. It was very much an adventure to him. Although there was absolutely no need for this war, he considered it a just cause, and he openly promoted it. The war was an opportunity for men to prove their mettle, and he was proud when his men did. So it was very much an adventure, something to be celebrated in his mind. But at the same time, he didn't skimp on the tragedy of war. He spent a considerable amount of time on the stories of men killed in battle - not in a bloodthirsty way, but sad, describing the human tragedy. I found myself identifying with his perspective in some ways, but unable to really embrace it. It was an eye-opener, though to a perspective of war that isn't really aired in today's various debates.
Second, it's easy to see from his writing why Roosevelt was so popular. He was so interested in other people and their stories, he spent a good deal of the book talking about all of the people around him, their backgrounds, and the ways that they impressed him. I've read a little before about how friendly he was and about how people were drawn to him, and it's on display in his writing.
Third, I was very impressed with the writing. The whole thing is essentially built around one battle that ends halfway through the book, and the fact that the rest of the book keeps the reader's interest, I think, is a testament to good story-telling.
All-in-all, a very good book both for the history of the war and for the insight into Roosevelt. An easy, worthwhile read.
Fact: Theodore Roosevelt was not
a
bad ass, he was
The
Bad Ass.
I suspect he was also a little bit crazy in the best possible way, as evidenced by how gleefully he describes the adventure of going to war with his group of rough-around-the-edges volunteers (also bad asses), because for him this really was just another adventure. (Further suspicion: his men--and everyone else--were probably less than thrilled, because most people don't think "war" = "yay! adventure!") To each their own.
I thorough
Fact: Theodore Roosevelt was not
a
bad ass, he was
The
Bad Ass.
I suspect he was also a little bit crazy in the best possible way, as evidenced by how gleefully he describes the adventure of going to war with his group of rough-around-the-edges volunteers (also bad asses), because for him this really was just another adventure. (Further suspicion: his men--and everyone else--were probably less than thrilled, because most people don't think "war" = "yay! adventure!") To each their own.
I thoroughly enjoyed
The Rough Riders
, what could've been dry was instead entertaining, presented in a conversational tone, and thoroughly engaging. I'm particularly fond of the bits of sly snark hidden in the text, very subtle, very nice. Every so often there are passages where the patronizing tone, despite Roosevelt's enthusiastic insistence that "everyone is as awesome as everyone else!", is a bit uncomfortable, a product more of the time period than the man himself. Overall this is a fabulous read, a firsthand account of a time period and war that's rarely (if ever) mentioned in schoolrooms. I'm a raging dork, but I wish this has been required reading in my late high school years. It's one of those books I can't believe it took me so long to discover and read.
...more
Before Theodore Roosevelt became the President of the United States, he had a war experience, which was less like the soldiers in WW2 and more of a fun adventure for Roosevelt. First of all, this was probably the beginning of unnecessary wars for the United States. Each generation of American probably needs his war.
First they started fighting all those natives in the land, then they spend some time fighting the British, then when all of that was done, they decided to have some internal fighting.
Before Theodore Roosevelt became the President of the United States, he had a war experience, which was less like the soldiers in WW2 and more of a fun adventure for Roosevelt. First of all, this was probably the beginning of unnecessary wars for the United States. Each generation of American probably needs his war.
First they started fighting all those natives in the land, then they spend some time fighting the British, then when all of that was done, they decided to have some internal fighting. This should have given them pause for some time, but America already had a big boner for war and when the Spanish were fighting the Cubans in Cuba, America decided to go help the Cubans and kick out the Spanish, in their soon to be healthy tradition of always helping natives of foreign lands by means of blood. Thank you, USA.
Since Roosevelt wasn’t involved in killing Indians, or the British, or each other, he couldn’t let killing INSERT NAME IN BLANK get away from him. When the opportunity of war came up, he volunteers with a bunch of others, and joins for some fun time. His book on his team, nicknamed “Rough Riders”, is basically 200 pages of him telling us the reader how awesome their unit was, how everyone in it was brave and had massive balls, and how they all were dignified and heroic, and how much ass they kicked. The book makes the war out to be something like a fishing trip.
"I did not see any sign among the fighting men, whether wounded or unwounded, of the very complicated emotions assigned to their kind by some of the realistic modern novelists who have written about battles."
...more
A stereotype of the American man exists: a man of purity with a simple, straightforward manner of supporting right and opposing wrong with bravery and fortitude. There is also another side to that stereotype: a man whose simple perspective of right and wrong minimizes minorities and significant perspectives just because they don't fit into that simple world view.
I think Theodore Roosevelt and his era fit both sides of that stereotype of the American man, good and bad.
In 1898 the American governm
A stereotype of the American man exists: a man of purity with a simple, straightforward manner of supporting right and opposing wrong with bravery and fortitude. There is also another side to that stereotype: a man whose simple perspective of right and wrong minimizes minorities and significant perspectives just because they don't fit into that simple world view.
I think Theodore Roosevelt and his era fit both sides of that stereotype of the American man, good and bad.
In 1898 the American government allowed for the raising of a volunteer fighting unit to assist the army during the Spanish-American War. Theodore Roosevelt was a key player in the raising and fighting of that unit, specifically of the 1st United States Volunteer Calvary. Three regiments were raised, but only the 1st actually went to Cuba and fought.
Roosevelt's The Rough Riders is his account of that fight, and it is written with Roosevelt's usual straightforward, highly readable prose style. Stated in an unemotional and "I was there" objective style, Roosevelt's account includes the sweep of history and also the nuts and bolts of the military campaign to whip the Spaniards in Cuba. The account begins with the raising of the regiments, their training, and their transport to Cuba. It describes the campaign with an eye focused on detail, events, and all the interesting and colorful men who volunteered and fought.
