On 6 September 1987, Stephen Roche touched greatness. Victory at the World Cycling Championship in Austria completed a near-unprecedented ‘triple crown’ that included triumphs in the same year at the Tour de France and the Giro d’Italia. In April, against all odds, he fought his own team and an angry, partisan Italian crowd who spat at him on his way to taking the Giro. In
On 6 September 1987, Stephen Roche touched greatness. Victory at the World Cycling Championship in Austria completed a near-unprecedented ‘triple crown’ that included triumphs in the same year at the Tour de France and the Giro d’Italia. In April, against all odds, he fought his own team and an angry, partisan Italian crowd who spat at him on his way to taking the Giro. In July a superhuman effort at La Plagne saw him secure the yellow jersey just before he blacked out. Roche’s victory in Austria confirmed his virtuosity.
Born to Ride
, Stephen Roche’s first full autobiography, uses his best year as the starting point to explore the rest of his life. He doesn’t hold back as he examines the many ups and downs of his time on and off the bike, scrutinising victories, defeats, rivals, serious injury, doping allegations and agonizing family breakdown.
At the heart of the book lies an enigma. For all his charm and rare, natural talent, beneath the surface lies an incredible tenacity and determination. Roche finally reveals himself as a smiling assassin; a master-strategist who lives to attack.
...more
I was a little more than halfway through this book when it struck me why Stephen Roche was such a great rider. He was often coined a natural talent, yes, he trained hard and intelligently, he had a positive attitude, he had some good teams, and so on, all very important elements to become a successful professional cyclist. However, Roche lived and breathed race tactics from the day he began his cycling career, until the day he stepped off the bike for good, and that was what made him so superior
I was a little more than halfway through this book when it struck me why Stephen Roche was such a great rider. He was often coined a natural talent, yes, he trained hard and intelligently, he had a positive attitude, he had some good teams, and so on, all very important elements to become a successful professional cyclist. However, Roche lived and breathed race tactics from the day he began his cycling career, until the day he stepped off the bike for good, and that was what made him so superior to most other rival riders. It is doubtful anyone else spent more effort working out their race strategy to the smallest of details. From chapter 2 onwards this book reads like a tactical manual. Anyone considering a career in the sport would be well served to read this book to get an idea of his thought processes before, during, and after races, how he came about developing his race plan, and executing it.
Roche analyzed each and every rider on opposing teams who he imagined could be a potential threat, from climbers to sprinters, and made sure he knew the race course and those certain riders well enough that he felt confident he knew where they could either attack or show vulnerability. More often than not he was correct. So detailed was his prerace strategy, it gave him confidence enough to be patient to carry out his race plans, which were usually spot on. That attention to detail and patience served him well in time trialing, a specialty of his, and he seemed proud of that throughout the book. No issue was too small to consider, he paid attention to the minutest detail and followed his plan. For instance, he didn't lose sleep worrying about the dangerous descent at Joux Plane but knew that Delgado probably did because he remembered Delgado had fallen and broken his collar bone there in a previous year. It seemed he had his own personal archive on other riders!
That discipline to carry out a plan provided him with the mental fortitude which helped him win a hostile Giro D'Italia, in which most of his own team was working against him, not to mention the hostile crowds along the race course. He knew his teammates, their capabilities and loyalties, and often would wheel and deal with riders on other teams for assistance, often choosing to sacrifice a stage win for that assistance, in favor of the ultimate stage race victory.
An amazing athlete with a brilliant outlook and mind. After reading this, I felt it wasn't necessary to know every detail of his personal life, and appreciated more getting to know why and how he achieved what he did in professional cycling.
With all the revelations about the systemised doping culture surrounding Lance Armstrong's team in the 1990s, it was interesting to read a story of a time before cycling was embroiled in one drugs scandal after another. Although perhaps not as memorable as Armstrong's career, Stephen Roche's will hold a place in cycling history for 1987, when he became only the second man to win the Tour de France, the Giro D'Italia and the World Championships in the same season. A quarter of a century after tha
With all the revelations about the systemised doping culture surrounding Lance Armstrong's team in the 1990s, it was interesting to read a story of a time before cycling was embroiled in one drugs scandal after another. Although perhaps not as memorable as Armstrong's career, Stephen Roche's will hold a place in cycling history for 1987, when he became only the second man to win the Tour de France, the Giro D'Italia and the World Championships in the same season. A quarter of a century after that remarkable feat, Roche has produced his autobiography, ''Born to Ride''.
The title seems apt, as it appears that Stephen Roche was destined for a life on two wheels from quite early on in his life. His father cycled and a neighbour spotted Stephen on his bike while he was a teenager and dragged him away from football in the park to try racing and Roche's course was set. From here on in, the book is a personal view of his career, with brief glimpses of his personal life and a little at the end about his life after cycling.
Recently, I described the writing style in Leo McKinstry's "Jack Hobbs: England's Greatest Cricketer" as perfectly fitting for the man and the actions it described. ''Born to Ride'' is exactly the same, in that the almost breathless and fast moving narrative when describing Roche's racing career fits the speed and demands of the sport perfectly. Cycling is a sport where a lot of activity takes place on consecutive days and Roche describes an awful lot of those days in the saddle, especially when he's competing in the major cycling events.