As with his book Through the Brazilian Wilderness, Roosevelt matter-of-factly depicts the great suffering contained within the events with words that describe the facts but eschew the emotions. That is to say, there is enough of a naturalist and journalist in him to describe in full what happened, but you aren't going to hear him whining about the horrendous nature of the circumstances.
When I wrote book reviews of Roosevelt's Through the Brazilian Wilderness and Candice Millard's chronicle The River of Doubt: Theodore Roosevelt's Darkest Journey, two accounts of the same event, one personal and the other scholarly, I discovered Roosevelt's penchant for baldly stating a difficult circumstance in his account--and then when reading Millard's account, discovering the great amount of detail that was left out by Roosevelt because he felt it would be too close to the emotional bone and might have been construed as whining or complaining. (Roosevelt mentions his disregard for whiners several times in The Rough Riders.)
Without whining, Roosevelt catalogs the United States' unpreparedness for the military campaign in Cuba.
--Lack of adequate transportation, resulting in the suffering of troops and inadequate materiel.
--Front line shortages of food, medicine, clothing and shelter--almost everything but ammunition.
--Older weapons that smoked when fired, allowing Spain to fire upon gun placements with their placements that couldn't be located because of smokeless powder.
However, the Americans prevailed, and Roosevelt describes the brave and selfless actions of his men and also of the regular army. He praises men educated and uneducated, men of different races and ethnic backgrounds. He looks upon them as individuals, and as the book progresses, we see that his judgment of the men as individuals earns him their respect. Even though Roosevelt writes this about himself, based on what I've read about him, I believe it to be true.
As we read about events written about from over a hundred years ago--as we read from an era when a Black American president has just been re-elected--we see that paradox of men who fought side by side, men of all races and backgrounds--men who judged one another on their individual manly qualities, and yet men who still were affected by and unconsciously promulgated the biases of the era.
Roosevelt praises the fighting abilities of the Black regular soldiers, yet the regulars were in a segregated regiment and led by white officers. He states that he was surprised that the Blacks were just as susceptible to malaria as whites; I assume his thinking was that since Blacks had come from Africa that there would be a genetic resistance to the disease. Roosevelt mentions casually all the officers who had been to the big schools in America--the Good Old Boy network--as just the way things were.
All these inequities are subsumed in the reality that these men of the Rough Riders lived and fought side by side in appalling conditions: fought, were wounded, and died with equal respect for bravery and perseverance, and with equal understanding that some men broke under the pressure and stress of the circumstances.
The Rough Riders paints a fascinating picture of a past time, a first-hand account written by a fascinating American. I downloaded my free eBook of The Rough Riders through the Kindle Store, but it is also available through Project Gutenberg. The particular edition listed through Goodreads I didn't use, so I can't comment on the introduction.
...more
"Credit should go with the performance of duty, and not with what is very often the accident of glory." - TR
What a fun read. Much like US Grant's memoirs I felt like TR and I were having a beer and he was just matter-of-factly recounting his experiences.
I did not know that Clara Barton was there in Cuba during the war which was fought over the sinking of the Maine which, according to continuing research, was probably due to bad ship design rather than Spanish monkey business.
Rough Riders
is Theodor Roosevelt’s account of his involvement in the Spanish-American War to liberate Cuba from Spanish control. Lieutenant-Colonel Roosevelt (serving under Colonel Leonard Wood) led the First US Volunteer Cavalry Regiment (a diverse group of cowboys, miners, hunters, gamblers and Ivy League graduates, who came to be more popularly known as the “Rough Riders”).
The story is Roosevelt’s first person account of the preparations for battle, travel to Cuba, storming of San Juan Hill
Rough Riders
is Theodor Roosevelt’s account of his involvement in the Spanish-American War to liberate Cuba from Spanish control. Lieutenant-Colonel Roosevelt (serving under Colonel Leonard Wood) led the First US Volunteer Cavalry Regiment (a diverse group of cowboys, miners, hunters, gamblers and Ivy League graduates, who came to be more popularly known as the “Rough Riders”).
The story is Roosevelt’s first person account of the preparations for battle, travel to Cuba, storming of San Juan Hill and the battle’s aftermath. In addition to the historical significance, it’s also a bit of an adventure tale, though it exhibits a few peculiarities:
1. He’s eager to give credit where credit is due, which is generous of him, but 100 years after the events took place, now that most of the participants have long since been forgotten, it doesn’t add anything to the story.
2. Roosevelt repeats the fact that the Spanish used smokeless powder which enabled them to fire on the US troops without revealing their positions about 100 times. Obviously this is an important military detail, particularly in a jungle environment where the dense vegetation makes it difficult to locate the enemy. But he harps on this point as if assuming the reader was a stroke victim suffering from short term memory loss.
3. Roosevelt appears to love every minute of it. He expresses an almost childlike delight at getting shot at, shooting back, the hardship, heat, illness, injury and death as if he were playing at war and not experiencing the real thing. In addition to the feelings of adventure and excitement he expresses, one gets the sense that he finds war to be a glorious and manly pursuit.
This illustrated edition, I found to be a more interesting version of TR's classic telling of the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. I read the story before, but seeing photos of the men, camps and battlefields adds to the impact of what was done during those four months so long ago. As Roosevelt writes of his men and their actions, he also writes about the other regiments that camped and fought with the Rough Riders. While TR's racism comes through at times when he writes of the 9th
This illustrated edition, I found to be a more interesting version of TR's classic telling of the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. I read the story before, but seeing photos of the men, camps and battlefields adds to the impact of what was done during those four months so long ago. As Roosevelt writes of his men and their actions, he also writes about the other regiments that camped and fought with the Rough Riders. While TR's racism comes through at times when he writes of the 9th and 10th cavalry regiments, whose enlisted men were black and other non-white people. He does give credit where its due. I have always liked to read about events by those who were there and took part. This book is a classic of that genre, whichever version you read.
...more
Well, Teddy was one brave, tough son of a gun for sure. This was an interesting book. I didn't know much about the war to rid Cuba of the Spaniards. I had no idea how big the battles were and how many casualties that they produced. Theodore doesn't really blow his own horn that much, which surprised me. He lets the testimonials from his commanding officers do that, by publishing all of their recommendations that he receive the Medal of Honor for his performance in an appendix. I have no problem
Well, Teddy was one brave, tough son of a gun for sure. This was an interesting book. I didn't know much about the war to rid Cuba of the Spaniards. I had no idea how big the battles were and how many casualties that they produced. Theodore doesn't really blow his own horn that much, which surprised me. He lets the testimonials from his commanding officers do that, by publishing all of their recommendations that he receive the Medal of Honor for his performance in an appendix. I have no problem with that at all. He obviously did a great job.
...more
This book is based on a series of articles Theodore Roosevelt wrote that were published in Scribners magazine. It is interesting because it offers that rare first-hand account of an historical event from the perspective of one of the leading participants and I might say, proponents, of the Spanish American War. In his account of organizing, training, and going to war with his company of Rough Riders, we see not only what happened but get a good impression of Roosevelt's strong opinions on what h
This book is based on a series of articles Theodore Roosevelt wrote that were published in Scribners magazine. It is interesting because it offers that rare first-hand account of an historical event from the perspective of one of the leading participants and I might say, proponents, of the Spanish American War. In his account of organizing, training, and going to war with his company of Rough Riders, we see not only what happened but get a good impression of Roosevelt's strong opinions on what he considered men should be like. In some way, though he predates
Hemmingway, Ernest
, they are of the same mind about men being manly, boxing, bravery, etc. Whose to say? Maybe Hemmingway was influenced by Roosevelt.
Theodore was a contradiction in many ways. An avid rancher, hunter, outdoor man, he founded our first national parks and was a strong environmentalist. At the other extreme, he was our first imperialist President, breaking a long-standing tradition since the time of our forefathers on non-involvement in world and especially European politics. As Assistant Secretary of War, he positioned Dewey for a war with Spain long before it even happened. After he assumed the presidency, he then sent a massive fleet around the world to frighten foreign powers with our military might and show them the U.S. had stepped out of a century of isolationism.
The book is amply illustrated with photos of Roosevelt and his men.
...more
It's easy to see why Roosevelt rose to such a height of popularity after publishing this book. The entire first third praises the wide variety of men who joined the Rough Riders, listing their various backgrounds, home regions, and skills. He often gives credit to individuals for outstanding efforts or accomplishments while minimizing his own contributions. Yet at no point does Roosevelt seem to engage in false modesty. It's obvious that he genuinely cared for the well-being of his troops. He al
It's easy to see why Roosevelt rose to such a height of popularity after publishing this book. The entire first third praises the wide variety of men who joined the Rough Riders, listing their various backgrounds, home regions, and skills. He often gives credit to individuals for outstanding efforts or accomplishments while minimizing his own contributions. Yet at no point does Roosevelt seem to engage in false modesty. It's obvious that he genuinely cared for the well-being of his troops. He also clearly understood the Rough Riders to be a type of symbol of democracy itself--men who place aside person prejudices or class differences to come together as a working unit under the command of leaders who earn respect and who are willing to face the same difficulties as the men, but who also acknowledge their natural leadership position within the chain of command. Leaders must be one with their men, but also with a distance that comes with the responsibility of being an officer. They must be firm and never flinching in their discipline, but also empathetic to the needs of the men. They must follow orders, but also know when to break them (in Roosevelt's case, to pay out-of-pocket for extra rations and supplies).
We also get insight into TR's view of masculinity. Real men charge forward without hesitation. They do their duty. And if they are injured, they don't groan and complain like those "realist modern novelists" would have you believe! Instead, they hum "My Country 'Tis of Thee" together in the hospital tent! (Yes, he actually claimed the wounded men did that...) Again, you can tell very quickly why soldiers loved this guy. I also give Roosevelt credit for so highly praising the news reporters who embedded with the Rough Riders, even claiming that Richard Harding Davis was just as courageous as the soldiers. Ol' TR new just what to say to get good press!
The war narrative itself is a bit dry at times, especially compared to the final chapters in which TR describes the landscape of Cuba in gorgeous prose. He certainly had a gift for language, and I found myself wanting to read more of his nature writing after finishing this book. My favorite chapter was actually the final one, in which he describes the men on Long Island mustering out. I can't remember the last time I read such a quintessentially American moment: rugged Southwestern men--fresh from a victorious war campaign--busting broncos, singing songs, and drinking. It sounded pretty amazing. I wish I could have been there to witness it.
...more
History as it was being made - told in a racey, contemporaneous style by one of the most interesting Americans of all time. Theodore Roosevelt, despite having already been chairman of the New York police borad and under secretary for the Navy, raised a volunteer regiment to help fight in the Spanish-American War. His cavalary troopers were christened the "Rough Riders" by the popular press and although Roosevelt initially hated the name it rapidly stuck. His re-telling of the raising of the regi
History as it was being made - told in a racey, contemporaneous style by one of the most interesting Americans of all time. Theodore Roosevelt, despite having already been chairman of the New York police borad and under secretary for the Navy, raised a volunteer regiment to help fight in the Spanish-American War. His cavalary troopers were christened the "Rough Riders" by the popular press and although Roosevelt initially hated the name it rapidly stuck. His re-telling of the raising of the regiments contains some fabulous pen pictures of the men who joined him - from refined Ivy Leaguers to frontier desperardos. I found my copy through Kindle and I have been dipping in at every available odd moment. I can't find one, but I would be very surprised if this hasn't been the basis of at least one Hollywood film. If it hasn't somebody should followed Teddy's example - and get a crew together to start shooting!