This does give the book a slightly one dimensional feel, as with Roche's life being entirely devoted to his sport, there is little time for anything else. This is reflected in the content of the book in that there are only brief mentions of his family in between the cycling and the parts of his life before and after cycling are really only touched upon. Whilst I can appreciate that Roche was a cyclist first, I would have liked a little more about the man, rather than just the cyclist he was. However, I can imagine that this single-minded devotion to his cycling is what allowed him to be as successful as he was and what is here is certainly good enough that you don't really notice what is missing.
On the plus side, the narrow focus does mean that Roche never strays into the areas of sensationalism that many autobiographies can do. Although he does dispute what others have said about him taking drugs, which is very topical at present, there is very little here about how he feels about things. This means that there is no airing of dirty laundry and, when you consider he's been through a divorce, it comes across as quite gentlemanly by comparison to many autobiographies.
The other thing that comes across is that Roche writes very well. Many sports autobiographies suffer from their authors being so dedicated to sport that things like education fell by the wayside. But this is no monosyllabic ''Match of the Day'' post-match interview style book. Roche recalls much of what he did even all those years ago and manages to write about it in such a way that you can almost feel every turn of the pedal up the steepest of mountain as well as the exhilaration of speeding downhill on the way to winning a major stage race.
For any cycling fan, this is essential reading, particularly for the more recent devotee of the sport who has seen nothing but it tainted by scandal. This is a story of how hard work and determination can be enough to succeed in competitive sport and it's told so well, you can feel a part of it. For these reasons, any fan of sports autobiographies in general will also soon become immersed in the fast pace Roche both writes and rides at. It is a great book for anyone who has followed cycling for as long as I have and will become even more an essential read when the paperback edition is released.
I quite enjoyed reading this book. It was a good insight into Roche's history and his persona.
I can remember the 87 tour quite vividly and still have the Channel 4 hi-lights on video tape. I watched every night and was enthralled by the whole event. This book gave me another insight into the man who won that Tour.
I really liked the back ground about Roche's early years in Ireland and in France and the characters who helped him develop into the successful cyclist he was. It was also interesting
I quite enjoyed reading this book. It was a good insight into Roche's history and his persona.
I can remember the 87 tour quite vividly and still have the Channel 4 hi-lights on video tape. I watched every night and was enthralled by the whole event. This book gave me another insight into the man who won that Tour.
I really liked the back ground about Roche's early years in Ireland and in France and the characters who helped him develop into the successful cyclist he was. It was also interesting to see what he has done since.
I wont give too much away here, but this is great for any fan of cycling from that era and since.
Much more open and personal in the writing style, that the Bjarnie Riis book.
...more
Roche was an OK cyclist who had one year of greatness, but what a year. The Giro, won despite the efforts of his team, team mates, and Italian cycling fans, then the Tour, then the World Championships. Only Eddie Merckx has done that. It's an astonishing feat, it wrecked his knee, and his career dribbled on for a few more years with no trace of the astonishing brilliance Roche displayed in '87. The book reflects that; mildly interesting in the build-up to '87, fantastically insightful talking ab
Roche was an OK cyclist who had one year of greatness, but what a year. The Giro, won despite the efforts of his team, team mates, and Italian cycling fans, then the Tour, then the World Championships. Only Eddie Merckx has done that. It's an astonishing feat, it wrecked his knee, and his career dribbled on for a few more years with no trace of the astonishing brilliance Roche displayed in '87. The book reflects that; mildly interesting in the build-up to '87, fantastically insightful talking about that year, then down-beat, full of descriptions of dodgy business ventures and broken relationships. But there's '87, the best year any cyclist has ever had in the 30 years I've followed it. Read it for that.
...more
I thoroughly enjoyed this book as someone with a good basic interest in cycling without having an in depth knowledge of the sport. Roche is an intriguing character, I just feel that the book just gave us a very quick insight and that it could have revealed so much more. A dedicated chapter on doping, his family issues and his thoughts on the future of the sport could have made it more complete but maybe the reason the book was so compelling wad because it literally was Roche's thought thrown ont
I thoroughly enjoyed this book as someone with a good basic interest in cycling without having an in depth knowledge of the sport. Roche is an intriguing character, I just feel that the book just gave us a very quick insight and that it could have revealed so much more. A dedicated chapter on doping, his family issues and his thoughts on the future of the sport could have made it more complete but maybe the reason the book was so compelling wad because it literally was Roche's thought thrown onto the page. Highly recommended for any sports fan.
...more
Not too bad. Very definitely some good insight into some truly historic races, by a key figures in the 1980s cycling community. I appreciated his opinions on some current trends, even if I don't necessarily agree with everything he says. Perhaps an under-rated champion, due to his years of injury.
In my opinion, this is a better book than the Agony and the Ecstacy, which essentially ends at the conclusion of the 1987 season, although some of the material is obviously similar.
As an Irishman, and as this was a gift from my wife, I am not going to give it anything but a glowing review.
It is crushing in his Roche's description of his difficult to the point of painful post-racing years, and it certainly illuminates his head-down work-away ethic. BUT it doesn't mention much on the dubious practices taht all and sundry know went on.
All the same, he sounds like a nice guy, along with being a national treasure.