As I learn more about Roosevelt I notice strong parallels with the life of Winston Churchill who also yearned to be - and succeeded in becoming - an all-action hero before turning to politics and eventually assuming his country's highest elected office. Both men had sons who found it difficult to shine in their fathers' shadows. Teddy Roosevelt Jr even died in the attempt - storming ashore on D-Day as a US Army general, recklessly taking little care for his own safety wearing a knitted cap instead of a tin helmet and refusing to take cover until his men were all safe. Teddy Jr obviously found this book as fascinating and inspirational.....his personal Jeep even had a hand-painted name on the side - "Rough Rider"
...more
Truly a diarist view of a very short war. Roosevelt describes in engaging detail the campaign against Spain in Cuba as he saw it. The book details the many issues with transportation to Cuba, while in Cuba, and in leaving Cuba. It also describes a leaders' worries about supplying food to his troops and ensuring the health of his troops after battle. Roosevelt also provides details of soldiers and officers wounded and killed in action, and this is what feels most like a diary. He also discusses t
Truly a diarist view of a very short war. Roosevelt describes in engaging detail the campaign against Spain in Cuba as he saw it. The book details the many issues with transportation to Cuba, while in Cuba, and in leaving Cuba. It also describes a leaders' worries about supplying food to his troops and ensuring the health of his troops after battle. Roosevelt also provides details of soldiers and officers wounded and killed in action, and this is what feels most like a diary. He also discusses the leadership changes as part of the battle and the decisions made throughout the battle and afterwards. The book is interesting in that about 1/6 of the American soldiers involved in the short war were killed or wounded, according to Roosevelts stats. He spends a lot of time comparing that number to his group as well as to the Spanish. He does balance the book between personal descriptions and narratives of larger political issues and even statistics. I listened to this on audio. The narrator provided a number of dramatic pauses - nicely done! Text is available online.
...more
This is a very detailed and descriptive account written by Theodore Roosevelt himself of the military campaign of the "Rough Riders", a volunteer force headed by Lieutenant Leonard Wood and Second Lieutenant Roosevelt who were pressed into military service during the war with Spain fought in Cuba. The nation had become outraged with the blowing up of the battleship Maine in a Cuban harbor. This brought great indignation to the American people and a cry for war to drive the Spanish from the Carib
This is a very detailed and descriptive account written by Theodore Roosevelt himself of the military campaign of the "Rough Riders", a volunteer force headed by Lieutenant Leonard Wood and Second Lieutenant Roosevelt who were pressed into military service during the war with Spain fought in Cuba. The nation had become outraged with the blowing up of the battleship Maine in a Cuban harbor. This brought great indignation to the American people and a cry for war to drive the Spanish from the Caribbean. Roosevelt's account describes his recruitment of primarily Western men (cowboys, trappers, miners and even Indians from Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado) thrown together with the Eastern elite (athletes, scholars and other patriots from the Ivy League schools). They all combined into a hardened fighting force which joined with US military regular forces and cavalry to rout the Spanish army in Cuba and Puerto Rico. Well written from first-hand knowledge by Roosevelt who was there at San Juan hill commanding the forces and observing the fighting. It is a part of US military history often overlooked. It is a riviting account and a worthwhile read.
...more
I remember learning something in school about the Rough Riders and Teddy Roosevelt. But I couldn't tell much else.
This book is about the development of the voluntary group of cowboys, farmers, college men, mountain men, and military men that make up the Rough Riders. I had no idea this group of horse riders actually fought. I just remember seeing pictures of men on horses and never thought more of it as far as I can remember.
Anyway, this little book is about the American battle against the Spani
I remember learning something in school about the Rough Riders and Teddy Roosevelt. But I couldn't tell much else.
This book is about the development of the voluntary group of cowboys, farmers, college men, mountain men, and military men that make up the Rough Riders. I had no idea this group of horse riders actually fought. I just remember seeing pictures of men on horses and never thought more of it as far as I can remember.
Anyway, this little book is about the American battle against the Spaniards in Cuba in 1898. See the Spanish-American War for more details.
I question how Theodore Roosevelt kept such details while fighting. I suppose having been in the Army gave me the idea for reading this. Roosevelt was giving much praise for the gallantry and dedication of fellow soldiers.
I can't imagine reading this story again, I did like learning about the names of the men and how some were famous for acts done out in the wild west. It seems Roosevelt was much respected by his men. Oh, and I read this because I was stationed at Fort Leanard Wood and Dr. Wood was the other main character who helped create this group of Rough Riders.
...more
This book was written in a style that reminded me of a play by play sports announcer. Teddy chronicles how he helped prepare men and horses by training, assembling, and transporting for war. It contained profiles of many of the men with whom he served in Cuba in the war with the Spaniards. A recurring theme was the waste, ineptitude and bureaucratic red tape of government and military leadership in Washington.
Teddy reflected the racial opinion of his day when he said "the colored soldiers behave
This book was written in a style that reminded me of a play by play sports announcer. Teddy chronicles how he helped prepare men and horses by training, assembling, and transporting for war. It contained profiles of many of the men with whom he served in Cuba in the war with the Spaniards. A recurring theme was the waste, ineptitude and bureaucratic red tape of government and military leadership in Washington.
Teddy reflected the racial opinion of his day when he said "the colored soldiers behaved well but they were peculiarly dependant on their white officers. Occasionally they produced a non-commissioned officer who could take initiative and accept responsibility, but this cannot be expected normally, nor is it fair to be expected."
Roosevelt's attitude seemed summed up to me like this....the Spaniards outnumbered and out-gunned us but we were braver, more patriotic, better trained and disciplined and we were favored by God...so we won.
The latter part of the book consisted of letters written by Roosevelt that retold the narrative of the previous text plus a letter written to correct information from someone's book that remembered or reported happenings remembered differently by Teddy.
This is not a biography of Teddy Roosevelt. It is not well written and not that interesting. It is Teddy's attempt to praise the men and their efforts in another war that the desk generals tried hard to lose, but the grunts in the field wouldn't let them lose it.
...more
Giving a vivid account of the author's participation in the Spanish-American war, this book so captivated the imagination of the American people that it got Teddy the Vice-Presidential nomination and set him on the path to Mount Rushmore. He tells this story well. Had a great gift for narrative - had a wonderful ability to create a sense of time and place. The reader feels as if he is with Teddy, experiencing these events himself - the descriptions are so vivid, the account so detailed, so "just
Giving a vivid account of the author's participation in the Spanish-American war, this book so captivated the imagination of the American people that it got Teddy the Vice-Presidential nomination and set him on the path to Mount Rushmore. He tells this story well. Had a great gift for narrative - had a wonderful ability to create a sense of time and place. The reader feels as if he is with Teddy, experiencing these events himself - the descriptions are so vivid, the account so detailed, so "just as it happened", step by step, that the reader feels as if he is with Roosevelt, is there on the ship transports, is charging up Kettle Hill - he becomes himself a Rough Rider. On the other hand, even reading this book for the first time as a youth, I was appalled by TR's over-the-top self-promotion - by his shameless glorification of his own heroics, by his celebration of war, of the "inner barbarian". It resulted in a life-long antipathy in me for TR. Now, reading the book again, I am more cognizant, more tolerant, of the role fantasy plays in all of our lives. Can even admire TR's commitment to his role as "the heroic soldier", admire his strenuous effort to live up to that ideal, to be that character. He really did risk his life charging up that hill. However what is not admirable about him, what is in fact unforgiveable, is that this desire for glory lead him to do whatever he could to create a war fever, to use all his propaganda talents to bring on that war, and then to selfishly use his political and social connections to win himself a military commissioning, and, despite his total lack of experience, to secure his own regiment, and to feel no shame about any of this - no shame about real men dying so he could play the hero. TR regarded war as a sport, a dangerous sport, but a fun adventure for "real men", a way to prove their "manhood. Only World War I and the death of his son cured him of this delusion. Unfortunately, this book and TR's continuing popularity show the persistent power of this delusion.
...more
64. Roosevelt, Theodore. ((1858-1919). THE ROUGH RIDERS. (1899). ****. This history of Roosevelt’s raising a volunteer regiment to fight in the Spanish-American War reads like a commentator’s coverage of a football game. It rates the four-star rating only because of its importance as an American document. It is quite obvious that Roosevelt approached this mission as he would have approached a yacht race. He managed to recruit over 1,000 men to form a fully volunteer force that was eager to parti
64. Roosevelt, Theodore. ((1858-1919). THE ROUGH RIDERS. (1899). ****. This history of Roosevelt’s raising a volunteer regiment to fight in the Spanish-American War reads like a commentator’s coverage of a football game. It rates the four-star rating only because of its importance as an American document. It is quite obvious that Roosevelt approached this mission as he would have approached a yacht race. He managed to recruit over 1,000 men to form a fully volunteer force that was eager to participate in the action against Spain. This motley crew of cowboys and Ivy-League scholars, the Rough Riders, stampeded into the War in 1898. Roosevelt, appointed a Colonel, recounts the dashing escapades in this rousing memoir. It seems obvious to me that this memoir was written by Roosevelt for the purposes of furthering his political career. He returned from Cuba as a national hero, and the publication of this book – in its many reprintings – sustained that image. He uses the opportunity of this memoir to sing the praises of his men, both as a group and as individuals. The original appendices have been included in this reprint that list the names of all the members of the Rough Riders along with a section of all of the honors bestowed upon Roosevelt after his return. The most common feature in the writings is Roosevelt’s comment on the Spaniards’ use of smokeless powder. If you’re using smokeless powder, then the enemy can’t see where the firing is coming from. Most of the gunfire from the Rough Riders was aimed at where they thought the enemy was, as opposed to any real knowledge of the proposed targets. It’s hard to say what finally conquered the Spanish troops holed up on San Juan Hill, but there’s no doubt in Roosevelt’s mind.
...more
Teddy Roosevelt's memoir of the less-than-six-months' existence of the Rough Riders, a volunteer cavalry unit formed for the sole purpose of serving in the Spanish-American War, is a breezy and entertaining read.
It is also a rather astonishing look into an alien world --- the world that used to be the United States, but is no longer.
Roosevelt was the Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1898. Though he doesn't make this clear in the book, he was the de facto Secretary and basically in charge of th
Teddy Roosevelt's memoir of the less-than-six-months' existence of the Rough Riders, a volunteer cavalry unit formed for the sole purpose of serving in the Spanish-American War, is a breezy and entertaining read.
It is also a rather astonishing look into an alien world --- the world that used to be the United States, but is no longer.
Roosevelt was the Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1898. Though he doesn't make this clear in the book, he was the de facto Secretary and basically in charge of the Navy. And he resigned in order to form a new cavalry regiment and go serve on the front lines of the war that everyone knew was coming.
Try to imagine ANY modern politician doing this. Some, certainly, served in the military prior to their political careers. Many, in fact, did so in furtherance of those same careers. None, not one, would voluntarily surrender political power to risk death. It's inconceivable.
Roosevelt, for all his swaggering bombast, did just that.
TR not only tells the story of the regiment from his perspective, he contrasts his observations and experiences with Spanish accounts of the battles in which he was involved (and, not surprisingly, finds them wanting), as well as including an appendix of "Corrections" where he shares observations from other Rough Riders that contrast somewhat with his memories, as well as taking apart completely another book that supposedly told the story of the taking of Santiago, Cuba.
Another historical insight that doesn't get taught today is that at this time, the US Army was all but racially integrated. TR and the Rough Riders fought side by side with at least two black regiments, and while his attitude toward them is somewhat patronizing, it is far less so than one would expect for the period. And he expresses zero reservations about black troops wielding weapons, not even implicitly. The Rough Riders themselves had many full-blooded and half-breed Indians in their ranks, also without any hint of tension or discord.
(The armed forces were re-segregated under Democrat Woodrow Wilson, whose racist policies were carried through World War II.)
In all, an informative and entertaining read, though it does not supply the entire context that it might have (it was written for an audience that TR presumes -- correctly -- already knew that context), and he might have taken more time to let the reader get to know more of the soldiers whose names he lists so frequently. But these flaws are simple absences. In my quick reading, there is no flaw of inclusion in the book, only things that were not there that I wish had been.
...more
All – Easterners and Westerners, Northerners and Southerners, officers and men, cowboys and college graduates, wherever they came from, and whatever their social position – possessed in common the traits of hardihood and a thirst for adventure. They were to a man born adventurers, in the old sense of the word.
At the outset of the Spanish-American War, Theodore Roosevelt and Leonard Wood were commissioned with raising, training and deploying a regim
Who were the Rough Riders?
As Roosevelt explains:
All – Easterners and Westerners, Northerners and Southerners, officers and men, cowboys and college graduates, wherever they came from, and whatever their social position – possessed in common the traits of hardihood and a thirst for adventure. They were to a man born adventurers, in the old sense of the word.
At the outset of the Spanish-American War, Theodore Roosevelt and Leonard Wood were commissioned with raising, training and deploying a regiment of volunteer cavalry – The First United States Volunteer Cavalry. This brief book by Roosevelt details their training, deployment and fighting, including the famous charge on San Juan Hill.
Roosevelt’s writing is factual and poetic, and his love for his soldiers shines through every chapter. Publishing his frank appraisal of the failures of the Army system, as well as some of its leaders, cost him the Medal of Honor during his lifetime. But he never quite followed the course of political tactfulness, even when he was President.
...more
This book was a very interesting and easy read. Former President Roosevelt tells a very vivid tale of his time during the Spanish-American War. It is easy for one to feel Roosevelt's genuineness while he takes us through the journey.
The book begins with the one-day President discussing the idea of war with Spain and the possibility of assembling a volunteer regiment. The language and way with which Roosevelt discusses war and it's supposed inevitability is indicative of the time at which he was
This book was a very interesting and easy read. Former President Roosevelt tells a very vivid tale of his time during the Spanish-American War. It is easy for one to feel Roosevelt's genuineness while he takes us through the journey.
The book begins with the one-day President discussing the idea of war with Spain and the possibility of assembling a volunteer regiment. The language and way with which Roosevelt discusses war and it's supposed inevitability is indicative of the time at which he was writing the piece. It is not so much that the language throughout the book is dated, although at times it may seem archaic, but rather the palpable yearning amongst Roosevelt and his contemporaries. This yearning for displays of grandeur and entry on the world stage is what is most striking of the book. Roosevelt is generous with his praise of others throughout the book but it does not seem to be easily given. If Roosevelt's recanting is to be believed the American man at the turn of the century wanted desperately honor and exaltation of one's country. When you consider that these men grew up in the shadow of the Civil War and heard yarns of Manifest Destiny perhaps their restless nature makes sense.
The descriptions of battles and day to day existence of a soldier in 1898 are valuable for how similar they seem to many problems that ail modern day troops. Issues of procurement, onerous red-tape, shortage of supplies, and the mundane yet logistical monstrosities of moving any large group of people. This is not surprising but it is however illuminating in some way that organization, and proper planning can be enemies of any endeavor.
The book is most valuable for the portrait it paints of the budding American empire. Intentionally or not President Roosevelt's insights, descriptions, and tone encapsulate the overarching historical theme of which he was a large influential part. If you want to humanize and supplement your historical understanding of the period this book is an excellent choice. Of course there are some objectionable, unforgivable aspects of the mindset which Roosevelt conveys but this does not diminish the utility of the book.
...more
An excellent, very readable book by Roosevelt. Enjoyed it thoroughly. This book is not some self-serving account by Colonel Roosevelt to advance himself. No, it is the story of one of the most colorful units in American military history, their members' backgrounds, their valor, and their adaptibility to very tough circumstances. I've always admired the Rough Riders, and after reading this book, my esteem increased even more.
One thing that I did not realize, until reading this, is how completely
An excellent, very readable book by Roosevelt. Enjoyed it thoroughly. This book is not some self-serving account by Colonel Roosevelt to advance himself. No, it is the story of one of the most colorful units in American military history, their members' backgrounds, their valor, and their adaptibility to very tough circumstances. I've always admired the Rough Riders, and after reading this book, my esteem increased even more.
One thing that I did not realize, until reading this, is how completely unprepared the U.S. Army was for war. Clearly, the Army's Quartermaster and Transportation systems were woefully unsuited even to projecting ground military power even close to America's shores, and, for that inadequacy, the Rough Riders and other soldiers paid the price. Their resourcefulness and stamina overcame these handicaps to defeat the Spaniards; however, if Cuba had, instead, been defended by one of the first rate militaries of the day such as the German or British Empires, one wonders if the outcome of the Cuban Campaign may have turned out quite differently ---- not because their soldiers were better than America's, but because their General Staffs enjoyed considerably more experience in battle planning, logistics, and transportation.
...more
Without doubt, Teddy Roosevelt is one of the most loved and most controversial/complex Americans to serve as POTUS. TR was fully a romantic, and his enthusiasm of life and thirst for adventure explode off the page in his account of the Rough Rider regiment's exploits in the Spanish-American War.
TR, like many men of his day, hungered for the opportunity to try themselves in battle as their fathers did the Civil War. These desires coupled with the belief in the necessity of American Expansionism
Without doubt, Teddy Roosevelt is one of the most loved and most controversial/complex Americans to serve as POTUS. TR was fully a romantic, and his enthusiasm of life and thirst for adventure explode off the page in his account of the Rough Rider regiment's exploits in the Spanish-American War.
TR, like many men of his day, hungered for the opportunity to try themselves in battle as their fathers did the Civil War. These desires coupled with the belief in the necessity of American Expansionism and Anglo-American superiority, led him and others to push for a war with the waning Spanish Empire over its neighboring colony of Cuba. When war was finally declared, TR eagerly joined the fray and was made Lieutenant-Colonel of the Rough Riders, a volunteer regiment made up of Ivy-League sportsmen of the East, Indian hunters, lawmen, miners and cowboys of the West. He describes the frontiersmen who joined as "a splendid set of men, these Southwesterners--tall and sinewy, with resolute, weather-beaten faces, and eyes that looked a man straight in the face without flinching." Truly the Rough Riders was a diverse group and TR gushes (using every platitude in the book) over the volunteers "in whose veins the blood stirred with the same impulse which one sent the Viking over sea."
While TR's views of his men and the battles they fought were obviously biased you can't help but be inspired by his enthusiasm and sense of adventure. Yes, he was a war-mongerer (provoking and championing an unnecessary war); yes, he was an overgrown boy living out his childhood fantasies of war and adventure. At the same time, you can't help but be infected by TR's passion for action and adventure and enjoy the ride as the "gallant, chivalric and ever courageous" Rough Riders fly to the rescue of Cuba to save it from the "evil Spanish empire!"
...more
It was good to read if not uncomfortable how Roosevelt and most other white Americans of his time viewed other people who weren't ancestors of the Vikings as he might put it. Roosevelt in describing bis desire to rid the Western world of the Spanish colonialists, describes how he had been wanting to fight them for axlong time. Choosing to lead a Calvary through Cuba, he first uses Ivy League college men and later men from the 4 territories, Texas, New Mexico, Indian and Arizona. Roosevelt does c
It was good to read if not uncomfortable how Roosevelt and most other white Americans of his time viewed other people who weren't ancestors of the Vikings as he might put it. Roosevelt in describing bis desire to rid the Western world of the Spanish colonialists, describes how he had been wanting to fight them for axlong time. Choosing to lead a Calvary through Cuba, he first uses Ivy League college men and later men from the 4 territories, Texas, New Mexico, Indian and Arizona. Roosevelt does choose some Indians but mentions they look white and aren't pure blooded. Then he admits he used some pure blooded Indians too. Several calvaries ventured to Cuba including some Black calvary troops also. He gives a blow by blow account of the fighting and mentions several who died. A major factor they had not planned on was disease. Both Yellow Fever and malaria killed the troops faster than fighting did. In Theodore Roosevelt's true fashion, he is surprised when white and black troops died and became sick at the same rate. Yes the US won and Roosevelt's troops took San Juan hill, but the people of Santiago, especially women and children sickened and died as refugees and he and his troops, short on supplies and food themselves couldn't help much. Roosevelt's Rough Riders became legendary but at a great cost for some. Roosevelt was rather proud of the Rough Riders as president and kept up with some men he knew there. He gives a good accounting of people's lives and deaths. Malaria continued to kill back home and some died or were permanently weakened. Interesting story but the racism surprised me. I thought it was good for me to know the general audience of the day thought that way or Roosevelt wouldn't have assumed he was correct in his beliefs.
...more
There was a generation of boys, especially (it seems) in Britain, who watched their fathers go off to fight in the First World War and resented staying at home. Too young, perhaps, to digest the horror of it, they grew up wishing they could participate in a national/military crisis of comparable glory. When WWII came around, most of them were in their middle-thirties, almost too old to take advantage of it. (I’m thinking, for example, of Evelyn Waugh, Malcolm Muggeridge, Anthony Powell.). It fel
There was a generation of boys, especially (it seems) in Britain, who watched their fathers go off to fight in the First World War and resented staying at home. Too young, perhaps, to digest the horror of it, they grew up wishing they could participate in a national/military crisis of comparable glory. When WWII came around, most of them were in their middle-thirties, almost too old to take advantage of it. (I’m thinking, for example, of Evelyn Waugh, Malcolm Muggeridge, Anthony Powell.). It felt unfair, and they tried desperately to find a position, any position, that could plausibly get them to the front.
Reading
The Rough Riders
, I had to wonder if Theodore Roosevelt’s generation suffered a similar anxiety. Their fathers’ generation had fought the Civil War – a conflict, in American terms, of incomparably Homeric proportion. It left them with a lot to live up to. When the Spanish-American War (the real beginning, perhaps, of the fabled “American century”) loomed on the horizon, Teddy (who was thirty-five) resigned his position as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy and called in any and all favors necessary to procure for himself a role in its execution. Along with his friend Leonard Wood, Roosevelt raised a volunteer regiment and made sure it would get to the battle lines. It was his big chance.
For Roosevelt, it was more than just a chance at military glory. It was also an avenue for his ambition. He would march off like Julius Caesar on campaign, expel the Spanish colonial power from the hemisphere, write a book about it, and step by step approach the imperial purple. It worked for him, as we all know. The book works too, and not only in terms of ensuring Teddy’s career advancement, but also as a well-crafted narrative wonderfully evocative in terms of era and place. That it’s no
De Bello Gallico
isn’t Teddy’s fault, exactly, but more to be blamed on the too speedy success of American arms.
...more
This simple story of Roosevelt’s action in Cuba is a story of the self-made man, courage under fire, and American diversity. There certainly some overly glamorized portions or sections that may go too far in elevating Roosevelt and his men while denigrating the input of others in the larger effort, but on the whole, the work is rather generous and fair. It is a wonderful story of action and adventure in a first person account. There is some level of honesty about the toll of war and its horrors.
This simple story of Roosevelt’s action in Cuba is a story of the self-made man, courage under fire, and American diversity. There certainly some overly glamorized portions or sections that may go too far in elevating Roosevelt and his men while denigrating the input of others in the larger effort, but on the whole, the work is rather generous and fair. It is a wonderful story of action and adventure in a first person account. There is some level of honesty about the toll of war and its horrors. Teddy Roosevelt stands as the initiator of that era when manliness was shown by facing great obstacles and foes on the outside, but the unseen picture of Rough Riders is a man who couldn’t face down the death of his first wife and responded in a less than manly way for most of his life to his family. The real man needs to be one who not only is capable of standing strong in the face of terrible obstacles on the outside, but also, in gentleness, overcoming the pains of relationships and the challenges of family and friends. So Rough Riders does show us half of that picture, and for that it is valuable.
...more
This book was a big disappointment to me. I have always admired Roosevelt, and expected him to be a good writer, but this is just a tiresome self promotional tract by a man advancing his political career. He goes on and on about the bravery of his men and how great the Rough Riders were. I got tired of the lists of names and the Ivy League schools they attended. It was like the catalog of ships in the Iliad. The were moments of color that raised above once star, but just barely.
Theodore Roosevelt's The Rough Riders is sheer, unadulterated Americana; the story of the Spanish-American War's most decorated and remembered regiments, comprised of cowboys, lawmen, illiterate former prospectors, Cherokee Indians, Ivy League educated east-coast aristocrats, circus performers, red blooded working class southwestern "territorials", and professional sportsmen all led by Colonel Leonard Wood and his energetic and intelligible friend and , the just weeks previous Assistant Secretar
Theodore Roosevelt's The Rough Riders is sheer, unadulterated Americana; the story of the Spanish-American War's most decorated and remembered regiments, comprised of cowboys, lawmen, illiterate former prospectors, Cherokee Indians, Ivy League educated east-coast aristocrats, circus performers, red blooded working class southwestern "territorials", and professional sportsmen all led by Colonel Leonard Wood and his energetic and intelligible friend and , the just weeks previous Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Lieutenant Colonel Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt writes about the colorful crew of Americans assembled under his command, their stay in Tampa Florida, and then their departure to the front in Cuba, daringly taking the lead against the Spanish defenders, recounting in detail his courageous charge up Kettle Hill (they took San Juan Hill afterwards in the same day). It is an interesting and exhilarating read that chronicles what has been dubbed the "splendid little war".
...more
This kind of reads like the Bible. There's a lot of names given and a lot of heroic people. It's hard to remember them all. There were heroics happening all the time. The action was written good. It was my favorite part. Teddy sees a man beside him and looks back and the man's head was gone or he was shot through the belly or spine or foot or face. Not a damn one complained, it didn't seem. Not even the ones that were shot in the head with nonfatal wounds. People got shot up and just took it and
This kind of reads like the Bible. There's a lot of names given and a lot of heroic people. It's hard to remember them all. There were heroics happening all the time. The action was written good. It was my favorite part. Teddy sees a man beside him and looks back and the man's head was gone or he was shot through the belly or spine or foot or face. Not a damn one complained, it didn't seem. Not even the ones that were shot in the head with nonfatal wounds. People got shot up and just took it and didn't want to go home or to the hospital in the back. They ate mostly what is called "hardtack." Didn't have much food. They took some beans as spoils from the Spaniards once. Teddy was never afraid, it seemed. He lost 20 pounds. His volunteer forces were given mascots. One was a mountain lion named Josephine. There was a dog named Cuba. There was an eagle named after Teddy. All of the mascots fought each other. The men loved Teddy and he loved them.
...more
An easy read, and gets exciting quickly and makes you feel like you're joining TR on his greatest adventure. Lots of praises from TR for his fellow troopers and those of the regular army and cavalry, with marked disdain for headquarters peppered throughout (especially due to their logistical incompetence). Praises for his fellow troopers stem from their experience in the wild, which might be an inspiration for other books I may want to read.
The adventures of the Rough Riders as written by Roosevelt himself. The book covers the regiment from inception and training, battles in Cuba, and return to the United States. Roosevelt writes in a straightforward style that engages the reader even if it occasionally seems like an after action report. No information is given about the war as a whole or anything outside of that which affected the Riders. You'll have to hit wikipedia for big picture information.
Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., also known as T.R., and to the public (but never to friends and intimates) as Teddy, was the twenty-sixth President of the United States, and a leader of the Republican Party and of the Progressive Movement. He became the youngest President in United States history at the age of 42. He served in many roles including Governor of New York, historian, naturalist, explorer, au
Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., also known as T.R., and to the public (but never to friends and intimates) as Teddy, was the twenty-sixth President of the United States, and a leader of the Republican Party and of the Progressive Movement. He became the youngest President in United States history at the age of 42. He served in many roles including Governor of New York, historian, naturalist, explorer, author, and soldier. Roosevelt is most famous for his personality: his energy, his vast range of interests and achievements, his model of masculinity, and his "cowboy" persona.
...more
“It was a pleasure to deal with a man of high ideals, who scorned everything mean and base, and who possessed those robust and hardy qualities of body and mind, for the lack of which no merely negative virtue can ever atone.”
—
15 likes
“Credit should go with the performance of duty, and not with what is very often the accident of glory.”
—
3 likes